Sucuri test result

Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for 99%
of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected with
malware?

--
David B.

David B. wrote:
Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for 99%
of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected with
malware?


This is what I'm seeing this morning.

A site intrusion attempt.

https://s9.postimg.org/eovvb70wf/boater.jpg

Paul

David B. STALKER wrote:

Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

...but their BUSINESS is collect monthly charges from YOU.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for 99%
of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected with
malware?

Yes. Just ask the owner of the website if it is infected, and *believe*
the answer.

--
-bts

On 29/01/2018 16:43, Paul wrote:
David B. wrote:
Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for
99% of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected
with malware?


This is what I'm seeing this morning.

A site intrusion attempt.

https://s9.postimg.org/eovvb70wf/boater.jpg

Â*Â* Paul


Magic! :-)

Well done, Paul. Thanks for the laugh.

Perhaps you can also explain why the tekrider site gets a major FAIL, he-

https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=m78hx7Vv

--
David B.

On 29/01/2018 17:24, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

..but their BUSINESS is collect monthly charges from YOU.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for 99%
of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected with
malware?

Yes. Just ask the owner of the website if it is infected, and *believe*
the answer.

First, tell me why your site gets a big 'F' *FAIL* he-

https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=m78hx7Vv

You are an expert; I'm just asking questions which you consistently fail
to answer.

--
David B.

David B. STALKER wrote:

On 29/01/2018 17:24, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

..but their BUSINESS is collect monthly charges from YOU.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for
99%
of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected
with malware?

Yes. Just ask the owner of the website if it is infected, and *believe*
the answer.

First, tell me why your site gets a big 'F' *FAIL* he-

https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=m78hx7Vv

It's a *shared server*. Remember those? I don't have any control over that
stuff.

You are an expert; I'm just asking questions which you consistently fail
to answer.

Because you're a goddamn lifelong *STALKER*, that's why. Further, you
don't have a single CLUE about what htbridge is testing -- NOTHING about
the "malware" you /claim/ my site contains (because you're a stalker).

--
-bts

On 29/01/2018 22:18, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

On 29/01/2018 17:24, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

..but their BUSINESS is collect monthly charges from YOU.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for
99%
of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected
with malware?

Yes. Just ask the owner of the website if it is infected, and *believe*
the answer.

First, tell me why your site gets a big 'F' *FAIL* he-

https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=m78hx7Vv

It's a *shared server*. Remember those? I don't have any control over that
stuff.

You are an expert; I'm just asking questions which you consistently fail
to answer.

Because you're a goddamn lifelong *STALKER*, that's why. Further, you
don't have a single CLUE about what htbridge is testing -- NOTHING about
the "malware" you /claim/ my site contains (because you're a stalker).


I shouldn't tease you. Will you accept an apology?

How about we go back to this point in time and YOU take an alternative
course?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/2h2t4md638...2017.tiff?dl=0

I meant EXACTLY what I said.

--
David B.

On 29/01/2018 23:19, David B. wrote:
On 29/01/2018 22:18, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

On 29/01/2018 17:24, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
Here's a scan result from an industry leader
https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/

"Security For Any Website" is their watch-phrase.

..but their BUSINESS is collect monthly charges from YOU.

"Hackers aren't picky. Neither are we. A security platform built for
99%
of websites on the web. Built in the cloud. Easy to use. No
installation. Simple, effective website security."

Here's the interesting scan result ...

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net

Are there *better* 'tools' to verify that a website is not infected
with malware?

Yes. Just ask the owner of the website if it is infected, and *believe*
the answer.

First, tell me why your site gets a big 'F' *FAIL* he-

https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=m78hx7Vv

It's a *shared server*. Remember those? I don't have any control over
that
stuff.

You are an expert; I'm just asking questions which you consistently fail
to answer.

Because you're a goddamn lifelong *STALKER*, that's why. Further, you
don't have a single CLUE about what htbridge is testing -- NOTHING about
the "malware" you /claim/ my site contains (because you're a stalker).


I shouldn't tease you. Will you accept an apology?

How about we go back to this point in time and YOU take an alternative
course?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/2h2t4md638...2017.tiff?dl=0


I meant EXACTLY what I said.

You may or may not have seen the image at the link.

It DID 'work' but I have since disabled it.

No doubt you have a copy of my original request to you.

It's bedtime now. Goodnight, Donald.

--
David B.

David B. STALKER wrote:

On 29/01/2018 23:19, David B. STALKER wrote:
On 29/01/2018 22:18, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
[snippage]
First, tell me why your site gets a big 'F' *FAIL* he-

https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=m78hx7Vv

It's a *shared server*. Remember those? I don't have any control over
that stuff.

Still don't understand shared servers, eh?

You are an expert; I'm just asking questions which you consistently
fail to answer.

