A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Performance and Maintainance of XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

XP slowdown



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old March 9th 09, 05:43 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Johnny Fosse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default XP slowdown

"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote:

I said I made an error a few posts ago. That's all you're getting out
of me. Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. Guess
what Gerry: You've got nothing to teach me. I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: flip you and the horse you rode in on.


You forgot that cutesy "Esq." sig, you overstuffed shirt/buffoon.

Ads
  #47  
Old March 9th 09, 05:43 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Johnny Fosse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default XP slowdown

"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote:

I said I made an error a few posts ago. That's all you're getting out
of me. Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. Guess
what Gerry: You've got nothing to teach me. I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: flip you and the horse you rode in on.


You forgot that cutesy "Esq." sig, you overstuffed shirt/buffoon.

  #48  
Old March 9th 09, 06:03 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Bent Attorney Esq.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default XP slowdown

On Mar 9, 12:35*pm, "Olórin"
wrote:
"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in ...

snip

I said I made an error a few posts ago. *That's all you're getting out
of me. *Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. *Guess
what Gerry: *You've got nothing to teach me. *I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. *Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. *In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: *flip you and the horse you rode in on.


I would like to wish you good luck sorting out your problem on your own
now - but I'm not going to. I hope you flounder to the full degree you
deserve for being such an appallingly rude ****.

I'm working from a new PC; I didn't bother trying to import my killfile
entries from my last one, but you're now the first there.

*plonk*


I've sped up my computer quite a bit. Cleaned out unneccessasssry
files. Cleaned out my registry. And am going to get rid of quite a
bit more crap. Sorry you were unable to help. Hope you don't feel
useless or anything. Also, mr. anal retentive: there are errors in
my posting. Could you please figure them out and get back to me.
Thanks.
  #49  
Old March 9th 09, 06:04 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Bent Attorney Esq.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default XP slowdown

On Mar 9, 12:43*pm, Johnny Fosse wrote:
"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote:

I said I made an error a few posts ago. *That's all you're getting out
of me. *Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. *Guess
what Gerry: *You've got nothing to teach me. *I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. *Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. *In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: *flip you and the horse you rode in on.


You forgot that cutesy "Esq." sig, you overstuffed shirt/buffoon.


Are you any relation to Bob Fosse? He was a speed freak too.
  #50  
Old March 9th 09, 06:04 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Bent Attorney Esq.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default XP slowdown

On Mar 9, 12:43*pm, Johnny Fosse wrote:
"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote:

I said I made an error a few posts ago. *That's all you're getting out
of me. *Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. *Guess
what Gerry: *You've got nothing to teach me. *I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. *Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. *In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: *flip you and the horse you rode in on.


You forgot that cutesy "Esq." sig, you overstuffed shirt/buffoon.


Are you any relation to Bob Fosse? He was a speed freak too.
  #51  
Old March 9th 09, 07:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Gerry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,437
Default XP slowdown

Bent

How to win friends and influence people!

--


Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in message
...
On Mar 9, 11:47 am, "Gerry" wrote:
Bent

This dialogue about hijacking has got out of hand. The reason for starting
a
new thread is to avoid confusion as, although users frequently think they
have the same problem, it is often not the case. Starting a new thread
makes
for clarity helping those to understand the problem and the answers to
questions posed. If you just said sorry for the misunderstand the other
normally helpful individuals would stop pursuing the point.


I said I made an error a few posts ago. That's all you're getting out
of me. Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. Guess
what Gerry: You've got nothing to teach me. I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: flip you and the horse you rode in on.

Otherwise you have not responding to my questions about your problem.

--

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in
...
On Mar 9, 6:23 am, "Olórin"
wrote:



snip


(BAE, in the future, please start your *own* thread. Thank you.)


OK. I didn't realize I was breaching etiquette. Subject line
related to my problem so...


What do you think "hijacking someone else's thread" means?


You of course are using the word 'hijacking' incorrectly. To hijack
something means that there was intent to steal something; i.e. an
aircraft comes to mind. You can't innocently hijack something without
without there being the intention of theft.
snip
==========


Nope. It *can* mean that but doesn't have to. For instance:


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/hijack, meaning (c): "To seize control
of
... by use of force, especially in order to reach an alternate
destination."


