ATTN: Users of NAV, NSW and NIS 2004

Well I know I stole a marking pen for one of the books that reveals answers
when I was young but I have repented of that sin so I feel my conscience is
clean.

"Tom" wrote in message
...

"Don Burnette" wrote in message
...
kurttrail wrote:
Leythos wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:13:22 -0700, Dan wrote:

Kurt is just pushing your buttons because you let him annoy you and
it is as simple as that.

If you believe that then he's been pushing your buttons more than
mine. He only got under my skin at the start, before I figured him
out, not he's just a toy

LOL! Keep on lying to yourself.


Don't let him fool you Dan, he's got an agenda and it doesn't include
any constructive help in this group.

Whatever.


Uh huh, Leythos is exactly right.

Once a thief, always a thief.


Really, have you actually ever seen kurt lift something illegally, other than
making words terms mean theft?

Did you ever (and don't lie) take something that was definite theft, (even if
it were a piece of candy)?

According to Don, you will always be a thief, notwithstanding your =
forgiven sins!

"Dan" wrote in message =
...
Well I know I stole a marking pen for one of the books that reveals =
answers
when I was young but I have repented of that sin so I feel my =
conscience is
clean.
=20
"Tom" wrote in message
...
=20
"Don Burnette" wrote in message
...
kurttrail wrote:
Leythos wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:13:22 -0700, Dan wrote:

Kurt is just pushing your buttons because you let him annoy you =
and
it is as simple as that.

If you believe that then he's been pushing your buttons more than
mine. He only got under my skin at the start, before I figured him
out, not he's just a toy

LOL! Keep on lying to yourself.


Don't let him fool you Dan, he's got an agenda and it doesn't =
include
any constructive help in this group.

Whatever.


Uh huh, Leythos is exactly right.

Once a thief, always a thief.

=20
Really, have you actually ever seen kurt lift something illegally, =
other than
making words terms mean theft?
=20
Did you ever (and don't lie) take something that was definite theft, =
(even if
it were a piece of candy)?
=20

"Leythos" wrote in message =
news
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:31:11 -0500, Tom wrote:

According to Don, you will always be a thief, notwithstanding your
forgiven sins!
=20
If you want to change the subject of this thread, please change the
"SUBJECT" to something else so that we don't have to read it inside
this thread about NAV, NSW, NIS. Thanks.
=20

LOL, I didn't change it, you net nazi, someone else did, and I just =
follow posts accordingly. I already explained to you before why I gave =
up following rules that people break (like yourself doing now)! If you =
get butt wedgies because of you see perceived newsgroups posting =
irregularities, avoid replying to them after you've gotten over your =
newsgroup conniption fit!

"Leythos" wrote in message =
news
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:41:42 -0500, Tom wrote:

LOL, I didn't change it, you net nazi, someone else did
=20
Just because many people in the MS groups don't have a clue about =
proper
methods in posting and threads doesn't make anyone pointing it out a =
Net
Nazi. It is interesting to see your reaction and the maturity in which =
you
reply to it.

It is more interesting how you violate the very same things you complain =
others do, by doing the very same thing; e.g. posting off topic! Again, =
don't read it, and also be consistent on who you reprimand for your =
version of NG netiquette violations. I have yet to see you say anything =
to an MVP, or another that does the same things that gives you anal acid =
reflux..

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:46:19 -0500, Pop wrote:

Dan wrote:
The Corporate editions may be okay but the home user editions of
Symantec (Norton) products suck.

And you know this ... how?

Maybe by experience, maybe by word of mouth? Personally, I've heard from
several folks (that the enterprise/corporate version of Symantec antivirus
is a horse of another color and much more pleasant to use). Have never
tried it so can't give a first-hand opinion but trust those who have
related their opinion to me. Enough that I would consider giving it a try
if shopping for a new a/v solution (which I'm not).

As always -- YMMV

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User

Tom wrote:
"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:41:42 -0500, Tom wrote:

LOL, I didn't change it, you net nazi, someone else did

Just because many people in the MS groups don't have a clue about
proper methods in posting and threads doesn't make anyone pointing
it out a Net Nazi. It is interesting to see your reaction and the
maturity in which you reply to it.

It is more interesting how you violate the very same things you
complain others do, by doing the very same thing; e.g. posting off
topic! Again, don't read it, and also be consistent on who you
reprimand for your version of NG netiquette violations. I have yet to
see you say anything to an MVP, or another that does the same things
that gives you anal acid reflux..

Anal acid reflux! ROFL!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Leythos wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:31:11 -0500, Tom wrote:

According to Don, you will always be a thief, notwithstanding your
forgiven sins!

If you want to change the subject of this thread, please change the
"SUBJECT" to something else so that we don't have to read it inside
this thread about NAV, NSW, NIS. Thanks.

