If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
I am trying to install the Fax funtionality for Windows XP Pro. When I try
this through Add/Remove, it asks me to insert the CD labled Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2. I have no such CD. I have the Windows XP Pro CD and inserted that, but it doesn't work. Since I upgraded to SP2 online, how am I suppose to do this?? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
Frequent question. That's why we have a FAQ here.
http://members.shaw.ca/bsanders/FAQFAX.htm#_Toc88835131 -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "randwill" wrote in message ... I am trying to install the Fax funtionality for Windows XP Pro. When I try this through Add/Remove, it asks me to insert the CD labled Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2. I have no such CD. I have the Windows XP Pro CD and inserted that, but it doesn't work. Since I upgraded to SP2 online, how am I suppose to do this?? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... Frequent question. That's why we have a FAQ here. http://members.shaw.ca/bsanders/FAQFAX.htm#_Toc88835131 -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "randwill" wrote in message ... I am trying to install the Fax funtionality for Windows XP Pro. When I try this through Add/Remove, it asks me to insert the CD labled Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2. I have no such CD. I have the Windows XP Pro CD and inserted that, but it doesn't work. Since I upgraded to SP2 online, how am I suppose to do this?? Thank you. Even though the answer to number one helped me, it is very out-of-date and doesn't mention SP2 at all. So now I'm installed and I navigate through several drop downs to Send a Fax ....get the Send Fax Wizard but when I click next I get the error- Fax server information cannot be retrieved. The Fax Wizard will close now. I'm not really surprised since the Configuartion Wizard only wanted input of stuff like my name and e-mail address. Wouldn't I have to tell the software about my modem? The Fax Configuration Wizard didn't ask this at all. Also, how do I know if my modem is compatable with this software? The compatability link on the old, out-of-date page sends me to a page named "Windows Marketplace" which encourages me to "Find Buy Try" and contains dozens of links to millions of things I don't care about. I just need a list of compatable Fax Modems. Does such a list exist? If Windows Fax utility is not compatable with my modem I don't need to go any further. I'm not trying to do anything as exotic as some of the questions and answers on the linked page suggest. I just want to use the Windows XP Fax utility to send and receive faxes. Are there step by step instructions somewhere? Thanks for any help. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
Configuration problem solved. I launched Send Fax again (well actually 3 or
4 times) and it finally asked about my modem and other questions. So it looks to be running now. Except when I try to send a fax, it tells me it detects no dial tone. I know the phone line is good because I've got a telephone hooked into the back of the modem and there IS a dial tone, and the phone receives and makes calls through this line all day long. So now I really wonder if this Windows XP Fax utility works with my modem which is a US Robotics 56K FaxModem Model 0701 ( or 5686 the way the numbers are positioned , it's hard to tell.). Is there any way to tell? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
You can always check the Windows XP Hardware Compatibility List. Windows XP
Fax is extremely fragile and often fails with many common modems and drivers. Have you updated your modem drivers? You should if you've updated your OS. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "randwill" wrote in message . .. Configuration problem solved. I launched Send Fax again (well actually 3 or 4 times) and it finally asked about my modem and other questions. So it looks to be running now. Except when I try to send a fax, it tells me it detects no dial tone. I know the phone line is good because I've got a telephone hooked into the back of the modem and there IS a dial tone, and the phone receives and makes calls through this line all day long. So now I really wonder if this Windows XP Fax utility works with my modem which is a US Robotics 56K FaxModem Model 0701 ( or 5686 the way the numbers are positioned , it's hard to tell.). Is there any way to tell? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... You can always check the Windows XP Hardware Compatibility List. Windows XP Fax is extremely fragile and often fails with many common modems and drivers. Have you updated your modem drivers? You should if you've updated your OS. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] Thanks. Here is the list of networking hardware I found. My modem isn't there so that settles that. http://testedproducts.windowsmarketp...ID=0&OR=1&PG=1 I'm troubled by your note that the WindowsXP Fax is "extremely fragile". I guess that's a nice way of saying it doesn't work. Why is such garbage released? Can anyone recommned fax software that DOES work? I have a couple of customers who prefer Faxing to email and need something that I can count on to work. I would even buy a new modem and software that is compatible with XP if necessary. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. I'm glad I now know better than to waste money on Windows XP Fax compatible soft and hardware. I guess MS made Windows Fax for people who don't really care if it works or not, but I need something for business that is reliable. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
I doubt most people purchase Windows XP because they are looking for
