If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
David doesn't want you to read those emails
"David B." "David
Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:49:17 GMT in alt.comp.os.windows-10, wrote: On 13/12/2018 21:33, Diesel (Dustin!) MALWARE SPECIALIST is fishing! "David B." "David news:QgrQD.13$4L7.10 @fx10.fr7 Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:21:19 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: Updated as he didn't take heed: https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ by didn't take heed, you meant to write, I didn't remove this completely true signature warning people about you: Reference: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/david.txt Has that link been deliberately infected with malware? *Can you be sure*? Think about it! He's an American using a British website host. The owner of that website is now the employee of Malwarebytes who is responsible for their own inbuilt 'Hosts' file. I've always smelt a rat about that! Any ideas as to why the long-established MVP Hosts file wasn't satisfactory? https://blogs.msmvps.com/hostsnews/ Things don't seem to be going so well for you huh? Desperate for people not to visit that url and see for themselves that what I've written about you the entire time, is ALL TRUE, eh? Do you really think you can keep hiding the fact you're a stalker? You threatened to blackmail me with a facebook page, then a blog. You appear to have settled on the blog, but, the contents are mostly, made up garbage. It's clear the 'blog' is nothing more than a site setup for 'revenge' purposes by you, because after dealing with you, and putting up with multiple doxing efforts by you, I was able to determine who you really are and where you actually do reside; and I've elected to share that information for anyone else who's had the misfortune of being harassed and/or stalked by you. You're no longer an anonymous person who's able to hit and run. -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): , |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
David is more than happy for you to read those emails!
On 14/12/2018 07:31, Diesel sounds defeated now. :-(
You're no longer an anonymous person who's able to hit and run. Dearest Dustin It is *YOU* who is no longer anonymous and able to hit and run. :-D I have never _really_ tried to hide! ;-) THIS, btw, is ALL correct information: https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ It is true that you were employed by Malwarebtes in the early days; that is why your name is printed for all to see on the product logo - around 2008. Now HERE's a post that shows your real colours, Dustin (Diesel) http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154477704700 Here's a thread some folk might like to read - it'a all about Malwarebytes on an Apple machine! https://discussions.apple.com/thread...6645022&page=1 And HERE is a post I made to Marcin! 12/10/2014 Hi Marcin :-) You may, or may not, be aware that I have been a long-term antagonist of Mr Dustin J Cook from Kingsport, Tennessee. I've even kept a piccie of when his name was 'up in lights' on your early MBAM product - https://www.dropbox.com/s/v8qhlhj5f7...copy.tiff?dl=0 I have no idea of WHY you 'let him go' (although I would LIKE to know!) but I thought you might be interested to review the recent comments about your firm which he has made on Usenet. Here is the relevant Message 33.145 You may get there easily by following this link: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi...254.233.145%3E Here's an extract of what Dustin said:- When I did a malwarebytes database file update yesterday on a clients machine, it was 10megabytes in size. This is completely unacceptable considering what's actually in the file. It's 10 megabytes compressed at that! Antivirus engines which can scan millions more, use superior technology; can actually allow the program to think it's running via emulation (Malwarebytes technology is years away from this; based on what I know of it's staff) don't need a 10+ meg compressed data file in order to do it. Malwarebytes isn't as professional under the hood as you and thousands of others seem to think it is. It has some neat stuff, but it has alot of **** simple things too. The program sometimes gets credit it does not deserve. It can't even handle polymorphic files, even if their trojan based and non viral. You could easily generate 10,000+ malware programs which would all do the same thing and be confident, the technology available in v1.x and v2.x wouldn't be able to detect you in nearly ALL cases. Even if you sent them samples. = I've read much about you, Marcin, and your determined efforts to conquer malware. I feel it unfair that one of your apparently disgruntled ex-employees should be maligning your product in this way without you being made aware of it. Please don't shoot ME - I'm just the messenger! ;-) With kind regards, David B. -- HTH :-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
David is more than happy for you to read those emails!
wotsit David B. sed...
Please don't shoot ME - I'm just the messenger! ;-) If only someone would. You're a boring ****. **** off and die. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
David is more than happy for you to read those emails!
