If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Agent Intercept
-hh wrote in
: On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 9:38:51 AM UTC-5, mGhost wrote: -hh wrote: mGhost wrote: -hh wrote: No idea what you are talking about. A cross-country check can easily take a whopping 5 business days to actually clear...And in the stock market, it is absolutely 3 days. These are facts. What I was saying is that what it takes them to do is less than what they tell you. By a large margin, as they profit from being “slow” t o post your credit. And what I am telling you is you're making up bull****. I'll say it again, and if you like, call a ****ing bank manager, talk to a broker, pray to God, do whatever the **** you like, but I am correct. If you’re correct, then just how are Day Traders able to transa ct? Be sure to think it through. Look you stupid ****. I have already explained. It is called, MARGIN. You are actually trading on MARGIN. Like I said, talk to a broker. The fact is you're a ****ing idiot. You think you know by observation, and your observation is incorrect. Google it if you like. Call a broker. Call you mom. I don't care. There are CASH accounts and there are Margin accounts. Most are Margin. When you sell a stock in a CASH account, you cannot purchase with the proceeds until it clears. In a Margin account, the brokerage LOANS you the money after the sale and before the clearance. Now, stop showing the whole group what a ****ing idiot you are and do some ****ing research. ALL STOCK TRADES TAKE 3 DAYS TO CLEAR. Get it through your ****ing retarded brain. ALL. Unfortunately, what you're not grokking is that I'm not contesting that the trading house specifies "3 days" to clear a transaction for your account. What I *am* contesting is that of said 3 days that it takes _them_ 3 days to do all of their processing, because the technology exists (and is in use) to convert a physical check to an electronic payment such that the physical receipt is no longer required for the transaction to be completed. A coast to coast check can easily take 5 days... I’ve had international wires clear in less than 2 days. But the ‘guarantee’ was as what you’re claiming . They build a buffer in for themselves ... and they can use this buffer for their own gain. That's a wire. I'm talking about a paper check issued from a california bank and cashed in a bank on the east coast. A coast to coast *check*. Jesus ****ing christ, how dumb are you? For those banks that still haven't upgraded to electronic transactions, they may still be required to ship the paper ... but they're becoming the exception rather than the rule, and I'm referring to where the banking technology has been heading for more than a decade instead of the holdouts. The reasons why banks are moving to electronic is because it reduces their internal processing costs ... PLUS they may, if they so choose (and are allowed to do so from a regulatory standpoint) use the "float" for their own financial gain. No one is holding your money. No one gives a **** about your dumb ****ing check. There are rules, and ALL banks follow them. It is a process, and takes the time it takes. It’s been automated. That’s why Charles Schwab was able to offer no-fee trades. Oh brother. You are one hopeless ****ing retard. Who's learned from familymembers who work in the financial services. As for the other bull****, I cut it off. If you're a diver, great. Pics on my website, some of which I’ve shared on COLA. I am not a diver. Since you’re vouching for him, is Elon Musk one? He's an engineer, as I said, and he made a mini sub. They teach the three R's in this country? I didn't ask if he was an Engineer: I asked if his qualifications included scuba diving in the relevant overhead (e.g., cave) environments and you've not answered that question. Including with relevant overhead environment experience? If not, he’s out of his area of expertise. I think you're a jealous idiot. You identify more with the diver, and would be happy to see Musk fail at anything. Why, I don't know. Some people just hate to see others successful. You've still not answered the question. Musk's bad and unprofessional behavior reflects negatively on both him as well as on his engineering profession. But I am a little tired of the constant, I'm an expert in this field bull**** that goes on here. I typically post on that which I know. Go look at all the threads I m silent on /s We both know that's bull****. You don't know about stock clearance or bank clearance and yet you keep insisting you know. Clearly you don't know. And with the world's information at your fingertips you still don't know. Must be both lazy and stupid. So how the **** can I trust you know anything about diving? So far, all you've shown me is that you're an idiot. Imagine the irony of bitching about another person supposedly being lazy when you then fail to do any due diligence yourself. For example, this pic from 1997 has been on my website for the past seven (7) years, which is a pic of a staircase inside a shipwreck (an overhead environment): http://huntzinger.com/photo/1997/brac/19970928-10c.jpg FYI, this particular shipwreck broke apart back in 2000 and rolled semi-turtle, so the lighting on the above staircase got trashed; but today I added the video from a 2010 dive when I was checking out the video capabilities on my then- newest UW camera system, which shows the semi-easy penetration into the overhead environment of the same wreck; I believe that the same staircase is visible - although approached from the other side - at the 0:50 mark: http://huntzinger.com/photo/2010/brac/356L_960x540.m4v The idea of the mini sub was that someone would guide it.... don't see how it would have failed. Well, it was a good idea if the entire route was underwater. But it wa sn’t. As such, the mini-sub would have had to have been manhandled over the dry sections, which was very rough terrain. Thats why Musk s idea would have failed. As I said, the water was rising, and that's why the mini was built. But even rising waters (which were a concern that the rescue would have to be aborted) does not eliminate the dry sumps that the rescue team was having to navigate through. Now, the diver got them out, that's great. But he was an asshole about it. Sorry, but that is how it how it happened. Even if he was right, a nd even if you are right, he didn't have to be an asshole about it. And you're still doing it now. Someone goes out of their way to build, tes t, and offer their considerable help and resources. And what does he get in return? **** on. That's the problem. Incorrect. The rescue team didn’t know what Musk was doing unt il Musk held a flashy press conference. Musk didn’t try to coordi nate anything behind the scenes; he was nothing but an attention-seeking egomaniac. He got called out as such and that’s when Musk star ted his lame Ad Hominem “pedo” attacks. Said the jealous man... Projection attempt. Sounds to me like you and others just have a whole lot of hate, and this causes irrational nonsense. You only see one side of it. "pedo" was an asshole. No, I merely recall the actual chronology of events. FYI, the procedure they did use was a modified body recovery. Great. Which is actually quite important from a training & skills perspective to make the rescue more likely to be successful. Even as it was, two rescuers died. The Tesla is the safest car ever made, and that's what the industry is saying, not me. Perhaps so, but let’s see the stats and including if it s a too-small sample size, and/or not properly normalized. Not perhaps. It is. It's a fact. Go cry in your pillow or whatever. Safest car ever tested, period. In any event, the g-shock loading vulnerability is a relatively recent find; won’t know for awhile what it’s net risk contribu tion will be in electric car safety...but it is being currently applied to understand how/why for some of the seemingly spontaneous car fires. Safest car ever tested, period. Nope. Musk tried to make that claim and got slapped with a "Cease and Desist" order from NHTSA: https://www.businessinsider.com/elon...safety-nhtsa-2 019-8 -hh What a douchebag. |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|