Snit busted - Lied about the bot

James
Fri, 24 Jul 2020
12:14:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote:

chrisv
m Thu, 23 Jul 2020
17:04:37 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Diesel wrote:

This is the full version; very long.
(thousands of lines, snipped)

This is what happens, folks, when one don't have the wisdom to
ignore worthless trolls, like the "Snit" thing.

In my own defense, Snit arrived to alt.computer.workshop ahead of
those who could warn us about him. I'd already began interacting
with him by the time the warnings were issued. I foolishly opted
to ignore them and pursue the interaction. In hindsight, that was
a mistake on my part. As the result has turned out being what this
thread is an example of.

And that is how snit sets up his snit circus in whatever group he
happens to be attacking ATM.
At first snit seems harmless enough but it doesn't take long for
him to start his trickery combined with dishonest snipping,
mis-quoting, and pathological lying.

I noticed all of those actions when I first engaged him - we were
discussing 3d printer technologies. He asked if I could determine
what technology was in use for a particular set of miniature
figurines. After a bit of back and forth, I realized he was clueless
and had severe reading comprehension issues. He continued trying to
claim we "Agreed" on things that we weren't even half way towards the
middle on. Usually, the "agreed" was things I wrote about that he
didn't understand, and that his response really had nothing to do
with.

He also "agreed" that I didn't know what technology was being used,
but I didn't make any such statement; infact, I provided him the
correct answer from the vendors site. He didn't know what technology
was in use, and when I showed him he could have answered his own
question, that's when he started trying to twist things around the
first time.

He pulled more **** with the AZ thread, and that's where he really
let his reading comprehension issue see the light of day. He took the
simple instructions I wrote, misunderstood them all, and took a
parting shot at me for his failure to comprehend because I specified
the ascii code table you should be using for the purposes of the
explanation as I provided it.

When I noticed he was doing that and called him out for it, he
proceeded to try and turn things around into me not knowing what
ASCII even was. Er, I've been writing software that made computers do
"things" since I was single digit age. Why wouldn't I have a firm
grasp of what ASCII is by the time I interacted with Snit, 30+
something years after the fact?

This is why ignoring snit from day one drives him to crawling up
the walls.

Heh, There's some truth to that statement. He started writing this
bull****:

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.

*** end

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close
to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation.

While I had him kf'd. When I ask about this post, Snit continues to
claim I 'misunderstood' him. I don't see how I could have possibly
done that. His post used very specific words, and like most words,
they actually do have a very specific meaning. According to what Snit
wrote, and going only by what he wrote, there should be atleast! one
post calling me out about the bot, and atleast one more post where I
clarified I had the compiled code. The section of a post I wrote,
that he shared for 'proof' has nothing to do with the bot itself, and
isn't proof of any kind. It's the 3rd paragraph of a reply I wrote,
calling out his lack of actual programming knowledge in front of
everyone else.

I guess he doesn't handle being wrong and shown to be wrong in public
well? Some people with large egos do suffer with that issue. He went
out of his way to write that story about me, all because he didn't
like my kf'ing him and continuing to mention him with other
conversations. My bad. But, he's a damn troll, and a liar, and he's
gone well out of his way to show that to not only myself, but damn
near anyone with an IQ above that of say, a monkey.

Mode 2 is where snit will suddenly "discover" that he made a minor
error and misread something his current victim (that's you) wrote.
At this point snit will offer a half assed apology for his
"unintentional mistake".

That won't be accepted. I've been on him for months now, slowly
adding more pressure inside the vice I've got his head snuggled in.
G I continue getting more and more specific with my questions. I
like watching him squirm and try to weasel his way out of my trap.

He really picked the wrong one this time, and he's going to learn
that, one way or another, he's going to learn. G

If the victim is foolish enough to fall for this ruse, and some
have, snit will make sure to plaster all over the group comments
such as "victim and I reached a solution to our petty
disagreement, and I commend him for admitting we were both wrong
on this".

Yes, well, I'm not going to accept anything but a full blown apology
at this point where Snit, rightfully, takes all of the blame. He's
the one who went out of his way to write the bull**** story, he's the
only one responsible for it's existance, he'll be the only one who
can apologize and take full responsibility for it, or it doesn't go
away; it'll just keep coming up, like a bad mcdonalds burger.
(assuming they ever served a decent one)

This isn't my first rodeo with a troll. I've been 0wning David Brooks
for years, I don't have a problem making a two for one combo deal.

