|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
March 16th 09, 03:12 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
Buffer Overrun ?????
I keep receiving this message and have to go to system restore to make the
system work again. It will run about 30 minutes and the message will come up again. It only happens when I try to work on line does anyone no what this means and what I need to do to correct it. I am running XP in a Dell 2700 with 256mgs mgs ram. Microsoft Visual C ++ Runtime Library Buffer overrun detected Program:C\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe A buffer overrun has been detected which has corrupted the programs internal state. The program can not safely continue executjion and must now be terminated. -- Later Gator Herb & Roxanne 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
March 16th 09, 04:11 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
256mb of ram memory is too small for xp,512mb is min.,1024mb is about
right (or more)..Also,once updated,open system properties,advanced,performance, virtual memory,change button,set C: to "let system manage",click set 2X,close out. "Chip and Roxanne" wrote: I keep receiving this message and have to go to system restore to make the system work again. It will run about 30 minutes and the message will come up again. It only happens when I try to work on line does anyone no what this means and what I need to do to correct it. I am running XP in a Dell 2700 with 256mgs mgs ram. Microsoft Visual C ++ Runtime Library Buffer overrun detected Program:C\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe A buffer overrun has been detected which has corrupted the programs internal state. The program can not safely continue executjion and must now be terminated. -- Later Gator Herb & Roxanne
|
|
#3
March 16th 09, 04:11 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
256mb of ram memory is too small for xp,512mb is min.,1024mb is about
right (or more)..Also,once updated,open system properties,advanced,performance, virtual memory,change button,set C: to "let system manage",click set 2X,close out. "Chip and Roxanne" wrote: I keep receiving this message and have to go to system restore to make the system work again. It will run about 30 minutes and the message will come up again. It only happens when I try to work on line does anyone no what this means and what I need to do to correct it. I am running XP in a Dell 2700 with 256mgs mgs ram. Microsoft Visual C ++ Runtime Library Buffer overrun detected Program:C\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe A buffer overrun has been detected which has corrupted the programs internal state. The program can not safely continue executjion and must now be terminated. -- Later Gator Herb & Roxanne
|
|
#4
March 16th 09, 11:37 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Andrew E. wrote:
256mb of ram memory is too small for xp,512mb is min.,1024mb is about right (or more)..Also,once updated,open system properties,advanced,performance, virtual memory,change button,set C: to "let system manage",click set 2X,close out. Andrew, you really don't know what you're talking about. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#5
March 16th 09, 11:37 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Andrew E. wrote:
256mb of ram memory is too small for xp,512mb is min.,1024mb is about right (or more)..Also,once updated,open system properties,advanced,performance, virtual memory,change button,set C: to "let system manage",click set 2X,close out. Andrew, you really don't know what you're talking about. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#6
March 16th 09, 11:38 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Chip and Roxanne wrote:
I keep receiving this message and have to go to system restore to make the system work again. It will run about 30 minutes and the message will come up again. It only happens when I try to work on line does anyone no what this means and what I need to do to correct it. I am running XP in a Dell 2700 with 256mgs mgs ram. Microsoft Visual C ++ Runtime Library Buffer overrun detected Program:C\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe A buffer overrun has been detected which has corrupted the programs internal state. The program can not safely continue executjion and must now be terminated. What version of Internet Explorer are you using? What Service Pack level is your XP (Home? Pro?) at? The First Question Of Troubleshooting: If the problem is new, what changed between the time things worked and the time they didn't? The Second Question of Windows Troubleshooting: what is the malware/virus status of the machine? If you think it is clean, what programs (and versions) did you use to determine this? Be sure the computer is clean: http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/...moving_Malware Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#7
March 16th 09, 11:38 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Chip and Roxanne wrote:
I keep receiving this message and have to go to system restore to make the system work again. It will run about 30 minutes and the message will come up again. It only happens when I try to work on line does anyone no what this means and what I need to do to correct it. I am running XP in a Dell 2700 with 256mgs mgs ram. Microsoft Visual C ++ Runtime Library Buffer overrun detected Program:C\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe A buffer overrun has been detected which has corrupted the programs internal state. The program can not safely continue executjion and must now be terminated. What version of Internet Explorer are you using? What Service Pack level is your XP (Home? Pro?) at? The First Question Of Troubleshooting: If the problem is new, what changed between the time things worked and the time they didn't? The Second Question of Windows Troubleshooting: what is the malware/virus status of the machine? If you think it is clean, what programs (and versions) did you use to determine this? Be sure the computer is clean: http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/...moving_Malware Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#8
March 17th 09, 11:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
"Malke" wrote in message ... Andrew E. wrote: 256mb of ram memory is too small for xp,512mb is min.,1024mb is about right (or more)..Also,once updated,open system properties,advanced,performance, virtual memory,change button,set C: to "let system manage",click set 2X,close out. Andrew, you really don't know what you're talking about. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ Malke, What Andrew said may have nothing to do with the problem, but an XP SP3 machine will hardly run. Memory is so cheap, I keep half a dozen 1GB chips on hand. Takes me a couple of months before I have to resupply.
