If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
Rick Merrill wrote:
Can one safely "uninstall" some of the .NET installations? It depends on whether you installed all of them manually or did some third party applications install redistributable versions on your system? If you installed them yourself then probably you don't need them and so uninstall them; If some third party applications installed them then you do need them (not all but a specific version). Very soon, you will be bombarded with version 4. I have downloaded and installed on my system because I have started using VS 2010 for my work. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9CFB2D51-5FF4-4491-B0E5-B386F32C0992&displaylang=en hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
Rick Merrill wrote:
Can one safely "uninstall" some of the .NET installations? It depends on whether you installed all of them manually or did some third party applications install redistributable versions on your system? If you installed them yourself then probably you don't need them and so uninstall them; If some third party applications installed them then you do need them (not all but a specific version). Very soon, you will be bombarded with version 4. I have downloaded and installed on my system because I have started using VS 2010 for my work. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9CFB2D51-5FF4-4491-B0E5-B386F32C0992&displaylang=en hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
LD55ZRA wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote: Can one safely "uninstall" some of the .NET installations? It depends on whether you installed all of them manually or did some third party applications install redistributable versions on your system? If you installed them yourself then probably you don't need them and so uninstall them; If some third party applications installed them then you do need them (not all but a specific version). Very soon, you will be bombarded with version 4. I have downloaded and installed on my system because I have started using VS 2010 for my work. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9CFB2D51-5FF4-4491-B0E5-B386F32C0992&displaylang=en hth Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
LD55ZRA wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote: Can one safely "uninstall" some of the .NET installations? It depends on whether you installed all of them manually or did some third party applications install redistributable versions on your system? If you installed them yourself then probably you don't need them and so uninstall them; If some third party applications installed them then you do need them (not all but a specific version). Very soon, you will be bombarded with version 4. I have downloaded and installed on my system because I have started using VS 2010 for my work. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9CFB2D51-5FF4-4491-B0E5-B386F32C0992&displaylang=en hth Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
Rick Merrill wrote:
LD55ZRA wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Can one safely "uninstall" some of the .NET installations? It depends on whether you installed all of them manually or did some third party applications install redistributable versions on your system? If you installed them yourself then probably you don't need them and so uninstall them; If some third party applications installed them then you do need them (not all but a specific version). Very soon, you will be bombarded with version 4. I have downloaded and installed on my system because I have started using VS 2010 for my work. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9CFB2D51-5FF4-4491-B0E5-B386F32C0992&displaylang=en hth Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? You fail to understand how the different .net versions work, they are not backward compatible and applications only with the particular version with which they were coded! An application needing version 1 will not work with verision 3, or 4... John |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
Rick Merrill wrote:
LD55ZRA wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Can one safely "uninstall" some of the .NET installations? It depends on whether you installed all of them manually or did some third party applications install redistributable versions on your system? If you installed them yourself then probably you don't need them and so uninstall them; If some third party applications installed them then you do need them (not all but a specific version). Very soon, you will be bombarded with version 4. I have downloaded and installed on my system because I have started using VS 2010 for my work. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9CFB2D51-5FF4-4491-B0E5-B386F32C0992&displaylang=en hth Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? You fail to understand how the different .net versions work, they are not backward compatible and applications only with the particular version with which they were coded! An application needing version 1 will not work with verision 3, or 4... John |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
On 24/04/2010 16:26, Rick Merrill wrote:
John John - MVP wrote: Thank you. What would be the first step in "finding out" if anything uses NET? (I thought uninstall would at least leave behind any .DLL used by another well-behaved application.) There is no list of apps (MS or 3d party) which you can tick-off against your installed ones. (Not one that I could find , when I asked the same question few months back.) Be aware that some very basic system functions use .NET however, as I discovered when I tried to purge my system of this Microsoft mess-of-an-environment. My Dell P could not 'rollback' driver updates, which shook me. The advice 'leave-it-alone' is a good one, unless you have a lot of time (and patience). |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
On 24/04/2010 16:26, Rick Merrill wrote:
John John - MVP wrote: Thank you. What would be the first step in "finding out" if anything uses NET? (I thought uninstall would at least leave behind any .DLL used by another well-behaved application.) There is no list of apps (MS or 3d party) which you can tick-off against your installed ones. (Not one that I could find , when I asked the same question few months back.) Be aware that some very basic system functions use .NET however, as I discovered when I tried to purge my system of this Microsoft mess-of-an-environment. My Dell P could not 'rollback' driver updates, which shook me. The advice 'leave-it-alone' is a good one, unless you have a lot of time (and patience). |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
