What If All the World Ran Linux?

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...html?tk=hp_pop

Enjoy and *learn*.

--
Alias

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:58:51 +0100, Alias
wrote:

Enjoy and *learn*.

I wouldn't want to be ya in your pipe dream.

--
posted with a Droid

Am Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:29:59 -0500 schrieb Big Steel:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:58:51 +0100, Alias
wrote:

Enjoy and *learn*.

I wouldn't want to be ya in your pipe dream.

LOL alias in yet another narcotic stupor. Recently he was accusing Frank
of executing a DDos attack on some crapy linsux distro because he
couldn't ping their server rofl

On 12/23/2010 01:49 PM, You must be wrote:
Am Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:29:59 -0500 schrieb Big Steel:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:58:51 +0100, Alias
wrote:

Enjoy and *learn*.

I wouldn't want to be ya in your pipe dream.

LOL alias in yet another narcotic stupor. Recently he was accusing Frank
of executing a DDos attack on some crapy linsux distro because he
couldn't ping their server rofl

Um, no I wasn't. That was an impostor. It's too bad for you that you're
too stupid to look at headers. Besides, everyone knows that Frank isn't
capable of such a thing except when his wife wants service.

--
Alias

Alias wrote:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...html?tk=hp_pop


Enjoy and *learn*.

It does.


--
LSMFT

Simple job, assist the assistant of the physicist.

On 12/23/2010 8:22 AM, Alias wrote:

snipped the babble

It's too bad that someone has you down to the 't'.

Se ya I wouldn't want to be ya.

Am Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:09:33 -0500 schrieb Steel:

On 12/23/2010 8:22 AM, Alias wrote:

snipped the babble

It's too bad that someone has you down to the 't'.

Se ya I wouldn't want to be ya.

LOL now alias is claiming it wasn't him who had a hissy fit cause his
bull**** linsux distro failed to pay their phone bill. ROFL but everybody
knows it was him.

On 23/12/2010 09:58, Alias wrote:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...html?tk=hp_pop


Enjoy and *learn*.



Nice woman!

However, her analysis of better security on Linux seems to depend
entirely on "default user permissions". She even states quite strongly
that that also limits the potential effects of malware as email attachments.
And all that together would create securer systems and thereby reduce
the currently vast AV market.

I doubt it very, very much.

Ed

On 12/23/2010 9:25 AM, You must be wrote:
Am Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:09:33 -0500 schrieb Steel:

On 12/23/2010 8:22 AM, Alias wrote:

snipped the babble

It's too bad that someone has you down to the 't'.

Se ya I wouldn't want to be ya.

LOL now alias is claiming it wasn't him who had a hissy fit cause his
bull**** linsux distro failed to pay their phone bill. ROFL but everybody
knows it was him.

After looking at the headers of the Alias posts in this thread, either
someone is doing a hell of an impersonation or both posts were made by
the same poster, Alias.

On 12/23/2010 03:32 PM, Ed Cryer wrote:
On 23/12/2010 09:58, Alias wrote:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...html?tk=hp_pop



Enjoy and *learn*.



Nice woman!

However, her analysis of better security on Linux seems to depend
entirely on "default user permissions". She even states quite strongly
that that also limits the potential effects of malware as email
attachments.
And all that together would create securer systems and thereby reduce
the currently vast AV market.

I doubt it very, very much.

Ed


Yet there isn't one single malware or virus in the wild for Linux. All
the so-called exploits need physical access to the machine. When they
had a contest for hackers, they hacked Apple and Windows in minutes.
They couldn't hack Ubuntu. Me thinks you know not of what you speak but
insist on speaking anyway.

--
Alias

On 12/23/2010 10:39 AM, Alias wrote:

snipped Alias babble

yawn

No one cares what you think.

On 12/23/2010 5:22 AM, Alias wrote:
On 12/23/2010 01:49 PM, You must be wrote:
Am Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:29:59 -0500 schrieb Big Steel:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:58:51 +0100, Alias
wrote:

Enjoy and *learn*.

I wouldn't want to be ya in your pipe dream.

LOL alias in yet another narcotic stupor. Recently he was accusing Frank
of executing a DDos attack on some crapy linsux distro because he
couldn't ping their server rofl

Um, no I wasn't. That was an impostor. It's too bad for you that you're
too stupid to look at headers. Besides, everyone knows that Frank isn't
capable of such a thing except when his wife wants service.

Whats wrong sheep-****er...does babba, your male sheep lover have
another headache?...LOL!