|
|
#9
March 17th 09, 11:58 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
"Malke" wrote in message ... Andrew E. wrote: 256mb of ram memory is too small for xp,512mb is min.,1024mb is about right (or more)..Also,once updated,open system properties,advanced,performance, virtual memory,change button,set C: to "let system manage",click set 2X,close out. Andrew, you really don't know what you're talking about. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ Malke, What Andrew said may have nothing to do with the problem, but an XP SP3 machine will hardly run. Memory is so cheap, I keep half a dozen 1GB chips on hand. Takes me a couple of months before I have to resupply.
|
|
#10
March 18th 09, 11:56 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Charles W Davis wrote:
What Andrew said may have nothing to do with the problem, but an XP SP3 machine will hardly run. Memory is so cheap, I keep half a dozen 1GB chips on hand. Takes me a couple of months before I have to resupply. I have plenty of clients running XP with only 256MB of RAM. I agree with you that 512MB or 1GB is preferable and RAM is cheap, but to say that "an XP SP3 will hardly run" with 256MB of RAM is inaccurate. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#11
March 18th 09, 11:56 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Charles W Davis wrote:
What Andrew said may have nothing to do with the problem, but an XP SP3 machine will hardly run. Memory is so cheap, I keep half a dozen 1GB chips on hand. Takes me a couple of months before I have to resupply. I have plenty of clients running XP with only 256MB of RAM. I agree with you that 512MB or 1GB is preferable and RAM is cheap, but to say that "an XP SP3 will hardly run" with 256MB of RAM is inaccurate. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#12
March 25th 09, 09:38 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Malke you are wrong. 256MB of RAM is not enough! Maybe back in the days of
SP1. Todays Anti-Virus plus firewall would make a XP machine with 256MB of RAM undesirable and unenjoyable. Bare minumum would be 768MB. I personally would not suggest anything under 1GB! -- Computer/Software Tech. Charles Richmond http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ "Malke" wrote: Charles W Davis wrote: What Andrew said may have nothing to do with the problem, but an XP SP3 machine will hardly run. Memory is so cheap, I keep half a dozen 1GB chips on hand. Takes me a couple of months before I have to resupply. I have plenty of clients running XP with only 256MB of RAM. I agree with you that 512MB or 1GB is preferable and RAM is cheap, but to say that "an XP SP3 will hardly run" with 256MB of RAM is inaccurate. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#13
March 25th 09, 09:38 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
Malke you are wrong. 256MB of RAM is not enough! Maybe back in the days of
SP1. Todays Anti-Virus plus firewall would make a XP machine with 256MB of RAM undesirable and unenjoyable. Bare minumum would be 768MB. I personally would not suggest anything under 1GB! -- Computer/Software Tech. Charles Richmond http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ "Malke" wrote: Charles W Davis wrote: What Andrew said may have nothing to do with the problem, but an XP SP3 machine will hardly run. Memory is so cheap, I keep half a dozen 1GB chips on hand. Takes me a couple of months before I have to resupply. I have plenty of clients running XP with only 256MB of RAM. I agree with you that 512MB or 1GB is preferable and RAM is cheap, but to say that "an XP SP3 will hardly run" with 256MB of RAM is inaccurate. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#14
March 25th 09, 11:44 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Malke you are wrong. 256MB of RAM is not enough! Maybe back in the days of SP1. Todays Anti-Virus plus firewall would make a XP machine with 256MB of RAM undesirable and unenjoyable. Bare minumum would be 768MB. I personally would not suggest anything under 1GB! No, false MVP, *you* are wrong. You obviously do not have a good grasp of technical issues and since you refuse to post a link to your MVP profile you obviously are not an MVP. A person who would lie about being an MVP is not a person who can be trusted about anything. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
|
#15
March 25th 09, 11:44 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buffer Overrun ?????
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
Malke you are wrong. 256MB of RAM is not enough! Maybe back in the days of SP1. Todays Anti-Virus plus firewall would make a XP machine with 256MB of RAM undesirable and unenjoyable. Bare minumum would be 768MB. I personally would not suggest anything under 1GB! No, false MVP, *you* are wrong. You obviously do not have a good grasp of technical issues and since you refuse to post a link to your MVP profile you obviously are not an MVP. A person who would lie about being an MVP is not a person who can be trusted about anything. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
