If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Setup question on dual XEON
On ny XP pro running 2 Xeon mb, is it possible to assigne Excel 2007 to
always launch using one XEON CPU and to assign the second XEONB to be the CPU dedicated to running Access? Is there any reading on MSDN or elsewhere that can teach me: 1. How to assign a particular program (such as Excel in my example above) to a CPU? Can it even be done to always dedicate Excel to one CPU & Access to another? And what governs the wisdom or lack thereof of doing so? 2. I had always let my NT 4 dual Pentium decide how to handle usage of the CPUs. Now that I'm using a dual XEON, & XP Pro, what resources are there to explain the thinking behind manual vs automatic control of the load on the individual CPUs? Thank in advance. I'm new to a dual XEON / XP Pro environment and want to do my reading to see what governs the decision of how to configure CPU usage. My basic plan was to create an icon on my desktop that launched my Excel and always uses one CPU for whatever processing it uses & to have a similar icon that launches Access dedicated to the other CPU. I just needed to know if this is even possible & to become informed as regards whether it is expedient or inexpedient. |
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Setup question on dual XEON
With all due respect, I knew each and every thing you replied. We have a
specific need to apply Excel & Access as specified. Were it not so, I'd not be asking any questions at all. If you can't be helpful, please don't cluuter my genuine and sincere and straightforward question with unhelpful and uninforative replies. TIA Alberta Hall "AJR" wrote: Xeons were not intended for non- commercial use but for servers, workstations and embedded environments. They are either one or multiple core processors - not multiple processors. Programs must be designed to utiliize multiple core processors Access and Excell are not. "Alberta Hall" Alberta wrote in message ... On ny XP pro running 2 Xeon mb, is it possible to assigne Excel 2007 to always launch using one XEON CPU and to assign the second XEONB to be the CPU dedicated to running Access? Is there any reading on MSDN or elsewhere that can teach me: 1. How to assign a particular program (such as Excel in my example above) to a CPU? Can it even be done to always dedicate Excel to one CPU & Access to another? And what governs the wisdom or lack thereof of doing so? 2. I had always let my NT 4 dual Pentium decide how to handle usage of the CPUs. Now that I'm using a dual XEON, & XP Pro, what resources are there to explain the thinking behind manual vs automatic control of the load on the individual CPUs? Thank in advance. I'm new to a dual XEON / XP Pro environment and want to do my reading to see what governs the decision of how to configure CPU usage. My basic plan was to create an icon on my desktop that launched my Excel and always uses one CPU for whatever processing it uses & to have a similar icon that launches Access dedicated to the other CPU. I just needed to know if this is even possible & to become informed as regards whether it is expedient or inexpedient. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Setup question on dual XEON
Note from your post "...is it possible to assigne Excel 2007 to always
launch using one XEON CPU and to assign the second XEONB to be the CPU...." Note from my reply "...Programs must be designed to utiliize multiple core processors Access and Excel are not....". Regarding your second post "...With all due respect...." Respect??? - and "... I knew each and every thing you replied...." - did I miss that information in your original post? Well - anyway Albert Hall have a good day!!! "Alberta Hall" wrote in message ... With all due respect, I knew each and every thing you replied. We have a specific need to apply Excel & Access as specified. Were it not so, I'd not be asking any questions at all. If you can't be helpful, please don't cluuter my genuine and sincere and straightforward question with unhelpful and uninforative replies. TIA Alberta Hall "AJR" wrote: Xeons were not intended for non- commercial use but for servers, workstations and embedded environments. They are either one or multiple core processors - not multiple processors. Programs must be designed to utiliize multiple core processors Access and Excell are not. "Alberta Hall" Alberta wrote in message ... On ny XP pro running 2 Xeon mb, is it possible to assigne Excel 2007 to always launch using one XEON CPU and to assign the second XEONB to be the CPU dedicated to running Access? Is there any reading on MSDN or elsewhere that can teach me: 1. How to assign a particular program (such as Excel in my example above) to a CPU? Can it even be done to always dedicate Excel to one CPU & Access to another? And what governs the wisdom or lack thereof of doing so? 2. I had always let my NT 4 dual Pentium decide how to handle usage of the CPUs. Now that I'm using a dual XEON, & XP Pro, what resources are there to explain the thinking behind manual vs automatic control of the load on the individual CPUs? Thank in advance. I'm new to a dual XEON / XP Pro environment and want to do my reading to see what governs the decision of how to configure CPU usage. My basic plan was to create an icon on my desktop that launched my Excel and always uses one CPU for whatever processing it uses & to have a similar icon that launches Access dedicated to the other CPU. I just needed to know if this is even possible & to become informed as regards whether it is expedient or inexpedient. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Setup question on dual XEON
None of which directly answered the question. The correct answer was,
IIR the question correcly, there is no way to assign the Xeon-duo (one of which I happen to have) in that manner without reasonably complex 3rd party software when using Excel and Access. XP Pro can actually do some of that, depending, and probably already does it where it's most useful. Implied answers within extraneous information is not the way to answer a question. Answer it first, THEN supply some additional prose if you just feel you must. Twayne Note from your post "...is it possible to assigne Excel 2007 to always launch using one XEON CPU and to assign the second XEONB to be the CPU...." Note from my reply "...Programs must be designed to utiliize multiple core processors Access and Excel are not....". Regarding your second post "...With all due respect...." Respect??? - and "... I knew each and every thing you replied...." - did I miss that information in your original post? Well - anyway Albert Hall have a good day!!! "Alberta Hall" wrote in message ... With all due respect, I knew each and every thing you replied. We have a specific need to apply Excel & Access as specified. Were it not so, I'd not be asking any questions at all. If you can't be helpful, please don't cluuter my genuine and sincere and straightforward question with unhelpful and uninforative replies. TIA Alberta Hall "AJR" wrote: Xeons were not intended for non- commercial use but for servers, workstations and embedded environments. They are either one or multiple core processors - not multiple processors. Programs must be designed to utiliize multiple core processors Access and Excell are not. "Alberta Hall" Alberta wrote in message ... On ny XP pro running 2 Xeon mb, is it possible to assigne Excel 2007 to always launch using one XEON CPU and to assign the second XEONB to be the CPU dedicated to running Access? Is there any reading on MSDN or elsewhere that can teach me: 1. How to assign a particular program (such as Excel in my example above) to a CPU? Can it even be done to always dedicate Excel to one CPU & Access to another? And what governs the wisdom or lack thereof of doing so? 2. I had always let my NT 4 dual Pentium decide how to handle usage of the CPUs. Now that I'm using a dual XEON, & XP Pro, what resources are there to explain the thinking behind manual vs automatic control of the load on the individual CPUs? Thank in advance. I'm new to a dual XEON / XP Pro environment and want to do my reading to see what governs the decision of how to configure CPU usage. My basic plan was to create an icon on my desktop that launched my Excel and always uses one CPU for whatever processing it uses & to have a similar icon that launches Access dedicated to the other CPU. I just needed to know if this is even possible & to become informed as regards whether it is expedient or inexpedient. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|