If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do
not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
The last time I saw any figures, SP2 had been installed on over 180 million
computers, and less than 1% sought assistance from Microsoft. It has been my experience that only poorly maintained computers experience any problems with SP2. It seems that those who know how to keep their systems healthy (regular defrags, proper procedures for installation and removal of software, etc) have no issues with SP2. Those that do nothing to maintain a healthy system are the ones having problems. SP2 only seems to cause problems when there is a pre-existing problem that will be exacerbated by SP2. In short, if you are lazy and don't take the steps necessary to maintain your system, then you should probably avoid installing SP2, as you wouldn't have a clue to fixing any issues it may or may not cause. If, on the other hand, you do regular maintenance, know how to make a backup prior to installation, and have a healthy system to begin with, you'll most certainly want to install SP2 for it's security enhancements and the added system stability. Bobby "MR" wrote in message ... Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
You read a disproportionate number of problem posts here because the
successful installers don't have to come here for help. -- Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine] (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested) "MR" wrote in message ... Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
"MR" wrote in message ... Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help If you follow basic good housekeeping routines and keep your computer in good shape there is nothing to fear from installing SP2. One check point that is often missed is to visit the support web site of your computer supplier to find if there are any updates to be applied before installing SP2. Remember that if your particular configuration does actually run into conflict with SP2 it can be uninstalled via add remove programs and you will still have your outdated SP1 version. For total peace of mind you should have in any case an effective regular backup system for your data, settings and system. If you do not you should be afraid, very afraid, every time you use your computer not just when installing a service pack :-)) Richard H. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
My two-pennyworth - having installed SP2 TWICE, on two different OS's (one
Home, one Pro) - it's a piece of cake. PROVIDED that all the "housekeeping" - AV scan, scans for malware/adware is done, and the latest drivers for external kit - it's a piece of cake. In relative terms, "less than 1%" problems" (on 180mm installations) - that indicates c1 million problems. It's no-where near that, and, as stated elewhere, it's only those who DON'T take regular (normal) precautions that get grief. I too was cautious - if I can do it, so can anyone. Go for it! Sincerely, Len. "MR" wrote in message ... Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
"MR" wrote in message
... Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help Waiting for a later service pack will not help you. If you are going to have issues with SP2 then you will probably have the same with SP3. Each Sp includes al the fixes from the previous packs (they are cumulative) so what ever is in SP2 is likely to also effect you if you wait for SP3. You should follow the advice given by all the other posters and get SP2 on your system as soon as possible then use Windows Update to get the rest of the patches and fixes you should be running to get a stable and secure system. -- Regards, Mike -- Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these newsgroups "MR" wrote in message ... Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
Salut/Hi NoNoBadDog!,
le/on Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:57:26 -1000, tu disais/you said:- The last time I saw any figures, SP2 had been installed on over 180 million computers, and less than 1% sought assistance from Microsoft. Presumably these were figures provided by Microsoft. Presumably therefore they didn't count those who sought assistance elsewhere, eg from the OEM supplier, because Microsoft won't help those who bought OEM versions. Do they apply to households world wide or in the US? In short, if you are lazy and don't take the steps necessary to maintain your system, Here we go .... sympathetic to a fault. want to install SP2 for it's security enhancements and the added system stability. Would it be nit picking to suggest that someone who can't apostrophise correctly might also not be able to maintain his computer to the level that causes no issues with SP2? Sorry Bobby, but your kind of response makes me see red. If around 1.8 millon people HAVE contacted Microsoft, (presumably in just the USA) that demonstrates some serious problems. No one WANTS to under maintain their system, you know. Windows XP has been deliberately marketed as being self maintaining, self diagnosing, and perfect for those who AREN'T very computer literate. So don't criticise someone who isn't and who chooses XP. -- All the Best Ian Hoare http://www.souvigne.com mailbox full to avoid spam. try me at website |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
In ,
MR typed: Hi I have delayed installing sp2(still have sp1) for months now because I do not want to have the problems that alot of N'G readers/posters have said they have had.EX: programs not working, installations of sp2 giving problems, etc With very rare exceptions, nobody comes to a newsgroup to report his successes. People come here for help with problems. So you should *expect* to see a lot of problems with SP2 reported here, just as you should expect to see a lot of problems with transmissions if you hang around a transmission shop. And I know that there have been lots of issues with this. There have been some, but very few, considering how many people have installed SP2. I've personally installed it a several machines with no problems on any of them. I know of *many* other people who have installed it multiple times, and I'm personally aware of only a single problem, and that was someone with multiple pieces of spyware installe--a