"David B." "David
Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:03:05 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: On 14/12/2018 07:31, Diesel sounds defeated now. :-( You're no longer an anonymous person who's able to hit and run. Dearest Dustin It is *YOU* who is no longer anonymous and able to hit and run. :-D I've made no effort to be anonymous in over two decades David. Didn't participate in hit and run activities when I was, either. I was in your face about it, actually. I have never _really_ tried to hide! ;-) Actually, you have. You applied for and had your address information removed from a certain cdrom database collection which is freely given to locals in your area. I had to go back a ways to acquire an iso of one that wasn't 'updated' via censoring efforts you requested. I suspect you had your information removed from it because you'd already ****ed off someone else and were concerned they'd figure out how to get in touch with you to discuss it in greater detail. THIS, btw, is ALL correct information: https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ Actually, it isn't. I went thru your comments previously demonstrating how they aren't accurate. Remember? I provided a fresh url to our email correspondence to backup the statements I wrote, discounting nearly all of the comments you've left on your blog. It is true that you were employed by Malwarebtes in the early days; that is why your name is printed for all to see on the product logo - around 2008. It's also true that they sought me out with a job offer, that I didn't apply to work for them, and wasn't even aware they were hiring. Now HERE's a post that shows your real colours, Dustin (Diesel) http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154477704700 My real colors? Oh, you mean my valid and verified as true comments concerning Malwarebytes, or my attitude towards obnoxious drunks? Incidently David, Neither the malwarebytes engine or the database has anything which can do a single thing with an actual virus. Despite their claims and West coast labs certifications, they do not scan for, remove, detect, etc any actual viruses. Malwarebytes is and has always been a trojan scanner. It doesn't have the codebase or the people to deal with self replicating malware of the viral kind. And despite their marketing claims, they are NOT a replacement for your antivirus. Here's a thread some folk might like to read - it'a all about Malwarebytes on an Apple machine! That's nice. You realize the Malwarebytes for the Mac is a rebranded product that Malwarebytes bought right? And HERE is a post I made to Marcin! 12/10/2014 Hi Marcin :-) You may, or may not, be aware that I have been a long-term antagonist of Mr Dustin J Cook from Kingsport, Tennessee. I've even kept a piccie of when his name was 'up in lights' on your early MBAM product - https://www.dropbox.com/s/v8qhlhj5f7...ok%20-%20Malwa rebytes%20copy.tiff?dl=0 Admission that you've been a long term stalker and slimey *******, noted. Here's an extract of what Dustin said:- When I did a malwarebytes database file update yesterday on a clients machine, it was 10megabytes in size. This is completely unacceptable considering what's actually in the file. It's 10 megabytes compressed at that! Antivirus engines which can scan millions more, use superior technology; can actually allow the program to think it's running via emulation (Malwarebytes technology is years away from this; based on what I know of it's staff) don't need a 10+ meg compressed data file in order to do it. Malwarebytes isn't as professional under the hood as you and thousands of others seem to think it is. It has some neat stuff, but it has alot of **** simple things too. The program sometimes gets credit it does not deserve. It can't even handle polymorphic files, even if their trojan based and non viral. You could easily generate 10,000+ malware programs which would all do the same thing and be confident, the technology available in v1.x and v2.x wouldn't be able to detect you in nearly ALL cases. Even if you sent them samples. = I've read much about you, Marcin, and your determined efforts to conquer malware. I feel it unfair that one of your apparently disgruntled ex-employees should be maligning your product in this way without you being made aware of it. Btw, I'm not the only person who took Malwarebytes to task, David. https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/go...bytes-kicking/ https://finance.yahoo.com/news/googl...220217984.html https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-...id=714&redir=1 The third link contains even more technical detail concerning the problems with the underlying code, database design, etc. Everything I warned people about, that you felt necessary to whine to Marcin to. They reached the same conclusions as myself via their own independent research. And, unlike myself, they cut full loose and left nothing hidden. Quite a disection on the third url. And it ALL AGREES with what I wrote about the programs problems at the time. -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): , |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
David is more than happy for you to read those emails!
