System Restore

You do that all the time! Perhaps you're finally seeing yourself?
"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Leonard:
Don't spread misinformation and instead respond to the OPs questions.

Don't use registry cleaners.
---
Leonard Grey
Errare humanum est

Susie wrote:
I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable to
restore to this date." I have tried this over several days but
always...no joy. Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a
registry cleaner and removed some "stuff." Supposedly items that
were not needed and were just trash. Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do not accept
Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers of registry
cleaners.
"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable to
restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner and removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were just trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do not accept
Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers of registry
cleaners.

Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable to
restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner and removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were just trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

?????????????????????????



"Eddie Hyde" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do not accept
Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers of
registry
cleaners.

Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable to
restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but always...no
joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner and
removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were just
trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

?????????????????????????



"Eddie Hyde" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do not
accept Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers of
registry
cleaners.

Won't work; there aren't 20 of them that stupid. Ask anyone with real
world experience. Misinformation is your game, stupidity your fame.


Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable
to restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but
always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner and
removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were just
trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

You are a non helpful clown that pops up here, from time to time.
Get back in your hole!

Wortzik; do you eat that!!!!
--
Mad Mike


"Sonny Wortzik" wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:53:22 -0000, "Gerry" wrote:

Twayne

Dumbo! Why don't you read what Susie wrote!

You're beginning to sound like Murphy. Has anyone ever seen the two
of you in the same room at the same time?

BTW... your sig is fooked.




--



Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute

From personal experience here with you, where you have disagreed with my
correct answer, you are a complete fool!

And Registry Cleaners are NOT needed in modern OSs.
--
Mad Mike


"Twayne" wrote:

?????????????????????????



"Eddie Hyde" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do not
accept Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers of
registry
cleaners.

Won't work; there aren't 20 of them that stupid. Ask anyone with real
world experience. Misinformation is your game, stupidity your fame.


Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable
to restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but
always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner and
removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were just
trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

From personal experience here with you, where you have disagreed with
my correct answer, you are a complete fool!

And Registry Cleaners are NOT needed in modern OSs.


To whichever name you're using today:

Registry cleaners definitely have their places and their uses. It isn't
that I disagree with your "correct answer", it's that your "correct
answer" is just plain wrong. And what the subject change to "NOT
needed" is about, I don't know, because that is not and has not been any
of the points here so far. Take your bait elsewhere.

Stop giving misinformation and I'll stop correcting you.




?????????????????????????



"Eddie Hyde" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do
not accept Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers of
registry
cleaners.

Won't work; there aren't 20 of them that stupid. Ask anyone with
real world experience. Misinformation is your game, stupidity your
fame.


Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable
to restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but
always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner
and removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were
just trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

You are a raving lunatic, who should be banned from here.
And sued for giving false information.
--
Mad Mike


"Twayne" wrote:

From personal experience here with you, where you have disagreed with
my correct answer, you are a complete fool!

And Registry Cleaners are NOT needed in modern OSs.


To whichever name you're using today:

Registry cleaners definitely have their places and their uses. It isn't
that I disagree with your "correct answer", it's that your "correct
answer" is just plain wrong. And what the subject change to "NOT
needed" is about, I don't know, because that is not and has not been any
of the points here so far. Take your bait elsewhere.

Stop giving misinformation and I'll stop correcting you.




?????????????????????????



"Eddie Hyde" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do
not accept Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers of
registry
cleaners.

Won't work; there aren't 20 of them that stupid. Ask anyone with
real world experience. Misinformation is your game, stupidity your
fame.


Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable
to restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but
always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner
and removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were
just trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

But ... how would I know which of your many identities is suing me? Or
don't your identities ta;l to each other? Within self, I mean. It's
hard to keep track of who you are each time you take ona new personna
and begin to spew your bottom-feeding tripe. You seriousle need a life;
but only one.


You are a raving lunatic, who should be banned from here.
And sued for giving false information.

From personal experience here with you, where you have disagreed
with my correct answer, you are a complete fool!

And Registry Cleaners are NOT needed in modern OSs.


To whichever name you're using today:

Registry cleaners definitely have their places and their uses. It
isn't that I disagree with your "correct answer", it's that your
"correct answer" is just plain wrong. And what the subject change
to "NOT needed" is about, I don't know, because that is not and has
not been any of the points here so far. Take your bait elsewhere.

Stop giving misinformation and I'll stop correcting you.




?????????????????????????



"Eddie Hyde" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do
not accept Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers
of registry
cleaners.

Won't work; there aren't 20 of them that stupid. Ask anyone with
real world experience. Misinformation is your game, stupidity your
fame.


Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was
unable to restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but
always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner
and removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were
just trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

I have always been a top poster, you f***ing idiot.
You can not understand anything; let alone read headers to discover the
spoofers here.

You are just a waste of space; as everybody here knows.
Have a crap holiday; you deserve it!
--
Mad Mike


"Twayne" wrote:

But ... how would I know which of your many identities is suing me? Or
don't your identities ta;l to each other? Within self, I mean. It's
hard to keep track of who you are each time you take ona new personna
and begin to spew your bottom-feeding tripe. You seriousle need a life;
but only one.


