A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » New Users to Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

System Restore



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 20th 08, 07:37 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Mick Murphy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,409
Default System Restore

If idiots like Twayne would follow proceedings here for a while, they would
realise that I was spoofed for months.

I do not like his stupidy regarding history of myself here, and his
dangerous stupidity in his replies to OPs.

You must also dislike a lot of MVPs here; thay also top post.

And I am not interested in scrolling down into an abyss of useless info to
find a particular reply, posted by a bottom poster like yourself.
--
Mad Mike


"The Max" wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:38:01 -0800, Mick Murphy
wrote:

I have always been a top poster, you f***ing idiot.
You can not understand anything; let alone read headers to discover the
spoofers here.

You are just a waste of space; as everybody here knows.
Have a crap holiday; you deserve it!
--
Mad Mike


Top-posters have always been frowned upon by traditional Usenet
aficionados. It is considered to be very bad form.

The first line of your post shows that bad form is apparently a highly
developed specialty of yours.

Ads
  #32  
Old December 20th 08, 08:31 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,402
Default System Restore

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:19:02 -0600, The Max
wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:43:49 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:01:17 -0600, The Max
wrote:


Top-posters have always been frowned upon by traditional Usenet
aficionados. It is considered to be very bad form.



*Some* "traditional Usenet aficionados" frown upon top-posters. Many
others (including me) do not. And some "traditional Usenet
aficionados" frown upon bottom-posters.


Those who frown on top-posters outnumber all of the others combined
IMO ;-



My view is exactly the opposite of yours. I think those who frown on
bottom-posters greatly outnumber those who frown on top-posters.
Top-posting has become the norm for enormous numbers of people,
primarily because Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, and Windows Mail
all put your cursor at the top of the message when you do a reply.


I much prefer to see bottom-posting with some good editing of quoted
material (like this reply) so that only the part that is being replied
to is quoted, or inline posting without editing.



As do I. That's what I said in my message. Once again, personally I
frown on the practice of top-posting, but not on the people who do it.

And I also frown on the practice of bottom-posting when the reply is
at the bottom of a long untrimmed quote.

So to repeat myself, to me, trimming is much more important than
whether it's top-posting or bottom posting.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.