On 14/12/2018 20:30, Diesel wrote:
"David B." "David Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:03:05 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: On 14/12/2018 07:31, Diesel sounds defeated now. :-( You're no longer an anonymous person who's able to hit and run. Dearest Dustin It is *YOU* who is no longer anonymous and able to hit and run. :-D I've made no effort to be anonymous in over two decades David. Didn't participate in hit and run activities when I was, either. I was in your face about it, actually. I have never _really_ tried to hide! ;-) Actually, you have. You applied for and had your address information removed from a certain cdrom database collection which is freely given to locals in your area. I had to go back a ways to acquire an iso of one that wasn't 'updated' via censoring efforts you requested. I suspect you had your information removed from it because you'd already ****ed off someone else and were concerned they'd figure out how to get in touch with you to discuss it in greater detail. Now you are confessing to being a STALKER, Dustin? THIS, btw, is ALL correct information: https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ Actually, it isn't. I went thru your comments previously demonstrating how they aren't accurate. Remember? I provided a fresh url to our email correspondence to backup the statements I wrote, discounting nearly all of the comments you've left on your blog. Reply on my Blog to anything you believe isn't correct. It is true that you were employed by Malwarebtes in the early days; that is why your name is printed for all to see on the product logo - around 2008. It's also true that they sought me out with a job offer, that I didn't apply to work for them, and wasn't even aware they were hiring. Agreed. Now HERE's a post that shows your real colours, Dustin (Diesel) http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154477704700 My real colors? Oh, you mean my valid and verified as true comments concerning Malwarebytes, or my attitude towards obnoxious drunks? I mean your callous and demeaning responses to folk on Usenet for twenty years or so. The Anontard, as you fefer to her, has publishd dozens of examples for folk to read. They are on-line for posterity and will be around to haunt you for ever, Incidently David, Neither the malwarebytes engine or the database has anything which can do a single thing with an actual virus. Despite their claims and West coast labs certifications, they do not scan for, remove, detect, etc any actual viruses. Malwarebytes is and has always been a trojan scanner. It doesn't have the codebase or the people to deal with self replicating malware of the viral kind. And despite their marketing claims, they are NOT a replacement for your antivirus. Here's a thread some folk might like to read - it'a all about Malwarebytes on an Apple machine! That's nice. You realize the Malwarebytes for the Mac is a rebranded product that Malwarebytes bought right? I do. They bought the developer to go with it - he's now a director of the company. And HERE is a post I made to Marcin! 12/10/2014 Hi Marcin :-) You may, or may not, be aware that I have been a long-term antagonist of Mr Dustin J Cook from Kingsport, Tennessee. I've even kept a piccie of when his name was 'up in lights' on your early MBAM product - https://www.dropbox.com/s/v8qhlhj5f7...ok%20-%20Malwa rebytes%20copy.tiff?dl=0 Admission that you've been a long term stalker and slimey *******, noted. You won't win, Dustin! :-D Here's an extract of what Dustin said:- When I did a malwarebytes database file update yesterday on a clients machine, it was 10megabytes in size. This is completely unacceptable considering what's actually in the file. It's 10 megabytes compressed at that! Antivirus engines which can scan millions more, use superior technology; can actually allow the program to think it's running via emulation (Malwarebytes technology is years away from this; based on what I know of it's staff) don't need a 10+ meg compressed data file in order to do it. Malwarebytes isn't as professional under the hood as you and thousands of others seem to think it is. It has some neat stuff, but it has alot of **** simple things too. The program sometimes gets credit it does not deserve. It can't even handle polymorphic files, even if their trojan based and non viral. You could easily generate 10,000+ malware programs which would all do the same thing and be confident, the technology available in v1.x and v2.x wouldn't be able to detect you in nearly ALL cases. Even if you sent them samples. = I've read much about you, Marcin, and your determined efforts to conquer malware. I feel it unfair that one of your apparently disgruntled ex-employees should be maligning your product in this way without you being made aware of it. Btw, I'm not the only person who took Malwarebytes to task, David. I know. Thanks fr the links. https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/go...bytes-kicking/ https://finance.yahoo.com/news/googl...220217984.html https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-...id=714&redir=1 The third link contains even more technical detail concerning the problems with the underlying code, database design, etc. Everything I warned people about, that you felt necessary to whine to Marcin to. They reached the same conclusions as myself via their own independent research. And, unlike myself, they cut full loose and left nothing hidden. Quite a disection on the third url. And it ALL AGREES with what I wrote about the programs problems at the time. It's NOT funny. :-( Why haven't you tackled Malwarebytes itself about their misleading of the general public? -- Regards, David B. https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
David is more than happy for you to read those emails!