On 26/04/2010 14:15, John John - MVP wrote:
Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? You fail to understand how the different .net versions work, they are not backward compatible and applications only with the particular version with which they were coded! An application needing version 1 will not work with verision 3, or 4... The basic 'failure to understand' is one originating from Microsoft. What clueless organisation would issue 5-6 versions of a developement environment, all of which are independent and incompatible with each other? To put it another way, how many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need on your machine to run Javascript? Advice to the OP - if you have the patience, purge yourself of .NET. As far as 3d party applications go, for every one that needs .NET, there are alternatives which do without .NET (and are the bette for it). |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
On 26/04/2010 14:15, John John - MVP wrote:
Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? You fail to understand how the different .net versions work, they are not backward compatible and applications only with the particular version with which they were coded! An application needing version 1 will not work with verision 3, or 4... The basic 'failure to understand' is one originating from Microsoft. What clueless organisation would issue 5-6 versions of a developement environment, all of which are independent and incompatible with each other? To put it another way, how many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need on your machine to run Javascript? Advice to the OP - if you have the patience, purge yourself of .NET. As far as 3d party applications go, for every one that needs .NET, there are alternatives which do without .NET (and are the bette for it). |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
"occam" wrote in message
... On 26/04/2010 14:15, John John - MVP wrote: Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? You fail to understand how the different .net versions work, they are not backward compatible and applications only with the particular version with which they were coded! An application needing version 1 will not work with verision 3, or 4... The basic 'failure to understand' is one originating from Microsoft. What clueless organisation would issue 5-6 versions of a developement environment, all of which are independent and incompatible with each other? To put it another way, how many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need on your machine to run Javascript? Advice to the OP - if you have the patience, purge yourself of .NET. As far as 3d party applications go, for every one that needs .NET, there are alternatives which do without .NET (and are the bette for it). There goes your credibility on this subject. The answer to your question, "How many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need to run JavaScript" is NONE. Java is a programming language. JavaScript is a scripting language. They have absolutely nothing to do with each other, and have no dependencies upon each other. You can remove all versions of Sun Java and MS Java from your system, and JavaScript will still work just fine. Actually, .NET Framework is *supposed* to be backward compatible...it just does not always work for a few reasons. An interesting read here, though older: CLR Inside Out: Ensuring .NET Framework 2.0 Compatibility http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163638.aspx The .NET 3.5 SP1 full installation package includes the full runtime installation packages for .NET 2.0 SP2 as well as .NET 3.0 SP2, so if you have NO .NET Frameworks versions installed, you can install just 3.5 SP1 and have the earlier runtimes included in one package. -- Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009 A+ http://dts-l.net/ |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
"occam" wrote in message
... On 26/04/2010 14:15, John John - MVP wrote: Assuming "version 4" is a good thing, wouldn't it be sensible to remove 1-3.5 of .NET first, then install NET4? You fail to understand how the different .net versions work, they are not backward compatible and applications only with the particular version with which they were coded! An application needing version 1 will not work with verision 3, or 4... The basic 'failure to understand' is one originating from Microsoft. What clueless organisation would issue 5-6 versions of a developement environment, all of which are independent and incompatible with each other? To put it another way, how many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need on your machine to run Javascript? Advice to the OP - if you have the patience, purge yourself of .NET. As far as 3d party applications go, for every one that needs .NET, there are alternatives which do without .NET (and are the bette for it). There goes your credibility on this subject. The answer to your question, "How many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need to run JavaScript" is NONE. Java is a programming language. JavaScript is a scripting language. They have absolutely nothing to do with each other, and have no dependencies upon each other. You can remove all versions of Sun Java and MS Java from your system, and JavaScript will still work just fine. Actually, .NET Framework is *supposed* to be backward compatible...it just does not always work for a few reasons. An interesting read here, though older: CLR Inside Out: Ensuring .NET Framework 2.0 Compatibility http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163638.aspx The .NET 3.5 SP1 full installation package includes the full runtime installation packages for .NET 2.0 SP2 as well as .NET 3.0 SP2, so if you have NO .NET Frameworks versions installed, you can install just 3.5 SP1 and have the earlier runtimes included in one package. -- Glen Ventura, MS MVP Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2009 A+ http://dts-l.net/ |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:58 +0200, occam wrote:
To put it another way, how many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need on your machine to run Javascript? None, as you would undoubtedly know if you knew that Java and Javascript are two completely different things. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
dot NET 1.1 to 3.5
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:01:58 +0200, occam wrote: To put it another way, how many versions of Sun's Java environment do you need on your machine to run Javascript? None, as you would undoubtedly know if you knew that Java and Javascript are two completely different things. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|