Because you're a goddamn lifelong *STALKER*, that's why. Further, you
don't have a single CLUE about what htbridge is testing -- NOTHING
about the "malware" you /claim/ my site contains (because you're a
stalker).

I shouldn't tease you. Will you accept an apology?

Why should I? Your apologies last about twenty minutes, then you continue
right where you left off, getting yourself in trouble. What part of
"goddamn lifelong *STALKER*" don't you understand?

How about we go back to this point in time and YOU take an alternative
course?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/2h2t4md638...ge%2028%20May%
202017.tiff?dl=0

I don't click on your links. Most people know it is wise not to do so.

I meant EXACTLY what I said.

You may or may not have seen the image at the link.

Not likely.

It DID 'work' but I have since disabled it.

Then why post it??

No doubt you have a copy of my original request to you.

Not likely.

It's bedtime now. Goodnight, Donald.

Goodnight, Daisy.

--
-bts

On 30/01/2018 01:23, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

On 29/01/2018 23:19, David B. STALKER wrote:
On 29/01/2018 22:18, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
[snippage]
First, tell me why your site gets a big 'F' *FAIL* he-

https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=m78hx7Vv

It's a *shared server*. Remember those? I don't have any control over
that stuff.

Still don't understand shared servers, eh?

You are an expert; I'm just asking questions which you consistently
fail to answer.

Because you're a goddamn lifelong *STALKER*, that's why. Further, you
don't have a single CLUE about what htbridge is testing -- NOTHING
about the "malware" you /claim/ my site contains (because you're a
stalker).

I shouldn't tease you. Will you accept an apology?

Why should I? Your apologies last about twenty minutes, then you continue
right where you left off, getting yourself in trouble. What part of
"goddamn lifelong *STALKER*" don't you understand?

How about we go back to this point in time and YOU take an alternative
course?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/2h2t4md638...ge%2028%20May%
202017.tiff?dl=0

I don't click on your links. Most people know it is wise not to do so.

Whyever not? What harm could POSSIBLY come to them by so doing?
I meant EXACTLY what I said.

You may or may not have seen the image at the link.

Not likely.

You're a cicken****?

It DID 'work' but I have since disabled it.

Then why post it??

It was a test post to check if my links are working.

No doubt you have a copy of my original request to you.

Not likely.

I don't believe you.

It's bedtime now. Goodnight, Donald.

Here's documentary evidence of the malware on your web site:-

https://www.dropbox.com/search/perso...M1V DP755s%3D

I do accept that you may not have KNOWN about it, but instead you denied
it was there.

Why the denial? Mike Easter saw it plainly too in the Aw-Snap tool scan.

--
David B.

David B. STALKER wrote:

Here's documentary evidence of the malware on your web site:-

"Sign in .. or Create an Account"

Not on your life, stalker.

Be sure to see my post at alt.computer.workshop

--
-bts

On 31/01/2018 15:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

Here's documentary evidence of the malware on your web site:-

"Sign in .. or Create an Account"

Not on your life, stalker.

*GOOD GUYS* already *HAVE* an account with Dropbox! ;-)

Be sure to see my post at alt.computer.workshop

Of course. That's *MY* group. :-)

--
David B.

On 2018-01-31 10:14 AM, David B. wrote:
On 31/01/2018 15:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

Here's documentary evidence of the malware on your web site:-

"Sign in .. or Create an Account"

Not on your life, stalker.

*GOOD GUYS* already *HAVE* an account with Dropbox! ;-)


Twits don't know how to make a Dropbox item available publicly.


Be sure to see my post at alt.computer.workshop

Of course. That's *MY* group. :-)

On 31/01/2018 18:19, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2018-01-31 10:14 AM, David B. wrote:
On 31/01/2018 15:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

Here's documentary evidence of the malware on your web site:-

"Sign in .. or Create an Account"

Not on your life, stalker.

*GOOD GUYS* already *HAVE* an account with Dropbox! ;-)


Twits don't know how to make a Dropbox item available publicly.

And you *do*?

Then TEACH me.

Be sure to see my post at alt.computer.workshop

Of course. That's *MY* group. :-)

Try here, Alan Baker.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/for...red-questions/

--
David B.

On 2018-01-31 10:23 AM, David B. wrote:
On 31/01/2018 18:19, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2018-01-31 10:14 AM, David B. wrote:
On 31/01/2018 15:11, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:

Here's documentary evidence of the malware on your web site:-

"Sign in .. or Create an Account"

Not on your life, stalker.

*GOOD GUYS* already *HAVE* an account with Dropbox! ;-)


Twits don't know how to make a Dropbox item available publicly.

And you *do*?

Then TEACH me.

Be sure to see my post at alt.computer.workshop

Of course. That's *MY* group. :-)

Try here, Alan Baker.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/for...red-questions/



A posted started by you... ...I don't think I'll bother.