"David B." "David
Fri, 14 Dec 2018 21:38:38 GMT in alt.comp.os.windows-10, wrote: On 14/12/2018 20:30, Diesel wrote: "David B." "David Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:03:05 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: On 14/12/2018 07:31, Diesel sounds defeated now. :-( You're no longer an anonymous person who's able to hit and run. Dearest Dustin It is *YOU* who is no longer anonymous and able to hit and run. :-D I've made no effort to be anonymous in over two decades David. Didn't participate in hit and run activities when I was, either. I was in your face about it, actually. I have never _really_ tried to hide! ;-) Actually, you have. You applied for and had your address information removed from a certain cdrom database collection which is freely given to locals in your area. I had to go back a ways to acquire an iso of one that wasn't 'updated' via censoring efforts you requested. I suspect you had your information removed from it because you'd already ****ed off someone else and were concerned they'd figure out how to get in touch with you to discuss it in greater detail. Now you are confessing to being a STALKER, Dustin? I wasn't stalking you David. Is my suspicion correct? THIS, btw, is ALL correct information: https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ Actually, it isn't. I went thru your comments previously demonstrating how they aren't accurate. Remember? I provided a fresh url to our email correspondence to backup the statements I wrote, discounting nearly all of the comments you've left on your blog. Reply on my Blog to anything you believe isn't correct. There's no need for me to do so. I provided all of my rebutal here. You haven't disputed any of it (so far). I'm more than willing to debate what you claimed on your blog vs what I wrote, if you'd like. I think it's a waste of your time though, because what you've written on your blog isn't backed up by the email correspondence between us; which as you know can be found he http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/david.txt It is true that you were employed by Malwarebtes in the early days; that is why your name is printed for all to see on the product logo - around 2008. It's also true that they sought me out with a job offer, that I didn't apply to work for them, and wasn't even aware they were hiring. Agreed. We agree on something then. I mean your callous and demeaning responses to folk on Usenet for twenty years or so. That depends entirely on the 'folk' and how they responded to me, doesn't it, David... The Anontard, as you fefer to her, has publishd dozens of examples for folk to read. They are on-line for posterity and will be around to haunt you for ever, They don't haunt me, David. Most of what they post is a decade or more old, and/or very misleading. So misleading in fact, they've written retractions, excusing their ****ups. [g] That's nice. You realize the Malwarebytes for the Mac is a rebranded product that Malwarebytes bought right? I do. They bought the developer to go with it - he's now a director of the company. And your point was? And HERE is a post I made to Marcin! 12/10/2014 Hi Marcin :-) You may, or may not, be aware that I have been a long-term antagonist of Mr Dustin J Cook from Kingsport, Tennessee. I've even kept a piccie of when his name was 'up in lights' on your early MBAM product - https://www.dropbox.com/s/v8qhlhj5f7...Cook%20-%20Mal wa rebytes%20copy.tiff?dl=0 Admission that you've been a long term stalker and slimey *******, noted. You won't win, Dustin! :-D I wasn't trying to 'win' anything, David. Btw, I'm not the only person who took Malwarebytes to task, David. I know. Thanks fr the links. Want some more? google for 'project zero malwarebytes' https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/go...ro-gives-malwa rebytes-kicking/ https://finance.yahoo.com/news/googl...ays-unencrypte d-220217984.html https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-...il?id=714&redi r=1 The third link contains even more technical detail concerning the problems with the underlying code, database design, etc. Everything I warned people about, that you felt necessary to whine to Marcin to. They reached the same conclusions as myself via their own independent research. And, unlike myself, they cut full loose and left nothing hidden. Quite a disection on the third url. And it ALL AGREES with what I wrote about the programs problems at the time. It's NOT funny. :-( Yes, it is. You and several others dismissed me and all the technical issues I reported about it being as that of a disgruntled employee who was telling porkies. I wasn't on either count. You continued to support the program by posting little email snippits between you and Marcin. Marcin would lie right to your face, you'd post it to usenet as if it were the gospel itself. It's damn funny, David. DAMN FUNNY. Which, I'll take great pleasure now, in reminding you, their research notes are completely inline (as in support everything) with the information I provided concerning the software at the time. What you labeled me as a basher