A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Blue ray burners



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 9th 13, 09:43 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Andy[_16_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 337
Default Blue ray burners


Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared to standard DVDs.

Andy
Ads
  #2  
Old April 9th 13, 10:48 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,275
Default Blue ray burners

Andy wrote:
Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared to standard DVDs.

Andy


See the "Recording Speed" table.
And just because a particular media speed is mentioned,
doesn't mean you can buy it. Your local store will be
filled with the most inferior media, in terms of speed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu_ray

Paul
  #3  
Old April 9th 13, 10:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
David H. Lipman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,185
Default Blue ray burners

From: "Andy"


Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared to standard DVDs.

Andy


I have a SATA Pioneer Blu-Ray and I am unable to find COTS Blu-Ray media.

Therefore I just use standard DVDRW +/- media.

--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
  #4  
Old April 10th 13, 02:18 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Blue ray burners

In ,
David H. Lipman typed:
From: "Andy"


Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared
to standard DVDs. Andy


I have a SATA Pioneer Blu-Ray and I am unable to find
COTS Blu-Ray media.
Therefore I just use standard DVDRW +/- media.


Yeah, I use the DVD RDL's; Stll only 8.5 Gig, but better than 4.7.
I'm considering buying a few blu-ray disks of a couple of different types
but I was amazed when I found the many different densities/space/prices, so
I'm approaching it rather carefully and only plan to try a couple of
different kinds if I can get low enough quantities.
Want a laugh? Quill.com carries only one blu-ray disc; a double-layer
hi-density 50 Gig disc with for $60.00 ! Nuh, uh! They don't even indicate
what speed they are capable of. My opticals are all capable of high-revs and
blu-ray, but ... woof! I'll get a couple thumbs for less than that cost!

HTH,

Twayne`


  #5  
Old April 10th 13, 02:22 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Blue ray burners

In ,
Andy typed:
Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared
to standard DVDs.

Andy


I don't use them, but an considering it. There's a large number of types
and spaces avalable for varying prices. My optical drives are capable of
blu-ray and the software's there to support it, but ... .

As for how long it takes, who cares, really? I'd hope for at least 8x but
what's the big deal? For the capacity of one blu-ray you'd still have to
burn multiple standard DVDs of DVD-RDLs, so I'd expect them to take longer
depending.

HTH,

Twayne`


  #6  
Old April 10th 13, 03:57 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,275
Default Blue ray burners

Twayne wrote:
In ,
Andy typed:
Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared
to standard DVDs.

Andy


I don't use them, but an considering it. There's a large number of types
and spaces avalable for varying prices. My optical drives are capable of
blu-ray and the software's there to support it, but ... .

As for how long it takes, who cares, really? I'd hope for at least 8x but
what's the big deal? For the capacity of one blu-ray you'd still have to
burn multiple standard DVDs of DVD-RDLs, so I'd expect them to take longer
depending.

HTH,

Twayne`



From the recording speed table here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu_ray

*******

Of the BD-RE on Newegg, they're 2X speed (9MB/sec).
This is the speed you'd get on a re-usable disc.

2X, single layer, 45 minutes, 25GB

The BR-R, you can find 6X speed, with just one pack
of 10X speed (and that one has no reviews). So I'd
expect to be buying 6X, of the "burn once" variety.

6X, single layer, 15 minutes, 25GB
10X, single layer, 9 minutes, 25GB

And that means 15 minutes per 25GB, or ten hours to
backup a 1TB hard drive (sitting around, changing media
etc). Or a lot longer, if you walk away from the machine,
and load in a new blank when wandering by.

I suppose you could buy ten drives, and cut down the
backup time to one hour. At least you'd be busy flipping
discs the whole time. To make that approach practical,
you might be better off making ISO images first, then
doing the burning of the ISOs as a separate step.

The 6X write speed is 27MB/sec, still within USB2 range.
If you did manage to find 10X BD-R to experiment with,
that runs 45MB/sec and then you'd want a SATA connection
to the optical drive. Or USB3, if you could find a working
solution (I don't know if there are problems doing ATAPI
over USB3 or not).

If you did take my joking suggestion, to use ten drives
in parallel, it would be best to connect them via SATA.
If using USB, you'd need to spend more time finding
a workable solution. Ten drives at 27MB/sec each, is a lot
of bandwidth for USB. Some experiments would be required,
some hair loss etc. My motherboard only has two USB2
controller logic blocks on it, to support all the ports,
so that means 120MB/sec absolute max aggregate bandwidth
(and less than that in practice). And I don't know if
anyone makes a USB3 to USB2 hub or not (rate changer with
no bandwidth limitations). Connecting up the ten optical
drives, and finding space to put them, would just be a PITA.

Paul
  #7  
Old April 11th 13, 02:08 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Andy[_16_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 337
Default Blue ray burners

On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 8:18:02 PM UTC-5, Twayne wrote:
In ,

David H. Lipman typed:

From: "Andy"






Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?


I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared


to standard DVDs. Andy




I have a SATA Pioneer Blu-Ray and I am unable to find


COTS Blu-Ray media.


Therefore I just use standard DVDRW +/- media.




Yeah, I use the DVD RDL's; Stll only 8.5 Gig, but better than 4.7.

I'm considering buying a few blu-ray disks of a couple of different types

but I was amazed when I found the many different densities/space/prices, so

I'm approaching it rather carefully and only plan to try a couple of

different kinds if I can get low enough quantities.

Want a laugh? Quill.com carries only one blu-ray disc; a double-layer

hi-density 50 Gig disc with for $60.00 ! Nuh, uh! They don't even indicate

what speed they are capable of. My opticals are all capable of high-revs and

blu-ray, but ... woof! I'll get a couple thumbs for less than that cost!



