A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Windows XP Help and Support
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th 12, 08:11 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
chrisv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

DevilsPGD wrote:

some POS liar that calls itself "GreyCloud" said:

On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I've been trying to remember this, and I honestly can't remember it
anymore. In MS-DOS, where were the standard external commands located?
The only thing I remember about MS-DOS was that the command.com was
located in the root directory (along with autoexec.bat, config.sys, and
the hidden files msdos.sys & io.sys). Slightly different names for the
PC-DOS version, such as pcdos.sys & ibmio.sys, but otherwise identical.
The standard external commands were those like chkdsk or xcopy, which
weren't built into the command.com. Was there an MSDOS folder or
something which contained these commands?

Yousuf Khan


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IO.SYS


What does that have to do with the question being asked?


Nothing. "GreyCloud" is a senile old fsckwit who mostly just trolls.
He's retired and bored, you see, so finds it "fun" to team-up with
some of the most vile assholes over to troll USENET and attack decent,
honest Linux advocates.

Ads
  #2  
Old June 30th 12, 12:37 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
GreyCloud[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 419
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On 6/29/2012 1:11 PM, chrisv wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:

some POS liar that calls itself "GreyCloud" said:

On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I've been trying to remember this, and I honestly can't remember it
anymore. In MS-DOS, where were the standard external commands located?
The only thing I remember about MS-DOS was that the command.com was
located in the root directory (along with autoexec.bat, config.sys, and
the hidden files msdos.sys & io.sys). Slightly different names for the
PC-DOS version, such as pcdos.sys & ibmio.sys, but otherwise identical.
The standard external commands were those like chkdsk or xcopy, which
weren't built into the command.com. Was there an MSDOS folder or
something which contained these commands?

Yousuf Khan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IO.SYS


What does that have to do with the question being asked?


Nothing. "GreyCloud" is a senile old fsckwit who mostly just trolls.
He's retired and bored, you see, so finds it "fun" to team-up with
some of the most vile assholes over to troll USENET and attack decent,
honest Linux advocates.

I see you have resorted to trolling a windows newsgroup.

For the rest of the windows users: watch out for this one, as he is
known habitual liar in other newsgroups. Worse, he is one of the worst
potty mouths you'll ever run into.


  #3  
Old June 30th 12, 12:46 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Gene E. Bloch[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,485
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:37:27 -0600, GreyCloud wrote:

On 6/29/2012 1:11 PM, chrisv wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:

some POS liar that calls itself "GreyCloud" said:

On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I've been trying to remember this, and I honestly can't remember it
anymore. In MS-DOS, where were the standard external commands located?
The only thing I remember about MS-DOS was that the command.com was
located in the root directory (along with autoexec.bat, config.sys, and
the hidden files msdos.sys & io.sys). Slightly different names for the
PC-DOS version, such as pcdos.sys & ibmio.sys, but otherwise identical.
The standard external commands were those like chkdsk or xcopy, which
weren't built into the command.com. Was there an MSDOS folder or
something which contained these commands?

Yousuf Khan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IO.SYS

What does that have to do with the question being asked?


Nothing. "GreyCloud" is a senile old fsckwit who mostly just trolls.
He's retired and bored, you see, so finds it "fun" to team-up with
some of the most vile assholes over to troll USENET and attack decent,
honest Linux advocates.

I see you have resorted to trolling a windows newsgroup.

For the rest of the windows users: watch out for this one, as he is
known habitual liar in other newsgroups. Worse, he is one of the worst
potty mouths you'll ever run into.


He's been here[1] before and is recognized.