for, previously. What you felt was necessary to contact Marcin about, what you reported back he called me a troll for having written. To quote recent song lyrics by Shinedown, 'Who's the asshole now?' Asshole the way in which I disclosed some issues with the software on usenet, sure. But, troll? I think not. I told you then, I'll remind you again, with pleasure. I discussed these issues with them during my employment time, multiple times. They ignored me. And, as you can see by independent confirmation via the third url above, that wasn't the best thing to do. They paid lip service to anyone who even so much as inquired about issues, employee or not back then. Initially paying lipservice to project zero as you can see by the urls, too. Some of the reported issues have been resolved, but, others, still (despite being known are problems for years now, David, years now) still are not fixed; and they don't seem to be in ANY rush to fix them. Why haven't you tackled Malwarebytes itself about their misleading of the general public? See above. You rode me for it, multiple times. You weren't the only one to do so, in fairness. Everyone of you who thought I was a disgruntled former employee just writing bull**** though, got a nice double heeping of crow; and I got to watch every one of you who thought that way dine on it, as more and more major news media outlets picked up on google's project zero disclosure. Leaving none of you doubters any recourse to what I wrote, then. Infact, you continued to defend them and share snippits of email between you and them, bashing me, for things I wrote about the software that they clearly wished I hadn't. They were in damage control, and, thought it was no big deal. I was just 'making noise'; that is, until someone? at project zero was curious enough to have a look for themselves. What did they find under the hood? Exactly what I wrote they would, right down to the nitty gritty you bashed me for disclosing about it's internals. And their opinion of it all when analyzed was? Yes, that's right, a pile of **** that's a security risk to your system with misleading sales pitches. I'll remember that forever David. It was vindication for me! -- Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk - His local police. Report? David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): , |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
David is more than happy for you to read those emails!
On 15/12/2018 04:11, Diesel wrote:
"David B." "David Fri, 14 Dec 2018 21:38:38 GMT in alt.comp.os.windows-10, wrote: On 14/12/2018 20:30, Diesel wrote: "David B." "David Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:03:05 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: On 14/12/2018 07:31, Diesel sounds defeated now. :-( You're no longer an anonymous person who's able to hit and run. Dearest Dustin It is *YOU* who is no longer anonymous and able to hit and run. :-D I've made no effort to be anonymous in over two decades David. Didn't participate in hit and run activities when I was, either. I was in your face about it, actually. I have never _really_ tried to hide! ;-) Actually, you have. You applied for and had your address information removed from a certain cdrom database collection which is freely given to locals in your area. I had to go back a ways to acquire an iso of one that wasn't 'updated' via censoring efforts you requested. I suspect you had your information removed from it because you'd already ****ed off someone else and were concerned they'd figure out how to get in touch with you to discuss it in greater detail. Now you are confessing to being a STALKER, Dustin? I wasn't stalking you David. Is my suspicion correct? I'm afraid not, Dustin. THIS, btw, is ALL correct information: https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ Actually, it isn't. I went thru your comments previously demonstrating how they aren't accurate. Remember? I provided a fresh url to our email correspondence to backup the statements I wrote, discounting nearly all of the comments you've left on your blog. Reply on my Blog to anything you believe isn't correct. There's no need for me to do so. I provided all of my rebutal here. You haven't disputed any of it (so far). I'm more than willing to debate what you claimed on your blog vs what I wrote, if you'd like. Sure, but over in my workshop group, eh? I think it's a waste of your time though, because what you've written on your blog isn't backed up by the email correspondence between us; which as you know can be found he http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/david.txt All ties in perfectly, as far as I can see. It is true that you were employed by Malwarebtes in the early days; that is why your name is printed for all to see on the product logo - around 2008. It's also true that they sought me out with a job offer, that I didn't apply to work for them, and wasn't even aware they were hiring. Agreed. We agree on something then. I mean your callous and demeaning responses to folk on Usenet for twenty years or so. That depends entirely on the 'folk' and how they responded to me, doesn't it, David... Your reputation preceeded you. The Anontard, as you fefer to her, has publishd dozens of examples for folk to read. They are on-line for posterity and will be around to haunt you for ever, They don't haunt me, David. Most of what they post is a decade or more old, and/or very misleading. So misleading in fact, they've written retractions, excusing their ****ups. [g] That's nice. You realize the Malwarebytes for the Mac is a rebranded product that Malwarebytes bought right? I do. They bought the developer to go with it - he's now a director of the company. And your point was? He might find the flaws in the companies modus operandi now that he's an 'insider'! And HERE is a post I made to Marcin! 