Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off. Despite him stating many times, nobody can quote any lies
written by him. I just did, right he

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.

Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G

Here's another one ROFL!:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Please note.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700
Message-ID:
References:



On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote:
.....
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.

Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past
nonsense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Diesel F08TPFtT157gyFB5:
-----
Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out
that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else.
Just stop. That's it. Simple right?
-----

The last time the bot had posted was more than three hours before.

Diesel made it clear he could find the IP of the person running the bot.
And he made it clear it would be easy for him to make a Sandman-like
time table of posting, but showing Carroll and the bot and myself.

Was he lying when he said that? Maybe. But I do not think so. And if he
was merely lying he would not have access to the program itself, which
he makes VERY clear he did.

Diesel and Carroll were trolling together. The bot goes silent. Diesel
then says if the bot is just turned off he will let it slide. Does that
sound like Diesel to you? And he also say this:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously **** poor
example of writing software.
-----

Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but
to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely
the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess:
he will NEVER say.

*** end copy

I've repeatedly asked you to backup the statements you wrote
concerning my involvement with the floodbot. Not one single time
have you even so much as attempted to do so. Questions again:

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come
close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. And
then we have the issue of the question you asked at the end. That
question makes the assumption that what you wrote previous to it is
factual - The question is intended to give credence to what's
written previous to it, to give it credibility. To assist in your
effort to mislead. Which is incidently, a form of manipulation,
Snit.

--
NUMBER CRUNCHING: Jumping on a Computer.

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.

If you could understand what you read you would have known I have been very
clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he pointed to. When you
cried about me doing research for him or whatever I thought you meant
something, you know, of any interest of value. You just were playing victim.

But notice how many times you have lied about me editing a video to add your
phone number that IS ALREADY THERE and, even worse for your idiotic claims, I
HAVE NOT SHOWN.

And even though you gave me permission to show it, I have not because I am
treating you like a child and protecting you from yourself.

https://ibb.co/fpJry4K
https://youtu.be/xRvaRLlb3b8
https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ

Gremlin :
-----
You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit.
-----

You directly gave me permission to show the number in my call log (which out
of your ignorance and failure to understand what you read you called a "caller
ID log"). I am protecting you from your own ignorance about the phone tech you
use, and your poor troubleshooting skills, by NOT posting the number YOU said
I could.

Your response is to throw tantrums lasting tens or even hundreds of thousands
of words and cry about my "attitude" as I protect you from yourself, and even
as you make threats.

Hint: you can write a million words and it will not make the number in my call
log go away (though time will, it only is saved for six months). Your ignorant
speculation cannot change reality.

Can you understand that?

This is NOT a rhetorical question -- you truly act like if you just write
enough words, and throw a big enough tantrum, that somehow the phone number
direct from my phone company records will disappear.

Remember: I already taught you how you can test your claims -- recreate the
situation: work out a time with me to call me again from another burner
number. Wait a day to see if it shows up in the logs. If you find a DIFFERENT
way maybe it will not, but if you do it the same way it almost surely will.

Simple troubleshooting -- but beyond your skills.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.

If you could understand what you read you would have known I have
been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he
pointed to.

What's to misunderstand by this?

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.

Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about:

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.

Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G

Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a mistake here?
Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?

Just how dishonest are you, snit?


You just were playing victim.

Catching you lying on me, again, is not my playing victim. It's
holding you accountable, and you might as well get used to the idea.

But

Nothing. You *lied* again, and this time, there's nothing for you to
use to even try confusing people. An apology is in order, snit. You
owe me an apology for lying about me here. I want that apology for
the direct lie you claim I made that I did NOT make. Your own words,
directly accusing me of something which was NOT true.

Now, you have to admit you ****ed up, and apologize. It's the right
thing to do. You can no longer claim 'unquotable lies'; because I
quoted you, straight up, lying about me, and I backed up my claim by
sharing Davids and yours discussion doing exactly what I wrote about
him asking you to do, and you doing for him, just as I wrote. There
was no direct lie on my part, at any point in time.

[diversion of your lies snipped]

Can you understand that?

Can you understand that I caught you in a direct lie this time that
you can't even try passing off as a misunderstanding?

