Buffer Overrun ?????

Gordon you need to learn to read the posts or replies. That is exactly what I
said. First read, then comprehend, then reply, cause you making yourself look
bad. Make it a great day.

--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Gordon" wrote:

"THE C. [MS MVP]" wrote in message
...
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access to.

What a load of cr@p. You are posting through the rubbish Internet Explorer
web interface for the MS Newsgroups.
From your headers:
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149

You are
wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being enough to run XP at any
rate other then SP1 or earlier.

No YOU are wrong. many machines DID run XP on 256 MB RAM when XP first came
out.


--
Me, not pretending to be an MVP. Unlike some stupid cretins in here.

Olorin please read more carefully, I disagree with Malke. What ever Andrew
says I can care less for he is not an MVP! Please again make it a great day.
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Olórin" wrote:

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access to.
You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being enough to
run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should be ashamed
of yourself, you are the only one responding to my replies cause
anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I am talking
about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as usual. I am still
waiting for your proof as to how I can be using the direct MS
Server... only employees have this access right? No fake MVP here.
Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to anyone.
If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have access, then
please post its name here so that your assertion can be investigated. Or is
it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your two recent posts in this
group as "THE C.", at least, have been made through the web interface, which
tends to indicate further that you don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee. More
evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking about" argument.

Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in agreeing with Andrew E.
that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree it may well not be
enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience, depending on what else the
user needs to run, but I know plenty of machines with only that amount of
RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB" - pish and tosh, and technically
incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as requested? I'd
have thought that if you were genuine, you would have been keen to do so and
prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the coffin, far as I'm concerned.

Olorin please read more carefully, I disagree with Malke. What ever Andrew
says I can care less for he is not an MVP! Please again make it a great day.
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Olórin" wrote:

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access to.
You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being enough to
run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should be ashamed
of yourself, you are the only one responding to my replies cause
anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I am talking
about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as usual. I am still
waiting for your proof as to how I can be using the direct MS
Server... only employees have this access right? No fake MVP here.
Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to anyone.
If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have access, then
please post its name here so that your assertion can be investigated. Or is
it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your two recent posts in this
group as "THE C.", at least, have been made through the web interface, which
tends to indicate further that you don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee. More
evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking about" argument.

Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in agreeing with Andrew E.
that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree it may well not be
enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience, depending on what else the
user needs to run, but I know plenty of machines with only that amount of
RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB" - pish and tosh, and technically
incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as requested? I'd
have thought that if you were genuine, you would have been keen to do so and
prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the coffin, far as I'm concerned.

Malke please do a little more thourgh search for me. I will give you only one
clue, If you find me then I will give you your MVP Blue sheld for a job well
done.
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Malke" wrote:

Olórin wrote:

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access to.
You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being enough to
run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should be ashamed
of yourself, you are the only one responding to my replies cause
anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I am talking
about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as usual. I am still
waiting for your proof as to how I can be using the direct MS
Server... only employees have this access right? No fake MVP here.
Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to anyone.
If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have access, then
please post its name here so that your assertion can be investigated. Or
is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your two recent posts in
this group as "THE C.", at least, have been made through the web
interface, which tends to indicate further that you don't know what you're
talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee. More
evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking about" argument.

Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in agreeing with Andrew E.
that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree it may well not
be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience, depending on what
else the user needs to run, but I know plenty of machines with only that
amount of RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB" - pish and tosh, and
technically incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as requested?
I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would have been keen to do
so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the coffin, far as I'm
concerned.

Thank you, Olorin. There is no seekrit server to which MVPs have access. ;-)
Most of us posting to the public newsgroups use msnews.microsoft.com. And
it is obvious that "THE C." is not an MVP nor a Microsoft employee. And
Microsoft employees can't be MVPs.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

Malke please do a little more thourgh search for me. I will give you only one
clue, If you find me then I will give you your MVP Blue sheld for a job well
done.
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Malke" wrote:

Olórin wrote:

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access to.
You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being enough to
run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should be ashamed
of yourself, you are the only one responding to my replies cause
anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I am talking
about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as usual. I am still
waiting for your proof as to how I can be using the direct MS
Server... only employees have this access right? No fake MVP here.
Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to anyone.
If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have access, then
please post its name here so that your assertion can be investigated. Or
is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your two recent posts in
this group as "THE C.", at least, have been made through the web
interface, which tends to indicate further that you don't know what you're
talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee. More
evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking about" argument.

Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in agreeing with Andrew E.
that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree it may well not
be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience, depending on what
else the user needs to run, but I know plenty of machines with only that
amount of RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB" - pish and tosh, and
technically incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as requested?
I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would have been keen to do
so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the coffin, far as I'm
concerned.

Thank you, Olorin. There is no seekrit server to which MVPs have access. ;-)
Most of us posting to the public newsgroups use msnews.microsoft.com. And
it is obvious that "THE C." is not an MVP nor a Microsoft employee. And
Microsoft employees can't be MVPs.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

"THE C. [MS MVP]" wrote in message
...
Gordon you need to learn to read the posts or replies.

sigh You said THIS:

Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access to.