Theft.

http://www.alphadictionary.com/goodword/word/hijack, meaning (2): "To
illegally take control of a transport vessel or vehicle and divert it to
a
different destination." The site also notes: "The meaning of today's
word
has been changing recently... it also applies to a wide assortment of
metaphors, "The conversation was pleasantly random until Stu deBaker and
Ford Parker came in and hijacked it; after that, the only topic
discussed
was cars.""


You have not proven that I intended to hijack anything. Intent must
be involved. If you go by your new and improved version of the word,
then you must understand that the idiots(that includes you btw, just
in case you're too dense to understand) that accused me of hijacking
this thread(which btw I never did; look at the subject of the thread;
what does it say?)did in fact hijack this thread; the subject was 'XP
Slowdown'. I responded positively to this thread. There was no
hijacking. Then the anal crowd came in, listened to themselves roar
and scurried away like the mice they are.
So we have here a thread that has morphed from concerning itself with
'XP Slowdown' to a thread that has been hijacked by the imbeciles who
live among us; hijacked into a thread that is concerned with hijacking
a thread. Please note that I wear special sunglasses; much in the
same way that Roddy Piper wore in the movie 'They Live.' It lets me
see who the green lizard people are very clearly. You obviously
intended to disrupt this thread and have of course succeeded by
hijackery. You are clearly visible and out in the open. My glasses
have seen to that. Next: You're going to bring up grammar and
spehlink. I purposely made 5 basic errors; let's see if you can find
them.
I'm waiting.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hijack, meaning (b): "to
commandeer (a flying airplane) especially by coercing the pilot at
gunpoint"


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hijack, meaning (3): "to
seize...
by force or threat of force"


http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/hijack?view=uk:"1 illegally seize
control of (an aircraft, ship, etc.) while it is in transit. 2 take over
(something) and use it for a different purpose.


Someone can be wrong; fine. But when they aren't, and someone (you,
here)
tries to correct them but are themselves wrong (and furthermore isn't
familiar with well-understood "local jargon"), I have to wade in!



  #52  
Old March 9th 09, 07:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Gerry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,437
Default XP slowdown

Bent

How to win friends and influence people!

--


Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in message
...
On Mar 9, 11:47 am, "Gerry" wrote:
Bent

This dialogue about hijacking has got out of hand. The reason for starting
a
new thread is to avoid confusion as, although users frequently think they
have the same problem, it is often not the case. Starting a new thread
makes
for clarity helping those to understand the problem and the answers to
questions posed. If you just said sorry for the misunderstand the other
normally helpful individuals would stop pursuing the point.


I said I made an error a few posts ago. That's all you're getting out
of me. Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. Guess
what Gerry: You've got nothing to teach me. I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: flip you and the horse you rode in on.

Otherwise you have not responding to my questions about your problem.

--

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in
...
On Mar 9, 6:23 am, "Olórin"
wrote:



snip


(BAE, in the future, please start your *own* thread. Thank you.)


OK. I didn't realize I was breaching etiquette. Subject line
related to my problem so...


What do you think "hijacking someone else's thread" means?


You of course are using the word 'hijacking' incorrectly. To hijack
something means that there was intent to steal something; i.e. an
aircraft comes to mind. You can't innocently hijack something without
without there being the intention of theft.
snip
==========


Nope. It *can* mean that but doesn't have to. For instance:


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/hijack, meaning (c): "To seize control
of
... by use of force, especially in order to reach an alternate
destination."


Theft.

http://www.alphadictionary.com/goodword/word/hijack, meaning (2): "To
illegally take control of a transport vessel or vehicle and divert it to
a
different destination." The site also notes: "The meaning of today's
word
has been changing recently... it also applies to a wide assortment of
metaphors, "The conversation was pleasantly random until Stu deBaker and
Ford Parker came in and hijacked it; after that, the only topic
discussed
was cars.""


