If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff wrote: On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote: On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote: Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the first on left hand side. https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv Sorry about that! ;-) Yeah I wondered where the image link was. Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ? Nice pic, nice boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it. geoff Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 6/6/20 PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff wrote: On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote: On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote: Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the first on left hand side. https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv Sorry about that! ;-) Yeah I wondered where the image link was. Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ? Nice pic, niceĀ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it. geoff Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 06/06/2020 18:23, John McWilliams wrote:
On 6/6/20Ā*Ā* PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote: On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff wrote: On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote: On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote: Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the first on left hand side. https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv Sorry about that! ;-) Yeah I wondered where the image link was. Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ? Nice pic, niceĀ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it. geoff Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. Hello John Will you please clarify? The link I posted https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv is not malicious - not according to VirusTotal anyway! https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/7...c9e2/detection |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
In article , John McWilliams
wrote: Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. 4 options: - ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons) - skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort) - use a proxy to circumvent the block - whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:23:57 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote: On 6/6/20 PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote: On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff wrote: On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote: On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote: Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the first on left hand side. https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv Sorry about that! ;-) Yeah I wondered where the image link was. Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ? Nice pic, niceĀ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it. geoff Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ejgecx8uk...nbury.jpg?dl=0 Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 07/06/2020 00:33, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:23:57 -0700, John McWilliams wrote: On 6/6/20 PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote: On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff wrote: On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote: On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote: Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the first on left hand side. https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv Sorry about that! ;-) Yeah I wondered where the image link was. Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ? Nice pic, niceĀ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it. geoff Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ejgecx8uk...nbury.jpg?dl=0 Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. Thanks, Eric. Please will you type out here the full name of the link being shown By Kaspersky? If you wish to explore further yourself, simply copy/paste the link into Virus Total - select 'URL', he- https://www.virustotal.com/gui/home/upload Thanks |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 06/06/2020 19:05, nospam wrote:
In article , John McWilliams wrote: Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. 4 options: - ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons) - skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort) - use a proxy to circumvent the block - whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently Which AV software do YOU recommend one should use on an Apple computer? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 19:05, nospam wrote: In article , John McWilliams wrote: Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. 4 options: - ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons) - skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort) - use a proxy to circumvent the block - whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently Which AV software do YOU recommend one should use on an Apple computer? Start working your way through the list ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...software#macOS Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 09/06/2020 16:24, Paul wrote:
David_B wrote: On 06/06/2020 19:05, nospam wrote: In article , John McWilliams wrote: Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. 4 options: - ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons) - skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort) - use a proxy to circumvent the block - whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently Which AV software do YOU recommend one should use on an Apple computer? Start working your way through the list ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...software#macOS Ā*Ā* Paul That's really comprehensive list. Thanks, Paul. I've already tried many of them! :-) I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of the best in the business though:- https://www.clamxav.com Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing? -- David |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
David_B wrote:
I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of the best in the business though:- https://www.clamxav.com Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing? wp: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...edit§ion=4 To be included in this list, the product must be notable, which means it must have an article written first. Redlinks or entries not linked to an article will be removed. ClamXAV does not have a wp article. It is (only) mentioned in the ClamAV wp article. I don't doubt that if the ClamXAV dev/s would go to the trouble to create an entry for the wp that was appropriate for acceptance, that they could also edit the Mac table to include clamxav. For examples: the tables include two other softwares which are based on the clamav engine, ClamWin and Immunet (now under Cisco), both of which have wp articles. It would be logical for the tables to include clamxav if there /were/ a wp article which is not at all impossible or even particularly difficult to achieve. ClamAV is an AV of 'modest' capabilities. -- Mike Easter |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 10/06/2020 7:39 am, David_B wrote:
I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of the best in the business though:- https://www.clamxav.com Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing? Sounds like a medicinal vaginal treatment. Possibly could be better-named. geoff |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
On 10/06/2020 00:16, geoff wrote:
On 10/06/2020 7:39 am, David_B wrote: I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of the best in the business though:- https://www.clamxav.com Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing? Sounds like a medicinal vaginal treatment. Possibly could be better-named. That's upside-down thinking for sure, geoff! :-) Not many folk here like the product either:- https://www.facebook.com/clamxav/ Less than 400 the last time I looked. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
On 09/06/2020 20:55, Mike Easter wrote:
David_B wrote: I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of the best in the business though:- https://www.clamxav.com Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing? wp: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...edit§ion=4 To be included in this list, the product must be notable, which means it must have an article written first. Redlinks or entries not linked to an article will be removed. ClamXAV does not have a wp article.Ā* It is (only) mentioned in the ClamAV wp article. I don't doubt that if the ClamXAV dev/s would go to the trouble to create an entry for the wp that was appropriate for acceptance, that they could also edit the Mac table to include clamxav. For examples: the tables include two other softwares which are based on the clamav engine, ClamWin and Immunet (now under Cisco), both of which have wp articles. It would be logical for the tables to include clamxav if there /were/ a wp article which is not at all impossible or even particularly difficult to achieve. ClamAV is an AV of 'modest' capabilities. Thank you for your comprehensive reply, Mike. What response do you think 'someone' would receive if they were to contact the developer he- https://www.clamxav.com/support/contact-us/ and ask why such a great product has no Wikipedia article about ClamXav and thus no mention of it here either:- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...software#macOS At the bottom of the web page it says:- "We respond to every request we receive (*promise*!) and our reply will either come from or ā so, if you use a spam filter, please ensure that youāve allowed emails from these addresses to reach you. If you havenāt heard from us within 48 hours, give your spam mailbox a quick check first!" |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
"David_B" wrote:
On 10/06/2020 00:16, geoff wrote: Sounds like a medicinal vaginal treatment. Possibly could be better-named. That's upside-down thinking for sure, geoff! :-) Lydia, Lydia Get rid of your chlamydia. Only an idiot would ever consider ya. (with apologies to John Cooper Clarke) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:02:36 +0100, David_B
wrote: On 10/06/2020 00:16, geoff wrote: On 10/06/2020 7:39 am, David_B wrote: I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of the best in the business though:- Maybe you should advertise it. You've installed it multiple times on your machines. You even asked people repeatedly to crack it so you wouldn't have to pay(and they did, and you used the crack). You must really love it. (MSG_IDs available on request) CUT_STALKING Not many folk here like the product either:- https://www.facebook.com/STALKING Less than 400 the last time I looked. Why did you even bother looking at a non-support site? It says quite clearly NOT to use the Facekook page for support. In your own words, please, explain to us why they don't support users with cracked software. While you're at it, explain the OT cross posts to Win 10 and photo groups. TIA ------------------------------------- BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to hide". I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request, rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!": https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php 65 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes! Google "David Brooks Devon" []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|