Microsoft end of support dates

Steve Carroll "Steve
Thu, 20 Aug 2020
00:25:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Happy Hackers Inc. ?

Very close. It's a creative play on words, and one of the other co
founders claims I put the "Happy' in happy Hackers. The individual
is a sarcastic prick!!! *waves*

I guess Snit is more famous on usenet than I gave him credit for.

have you googled him lately?

I didn't realize snit was completely clueless about hpavc.

As am I... never heard of it or HHI.

Wow. So, tell me something, what's it like to be a mushroom in
the digital world? g

Did he antagonize this HHI member (that'd be my guess)? It's what
he does, who he is shrug.

rofl, yea, something like that. G


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

On 2020-08-30, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve
Thu, 20 Aug 2020
00:25:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Happy Hackers Inc. ?

Very close. It's a creative play on words, and one of the other co
founders claims I put the "Happy' in happy Hackers. The individual
is a sarcastic prick!!! *waves*

I guess Snit is more famous on usenet than I gave him credit for.

have you googled him lately?

Just now because you asked. I don't see anything out of the ordinary.

I didn't realize snit was completely clueless about hpavc.

As am I... never heard of it or HHI.

Wow. So, tell me something, what's it like to be a mushroom in
the digital world? g

I've never looked into the hacking thing shrug.

Did he antagonize this HHI member (that'd be my guess)? It's what
he does, who he is shrug.

rofl, yea, something like that. G

I'm not surprised.

On 2020-08-30, Steve Carroll "Steve wrote:
On 2020-08-30, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve
Thu, 20 Aug 2020
00:25:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Happy Hackers Inc. ?

Very close. It's a creative play on words, and one of the other co
founders claims I put the "Happy' in happy Hackers. The individual
is a sarcastic prick!!! *waves*

I guess Snit is more famous on usenet than I gave him credit for.

have you googled him lately?

Just now because you asked. I don't see anything out of the ordinary.

Nor do I.
What am I supposed to see?




--
pothead

Steve Carroll "Steve Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:43:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

have you googled him lately?

Just now because you asked. I don't see anything out of the
ordinary.

Ahh. I hadn't before, so it was news to me. You're used to it, I
suppose. Make sure you took a good look at the results you got when
you googled. In a week, I'll ask you to do it again and compare.
bfg

I've never looked into the hacking thing shrug.

It's an interesting world.

Did he antagonize this HHI member (that'd be my guess)? It's what
he does, who he is shrug.

rofl, yea, something like that. G

I'm not surprised.

We weren't either at the end of the day. It's clear he wants to be
shown things he doesn't comprehend can happen. His terms have been
accepted. Stay tuned, your boy snit is about to get bitchslapped
into a reality he never knew existed. This is going to be *very
entertaining* (not so much for snit) nearly everyone else who's ever
had to **** with him,or who's been hassled by him is going to enjoy
what's coming - I almost guarantee it.

It's going to be ****ing brutal, so I hope nobody has a weak stomach
or in any way feels sorry for snit for any reason; you're about to
see some really nasty things done to another human being that
shouldn't be, but are going to be to make an example and a point. If
for some reason, you're reading this reply and you do feel bad for
snit, you might want to turn away at my posts coming later this
week; snits going to be featured and it's not going to be fun for
him. Not fun at all. *highly amusing* for me and some others at this
point though, we're already laughing our asses off.

--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

pothead Sun,
30 Aug 2020 14:46:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-08-30, Steve Carroll "Steve wrote:
On 2020-08-30, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve
Thu, 20 Aug
2020 00:25:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Happy Hackers Inc. ?

Very close. It's a creative play on words, and one of the other
co founders claims I put the "Happy' in happy Hackers. The
individual is a sarcastic prick!!! *waves*

I guess Snit is more famous on usenet than I gave him credit
for.

have you googled him lately?

Just now because you asked. I don't see anything out of the
ordinary.

Nor do I.
What am I supposed to see?