Notice how snit drags his victim into the admission of a mistake
being made so IOW snit AND his victim both screwed up.

Yes, I have noticed this routine tried with others, and he gets mixed
results with it. He won't "wear me down" about this. I'm not going to
let it go, until I get that ****ing apology. No compromise, no
"agreement", an apology is the only thing that will get me off his
ass about that series of lies he told.

And the longer he delays, the more of his lies I'll find and question
him over, right here, in public. I'll continue getting specific with
my questions as I isolate more lies he's written (he's been here for
months now, he's provided all kinds of material I can use) about me,
too.

With me, the longer he takes to comply, the hotter the kitchen is
going to get.

Snit being the extreme narcissist that he is has never been
capable of admitting that he is solely to blame for some error
being made so he attempts to convert it into a group error so that
the blame is shared.

Yep. In this case, there's no blame to be shared. No blame to be
passed around. No misunderstanding on anyones part, at this point,
either. I won't even let him use that excuse as a way out at this
point, I already offered it; he declined. Now, my questions are more
specific. A misunderstanding didn't take place. Snit told a series of
lies, and I'm asking for an apology about them:

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.
***

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close
to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation.

As you can see, Snit used very specific words in his claim; I've
since began narrowing the focus of my beam and asking about them,
specifically. He made very specific claims, there should be no
problem with him finding the MIDs to the posts to back them up,
right?

Watch for it, because after snit tires of his current rainman
routine, he will shift to the profuse apology routine, Mode 2.

He's already been given the chance, multiple times now, to do the
right thing. He declined to do so, he tried to twist it into my
having a severe reading comprehension issue (I don't), and he's tried
to claim that he didn't lie about anything, I "misunderstood".

I misnderstood, nothing. And he did lie, and i'm going to continue
requesting that apology, a full apology for the lie, not a
misunderstanding, but a series of lies, he wrote about me concerning
the google flood bot.

You can bet your left testicle on it.

I'd rather not bust up a matching set. G

--
A cat is only domestic in so far as suits its own needs.

Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:31:30 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 7/24/20 6:37 AM, David_B wrote:
On 24/07/2020 13:14, James wrote:
Â* And this is snit's goal and has been from the day he appears
in a given group.

You may be interested to learn that I INVITED Snit to join me
here. Our views on many things differ, be he's a straight-forward
and honest family man who has helped me in so many different
ways. :-)

What about you, James? Where have YOU sprung from?

Interestingly, you only the second other person I've ever met
online who uses blocknews.net as their newsserver. It's very
good, isn't it?

Tell me how you know Snit so well?

Another "new" person who sounds exactly like Carroll and tells the
same lies Carroll does. And Diesel will pretend to not see that it
is almost surely Carroll.

Why do you continue involving me in your nonsense accusations?

I wonder if they both know how predictable their trolling is?

It's not hard to predict that I'd take an issue with your lying on
me. You already know I have a problem with you for doing that,
previously. A problem that's still unresolved:

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close
to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation.

Where are those posts, Snit?


--
Hapiness is a warm stone circle.

Ron Riggins
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:02:39 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:44:45 +0000, Arlen Holder wrote:
Yet, Alan Baker is as Dunning Kruger Quadrant 1 as is Snit,

Arlen,

I'm susprised various people in acf and other newsgroups are still
electing to feed you. especially when you go and insult people as
you're doing here.

Did I somehow get removed from your list of people you think don't
know anything? If so, please add me back. I don't want to correspond
with you, I was content with you having ****ed off. I'd like things
to go back to that.

I credit snit with encouraging me to learn how to use slrn. His
trolling an massive sock puppetry got so bad that it was getting
tiresome setting up kill filters using 40tude Dialog.

Ron,

Just be glad you aren't a working resident of AZ. If you were, you'd
be partially footing the bill for Snit to stay home all day and troll
around usenet. We're all technically, helping to foot the bill for
him and those just like him, but, if you live in the same state,
you're paying more out for it than I am.