You owe me an apology.

Remember: I already taught you how you can test your claims --
recreate the situation: work out a time with me to call me again
from another burner number. Wait a day to see if it shows up in
the logs. If you find a DIFFERENT way maybe it will not, but if
you do it the same way it almost surely will.

I didn't call you from a burner the first time, as I've taken a
great amount of time to explain to your quite stupid ass,
previously. What part of voIP isn't clear to you? the vo or IP?

Simple troubleshooting -- but beyond your skills.

You're projecting your own shortcomings onto me, yet again. It's
amusing, considering how easy it is for me to prove that's the case
here. A recent Joel inability to burn an audio cd so he hoses the os
is a fine example of that. I can find the post where I asked
technical support questions, as any professional would. I cannot
find a single post where you so much as tried. I can find the post
where I asked if yuo agreed with joels repair methodology; to hose
the system and reload another os. you said that was a good idea. It
wasn't, because if the issue comes up again, joel has no idea how it
happened and no idea how to fix it, aside from OS reloading. That's
not something a professional technician does as their first option
for such a situation. I can find hundreds of posts, more likely
thousands though were i'm involved in very technical discussions and
offering useful assistance, ranging from an actual virus infection
to non malicious software and hardware troubleshooting issues, snit.

Anytime you want to setup a troubleshooting contest, lemme know;
We'll do it stupid easy, with the basics of the basic **** here.

We'll setup a circuit simulator with a known ****ing problem and see
which of the first, if both even do, find it and correct the issue.
I bet you fail miserably. Any takers?

--
He's dead Jim. Grab his tricorder. I'll get his wallet.

On Aug 22, 2020 at 2:36:00 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.

If you could understand what you read you would have known I have
been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he
pointed to.

What's to misunderstand by this?

.....

You really fail to understand everything you read. Remember, I already
acknowledged he pointed me to a couple web searches to see if your number was
there -- AFTER YOU TOLD HIM I HAD YOUR NUMBER.

Remember, I did not even mention that, nor even tell him or anyone in any
group you are spamming that you called me.

Please TRY to understand what you read... and TRY to understand at least the
basics of your phone system and how to troubleshoot / test it. PLEASE!

You are not the victim you think you are.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:08:19 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 2:36:00 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying
his arse off.

If you could understand what you read you would have known I
have been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the
site he pointed to.

What's to misunderstand by this?


You really fail to understand everything you read.

I don't see how I could have possibly misunderstood what you wrote, he

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

Snit, isn't that exactly what David asked you to do for him? And
isn't that what you've been doing for him? Why yes, yes it is. So,
how and in what possible way was I lying about this, Snit? When you
can't back your statements up, and in this case, you can't - it's
probably best not to try and stick with your totally bull**** claim.
Instead, you should be doing the right thing, manning up, and
apologizing for writing what you did about me - Nothing you've
published so far about me has been true.


What you've been running away from in the last two replies you've
provided in this thread. You clearly went out of your way to lie
about me, again, and now, you're backpeddling about what you did,
again. I really don't see how you think you can convince anyone that
you didn't lie on me, yet again, just because you can.


Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.

Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about:

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.

Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G Just keep denying
things took place as the timeline and myself are clearly showing
they did. Even Google's view of this thread backs me up and calls
you out for the liar you are regarding this entire conversation.
It's all right here in this very thread. You denying David asking
you to do something for him, twice.

You trying to blame your lie on a bogus reading comprehension issue
you want so much for me to be diagnosed with; so that we have
something in common; that's how desperate you are to be accepted by
those with far more knowledge than yourself. You really are, that
pathetic. Especially in this case, lying your arse off as you're
continuing to duck and dodge around the apology you owe me.

Anything to avoid admission of your mistakes. The delays you've
provided say a ****load about you and those who are responsible for
raising you. They did a **** poor job of things, clearly, a ****
poor job of things.


Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect
you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a
mistake here? Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've
continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?

Just how dishonest are you, snit? It's a rhetorical question,
simplesnit. I have a very good idea how dishonest you actually are
now. Willing to lie about the smallest of things doesn't bestow
much trust in you. And despite your claims to the contrary, you did
infact LIE on me again when you claimed I wrote a direct lie about
what David and yourself have been doing. I didn't.