You are plainly NOT USING an MS server which MS employees only have access
to.
You obviously are SO head up your own arse with lying about being an MVP
that you can't even read your own posts.

--
Asking a question?
Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about,
your OS, Service Pack level
and the FULL contents of any error message(s)

"THE C. [MS MVP]" wrote in message
...
Gordon you need to learn to read the posts or replies.

sigh You said THIS:

Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access to.


You are plainly NOT USING an MS server which MS employees only have access
to.
You obviously are SO head up your own arse with lying about being an MVP
that you can't even read your own posts.

--
Asking a question?
Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about,
your OS, Service Pack level
and the FULL contents of any error message(s)

The Real Truth [MS MVP] wrote:
You sick phucks. Your obsession with me has got all of you challenging
everyone in these group with your off topic BS. That's a damn shame.
That goes to you too Malke. You all need to grow up, this NG is shot
to hell because of your trolling.

It'll be much better when you're gone though. Malke et al are not the
problem; you are. And THAT is not a shame!




"Olórin" wrote in message
...
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access
to. You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being
enough to run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should
be ashamed of yourself, you are the only one responding to my
replies cause anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I
am talking about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as
usual. I am still waiting for your proof as to how I can be using
the direct MS Server... only employees have this access right? No
fake MVP here. Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to
anyone. If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have
access, then please post its name here so that your assertion can be
investigated. Or is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your
two recent posts in this group as "THE C.", at least, have been made
through the web interface, which tends to indicate further that you
don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee.
More evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking
about" argument. Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in
agreeing with
Andrew E. that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree
it may well not be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience,
depending on what else the user needs to run, but I know plenty of
machines with only that amount of RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB"
- pish and tosh, and technically incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as
requested? I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would have
been keen to do so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the
coffin, far as I'm concerned.

The Real Truth [MS MVP] wrote:
You sick phucks. Your obsession with me has got all of you challenging
everyone in these group with your off topic BS. That's a damn shame.
That goes to you too Malke. You all need to grow up, this NG is shot
to hell because of your trolling.

It'll be much better when you're gone though. Malke et al are not the
problem; you are. And THAT is not a shame!




"Olórin" wrote in message
...
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access
to. You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being
enough to run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should
be ashamed of yourself, you are the only one responding to my
replies cause anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I
am talking about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as
usual. I am still waiting for your proof as to how I can be using
the direct MS Server... only employees have this access right? No
fake MVP here. Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to
anyone. If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have
access, then please post its name here so that your assertion can be
investigated. Or is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your
two recent posts in this group as "THE C.", at least, have been made
through the web interface, which tends to indicate further that you
don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee.
More evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking
about" argument. Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in
agreeing with
Andrew E. that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree
it may well not be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience,
depending on what else the user needs to run, but I know plenty of
machines with only that amount of RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB"
- pish and tosh, and technically incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as
requested? I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would have
been keen to do so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the
coffin, far as I'm concerned.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Olorin please read more carefully, I disagree with Malke. What ever
Andrew says I can care less for he is not an MVP! Please again make
it a great day.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access
to. You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being
enough to run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should
be ashamed of yourself, you are the only one responding to my
replies cause anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I
am talking about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as
usual. I am still waiting for your proof as to how I can be using
the direct MS Server... only employees have this access right? No
fake MVP here. Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to
anyone. If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have
access, then please post its name here so that your assertion can be
investigated. Or is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your
two recent posts in this group as "THE C.", at least, have been made
through the web interface, which tends to indicate further that you
don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee.
More evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking
about" argument.

Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in agreeing with
Andrew E. that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree
it may well not be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience,
depending on what else the user needs to run, but I know plenty of
machines with only that amount of RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB"
- pish and tosh, and technically incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as
requested? I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would have
been keen to do so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the
coffin, far as I'm concerned.

Nonetheless, you do agree with Andrew. However, as I'm not an MVP either,
your haughty and arrogant rationale dictates that you don't care what I say,
so there's no point in continuing this exchange.

I notice that you completely avoid the other issues - the "direct MS server
to which only MS employees (which includes us MVPs) have access" baloney you
spouted, and the challenge to produce evidence as to your MS-MVP standing.

Nuff said.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Olorin please read more carefully, I disagree with Malke. What ever
Andrew says I can care less for he is not an MVP! Please again make
it a great day.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access
to. You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being
enough to run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should
be ashamed of yourself, you are the only one responding to my
replies cause anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what I
am talking about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as
usual. I am still waiting for your proof as to how I can be using
the direct MS Server... only employees have this access right? No
fake MVP here. Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to
anyone. If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have
access, then please post its name here so that your assertion can be
investigated. Or is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs? Your
two recent posts in this group as "THE C.", at least, have been made
through the web interface, which tends to indicate further that you
don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee.
More evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking
about" argument.

Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in agreeing with
Andrew E. that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree
it may well not be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast experience,
depending on what else the user needs to run, but I know plenty of
machines with only that amount of RAM. "Bare minimum would be 768MB"
- pish and tosh, and technically incorrect. Yet more evidence.