That actually bugs me a bit from time to time, too. I work for a
living, uncle sam doesn't pay me to sit on my ass and **** off all
day. Uncle sam rewards me by working for a living by taking monies
from me to give to people like snit.

Damn morals and work ethics I was raised with. As much as I'd like a
free to ****off day, I wouldn't be productive because I know it's not
right and I wouldn't be able to chill out and relax. I was raised to
earn my money, by working for it.

With slrn under Linux it's trivial to kill file snit and easily
add his various socks as they appear.

It's **** easy with Xnews under Windows or Wine if used on linux,
too. The usenet bot is pathetic, I really don't know why Snit is so
interested in it. His IRC bot isn't much better - they're both a
terrible example of programming; neither should be used as a
programming skill level demonstration; unless you want people to
think you just started the semester in college first year,
programing.

And he took exceptional offense over something I wrote concerning the
ease in which his efforts could be duplicated by those of us who have
real experience writing software. He likes to remind people that he's
not a programmer, but is quick as hell, to try and correct people,
like myself, apd, etc, who are programmers over something one of us
wrote about, of all things, programming.

It doesn't make sense to me that a normally thinking person who's
already stated they aren't experts in such and such a field, would
proceed to try and talk down to people who actually are experts n
such a such fields. But, that's exactly what Snit does. And it's not
a one time event.

I've been on usenet for about 15 years and the only person I have
encountered who rivals snit for the title of uber troll is Tholen
and maybe that sicko with the goatse site.

Give David Brooks a little time, he'll convince you he should be on
your list too. And you'll ask yourself why he isn't already once he
does.

The only person who has so much trouble follow him/her everywhere
he/she lands is Hillary Clinton who seems to have a talent for
associating with people who eventually kill themselves.
Hey, maybe we can introduce snit to Hillary?
vbg!

The question then becomes, who will go first? And the next question
is obviously going to be, does it really matter? vbg



--
Any sufficiently advanced technology looks like magic.

David_B
news in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 24/07/2020 17:32, Snit wrote:
On 7/24/20 5:07 AM, David_B wrote:
On 24/07/2020 08:46, Snit wrote:
I just worry for you. I sincerely hope you are okay.

It's so good to see someone write pleasant and meaningful things
here in ACW. Thanks for caring. :-)

I suspect Diesel will take it as my being sarcastic -- but I am
not. He is clearly becoming unhinged, and as much as I do poke
fun at his tantrum a fair amount, I also am sincere in hoping he
is OK.

I am truly impressed that you are not in the least bit fearful of
Dustin - someone who has the unique ability to completely destroy
the life of you and your family.

Why are you attacking me like this, David?

He's like a *God* in the APVC (HAVP -sp) scene (whatever THAT is!)

hpavc. I'm not a god, i'm known and respected. There's a difference.


--
Faith is good, but scepticism is better. - Giuseppe Verdi

Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:09:31 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 7/24/20 5:59 AM, Diesel wrote:
David_B
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:18:17
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote:
chrisv
Thu, 23 Jul
2020 17:04:37 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Diesel wrote:

This is the full version; very long.
(thousands of lines, snipped)

This is what happens, folks, when one don't have the wisdom to
ignore worthless trolls, like the "Snit" thing.

In my own defense, Snit arrived to alt.computer.workshop ahead
of those who could warn us about him. I'd already began
interacting with him by the time the warnings were issued. I
foolishly opted to ignore them and pursue the interaction. In
hindsight, that was a mistake on my part. As the result has
turned out being what this thread is an example of.

*Everyone*, who has been paying attention, already knows that
the "Snit" thing is a pathological liar. There is no need to
convince anyone.

My intentions weren't so much as trying to convince anyone vs
defending my good name. Snit wrote the following, but, none of
it's true:

You don't HAVE a good name, Dustin. :-(

Heh. When you seperate the truth from the bull**** written about
me, David, I actually have a pretty decent rep on both sides of
the fence.

And yet when you showed yourself to be less than honorable you
added to the evidence by lying and insisting I was blindly
trusting David and not doing what I was -- just reading your
comments and understanding what they say about your actions.

You never did explain why you told that lie about me -- but I am
mature enough to not need you to in order to move forward in
peace.