You have not proven that I intended to hijack anything. Intent must
be involved. If you go by your new and improved version of the word,
then you must understand that the idiots(that includes you btw, just
in case you're too dense to understand) that accused me of hijacking
this thread(which btw I never did; look at the subject of the thread;
what does it say?)did in fact hijack this thread; the subject was 'XP
Slowdown'. I responded positively to this thread. There was no
hijacking. Then the anal crowd came in, listened to themselves roar
and scurried away like the mice they are.
So we have here a thread that has morphed from concerning itself with
'XP Slowdown' to a thread that has been hijacked by the imbeciles who
live among us; hijacked into a thread that is concerned with hijacking
a thread. Please note that I wear special sunglasses; much in the
same way that Roddy Piper wore in the movie 'They Live.' It lets me
see who the green lizard people are very clearly. You obviously
intended to disrupt this thread and have of course succeeded by
hijackery. You are clearly visible and out in the open. My glasses
have seen to that. Next: You're going to bring up grammar and
spehlink. I purposely made 5 basic errors; let's see if you can find
them.
I'm waiting.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hijack, meaning (b): "to
commandeer (a flying airplane) especially by coercing the pilot at
gunpoint"


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hijack, meaning (3): "to
seize...
by force or threat of force"


http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/hijack?view=uk:"1 illegally seize
control of (an aircraft, ship, etc.) while it is in transit. 2 take over
(something) and use it for a different purpose.


Someone can be wrong; fine. But when they aren't, and someone (you,
here)
tries to correct them but are themselves wrong (and furthermore isn't
familiar with well-understood "local jargon"), I have to wade in!



  #53  
Old March 9th 09, 08:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Bent Attorney Esq.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default XP slowdown

On Mar 9, 2:46*pm, "Gerry" wrote:
Bent

How to win friends and influence people!


I need your friendship like I need a bag on my hip.


--

Gerry
*~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in ...
On Mar 9, 11:47 am, "Gerry" wrote:

Bent


This dialogue about hijacking has got out of hand. The reason for starting
a
new thread is to avoid confusion as, although users frequently think they
have the same problem, it is often not the case. Starting a new thread
makes
for clarity helping those to understand the problem and the answers to
questions posed. If you just said sorry for the misunderstand the other
normally helpful individuals would stop pursuing the point.


I said I made an error a few posts ago. *That's all you're getting out
of me. *Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. *Guess
what Gerry: *You've got nothing to teach me. *I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. *Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. *In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: *flip you and the horse you rode in on.

Otherwise you have not responding to my questions about your problem.


--


Hope this helps.


Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in
...
On Mar 9, 6:23 am, "Olórin"
wrote:


snip


(BAE, in the future, please start your *own* thread. Thank you.)


OK. I didn't realize I was breaching etiquette. Subject line
related to my problem so...


What do you think "hijacking someone else's thread" means?


You of course are using the word 'hijacking' incorrectly. To hijack
something means that there was intent to steal something; i.e. an
aircraft comes to mind. You can't innocently hijack something without
without there being the intention of theft.
snip
==========


Nope. It *can* mean that but doesn't have to. For instance:


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/hijack, meaning (c): "To seize control
of
... by use of force, especially in order to reach an alternate
destination."


Theft.


http://www.alphadictionary.com/goodword/word/hijack, meaning (2): "To
illegally take control of a transport vessel or vehicle and divert it to
a
different destination." The site also notes: "The meaning of today's
word
has been changing recently... it also applies to a wide assortment of
metaphors, "The conversation was pleasantly random until Stu deBaker and
Ford Parker came in and hijacked it; after that, the only topic
discussed
was cars.""


You have not proven that I intended to hijack anything. Intent must
be involved. If you go by your new and improved version of the word,
then you must understand that the idiots(that includes you btw, just
in case you're too dense to understand) that accused me of hijacking
this thread(which btw I never did; look at the subject of the thread;
what does it say?)did in fact hijack this thread; the subject was 'XP
Slowdown'. I responded positively to this thread. There was no
hijacking. Then the anal crowd came in, listened to themselves roar
and scurried away like the mice they are.
So we have here a thread that has morphed from concerning itself with
'XP Slowdown' to a thread that has been hijacked by the imbeciles who
live among us; hijacked into a thread that is concerned with hijacking
a thread. Please note that I wear special sunglasses; much in the
same way that Roddy Piper wore in the movie 'They Live.' It lets me
see who the green lizard people are very clearly. You obviously
intended to disrupt this thread and have of course succeeded by
hijackery. You are clearly visible and out in the open. My glasses
have seen to that. Next: You're going to bring up grammar and
spehlink. I purposely made 5 basic errors; let's see if you can find
them.
I'm waiting.