If you're already used to what came up, then nothing. I didn't
before, so I did recently to establish a baseline for the purposes
of progress tracking as things proceed. It's nice to be able to see
how things are going at a glance, you know?


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Snit
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:50:44 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 30, 2020 at 7:11:59 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:58:42
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I may have forgotten to tell you, but HHI consists of several
people.

But it is you and only you making the threat. Can you
understand that?

Umm, So, you think releases can be issued just because I want to?
that I don't require the entire group to be onboard with it? Is
that how you think groups like this function snit?

The question was if you understood you are the one making threats.

I understand the question. Do you know the difference between the
consequence of an action vs a threat? There is a difference between
the two. I've been very specific concerning which it is I've written
to you, as well.

Clearly you did failed to understand the question.

When you're going to project your own short comings onto another
person, with your near illiterate reading level; double check your
snarky comment to make sure it's not ****ed up in some manner, like
that one was. "you did failed" doesn't make any sense, iliterate
one.

Do you understand it now?

I understand your efforts to be insulting should have been spell
checked before you posted it, yes.

I have never said, suggested, hinted, or implied I would dox you,

Bull****.

The number I have in my phone records, by the way, is not illegal
to share.

I'll bite, snit. On what grounds do you think it's not illegal to
share?

If I do

At this point, as far as I'm concerned, you already have. I realize
you still think you're okay, that you can handle me with ease. We'll
see how you feel in a few days from now.

it will be to refute your claims about the
number not being there

Moving goalposts to justify what you're threatening to do again. How
quaint. I do *not* deny it's present. Of course it is, you put it
there. Duh!

and so people can verify that it does tie
to Johnson City (and Verizon). These are things you say your
number does not do -- and if you are correct it is not even your
number!

I know what the app is telling you. I'm just telling you that
another carrier is my provider, so as Mike indicated previously, the
database that app is using isn't up to date.

You only have one number on me, so this attempt to confuse people so
you can dox me with the one number you have, and play stupid about
it (that's what you're trying to set things up for here, to cover
your ass; but it's not going to cover your ass with me. I'm not the
law, I don't have to follow specific procedures to get you in a
"proper" manner legal way. I'm patient, sure, but not that patient.
We (That's *You* and *I* snit) have an issue that you still think is
a joke.

Well, we'll see if your still laughing as much as you are now in a
few days, Snit. And when I see how you're doing, it's not going to
be an offer for you to say uncle, you get the message, I can stop
now. That's not how this works. Anyways, you're going to come to an
all new understanding of how the internet can be your worst
nightmare, within the next few days.

Remember, you are simply speculating about what is in my phone
records.

Stop putting words in my mouth, druggie. I know what's in your phone
records. I've seen your video editing work for myself. I've seen you
get busted for forging evidence previously. I don't care how much
time and effort you put into rewriting what I wrote and what you've
already written about this as you continue to move the goal posts
around, hoping for a better position.

You're still doing all of this to divert attention away from several
lies you've written about me, that you aren't willing to admit are
lies. You went out of your way to issue an apology for something I
didn't even ask you about, and at no time did you mention what you
actually did in the apology, and the apology wasn't directed to me.
Infact, you lied and claimed I called you out for something you made
up, and that's what you were apologizing for, a resulting "error" As
can clearly be seen he

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass
3WTC373bt67J31gn

YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

A direct lie is it? Explain this then:

From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:




Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:



On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.

Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

I think maybe you should retire the "direct lie" routine. It's over
used, and clearly, not accurate when you claim it.

Here comes the bull**** apology, nearly ten days later, after
repeated requests and repeated reposts of the lie he clearly wrote,
you finally issue an apology.