You flat out, straight up, lied your ass off here. As you're more
than willing to lie about this, what else would you lie about with
ease? Oh yes, a phone log. You'd go so far to complete the lie that
you'd dr the evidence to support it. It's really No different than
what you're doing with your replies in this thread.

Remember, I already acknowledged he pointed me to a couple web
searches to see if your number was there

So, there's no question about then, you knew you were lying as you wrote this:

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

You straight up knew for a fact prior to you having writing that
reply that it was a lie; and you went and wrote it anyway. Why do
you make the decision to intentionally be as dishonest as you are?


AFTER YOU TOLD HIM I HAD YOUR NUMBER.

You made it perfectly clear to him you had an alternate way of
reaching me. And I suspect you knew David likes to read between the
lines, so you left him a large line to follow.

Ahh, so when you wrote this:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

You were fully aware of the fact you were lying the entire time,
that I didn't write a direct lie as you claimed, nor did I write an
indirect lie. I didn't lie at all, by your own admission; you did
and you're trying to avoid taking responsibility for what you wrote,
yet again.

Remember, I did not even mention that, nor even tell him or anyone
in any group you are spamming that you called me.

Snit, I already explained what you did, by accident that one
particular case. You chose to ignore what I told you, but that
doesn't make what I told you about this go away or cease to exist.
It simply means, as with other things, you chose to ignore it and
play stupid. Only, the more I interact with you, the less likely I
find it to be that you're playing.

Please TRY to understand what you read...

I understand what I read just fine. There's no way in which for me to have misunderstood this:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

At no time was it ever a direct, or indirect for that matter lie
from me. He did infact do such things, and you just recently
admitted to knowing about it before you wrote the post accusing me
of lying about it. There's no reading issue here, no
misunderstanding. What happened is quite simple, you lied your ass
off (again) about me, with NOTHING to support what you claim
happened.

But there is evidence which supports what I said you and David have
done: As well as your own admission that He'd already asked for your
help by the time you got around to writing the lie you did again
about me. What's funny is that you actually think you can get away
with it.

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.

Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about:

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.

Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G

Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect
you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a
mistake here? Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've
continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?

Just how dishonest are you, snit?

You are not the victim you think you are.

I'm not claiming to be any such thing. Continued attempts to avoid
and project have been noted though.


--
Useless Invention: Blinker Fluid.

On 23/08/2020 05:32, Gremlin wrote:
Snit, isn't that exactly what David asked you to do for him? And
isn't that what you've been doing for him? Why yes, yes it is. So,
how and in what possible way was I lying about this, Snit?

What you completely failed to understand is that Snit wasn't doing
ANYTHING for *me*.

I don't NEED anything, Dustin. My fiend in the States tracked you down
in real life and sent me full details of your address in Kingsport. I've
shown it to Snit, but not published it 'in the clear' so to speak.

I was trying to help Snit locate purported business premises for which
he has a telephone number - given to him by you.

I suspect Snit is now thinking that you are a complete and utter fraud.

*You run away from the truth*, Dustin J. Cook!

Man up, for once in your miserable life.

On Aug 22, 2020 at 3:08:19 PM MST, "Snit"
wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 2:36:00 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.

If you could understand what you read you would have known I have
been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he
pointed to.

What's to misunderstand by this?

....

You really fail to understand everything you read. Remember, I already
acknowledged he pointed me to a couple web searches to see if your number was
there -- AFTER YOU TOLD HIM I HAD YOUR NUMBER.

Remember, I did not even mention that, nor even tell him or anyone in any
group you are spamming that you called me.

Please TRY to understand what you read... and TRY to understand at least the
basics of your phone system and how to troubleshoot / test it. PLEASE!

You are not the victim you think you are.


I was planning on doing you the favor of responding to anything dealing with
TECH you responded with and ignoring the rest. You know, helping you to learn
how to focus on important things and not your victim mentality.

But you ONLY focused on your victim mentality. NOTHING else.

I sincerely feel bad for you. Seriously, read the above and this time try to
understand it. When you do, maybe, you will be able too move forward in your
life.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.