Snit, for what it's worth, I find your desperate efforts to twist the
subject concerning your efforts to lie on me around, somewhat
amusing.

You actually think more than one? of the regulars here still trusts
anything you write at face value. I would like to take this
opportunity to tell you, with a big smile on my face, that you've
probably been in the dog house here for awhile now, and you pretty
much sealed your fate with it when you continued to play games about
the lies you wrote he

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close
to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation.

I told you, didn't I.. continuing to dance around what I was asking
wasn't going to benefit you, no matter how much wiggling and flossing
of your ass cheeks you did.

It would have better far better for you to come out and meet that
head on, but you being you, opted to duck and dodge and spin instead.
It didn't work. You aren't in a newsgroup full of primarily stupid,
easily conned and otherwise gullible individuals. David Brooks is the
noted exception.

Can you imagine growing to that level of maturity? Is it something
you are interested in doing?

Snit, let's stop projecting maturity issues around. You seem to be
lacking, significantly in that dept too:

http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close
to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation.


--
"The problem with defending the purity of the English language is
that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just
borrow words. On occasion English has pursued other languages down
alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new
vocabulary." -- James Nicoll, rasfw

Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:41:25 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 7/24/20 1:02 PM, Ron Riggins wrote:
Other than those 2 and that's really a toss, snit is in a league
of his own when it comes to idiocy, dishonesty and truly a waste
of human life.

I bet Diesel is not coherent enough to understand why the sock I
am replying to is almost certainly Carroll.

Come on, Diesel... show you have even basic understanding.

I bet you won't.


Your efforts to troll are a very nice example of that superior maturity
you've claimed you have, there, Snit. Should I be impressed with that
lame as **** all attempt to be insulting?

And what, specifically, is not accurate concerning you in that post? Be
specific.


--
The cats let us live here.

On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote:
Snit has quite the reputation in cola, David. Maybe you should bring
yourself upto speed?

If I want to know something about Snit I ask him.

He's never yet failed to provide a truthful and straight-forward answer.

On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote:
David_B
news in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 24/07/2020 17:32, Snit wrote:
On 7/24/20 5:07 AM, David_B wrote:
On 24/07/2020 08:46, Snit wrote:
I just worry for you. I sincerely hope you are okay.

It's so good to see someone write pleasant and meaningful things
here in ACW. Thanks for caring. :-)

I suspect Diesel will take it as my being sarcastic -- but I am
not. He is clearly becoming unhinged, and as much as I do poke
fun at his tantrum a fair amount, I also am sincere in hoping he
is OK.

I am truly impressed that you are not in the least bit fearful of
Dustin - someone who has the unique ability to completely destroy
the life of you and your family.

Why are you attacking me like this, David?

It's important for Snit to understand how ruthless you can be.

What makes you think this post was an attack? Have you lost your prowess?

He's like a *God* in the APVC (HAVP -sp) scene (whatever THAT is!)

hpavc. I'm not a god, i'm known and respected. There's a difference.

Thanks for the reminder. https://caughq.wordpress.com/category/hpavc/

Who else might I know there, Diesel?

David_B
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:23:03 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote:
David_B
news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 24/07/2020 17:32, Snit wrote:
On 7/24/20 5:07 AM, David_B wrote:
On 24/07/2020 08:46, Snit wrote:
I just worry for you. I sincerely hope you are okay.

It's so good to see someone write pleasant and meaningful
things here in ACW. Thanks for caring. :-)

I suspect Diesel will take it as my being sarcastic -- but I am
not. He is clearly becoming unhinged, and as much as I do poke
fun at his tantrum a fair amount, I also am sincere in hoping
he is OK.

I am truly impressed that you are not in the least bit fearful
of Dustin - someone who has the unique ability to completely
destroy the life of you and your family.

Why are you attacking me like this, David?

It's important for Snit to understand how ruthless you can be.



He seems very confident where he thinks he stands with me, David:

Message-ID:
As far as any tantrum is concerned, uhh, no, I've just wasted
months now effectively, asking for an apology that you owe me for
some lies you wrote about me.