The people of this group are NOT your children. YOUR rules do not apply
here. Whine to your own children, about your rules, because, as you can
see, the people here will not follow YOUR rules.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Leythos wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:57:50 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:41:42 -0500, Tom wrote:

LOL, I didn't change it, you net nazi, someone else did

Just because many people in the MS groups don't have a clue about
proper methods in posting and threads doesn't make anyone pointing
it out a Net Nazi. It is interesting to see your reaction and the
maturity in which you reply to it.

It is more interesting how you violate the very same things you
complain others do, by doing the very same thing; e.g. posting off
topic! Again, don't read it, and also be consistent on who you
reprimand for your version of NG netiquette violations. I have yet
to see you say anything to an MVP, or another that does the same
things that gives you anal acid reflux..

Yea, like people that don't know how to set line lengths for 7X
characters, people that understand how to post but choose not to post
properly, like people that complain about people that try and help
people understand Usenet methods in a nice manner, like people that
complain to complain....

I've never differentiated between MVP and anyone else, if an
"Informed" person doesn't post properly they are lamers just the same.

As for violating - I did change the subject of a couple threads once
they became completely off the subject, and I posted the last time
under the same subject in order to give the reader the opportunity to
change it. If you take your head out of your arse you might be a nice
person.

Lamethos strikes again!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

"Leythos" wrote in message =
news
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:57:50 -0500, Tom wrote:
=20
=20
"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:41:42 -0500, Tom wrote:

LOL, I didn't change it, you net nazi, someone else did
=20
Just because many people in the MS groups don't have a clue about
proper methods in posting and threads doesn't make anyone pointing =
it
out a Net Nazi. It is interesting to see your reaction and the =
maturity
in which you reply to it.
=20
It is more interesting how you violate the very same things you =
complain
others do, by doing the very same thing; e.g. posting off topic! =
Again,
don't read it, and also be consistent on who you reprimand for your
version of NG netiquette violations. I have yet to see you say =
anything
to an MVP, or another that does the same things that gives you anal =
acid
reflux..
=20
Yea, like people that don't know how to set line lengths for 7X
characters, people that understand how to post but choose not to post
properly, like people that complain about people that try and help =
people
understand Usenet methods in a nice manner, like people that complain =
to
complain....
=20
I've never differentiated between MVP and anyone else, if an =
"Informed"
person doesn't post properly they are lamers just the same.
=20
As for violating - I did change the subject of a couple threads once =
they
became completely off the subject, and I posted the last time under =
the
same subject in order to give the reader the opportunity to change it. =
If
you take your head out of your arse you might be a nice person.
=20

Again, I don't care what your rules are regarding USENET as I have tried =
to use them according to acceptable rules; only to the ones (like you) =
who preach the gospel about those rules break them. So, I just make =
things easy for myself, by posting according to whoever makes a post. If =
they top post, I reply in kind to keep the thread consistent, likewise =
in reverse. I have given up using your idiotic standard for word wrap, =
because there are too many that don't follow through, so I stick with =
it, and it reads better on my machine.

Again, I have yet to see you go after other violators, especially many =
MVPs here who post like I do), probably because you would get ignored =
nad feel hurt, who knows with you anyway. But I do find it amusing that =
you get mentally constipated looking at a version of a non-leythos =
standardized newgroups composition. I just read, reply to the topic at =
hand, and move on, life's too short for the net lames like you.

"Leythos" wrote in message =
news
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:58:28 -0500, Tom wrote:
=20
Again, I have yet to see you go after other violators, especially =
many
MVPs here who post like I do)
=20
I've mentioned it in a number of threads where I've posted, come to =
think
of it if you've missed it then you've not really read much that I've
posted (except the the Kurt BS).

I don't read the whole thread, unless there is a situation where one was =
seeking help. But these threads that are about lames, I only reply, and =
read the posts that are directed to me. You worry and complain so much =
about how others should compose their posts here, that it has become =
obsessive compulsive behavior for you. I don't like top posting, but I =
am not going to complain to those who do, it does no good. Again, if you =
don't like the way I post, don't read them, or place me in your =
killfile, I don't change anything that I have setup in these groups =
anway, so I would last in your killfile as long as your killfile filter =
isn't changed.

=20
When people top post or when they reply without including some part of =
the
thread they are replying to, and it's a thread I'm involved in, I do
mention it. I didn't single you out, that would be a waste of time as
evidenced by your inability to post properly. I usually only make =
comment
of the posting method once in a thread anyway.

I reply with pertinent parts of the thread, and most of the time, I =
snipped out parts that I don't make replies to. Again, move on, and stop =
being a net nanny, it does you no good, and I am going to follow the =
same posting procedures that everyone else does. You remind me of a =
somewhat mild-manner Miss Perspicacia Tick, who also get butt munges =
when other don't meet her net standards.

Leythos wrote:


snip

the difference between the Intern
and the Web

snip

Bill Clinton wouldn't try to stick a cigar up the pussy of the Web.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

"kurttrail" wrote in message =
...
Leythos wrote:
=20
=20
snip
=20
the difference between the Intern
and the Web
=20
snip
=20
Bill Clinton wouldn't try to stick a cigar up the pussy of the Web.
=20

LMAO! I miss Bill, he was a good prez!