Which as anyone can see, is completely made up bull**** and you
proceed to apologize for the bogus error you made, but not the false
accusation you made against me specifically which I called you out
for having done. Yes, you're that dishonest, yes, it's this easy to
show:

Message-ID:

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,co mp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 27 Aug 2020 16:00:24 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass
YyRp

XnsAC1EBCDBAAD5EHT1@0ydV5Cg6OLqWT90unHZ34QVT6yqk8 KnKb.nd

I did incorrectly say he had not asked me to "research" or whatever -- not
considering such a quick look to really count. But from your perspective, I
suppose, where doing a quick search on a list is not completely trivial, it
counts. Sorry for my error on that.

Again, for comparison, this is what I wrote that he claimed was a direct lie:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass
3WTC373bt67J31gn

YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

It clearly wasn't, and I didn't say a damn thing about research. No
error had been made, snit lied his ****ing ass off and doesn't dare
fork what's rightfully mine over to me; a ****ing apology to ME for
having lied on me.


I am the one who knows for certain.

No question about that.

So, go outside, do something relaxing and enjoyable. You have long
weeks coming, and winters going to be one cold mother****er this
year for you. Next year isn't looking much better.

It's for me constantly being on your ass about the lies you've been
writing that's caused you to shift gears from trying to wear me down
to threatening to dox me. And, yet, I'm still on your ass, demanding
those apologies, posting proof of your lies, and continuing to ride
your ass right into the ground over them. I won't stop doing it,
even as things get real unpleasant for you this coming week. I'm
still going to be on your ass for those lies. Nothing you write is
going to convince me to stop asking you to do what's right. Nothing.


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

On Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:24 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Steve Carroll "Steve
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:43:20
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

have you googled him lately?

Just now because you asked. I don't see anything out of the
ordinary.

Ahh. I hadn't before, so it was news to me. You're used to it, I
suppose. Make sure you took a good look at the results you got when
you googled. In a week, I'll ask you to do it again and compare.
bfg

I've never looked into the hacking thing shrug.

It's an interesting world.

Did he antagonize this HHI member (that'd be my guess)? It's what
he does, who he is shrug.

rofl, yea, something like that. G

I'm not surprised.

We weren't either at the end of the day. It's clear he wants to be
shown things he doesn't comprehend can happen. His terms have been
accepted. Stay tuned, your boy snit is about to get bitchslapped
into a reality he never knew existed. This is going to be *very
entertaining* (not so much for snit) nearly everyone else who's ever
had to **** with him,or who's been hassled by him is going to enjoy
what's coming - I almost guarantee it.

It's going to be ****ing brutal, so I hope nobody has a weak stomach
or in any way feels sorry for snit for any reason; you're about to
see some really nasty things done to another human being that
shouldn't be, but are going to be to make an example and a point. If
for some reason, you're reading this reply and you do feel bad for
snit, you might want to turn away at my posts coming later this
week; snits going to be featured and it's not going to be fun for
him. Not fun at all. *highly amusing* for me and some others at this
point though, we're already laughing our asses off.


You are really losing it. For what? You cannot figure out your own phone
system?

YyRp
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----

The number I have absolutely DOES point to Johnson City:

https://youtu.be/SIoxVQYZQ7Q

Unblurred here, but the video is currently set to private:

https://youtu.be/s4xjdkWzW7Y

Also recall you already gave me permission to share that number:

Gremlin :
-----
You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit.
-----

Any reason for me to not set that to public so you know exactly what number I
mean and can verify for yourself, as can others, that it points to Johnson
City?



--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:26 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Snit
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:50:44 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 30, 2020 at 7:11:59 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:58:42
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I may have forgotten to tell you, but HHI consists of several
people.

But it is you and only you making the threat. Can you
understand that?

Umm, So, you think releases can be issued just because I want to?
that I don't require the entire group to be onboard with it? Is
that how you think groups like this function snit?

The question was if you understood you are the one making threats.

I understand the question.

Are you simply unable to answer? Unwilling?

Let me be very clear: you are making threats. I neither approve of your
threats nor appreciate them.

I am asking you to stop making threats. Why are you even freaking out so
badly? Just because you cannot figure out your own phone system?