You are desperate to have me lie and say I agree with your
perspective -- which of course, if you could understand what you
read, you would

*** end

David, how many months did I let Jenn (Muggles) go off with nonsense
like that about me before I took a big chunk out of her arse and
slapped her around like a total bitch all over usenet, and someplaces
well outside of usenet? I ask because I forgot. It was awhile though,
right? I mean, I did take the time, just as I have with Snit, trying
to educate her didn't I?

Do you remember how much time eagle got to do his **** before I umm,
did some things which resulted in a not so fun time for him? Do you
by chance remember how many times both of them tried to get the law
dogs on me?

Ah well, I don't suppose it matters. Snit thinks i've been blowing
smoke up his ass the entire time anyway. I suspect if you told him
the truth (heh, if you do, it's because there's something in it for
you) which is that I've been 100% honest with him this entire time..
I didn't even come close to trying to BS him.

He'd disagree with you, or claim you misunderstood something or
other. He wouldn't accept the facts for what they are, David. No,
Snit actually thinks he is a peer of mine, that we're actually on the
same level, etc.

I doubt you can convince him otherwise at this point in time, David.
You propped him up with a comment you wrote awhile back, and he's not
about to let either of us show he's wrong now. He's far too invested.
The only way he will learn and understand differently is when he goes
far enough with me that he becomes another name on my wall of stupid
****ers who should have known better, but had to be taught later.
And, as with eagle, and jenn, it will be your fault at the end of the
day.

You mislead them just as you did Snit concerning me. You are fully
responsible for what I suspect will eventually have to be done to
settle things properly. I'm simply defending myself and my
reputation.

What makes you think this post was an attack? Have you lost your
prowess?

David, I considered it to be an attack because I read it with a bit
of sarcasm to it. If that wasn't intentional on your part, then I
apologize. You haven't taken the time before to do any warning for
him, why begin now?

He's like a *God* in the APVC (HAVP -sp) scene (whatever THAT
is!)

hpavc. I'm not a god, i'm known and respected. There's a
difference.

Thanks for the reminder.
https://caughq.wordpress.com/category/hpavc/

Who else might I know there, Diesel?

Oh, when you want something from me, you're using the proper posting
nym. When you want to be an arsemunching cretin (which is what you
are most of the time during your waking hours), you pretend to show
a little respect..When it becomes real, I might actually humour some
of your questions.




--
I'd rather have a life than a living.

On 7/26/20 3:11 PM, David_B wrote:
On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote:
Snit has quite the reputation in cola, David. Maybe you should bring
yourself upto speed?

If I want to know something about Snit I ask him.

He's never yet failed to provide a truthful and straight-forward answer.

And I will for most people -- though the honest answer might be "none of
your business" for some personal questions, such as when Carroll pushes
lies about my health in an effort to get the focus on me and off his
obvious trolling.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

David_B
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:11:50 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote:
Snit has quite the reputation in cola, David. Maybe you should
bring yourself upto speed?

If I want to know something about Snit I ask him.

Okay.

He's never yet failed to provide a truthful and straight-forward
answer.

Can you provide evidence of that? He has a very well known track record
of doing the opposite. He's even tried it with me, David. I know you
won't say anything to him about it, because we're not friends, but even
your rather dumbass knows what he's doing, and can see it just as well
as FTR and Apd. And yes, David, as you know, they are both aware of his
lack of honesty and integrity. They're also well aware of his profound
reading comprehension problem. He shouldn't be on usenet with the
nearly illiterate reading level he's shown us.




--
He who places head in sand, will get kicked in the end!

On Aug 4, 2020 at 6:12:43 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Snit
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:23:47 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 7/26/20 1:17 PM, Diesel wrote:
Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:09:31
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
[snip]

Snit, for what it's worth,

Until you learn to understand what you read, there is no reason to
think your comments are worth ANYTHING other, perhaps, than a
source of amusement.

Snit, I'm not the one who's already demonstrated they have severe
reading comprehension issues.

Not that you have bene able to understand, despite so many examples being
shown.

The irony is amazing.

....

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 05/08/2020 02:12, Gremlin wrote:
Can you provide evidence of that?

Of course. Just read ANY of his responses to me in ACW.

David_B wrote:
On 05/08/2020 02:12, Gremlin wrote:
Can you provide evidence of that?

Of course. Just read ANY of his responses to me in ACW.


Read and understand.

That second part seems his bigger challenge.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.