You are a raving lunatic, who should be banned from here.
And sued for giving false information.

From personal experience here with you, where you have disagreed
with my correct answer, you are a complete fool!

And Registry Cleaners are NOT needed in modern OSs.


To whichever name you're using today:

Registry cleaners definitely have their places and their uses. It
isn't that I disagree with your "correct answer", it's that your
"correct answer" is just plain wrong. And what the subject change
to "NOT needed" is about, I don't know, because that is not and has
not been any of the points here so far. Take your bait elsewhere.

Stop giving misinformation and I'll stop correcting you.




?????????????????????????



"Eddie Hyde" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0600, "Unknown"
wrote:

Susie; For your own peace of mind and trouble free computing do
not accept Twaynes misinformation.
Just ask any 20 knowledgeable Microsoft MVP's about the dangers
of registry
cleaners.

Won't work; there aren't 20 of them that stupid. Ask anyone with
real world experience. Misinformation is your game, stupidity your
fame.


Carey Frisch is NOT in the Team Photo.


"Susie" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the help, all of you.
The restore in safe mode did it for me.
I didn't know anything about safe mode.
Thanks again...Susie

"Susie" wrote:

I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was
unable to restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but
always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner
and removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were
just trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:38:01 -0800, Mick Murphy
wrote:

I have always been a top poster, you f***ing idiot.
You can not understand anything; let alone read headers to discover the
spoofers here.

You are just a waste of space; as everybody here knows.
Have a crap holiday; you deserve it!
--
Mad Mike

Top-posters have always been frowned upon by traditional Usenet
aficionados. It is considered to be very bad form.

The first line of your post shows that bad form is apparently a highly
developed specialty of yours.

You have probably corrupted the system restore points in which case none
will be of any use.

I'm afraid that registry cleaners do have a tendency to create more problems
than they actually cure. For that reason I always advise users not to use
registry cleaners, regardless of how 'marvellous' the registry cleaner
company's advertising people paint them.

--

--
John Barnett MVP
Windows XP Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience

Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..


"Susie" wrote in message
...
I'm unable to use system restore. The restore points are made
automatically
but
when I try to restore I get the message "the computer was unable to
restore
to this date." I have tried this over several days but always...no joy.
Sometime in the past, CRS you know, I ran a registry cleaner and removed
some "stuff." Supposedly items that were not needed and were just trash.
Now, I'm wondering.
Would anyone have any helpfull suggestions?

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:01:17 -0600, The Max
wrote:


Top-posters have always been frowned upon by traditional Usenet
aficionados. It is considered to be very bad form.


*Some* "traditional Usenet aficionados" frown upon top-posters. Many
others (including me) do not. And some "traditional Usenet
aficionados" frown upon bottom-posters.

Personally I don't frown upon anyone just for his posting style, but I
can tell you several things concerning the way I feel about posting
styles:

1. If someone replies to a long message with a question at the bottom
of it by top-posting his answer and quoting the entire text of the
original, I have to first scroll all the way down to the bottom to
find the question and then scroll all the way back up to the top to
read the answer.

2. If someone replies to a long message with a question at the bottom
of it by bottom-posting his answer and quoting the entire text of the
original, I have to scroll all the way down to the bottom to find the
question and the answer.

Both of the above are poor ways to post, as far as I'm concerned, and
inconvenience me greatly--so greatly that in many cases, I don't
bother doing the scrolling and just bypass the message.

So my view of the best way to post replies is the following:

1. Answers should follow questions, never precede them. That avoids
scrolling down and then back up.

2. Answers should never be way down at the bottom so that one has to
scroll a long way down to find them.

3. If the question being answered is near the top of the original
message, the answer should be posted immediately after it. The rest of
the quoted material can follow the answer, or be deleted if it's not
critical to the message.

4. If the question being answered is near the bottom of the original
message, as much as possible of what precedes it should be deleted
when quoting, so that scrolling to the bottom is minimized.

5. If there are multiple questions being answered, the replies to each
of them should follow each question. That makes it clear which answer
pertains to which question.

6. If sufficient original test is deleted rather than quoted and the
answer is reasonably short, the reply to the question can either
precede the question or follow it. As I said above, I prefer the
answer following the question, but since both will fit on the screen
at the same time, and no scrolling will be required, the difference
between the two styles isn't very important

I personally think that number 6 above is the most important point.
Trimming the material quoted is more important than whether the answer
is top-posted or bottom-posted, because minimizing the scrolling
required to read the message is the most important consideration.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:43:49 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
wrote:

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:01:17 -0600, The Max
wrote:


Top-posters have always been frowned upon by traditional Usenet
aficionados. It is considered to be very bad form.


*Some* "traditional Usenet aficionados" frown upon top-posters. Many
others (including me) do not. And some "traditional Usenet
aficionados" frown upon bottom-posters.

Those who frown on top-posters outnumber all of the others combined
IMO ;-

I much prefer to see bottom-posting with some good editing of quoted
material (like this reply) so that only the part that is being replied
to is quoted, or inline posting without editing.