[1] Or maybe another place where I hang out, I don't recall.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
  #4  
Old June 30th 12, 05:51 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
bd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On 6/29/2012 1:11 PM, chrisv wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:

some POS liar that calls itself "GreyCloud" said:

On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I've been trying to remember this, and I honestly can't remember
it anymore. In MS-DOS, where were the standard external commands
located? The only thing I remember about MS-DOS was that the
command.com was located in the root directory (along with
autoexec.bat, config.sys, and the hidden files msdos.sys &
io.sys). Slightly different names for the PC-DOS version, such as
pcdos.sys & ibmio.sys, but otherwise identical. The standard
external commands were those like chkdsk or xcopy, which weren't
built into the command.com. Was there an MSDOS folder or something
which contained these commands?


In DOS enter the command followed by the slash and a question mark.

i.e. xcopy /?

  #5  
Old July 2nd 12, 08:19 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
chrisv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

some filthy liar that calls itself "GreyCloud" wrote:

On 6/29/2012 1:11 PM, chrisv wrote:

"GreyCloud" is a senile old fsckwit who mostly just trolls.
He's retired and bored, you see, so finds it "fun" to team-up with
some of the most vile assholes over to troll USENET and attack decent,
honest Linux advocates.


I see you have resorted to trolling a windows newsgroup.


I see you have resorted to your shameless lying, as usual,
"GreyCloud".

I merely noticed your vile presence while on a rare visit to one of my
old haunts, c.s.i.p.h.chips, and thought that some of these fine folks
might benefit by knowing more about you.

For the rest of the windows users: watch out for this one,


There's no need for anyone to "watch out" for me, "GreyCloud". I'm
not going to hang-around.

Unlike you, I am not some fscking asshole who trolls an advocacy or
help group, siding with a bunch of puerile, lying sociopaths and
ridiculing a bunch of decent and honest people.

as he is known habitual liar in other newsgroups.


This could be called "the pot calling the polished silver black".
This is a favorite attack of filthy lying assholes like "GreyCloud" -
he not only *lies* without shame, but he calls honest people liars!

But no one has to take my word for it. It's all in the record in the
Linux advocacy group.

"GreyCloud" has been kill-filed by myself and many of the other
advocates, but he's still making his nasty little comments and
supporting his nasty little "friends" in attacking a bunch of decent,
honest, and reasonable people.

Worse, he is one of the worst potty mouths you'll ever run into.


"Potty mouth" is a lot better than what "GreyCloud" is.

"GreyCloud" is an anti-advocate troll in an advocacy group. For those
who have experience with such vermin, this may be enough-said.

"GreyCloud" has chosen to join-forces with as vile a group of liars,
assholes, stalkers, shills, imbeciles, and bigots that are to be found
on USENET. Together, they take the anti-charter position on
pretty-much every* issue, and tirelessly disrupt the newsgroup,
shamelessly using idiocy and lies to attack the advocates and what
they believe in.

"GreyCloud" will call you a liar to your face, when you know damn well
you speak the truth.

He's retired and bored, you see, and finds being a total ****
"entertaining".

Again, no one needs to take my word, on any of this.

  #6  
Old July 2nd 12, 08:29 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
chrisv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

Gene E. Bloch wrote:

He's been here[1] before and is recognized.

[1] Or maybe another place where I hang out, I don't recall.


Perhaps you should be more careful about whom you claim to
"recognize", when you can't recall from where.

I've posted essentially nothing outside the Linux advocacy group, in
recent years. Of course, there are some cross-posts.

I'm not like "GreyCloud". Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't go looking for
people to ridicule and harass. Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't troll
newsgroups where I'm not wanted. Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't get my
kicks attacking decent, honest people as "hypocrites", "liars", and
"cult members".

  #7  
Old July 2nd 12, 09:51 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
GreyCloud[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 419
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On 7/2/2012 1:29 PM, chrisv wrote:
Gene E. Bloch wrote:

He's been here[1] before and is recognized.

[1] Or maybe another place where I hang out, I don't recall.


Perhaps you should be more careful about whom you claim to
"recognize", when you can't recall from where.

I've posted essentially nothing outside the Linux advocacy group, in
recent years. Of course, there are some cross-posts.