12/10/2014 Hi Marcin :-) You may, or may not, be aware that I have been a long-term antagonist of Mr Dustin J Cook from Kingsport, Tennessee. I've even kept a piccie of when his name was 'up in lights' on your early MBAM product - https://www.dropbox.com/s/v8qhlhj5f7...Cook%20-%20Mal wa rebytes%20copy.tiff?dl=0 Admission that you've been a long term stalker and slimey *******, noted. You won't win, Dustin! :-D I wasn't trying to 'win' anything, David. Then you will, most surely, be the loser. Btw, I'm not the only person who took Malwarebytes to task, David. I know. Thanks fr the links. Want some more? Sure. Thanks. google for 'project zero malwarebytes' https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/go...ro-gives-malwa rebytes-kicking/ https://finance.yahoo.com/news/googl...ays-unencrypte d-220217984.html https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-...il?id=714&redi r=1 The third link contains even more technical detail concerning the problems with the underlying code, database design, etc. Everything I warned people about, that you felt necessary to whine to Marcin to. They reached the same conclusions as myself via their own independent research. And, unlike myself, they cut full loose and left nothing hidden. Quite a disection on the third url. And it ALL AGREES with what I wrote about the programs problems at the time. It's NOT funny. :-( Yes, it is. You and several others dismissed me and all the technical issues I reported about it being as that of a disgruntled employee who was telling porkies. I wasn't on either count. You continued to support the program by posting little email snippits between you and Marcin. Marcin would lie right to your face, you'd post it to usenet as if it were the gospel itself. It's damn funny, David. DAMN FUNNY. Which, I'll take great pleasure now, in reminding you, their research notes are completely inline (as in support everything) with the information I provided concerning the software at the time. What you labeled me as a basher for, previously. What you felt was necessary to contact Marcin about, what you reported back he called me a troll for having written. To quote recent song lyrics by Shinedown, 'Who's the asshole now?' Asshole the way in which I disclosed some issues with the software on usenet, sure. But, troll? I think not. I told you then, I'll remind you again, with pleasure. I discussed these issues with them during my employment time, multiple times. They ignored me. And, as you can see by independent confirmation via the third url above, that wasn't the best thing to do. They paid lip service to anyone who even so much as inquired about issues, employee or not back then. Initially paying lipservice to project zero as you can see by the urls, too. Some of the reported issues have been resolved, but, others, still (despite being known are problems for years now, David, years now) still are not fixed; and they don't seem to be in ANY rush to fix them. Meanwhile the company is making $millions :-( Why haven't you tackled Malwarebytes itself about their misleading of the general public? See above. You rode me for it, multiple times. You weren't the only one to do so, in fairness. Everyone of you who thought I was a disgruntled former employee just writing bull**** though, got a nice double heeping of crow; and I got to watch every one of you who thought that way dine on it, as more and more major news media outlets picked up on google's project zero disclosure. Leaving none of you doubters any recourse to what I wrote, then. Infact, you continued to defend them and share snippits of email between you and them, bashing me, for things I wrote about the software that they clearly wished I hadn't. They were in damage control, and, thought it was no big deal. I was just 'making noise'; that is, until someone? at project zero was curious enough to have a look for themselves. What did they find under the hood? Exactly what I wrote they would, right down to the nitty gritty you bashed me for disclosing about it's internals. And their opinion of it all when analyzed was? Yes, that's right, a pile of **** that's a security risk to your system with misleading sales pitches. I'll remember that forever David. It was vindication for me! Then how best to close down a fraudulent operation? Any ideas? -- Regards, David B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|