definite no-no. Prepare properly and your chances of problems are slim. Read http://forum.aumha.org/viewforum.php?f=45 So, do they have out and sp3 sp4 No, SP2 is the lastest service pack. And when another service pack comes out it would almost cetrainly include the SP2 fixes; it wouldn't protect you against any problems you might have with it. or other that will give less problems than sp2. I have the sp2 cd sitting by my pc and cannot get myself to install it onto my 2 year old pc. I have security programs installed and do pretty good in keeping my pc safe from viruses/spyware/etc. Good, but although the security fixes in SP2 are what are highly touted, that's not all that SP2 is about See "List of fixes included in Windows XP Service Pack 2" http://support.microsoft.com/default...t=windowsxpsp2 I did lots of reading in the past on the MS web site but, honestly, it overwhelmed me to the point of being scared to install. thanks for your help My advice is to install it, but prepare for it properly (read the link above) and do a backup first. I can't promise success, but I can tell you that the chances of problems will be extremely slight. -- Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User Please reply to the newsgroup |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
"Shenan Stanley" wrote in message ... Ian Hoare wrote: snip If around 1.8 millon people HAVE contacted Microsoft, (presumably in just the USA) that demonstrates some serious problems. No one WANTS to under maintain their system, you know. Windows XP has been deliberately marketed as being self maintaining, self diagnosing, and perfect for those who AREN'T very computer literate. So don't criticise someone who isn't and who chooses XP. I cannot say I agree that it has been marketed (completely) in such a way. It is better at self-maintenance than most other Operating Systems - out of the box. There are many cars that don't need oil changes as often as others.. Air compressors that do not require lubrication.. Easy to clean flooring materials.. Self-cleaning ovens.. But all of these objects require some knowledge to utilize and maintain. I do not think it is too much to expect the same thing from your computer. I have little sympathy for those who do not bother to learn to properly maintain/use something they own. Empathy for not understanding they need to learn.. maybe. Windows is more self-maintaining and better for those not computer literate than Linux, BeOS, etc.. It may NOT be more so than OS X, but in as far as applications and mass market appeal - Windows XP does have the bear's share. It's not a fault of an OS that people install (or allow to be installed) malware. It is not the fault of an OS that some hardware manufacturers decide not to support their hardware beyond a given point and leave those who own said hardware out in the cold. There is no substitute for learning to use the equipment you have before it goes south on you. I will not say that SP2 did not cause issues - I will venture to say most of those issues boiled down to some underlying problem that existed before SP2 - but SP2 uncovered on the system OR with the support (lack of) given by hardware/software manufacturers whose product was installed on machines and then caused issues. The number of manufacturers who did not come out with patches for 3 months after SP2 was officially released (although the beta existed for months before that) or those who did not update drivers to allow full functionality in Windows XP SP2 (instead pushing their new products, as they would if a new OS was released) is quite high in relative terms. They make more selling new products/revisions than giving away patches to maintain old versions. No one may WANT to "under maintain thier system", but since they now have requested help, it is an opportunity to make sure they have the proper tools to avoid it, is it not? snipped I think you make a good point, but what I get from Ian's posts, is Bobby's conscending attitude about how others should just about know what he knows. Though you stress almost the same points as Bobby, you point out the issues without noting "if you are lazy ", or "you wouldn't have a clue to fixing", etc. Bobby knows what he's talking about (sometimes), but he is rough when he replies, and it shows when others reply to him. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
Ian Hoare wrote:
snip If around 1.8 millon people HAVE contacted Microsoft, (presumably in just the USA) that demonstrates some serious problems. No one WANTS to under maintain their system, you know. Windows XP has been deliberately marketed as being self maintaining, self diagnosing, and perfect for those who AREN'T very computer literate. So don't criticise someone who isn't and who chooses XP. Shenan Stanley wrote: I cannot say I agree that it has been marketed (completely) in such a way. It is better at self-maintenance than most other Operating Systems - out of the box. There are many cars that don't need oil changes as often as others.. Air compressors that do not require lubrication.. Easy to clean flooring materials.. Self-cleaning ovens.. But all of these objects require some knowledge to utilize and maintain. I do not think it is too much to expect the same thing from your computer. I have little sympathy for those who do not bother to learn to properly maintain/use something they own. Empathy for not understanding they need to learn.. maybe. Windows is more self-maintaining and better for those not computer literate than Linux, BeOS, etc.. It may NOT be more so than OS X, but in as far as applications and mass market appeal - Windows XP does have the bear's share. It's not a fault of an OS that people install (or allow to be installed) malware. It is not the fault of an OS that some hardware manufacturers decide not to support their hardware beyond a given point and leave those who own said hardware out in the cold. There is no substitute for learning to use the equipment you have before it goes south on you. I will not say that SP2 did not cause issues - I will venture to say most of those issues boiled down to some underlying problem that existed before SP2 - but SP2 uncovered on the system OR with the support (lack of) given by hardware/software manufacturers whose product