reliable, production level fax software. That was never Microsoft's intent. This is a simple basic fax module for users who only have an occasional need to fax. There are a many modems with which it will not work. Anyone who prefers to use fax over email should be looking to purchase third party fax software. I can't advise you on that because I've never used any other fax software. Many people are now outsourcing faxing to Internet Fax providers so they can skip purchasing a modem entirely. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "randwill" wrote in message . .. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... You can always check the Windows XP Hardware Compatibility List. Windows XP Fax is extremely fragile and often fails with many common modems and drivers. Have you updated your modem drivers? You should if you've updated your OS. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] Thanks. Here is the list of networking hardware I found. My modem isn't there so that settles that. http://testedproducts.windowsmarketp...ID=0&OR=1&PG=1 I'm troubled by your note that the WindowsXP Fax is "extremely fragile". I guess that's a nice way of saying it doesn't work. Why is such garbage released? Can anyone recommned fax software that DOES work? I have a couple of customers who prefer Faxing to email and need something that I can count on to work. I would even buy a new modem and software that is compatible with XP if necessary. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. I'm glad I now know better than to waste money on Windows XP Fax compatible soft and hardware. I guess MS made Windows Fax for people who don't really care if it works or not, but I need something for business that is reliable. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I doubt most people purchase Windows XP because they are looking for reliable, production level fax software. That was never Microsoft's intent. This is a simple basic fax module for users who only have an occasional need to fax. There are a many modems with which it will not work. Anyone who prefers to use fax over email should be looking to purchase third party fax software. I can't advise you on that because I've never used any other fax software. Many people are now outsourcing faxing to Internet Fax providers so they can skip purchasing a modem entirely. -- I use to have third party faxware but it doesn't work with XP so that's why I was trying to see if Windows XP Fax would be acceptable. It seems to me it would be better to not include a fax utility than include one that works poorly. Even if a user uses a functionality only occasionally, they should still expect it to work reliably. But the fact that XP's Fax doesn't install as part of the operating system's initial install might be a clue. Anyway, I'm looking into other options from vendors who know how to create fax software that works. My only regret is the time I have wasted for which MS will not compensate me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
randwill wrote:
"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I doubt most people purchase Windows XP because they are looking for reliable, production level fax software. That was never Microsoft's intent. This is a simple basic fax module for users who only have an occasional need to fax. There are a many modems with which it will not work. Anyone who prefers to use fax over email should be looking to purchase third party fax software. I can't advise you on that because I've never used any other fax software. Many people are now outsourcing faxing to Internet Fax providers so they can skip purchasing a modem entirely. -- I use to have third party faxware but it doesn't work with XP so that's why I was trying to see if Windows XP Fax would be acceptable. It seems to me it would be better to not include a fax utility than include one that works poorly. Even if a user uses a functionality only occasionally, they should still expect it to work reliably. But the fact that XP's Fax doesn't install as part of the operating system's initial install might be a clue. Anyway, I'm looking into other options from vendors who know how to create fax software that works. My only regret is the time I have wasted for which MS will not compensate me. You might look into MightyFax, although I have no personal knowledge of how it works. http://www.rkssoftware.com/mightyfax/overview.html If you want industrial-strength fax software, however, you'll have to pay a lot more than $20. RightFax is probably the most commonly used corporate fax solution. But it's one of those things that if you have to ask how much it costs, you can't afford it. http://www.captaris.com/rightfax/index.html -- Lem MS MVP -- Networking To the moon and back with 64 Kbits of RAM and 512 Kbits of ROM. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
If you want industrial-strength fax software, however, you'll have to pay
a lot more than $20. RightFax is probably the most commonly used corporate fax solution. But it's one of those things that if you have to ask how much it costs, you can't afford it. http://www.captaris.com/rightfax/index.html You hit a nerve! There is a HUGE difference between being able to afford something and deciding the product is not worth the cost. This kind of response assumes people decide on products based upon what they can afford rather than if the product is worth the purchase price. End rant. David |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
I'm not sure I understand why you would expect MS to compensate you for
problems you encountered with a modem not even on the HCL list, nor even for one that was. This is not a core OS function. It is a convenience feature. If it were robust enough to obviate the need for full featured fax software, MS would be back in trouble with the DOJ. Nevertheless, it has been frustrating to see how often Windows XP Fax craps out with many common modems. Like you, I'd rather they just do it right or not do it at all. A lot of the transmission failures seem to occur when unexpected handshake signals are returned from the receiving modem. Microsoft's commitment to fax software has been hard to read. Just when it looks like they are going to dispense with it once and for all, it resurfaces. But there are signs it is improving. Just today, for example, I was trying to send a fax with XP Fax. I could hear the handshake signals and knew the call was answered and the transmission was underway. Then suddenly everything stopped and I got the cryptic message, "Transmission failed. The call was not answered." Baloney. So I booted over to Vista RC2, used its Fax service to send to the same number, and it sailed. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "randwill" wrote in message ... "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I doubt most people purchase Windows XP because they are looking for reliable, production level fax software. That was never Microsoft's intent. This is a simple basic fax module for users who only have an occasional need to fax. There are a many modems with which it will not work. Anyone who prefers to use fax over email should be looking to purchase third party fax software. I can't advise you on that because I've never used any other fax software. Many people are now outsourcing faxing to Internet Fax providers so they can skip purchasing a modem entirely. -- I use to have third party faxware but it doesn't work with XP so that's why I was trying to see if Windows XP Fax would be acceptable. It seems to me it would be better to not include a fax utility than include one that works poorly. Even if a user uses a functionality only occasionally, they should still expect it to work reliably. But the fact that XP's Fax doesn't install as part of the operating system's initial install might be a clue. Anyway, I'm looking into other options from vendors who know how to create fax software that works. My only regret is the time I have wasted for which MS will not compensate me. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I'm not sure I understand why you would expect MS to compensate you for problems you encountered with a modem not even on the HCL list, nor even for one that was. I was just venting frustration at time wasted. It's cumulative. Anybody who has a comupter of any kind has thrown away hours of their lives trying to make something work that by all reason should JUST WORK. You know, like it does for those happy laughing pointing-at-the-screen people in the pictures on the MS and other websites. Like it does for those hysterically smiling and dancing people in the commercials. I know it's been said but, if any company tried to market a car or a refrigerator or any other product as buggy, faulty, defect ridden and in some cases delibrately crippled as the computer and software manufacturers do routinely, they would have been arrested, thrown in jail had their assets seized and their families murdered. Someday computers will JUST WORK. But we'll all be long dead by then. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
I don't think those people were happy. I think they were laughing at the
error messages. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "randwill" wrote in message ... "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I'm not sure I understand why you would expect MS to compensate you for problems you encountered with a modem not even on the HCL list, nor even for one that was. I was just venting frustration at time wasted. It's cumulative. Anybody who has a comupter of any kind has thrown away hours of their lives trying to make something work that by all reason should JUST WORK. You know, like it does for those happy laughing pointing-at-the-screen people in the pictures on the MS and other websites. Like it does for those hysterically smiling and dancing people in the commercials. I know it's been said but, if any company tried to market a car or a refrigerator or any other product as buggy, faulty, defect ridden and in some cases delibrately crippled as the computer and software manufacturers do routinely, they would have been arrested, thrown in jail had their assets seized and their families murdered. Someday computers will JUST WORK. But we'll all be long dead by then. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
How to install Fax on an SP2 system.
"randwill" wrote in message ... "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ... I'm not sure I understand why you would expect MS to compensate you for problems you encountered with a modem not even on the HCL list, nor even for one that was. I was just venting frustration at time wasted. It's cumulative. Anybody who has a comupter of any kind has thrown away hours of their lives trying to make something work that by all reason should JUST WORK. In most cases computer things work better than in say, 1982(or 1965). I seem to remember a Scientific American article from a few years ago that claimed that the huge productivity gains promised by computers have not been realized(or completely realized) because of time wasted trying to make things work that "should JUST WORK." You know, like it does for those happy laughing pointing-at-the-screen people in the pictures on the MS and other websites. Like it does for those hysterically smiling and dancing people in the commercials. Such a world only exists in the world of ads and TV commercials. Actually computers are complex devices that sometimes fail in nonobvious ways. So do most other things in our technical society. I know it's been said but, if any company tried to market a car or a refrigerator or any other product as buggy, faulty, defect ridden and in some cases delibrately crippled as the computer and software manufacturers do routinely, they would have been arrested, thrown in jail had their assets seized and their families murdered. If you are seriously concerned about this sort of thing, look for alternative solutions. Macintosh, Unix, etc. when and where you can. Put pressure on Microsoft to supply a better product, just like you would do if your car was a lemon, by hitting them in their pocketbook. Don't expect it to be easier, however. Note, it is not a criminal offense for Microsoft to supply a product that you think is inferior, only an economic one, so having their assets seized and their families murdered is not in the cards. However reasonable change is possible. Look at the way Microsoft has changed their End of Life policy repeatedly based on customer complaints. Someday computers will JUST WORK. But we'll all be long dead by then. Doubtful that this will ever be true for the consumer. Clearly in this case, however, Microsoft has decided for their own reasons to supply a feature that only works poorly. Probably has something to do with the perceived profit to be made from such a feature. Dick Kistler |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|