YyRp
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----

The number I have absolutely DOES point to Johnson City:

https://youtu.be/SIoxVQYZQ7Q

Unblurred here, but the video is currently set to private:

https://youtu.be/s4xjdkWzW7Y

Also recall you already gave me permission to share that number:

Gremlin :
-----
You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit.
-----

Any reason for me to not set that to public so you know exactly what number I
mean and can verify for yourself, as can others, that it points to Johnson
City?



--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:26 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

it will be to refute your claims about the
number not being there

Moving goalposts to justify what you're threatening to do again. How
quaint. I do *not* deny it's present. Of course it is, you put it
there. Duh!

The number in phone records from a phone provider show up automatically when
you call, assuming your number is not somehow blocked. It is not the recipient
who puts them there.

Can you understand that?




--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:26 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

and so people can verify that it does tie
to Johnson City (and Verizon). These are things you say your
number does not do -- and if you are correct it is not even your
number!

I know what the app is telling you. I'm just telling you that
another carrier is my provider, so as Mike indicated previously, the
database that app is using isn't up to date.

Are you saying you were flat out wrong when you said the following?

YyRp
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----

Are you really sure of what you said here?


-----
And amusingly (this is what sunk you bro) found yourself
in disagreement with David Brooks (a well known internet
stalker that you foolishly think is your friend) over
which city it is I reside in. it's Kingsport, snit. Not
Johnson City. I'm not within walking distance of Johnson
City, snit. rofl. It's not even a short drive for me, it's
a bit of a long one. So, how can you explain why that city
is supposed to show in your logs but not the one I reside
in?
-----

Do you see how foolish you were here?

3WTC373bt67J31gn
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----

On this one it seems you are admitting YOU were busted being ignorant when you
said these things.

oj8b
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a ****up on his part
by now?
-----

Are you saying it is you, and not me, who made the error?


-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from.
-----

Do you see how where you made your mistake?

YyRp
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----

Not one time, eh? Do you see your error?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2020-08-30, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:43:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

have you googled him lately?

Just now because you asked. I don't see anything out of the
ordinary.

Ahh. I hadn't before, so it was news to me. You're used to it, I
suppose. Make sure you took a good look at the results you got when
you googled. In a week, I'll ask you to do it again and compare.
bfg

I've never looked into the hacking thing shrug.

It's an interesting world.

Did he antagonize this HHI member (that'd be my guess)? It's what
he does, who he is shrug.

rofl, yea, something like that. G

I'm not surprised.

We weren't either at the end of the day. It's clear he wants to be
shown things he doesn't comprehend can happen. His terms have been
accepted. Stay tuned, your boy snit is about to get bitchslapped
into a reality he never knew existed. This is going to be *very
entertaining* (not so much for snit) nearly everyone else who's ever
had to **** with him,or who's been hassled by him is going to enjoy
what's coming - I almost guarantee it.

It's going to be ****ing brutal, so I hope nobody has a weak stomach
or in any way feels sorry for snit for any reason; you're about to
see some really nasty things done to another human being that
shouldn't be, but are going to be to make an example and a point. If
for some reason, you're reading this reply and you do feel bad for
snit,

LOL! Dude, are you f*cking high? Me? Feel sorry for Snit?! Don't get me
wrong, all the crap he's claimed I've done outside of usenet, that's all
lies by him, IOW... I wouldn't do what you're planning if it's outside
of usenet (and it sounds like it is). That said, whatever it is I've no
doubt he's earned it, from many years of bad karma if nothing else.

you might want to turn away at my posts coming later this
week; snits going to be featured and it's not going to be fun for
him. Not fun at all. *highly amusing* for me and some others at this
point though, we're already laughing our asses off.

What did he do to you (aside from his usual attempts at humiliation that
he's been doing for months already) or this HHI person he antagonized
(and how was that done)? I thought this was mainly about some phone
number he says showed up in his records and you say it didn't. Is that
not the case? Or was it just the back breaking straw?