Oh, and why have you not posted a link to your MVP profile as
requested? I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would have
been keen to do so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail in the
coffin, far as I'm concerned.

Nonetheless, you do agree with Andrew. However, as I'm not an MVP either,
your haughty and arrogant rationale dictates that you don't care what I say,
so there's no point in continuing this exchange.

I notice that you completely avoid the other issues - the "direct MS server
to which only MS employees (which includes us MVPs) have access" baloney you
spouted, and the challenge to produce evidence as to your MS-MVP standing.

Nuff said.

LOL, it's almost like you believe the tripe dripping from your
fingertip/s! You should spend a few minutes thinking about the medical
problems of someone who thinks everyone else is wrong and only they are
right. Rather than participate in a flame-war I've no more to say to
you here, but ... you quite seriously need to take a look at yourself.
I'm afraid you've made your own bed, just as everyone else does.
Twayne



The Real Truth [MS MVP] wrote:
WRONG the problem here is people trolling me. I give advice that
works. My software works. The trolls know it works so they can't say
much about it. They would rather have people no get their system
fixed then to use my software. That is what is called a troll. They
are the problem not me.


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
The Real Truth [MS MVP] wrote:
You sick phucks. Your obsession with me has got all of you
challenging everyone in these group with your off topic BS. That's
a damn shame. That goes to you too Malke. You all need to grow up,
this NG is shot to hell because of your trolling.

It'll be much better when you're gone though. Malke et al are not
the problem; you are. And THAT is not a shame!




"Olórin" wrote in message
...
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access
to. You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being
enough to run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should
be ashamed of yourself, you are the only one responding to my
replies cause anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what
I am talking about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as
usual. I am still waiting for your proof as to how I can be using
the direct MS Server... only employees have this access right? No
fake MVP here. Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to
anyone. If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have
access, then please post its name here so that your assertion can
be investigated. Or is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs?
Your two recent posts in this group as "THE C.", at least, have
been made through the web interface, which tends to indicate
further that you don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee.
More evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking
about" argument. Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in
agreeing with
Andrew E. that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree
it may well not be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast
experience, depending on what else the user needs to run, but I
know plenty of machines with only that amount of RAM. "Bare
minimum would be 768MB" - pish and tosh, and technically
incorrect. Yet more evidence. Oh, and why have you not posted a
link to your MVP profile as
requested? I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would
have been keen to do so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail
in the coffin, far as I'm concerned.

LOL, it's almost like you believe the tripe dripping from your
fingertip/s! You should spend a few minutes thinking about the medical
problems of someone who thinks everyone else is wrong and only they are
right. Rather than participate in a flame-war I've no more to say to
you here, but ... you quite seriously need to take a look at yourself.
I'm afraid you've made your own bed, just as everyone else does.
Twayne



The Real Truth [MS MVP] wrote:
WRONG the problem here is people trolling me. I give advice that
works. My software works. The trolls know it works so they can't say
much about it. They would rather have people no get their system
fixed then to use my software. That is what is called a troll. They
are the problem not me.


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
The Real Truth [MS MVP] wrote:
You sick phucks. Your obsession with me has got all of you
challenging everyone in these group with your off topic BS. That's
a damn shame. That goes to you too Malke. You all need to grow up,
this NG is shot to hell because of your trolling.

It'll be much better when you're gone though. Malke et al are not
the problem; you are. And THAT is not a shame!




"Olórin" wrote in message
...
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Well I am using the MS server which only MS employees have access
to. You are wrong on your statement regarding 256MB RAM being
enough to run XP at any rate other then SP1 or earlier. You should
be ashamed of yourself, you are the only one responding to my
replies cause anyone who uses or repairs computer would know what
I am talking about. You are sadly wrong again or should I say as
usual. I am still waiting for your proof as to how I can be using
the direct MS Server... only employees have this access right? No
fake MVP here. Make it a great day!

snip

If, by "the direct MS server" (a telling phrase), you mean
msnews.microsoft.com then you're plain wrong - that's available to
anyone. If you mean a different server, to which only MS MVPs have
access, then please post its name here so that your assertion can
be investigated. Or is it top secret and only divulged to MS MVPs?
Your two recent posts in this group as "THE C.", at least, have
been made through the web interface, which tends to indicate
further that you don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, and you're confusing MS MVP status with being an MS employee.
More evidence in favour of the "don't know what you're talking
about" argument. Finally, XP and 256MB RAM - you are incorrect in
agreeing with
Andrew E. that it is "too small". XP *will* run with 256MB. I agree
it may well not be enough for a hugely pleasant and fast
experience, depending on what else the user needs to run, but I
know plenty of machines with only that amount of RAM. "Bare
minimum would be 768MB" - pish and tosh, and technically
incorrect. Yet more evidence. Oh, and why have you not posted a
link to your MVP profile as
requested? I'd have thought that if you were genuine, you would
have been keen to do so and prove wrong the doubters. Final nail
in the coffin, far as I'm concerned.