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hijack, meaning (b): "to
commandeer (a flying airplane) especially by coercing the pilot at
gunpoint"


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hijack, meaning (3): "to
seize...
by force or threat of force"


http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/hijack?view=uk:"1 illegally seize
control of (an aircraft, ship, etc.) while it is in transit. 2 take over
(something) and use it for a different purpose.


Someone can be wrong; fine. But when they aren't, and someone (you,
here)
tries to correct them but are themselves wrong (and furthermore isn't
familiar with well-understood "local jargon"), I have to wade in!


  #54  
Old March 9th 09, 08:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Bent Attorney Esq.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default XP slowdown

On Mar 9, 2:46*pm, "Gerry" wrote:
Bent

How to win friends and influence people!


I need your friendship like I need a bag on my hip.


--

Gerry
*~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in ...
On Mar 9, 11:47 am, "Gerry" wrote:

Bent


This dialogue about hijacking has got out of hand. The reason for starting
a
new thread is to avoid confusion as, although users frequently think they
have the same problem, it is often not the case. Starting a new thread
makes
for clarity helping those to understand the problem and the answers to
questions posed. If you just said sorry for the misunderstand the other
normally helpful individuals would stop pursuing the point.


I said I made an error a few posts ago. *That's all you're getting out
of me. *Now you are getting on the hijacking bandwagon as well. *Guess
what Gerry: *You've got nothing to teach me. *I've learned much on my
own in the past couple of days. *Beats posting to the deadbeat
(including you)pseudo helpers here. *In case you didn't get the gist
of this post it is this: *flip you and the horse you rode in on.

Otherwise you have not responding to my questions about your problem.


--


Hope this helps.


Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"Bent Attorney Esq." wrote in
...
On Mar 9, 6:23 am, "Olórin"
wrote:


snip


(BAE, in the future, please start your *own* thread. Thank you.)


OK. I didn't realize I was breaching etiquette. Subject line
related to my problem so...


What do you think "hijacking someone else's thread" means?


You of course are using the word 'hijacking' incorrectly. To hijack
something means that there was intent to steal something; i.e. an
aircraft comes to mind. You can't innocently hijack something without
without there being the intention of theft.
snip
==========


Nope. It *can* mean that but doesn't have to. For instance:


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/hijack, meaning (c): "To seize control
of
... by use of force, especially in order to reach an alternate
destination."


Theft.


http://www.alphadictionary.com/goodword/word/hijack, meaning (2): "To
illegally take control of a transport vessel or vehicle and divert it to
a
different destination." The site also notes: "The meaning of today's
word
has been changing recently... it also applies to a wide assortment of
metaphors, "The conversation was pleasantly random until Stu deBaker and
Ford Parker came in and hijacked it; after that, the only topic
discussed
was cars.""


You have not proven that I intended to hijack anything. Intent must
be involved. If you go by your new and improved version of the word,
then you must understand that the idiots(that includes you btw, just
in case you're too dense to understand) that accused me of hijacking
this thread(which btw I never did; look at the subject of the thread;
what does it say?)did in fact hijack this thread; the subject was 'XP
Slowdown'. I responded positively to this thread. There was no
hijacking. Then the anal crowd came in, listened to themselves roar
and scurried away like the mice they are.
So we have here a thread that has morphed from concerning itself with
'XP Slowdown' to a thread that has been hijacked by the imbeciles who
live among us; hijacked into a thread that is concerned with hijacking
a thread. Please note that I wear special sunglasses; much in the
same way that Roddy Piper wore in the movie 'They Live.' It lets me
see who the green lizard people are very clearly. You obviously
intended to disrupt this thread and have of course succeeded by
hijackery. You are clearly visible and out in the open. My glasses
have seen to that. Next: You're going to bring up grammar and
spehlink. I purposely made 5 basic errors; let's see if you can find
them.
I'm waiting.


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hijack, meaning (b): "to
commandeer (a flying airplane) especially by coercing the pilot at
gunpoint"


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hijack, meaning (3): "to
seize...
by force or threat of force"


http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/hijack?view=uk:"1 illegally seize
control of (an aircraft, ship, etc.) while it is in transit. 2 take over
(something) and use it for a different purpose.


Someone can be wrong; fine. But when they aren't, and someone (you,
here)
tries to correct them but are themselves wrong (and furthermore isn't
familiar with well-understood "local jargon"), I have to wade in!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.