On 2020-08-30, Gremlin wrote:
pothead Sun,
30 Aug 2020 14:46:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-08-30, Steve Carroll "Steve wrote:
On 2020-08-30, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve
Thu, 20 Aug
2020 00:25:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Happy Hackers Inc. ?

Very close. It's a creative play on words, and one of the other
co founders claims I put the "Happy' in happy Hackers. The
individual is a sarcastic prick!!! *waves*

I guess Snit is more famous on usenet than I gave him credit
for.

have you googled him lately?

Just now because you asked. I don't see anything out of the
ordinary.

Nor do I.
What am I supposed to see?

If you're already used to what came up, then nothing. I didn't
before, so I did recently to establish a baseline for the purposes
of progress tracking as things proceed. It's nice to be able to see
how things are going at a glance, you know?

Got it.
Thank you.




--
pothead

Snit
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:41 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:26 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:50:44
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 30, 2020 at 7:11:59 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020
22:58:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I may have forgotten to tell you, but HHI consists of
several people.

But it is you and only you making the threat. Can you
understand that?

Umm, So, you think releases can be issued just because I want
to? that I don't require the entire group to be onboard with
it? Is that how you think groups like this function snit?

The question was if you understood you are the one making
threats.

I understand the question.

Are you simply unable to answer? Unwilling?

I did.

Message-ID: I9qhY

You snipped the rest:

I understand the question. Do you know the difference between the
consequence of an action vs a threat? There is a difference between
the two. I've been very specific concerning which it is I've written
to you, as well.

Let me be very clear: you are making threats. I neither approve of
your threats nor appreciate them.

I'm not making a single threat towards you or anyone else.

I am asking you to stop making threats.

I haven't made any. And you aren't in a position to be asking
anything of me anymore.

Any reason for me to not set that to public so you know exactly
what number I mean and can verify for yourself, as can others,
that it points to Johnson City?

Your youtube channel, for starters.

--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

On Aug 31, 2020 at 6:28:14 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Snit
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:54:41 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:26 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:50:44
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 30, 2020 at 7:11:59 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Wed, 19 Aug 2020
22:58:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

I may have forgotten to tell you, but HHI consists of
several people.

But it is you and only you making the threat. Can you
understand that?

Umm, So, you think releases can be issued just because I want
to? that I don't require the entire group to be onboard with
it? Is that how you think groups like this function snit?

The question was if you understood you are the one making
threats.

I understand the question.

Are you simply unable to answer? Unwilling?

I did.

Message-ID: I9qhY

You snipped the rest:

I understand the question. Do you know the difference between the
consequence of an action vs a threat? There is a difference between
the two. I've been very specific concerning which it is I've written
to you, as well.

Let me be very clear: you are making threats. I neither approve of
your threats nor appreciate them.

I'm not making a single threat towards you or anyone else.

I am asking you to stop making threats.

I haven't made any. And you aren't in a position to be asking
anything of me anymore.

Any reason for me to not set that to public so you know exactly
what number I mean and can verify for yourself, as can others,
that it points to Johnson City?

Your youtube channel, for starters.

Are you saying to set it to public so people can verify if the number I have,
contrary to your claims, points to Johnson City?


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit
Tue, 01 Sep 2020 02:09:17 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 31, 2020 at 6:28:13 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

When I explained that what he was doing would have consequences,
his response trying to spin consequences into threats (they are
not the same thing, obviously) is what was the final straw. As I
was told "where the **** does he get off thinking he can do
whatever the **** he damn well likes with your information and
you can't do anything about it? **** that, and **** him. You can,
we can, and we will."

That's a verbatim copy/paste from an irc chat taken two days ago.

He's going to be in for a very rude awakening. He finally tagged
the wrong one to play his snit games with. Go Snit!


Please stop making threats to

No threats have been made towards you. The fact you don't understand
that, or you do, but are desperately trying to label it as something
else entirely is your own fault; no one elses.