was installed on machines and then caused issues. The number of manufacturers who did not come out with patches for 3 months after SP2 was officially released (although the beta existed for months before that) or those who did not update drivers to allow full functionality in Windows XP SP2 (instead pushing their new products, as they would if a new OS was released) is quite high in relative terms. They make more selling new products/revisions than giving away patches to maintain old versions. No one may WANT to "under maintain thier system", but since they now have requested help, it is an opportunity to make sure they have the proper tools to avoid it, is it not? snipped Tom wrote: I think you make a good point, but what I get from Ian's posts, is Bobby's conscending attitude about how others should just about know what he knows. Though you stress almost the same points as Bobby, you point out the issues without noting "if you are lazy ", or "you wouldn't have a clue to fixing", etc. Bobby knows what he's talking about (sometimes), but he is rough when he replies, and it shows when others reply to him. True. We all have our "blunt" moments - some have more than others. -- - Shenan - -- The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are getting into before you jump in with both feet. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
"Shenan Stanley" wrote in message ... Ian Hoare wrote: snip If around 1.8 millon people HAVE contacted Microsoft, (presumably in just the USA) that demonstrates some serious problems. No one WANTS to under maintain their system, you know. Windows XP has been deliberately marketed as being self maintaining, self diagnosing, and perfect for those who AREN'T very computer literate. So don't criticise someone who isn't and who chooses XP. Shenan Stanley wrote: I cannot say I agree that it has been marketed (completely) in such a way. It is better at self-maintenance than most other Operating Systems - out of the box. There are many cars that don't need oil changes as often as others.. Air compressors that do not require lubrication.. Easy to clean flooring materials.. Self-cleaning ovens.. But all of these objects require some knowledge to utilize and maintain. I do not think it is too much to expect the same thing from your computer. I have little sympathy for those who do not bother to learn to properly maintain/use something they own. Empathy for not understanding they need to learn.. maybe. Windows is more self-maintaining and better for those not computer literate than Linux, BeOS, etc.. It may NOT be more so than OS X, but in as far as applications and mass market appeal - Windows XP does have the bear's share. It's not a fault of an OS that people install (or allow to be installed) malware. It is not the fault of an OS that some hardware manufacturers decide not to support their hardware beyond a given point and leave those who own said hardware out in the cold. There is no substitute for learning to use the equipment you have before it goes south on you. I will not say that SP2 did not cause issues - I will venture to say most of those issues boiled down to some underlying problem that existed before SP2 - but SP2 uncovered on the system OR with the support (lack of) given by hardware/software manufacturers whose product was installed on machines and then caused issues. The number of manufacturers who did not come out with patches for 3 months after SP2 was officially released (although the beta existed for months before that) or those who did not update drivers to allow full functionality in Windows XP SP2 (instead pushing their new products, as they would if a new OS was released) is quite high in relative terms. They make more selling new products/revisions than giving away patches to maintain old versions. No one may WANT to "under maintain thier system", but since they now have requested help, it is an opportunity to make sure they have the proper tools to avoid it, is it not? snipped Tom wrote: I think you make a good point, but what I get from Ian's posts, is Bobby's conscending attitude about how others should just about know what he knows. Though you stress almost the same points as Bobby, you point out the issues without noting "if you are lazy ", or "you wouldn't have a clue to fixing", etc. Bobby knows what he's talking about (sometimes), but he is rough when he replies, and it shows when others reply to him. True. We all have our "blunt" moments - some have more than others. Yes, I have that too, but not right off to be a dick about it. Bobby is a constant when it comes to disrespectful replies; he and MPT are co-virtuals in these forums. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
I run belarc advisor and lists updates for SP3?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
Hi,
Any critical update released after SP2 will indicate that, as they will likely be included in SP3 - whenever that occurs. Same thing was true of updates released after SP1 and prior to SP2. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone Windows help - www.rickrogers.org "norm" wrote in message ... I run belarc advisor and lists updates for SP3? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
anything higher than sp2?
Thanks,
Hi, Any critical update released after SP2 will indicate that, as they will likely be included in SP3 - whenever that occurs. Same thing was true of updates released after SP1 and prior to SP2. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone Windows help - www.rickrogers.org "norm" wrote in message ... I run belarc advisor and lists updates for SP3? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Not "burning" to Cd after SP2 upgrade | \old\ devildog | Windows Service Pack 2 | 4 | December 2nd 04 05:33 PM |
Not "burning" to Cd after SP2 upgrade | \old\ devildog | Windows XP Help and Support | 0 | November 30th 04 05:15 PM |
SP2 Boot failure, system freeze, AGPCPQ.SYS, AGP440.SYS lock-ups. | Trebor | Windows Service Pack 2 | 2 | October 19th 04 07:55 PM |
Has SP2 been issued by MS yet? | tom-islander | Windows Service Pack 2 | 4 | September 6th 04 12:07 AM |
How Do I Reset My Machine to Download XP SP2 After Denying It During Upgrade | [email protected] | Windows Service Pack 2 | 1 | August 26th 04 04:50 AM |