On 12/23/2010 7:39 AM, Alias wrote:
On 12/23/2010 03:32 PM, Ed Cryer wrote:
On 23/12/2010 09:58, Alias wrote:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...html?tk=hp_pop




Enjoy and *learn*.



Nice woman!

However, her analysis of better security on Linux seems to depend
entirely on "default user permissions". She even states quite strongly
that that also limits the potential effects of malware as email
attachments.
And all that together would create securer systems and thereby reduce
the currently vast AV market.

I doubt it very, very much.

Ed


Yet there isn't one single malware or virus in the wild for Linux.

You wouldn't know if there was one! You're nothing but an incompetent,
arrogant, ignorant POS lying linturd loser. A real asshole creep.

All
the so-called exploits need physical access to the machine. When they
had a contest for hackers, they hacked Apple and Windows in minutes.
They couldn't hack Ubuntu.

They didn't give a **** about that useless toy POS os for losers.

Me thinks you know not of what you speak but
insist on speaking anyway.

Now you're projecting again, you bigoted POS.
Get lost asshole and shove your linux up your ass. I'm sure you'd enjoy
every seconds of it.

"Alias" schreef in bericht
...
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...html?tk=hp_pop

Enjoy and *learn*.

What stupid OS will have so much losers and society rejects using it?
Only Linux.
What OS has so much cryptic and lame assed names and files that tells how
sexually deprived its lusers are (clue: PIMP)?
Only Linux.
What stupid OS will gather so much retards/losers/society rejects/metally
challenged asswipes here like Peter Kohlmann, Terry Porter, chrisv, Tattoo
****licker, ...er, Vampire, ...er Don Zeigler, the "7" ass slurper,
HPT-nymshifter, La-de-dah poofter boi Marti van Lin, Alias the idiot?
Only Linux.
What stupid OS is full of security holes but its lusers think that they are
safe?
Only Linux
What stupid OS has no real value that its advocates can use to advocate it,
but instead they decide to attack microsoft and bitch about them?
Only Linux.
What stupid OS has not introduced anything unique or innovated from the day
it started?
Only Linux.
What stupid OS is proven to be a failure despite all the noise and hype of
its lusers and gimps?
Only Linux.
What stupid OS is used by teenagers with penis envy that program viruses to
bring down Windows and yet fail?
Only Linux.
What stupid OS has the most ignorant user base that know nothing about other
popular OSes out there?
Only Linux.
What stupid OS still has no photoshop port?
Only linux.
What stupid OS has so many "advocates" that use Windows every day to earn a
living?
Only linux.

--
Alias

On 12/24/2010 03:01 PM, Clog__wog (®) wrote:
"Alias" schreef in bericht
...
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...html?tk=hp_pop


Enjoy and *learn*.

What stupid OS will have so much losers and society rejects using it?

Windows Me and Windows Vista.

Only Linux.

False.

What OS has so much cryptic and lame assed names and files that tells
how sexually deprived its lusers are (clue: PIMP)?

All Windows versions have cmd. Do you know what that is?

Only Linux.

I haven't used a command line in Linux for *years*.

What stupid OS will gather so much retards/losers/society
rejects/metally challenged asswipes here like Peter Kohlmann, Terry
Porter, chrisv, Tattoo ****licker, ...er, Vampire, ...er Don Zeigler,
the "7" ass slurper, HPT-nymshifter, La-de-dah poofter boi Marti van
Lin, Alias the idiot?

Considering I am far more educated, intelligent and worldly compared to
you, you were saying?

Only Linux.

ALL the super computers run Linux. Most servers, including Google, run
Linux. You don't know what you're talking about.

What stupid OS is full of security holes but its lusers think that they
are safe?

Windows.

Only Linux

False.

What stupid OS has no real value that its advocates can use to advocate
it, but instead they decide to attack microsoft and bitch about them?
Only Linux.

False.

What stupid OS has not introduced anything unique or innovated from the
day it started?
Only Windows.
What stupid OS is proven to be a failure despite all the noise and hype
of its lusers and gimps?
Only Windows.
What stupid OS is used by teenagers with penis envy that program viruses
to bring down Windows and yet fail?
Only Linux.

False.

What stupid OS has the most ignorant user base that know nothing about
other popular OSes out there?
Only Linux.

False.

What stupid OS still has no photoshop port?
Only linux.

Try GIMP once you've graduated from high school.

What stupid OS has so many "advocates" that use Windows every day to
earn a living?
Only linux.

No one I know of does that but you're a known liar.


--
Alias