You have lied on me, several times now, attempted to stalk my
business, several times now, offered to share the phone number you
have, several times now, under the totally bull**** disclaimer "Don't
make it public and you can have it."

You've even gone so far as to try to dupe various people into
thinking we've been discussing two different phone numbers. And as
you've done so, tried to excuse yourself to leak it since I
disagreed with you concerning the city you pasted into your dr'd
evidence pile. The reason you're so desperate to try and sling any
mud you can at me, is because you don't want to get caught for the
third time in a row, in a ****ing row no less, of lying your ass off
about me, and getting called out for it.

You can't use that old routine "those unquotable lies" anymore,
because I can easily show two of the three you've tried to sell now
are infact, absolute, no question about it, lies. That you wrote
about me, intentionally.

try to hide how you cannot stand that the number you called me
with, that is in my phone provider's records, is tied to Johnson
City.

You clearly have the maturity level of a small child most of the
time. Which is laughable considering how much effort you put forth
in trying to talk down to someone else.

It's so funny to read - because nearly everyone knows you can't
backup the attitude you display with any actual knowledge of
technical matters. Not only do you have severe learning
disabilities, you also suffer from a severe case of being a super
dishonest, trolling, ****wit, most of the time, too.

I didn't call you with a phone, so there's no way the disposable
cells number is in your incoming call records, atleast not the
incoming ones. Outbound sure, you've called it twice. But, not
inbound.

So, how many times have you actually been busted forging so called
evidence to support the lies you've passed off as the truth before?

It really is amazing how much you are angry about your failure to
understand the tech you use and your failure to be able to do
basic troubleshooting.

Neither of which are statements you have been able to support at any
point in time. You just write **** without backing it up.

By the way, the number does not always point to Verizon

No ****, sherlock. I believe I mentioned that already.


-- on some databases it points to Century Link -- but I have not found a
single one that points to a city other than Johnson City.

But, you aren't trying to stalk me right? And those posts concerning
my business you sent to troll who changes nyms often is what if it's
not stalking? What legitimate interest do you have in another
computer repair business in a state that's no where near you? I've
asked you that before, but I got crickets for a response. So, I'll
ask again. If you aren't stalking me, why are you trying so hard to
locate my business information? What legitimate interest do you have
in my business, Snit?

https://gofile.io/d/8XldzV

If you are right that your number NEVER points to that then we
cannot be talking about the same number. Can you understand that?

That's exactly what I was writing about above. You're attempting to
confuse people into thinking we're discussing two seperate phone
numbers, so that you can leak it under the guise of "it must be the
wrong number." I've asked just how dishonest you were previously...I
think I have a very good idea as to the answer to that question now.


Snit, I think you actually do know the difference between a
consequence and a threat. I also think you're attempting to confuse
things into you being threatened so that you won't be held
accountable for what you've already done. The only way this is going
to work in your favor is if everyone you reach out to to complain,
has the exact same mental issues as yourself. But, alas, they're
employed and have passed a background check; so your chances of
misleading them isn't that high.

I suspect due to the fact you've tried to take things to real life
with people before, that you've probably scored yourself a spot on a
netkook list. You can only BS various individuals for so long, snit.
And you have a stock pile of people who despise you, going back over
a decade. So, it's more than likely not, you've to use one of your
favorite, easy to spell words, "whined" way too much about various
people, you know, as you like to say, "playing victim" Except that
you aren't the victim, you're the aggressor.

In the event you actually try the ruse though, and one of my own
locals reaches out to me, I'll give them another copy of various
posts, urls, etc I've collected. I've already taken the liberty of
doing this in preparation; you advised it the first time you made
the threat. And what you wrote was an actual threat. I'd be very
surprised if they haven't already made contact with your locals to
confirm some/all of the material, in the event they hear from you
concerning some stupid **** you've been doing that you're going to
answer for having done.

--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Ayep...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php