HTH,



Twayne`


I read that consumer Blue Ray disks are very sensitive to light, scratches, and oxygen as compared to CDs.

It only takes one day in sunlight and they become coasters.

The DVD movies are pressed in the DVD, so they last much longer.

I'll stick to CDs and pen drives.

  #8  
Old April 11th 13, 02:14 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Andy[_16_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 337
Default Blue ray burners

On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 9:57:08 PM UTC-5, Paul wrote:
Twayne wrote:




10X, single layer, 9 minutes, 25GB



And that means 15 minutes per 25GB, or ten hours to

backup a 1TB hard drive (sitting around, changing media

etc). Or a lot longer, if you walk away from the machine,

and load in a new blank when wandering by.


Paul


I can't imagine many folks using much space on a 1 Tb drive.

It must take forever to do a chkdsk or defrag on it. :-)

I am using only 16 Gb out of a 225 Gb drive.

Andy

  #9  
Old April 11th 13, 05:50 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Blue ray burners

In ,
Paul typed:
Twayne wrote:
In
,
Andy typed:
Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared
to standard DVDs.

Andy


I don't use them, but an considering it. There's a
large number of types and spaces avalable for varying
prices. My optical drives are capable of blu-ray and the
software's there to support it, but ... . As for how long it takes, who
cares, really? I'd hope
for at least 8x but what's the big deal? For the
capacity of one blu-ray you'd still have to burn
multiple standard DVDs of DVD-RDLs, so I'd expect them
to take longer depending. HTH,

Twayne`



From the recording speed table here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu_ray

*******

I don't know why I never thought of Wikipedia; dumb! Thanks.

Going Inline:

....

Well, I back up to Terabyte external drives via USB but it all works in the
background plus doesn incrementals wth a full backup on the first day of
each month. One external is for Drives C & D, the other for the other three
drives. If I keep a history of more than 4 backups, I shortly run out of
room and need to let the backup program delete some of them; it does an
interestingly good job of keeping incrementals from old backups and
attaching them to backups that won't be removed.
And yes, it compresses files also.

Every three to six months I copy the most recent backups to DVD-RDL (8.5
Gig) and that too happens in the background. It's no big job to toss in
another DVD every time one fills up and the tray ejects as I go about my
daily work. It's no big sacrifice to toss in a new DVD here & there as I
work.
My real goal is to cut down on the number of DVDs it takes for a complete
transfer to DVDs, and not a time issue; I'm used to that and know better
than to NOT do backups, having learned the hard way.

The other half of the issue is to not go broke buying blu-rays; another 1 or
2 terabyte drive isn't the answer either because only DVDs are a
semi-permanent storage soluton.

Thanks for the Wikipedia link.

....

Paul




  #10  
Old April 11th 13, 05:54 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Blue ray burners

In ,
Andy typed:
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 9:57:08 PM UTC-5, Paul wrote:
Twayne wrote:




10X, single layer, 9 minutes, 25GB



And that means 15 minutes per 25GB, or ten hours to

backup a 1TB hard drive (sitting around, changing media

etc). Or a lot longer, if you walk away from the machine,

and load in a new blank when wandering by.


Paul


I can't imagine many folks using much space on a 1 Tb
drive.

It must take forever to do a chkdsk or defrag on it. :-)

I am using only 16 Gb out of a 225 Gb drive.

Andy


I haven't yet had one of my terabyte drives indicate defrag is over a few
percent and it's usually zero. A good backup program does very well at
keeping fragmentation down.

As for 16 Gig being all you need, apparently you don't keep any history of
your backups and only do one at a time. But that said, you're very frugal if
you can back everything up in 16 Gig. That's not bad, just very unusual. So
DVD storage should be a snap for you.
--
Regards,

Tom`





  #11  
Old April 12th 13, 12:21 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Andy[_16_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 337
Default Blue ray burners

On Thursday, April 11, 2013 11:54:37 AM UTC-5, Twayne wrote:
In ,

Andy typed:

On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 9:57:08 PM UTC-5, Paul wrote:


Twayne wrote:










10X, single layer, 9 minutes, 25GB








And that means 15 minutes per 25GB, or ten hours to




backup a 1TB hard drive (sitting around, changing media




etc). Or a lot longer, if you walk away from the machine,




and load in a new blank when wandering by.




Paul




I can't imagine many folks using much space on a 1 Tb


drive.




It must take forever to do a chkdsk or defrag on it. :-)




I am using only 16 Gb out of a 225 Gb drive.




Andy




I haven't yet had one of my terabyte drives indicate defrag is over a few

percent and it's usually zero. A good backup program does very well at

keeping fragmentation down.



As for 16 Gig being all you need, apparently you don't keep any history of

your backups and only do one at a time. But that said, you're very frugal if

you can back everything up in 16 Gig. That's not bad, just very unusual. So

DVD storage should be a snap for you.

--

Regards,



Tom`


Thanks for the good info.

I don't have a second drive on my laptop.

I use a batch file to back up changes.

After reading about the shorter life of CD-RW which I am using, I may backup using CD-Rs.

  #12  
Old April 13th 13, 05:58 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Yousuf Khan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,447
Default Blue ray burners

On 09/04/2013 4:43 PM, Andy wrote:

Does anyone use Blue Ray burners for backups ?
I was wondering how long it takes to burn DVDs compared to standard DVDs.


I got such a burner, but I've not yet even used a Blu-Ray blank in it
yet. But it burns DVD's quite fast, just as well as any standard DVD
burner, 16X DVD speed, 12X BD speed.

Yousuf Khan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.