I'm not like "GreyCloud". Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't go looking for
people to ridicule and harass. Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't troll
newsgroups where I'm not wanted. Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't get my
kicks attacking decent, honest people as "hypocrites", "liars", and
"cult members".

You are a well known and documented liar and a hypocrite as well.
One of usenets worst potty mouth. And no one here wants to talk to you.


  #8  
Old July 2nd 12, 11:26 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Gene E. Bloch[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,485
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:29:04 -0500, chrisv wrote:

Gene E. Bloch wrote:

He's been here[1] before and is recognized.

[1] Or maybe another place where I hang out, I don't recall.


Perhaps you should be more careful about whom you claim to
"recognize", when you can't recall from where.


It doesn't matter that much - I've seen posts from you somewhere. When I
see another I recall the earlier experiences and consequently can figure
out where the deja vu feeling came from.

I've posted essentially nothing outside the Linux advocacy group, in
recent years. Of course, there are some cross-posts.

I'm not like "GreyCloud". Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't go looking for
people to ridicule and harass. Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't troll
newsgroups where I'm not wanted. Unlike "GreyCloud", I don't get my
kicks attacking decent, honest people as "hypocrites", "liars", and
"cult members".



--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
  #9  
Old July 3rd 12, 02:15 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
chrisv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

Gene E. Bloch wrote:

chrisv wrote:

Perhaps you should be more careful about whom you claim to
"recognize", when you can't recall from where.


It doesn't matter that much - I've seen posts from you somewhere. When I
see another I recall the earlier experiences and consequently can figure
out where the deja vu feeling came from.


Uh huh. I sure don't recall seeing your name before.

Be aware, too, that I've been quite-often forged by - you might guess
it - anti-Linux trolls.

Anyway, if your recollection of (the real) me is true, it's of someone
who treats people very much as they deserve to be treated.
Respectable people being treated with respect, and filthy lying
*assholes* like "GreyCloud" getting treated as they deserve.

  #10  
Old July 3rd 12, 02:22 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
chrisv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

chrisv wrote:

Anyway, if your recollection of (the real) me is true, it's of someone
who treats people very much as they deserve to be treated.
Respectable people being treated with respect, and filthy lying
*assholes* like "GreyCloud" getting treated as they deserve.


I noticed that there are a couple old .chips guys, (krw and Yousuf
Khan) participating in this thread. They might vouch that I'm not a
bad sort, and that the above is true. Or they might (wisely) choose
to stay out of this silliness. 8)

Hey guys. Glad to see you're still alive. Is 'Tripper still around?

  #11  
Old July 3rd 12, 04:08 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
No_Name
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:22:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:

chrisv wrote:

Anyway, if your recollection of (the real) me is true, it's of someone
who treats people very much as they deserve to be treated.
Respectable people being treated with respect, and filthy lying
*assholes* like "GreyCloud" getting treated as they deserve.


I noticed that there are a couple old .chips guys, (krw and Yousuf
Khan) participating in this thread. They might vouch that I'm not a
bad sort, and that the above is true. Or they might (wisely) choose
to stay out of this silliness. 8)

Hey guys. Glad to see you're still alive. Is 'Tripper still around?


Never left .chips, just been lurking for five years, or so, though. x86 is so
last century. ;-)
  #12  
Old July 3rd 12, 06:54 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
GreyCloud[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 419
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On 7/3/2012 7:15 AM, chrisv wrote:
Gene E. Bloch wrote:

chrisv wrote:

Perhaps you should be more careful about whom you claim to
"recognize", when you can't recall from where.


It doesn't matter that much - I've seen posts from you somewhere. When I
see another I recall the earlier experiences and consequently can figure
out where the deja vu feeling came from.


Uh huh. I sure don't recall seeing your name before.

Be aware, too, that I've been quite-often forged by - you might guess
it - anti-Linux trolls.

Anyway, if your recollection of (the real) me is true, it's of someone
who treats people very much as they deserve to be treated.
Respectable people being treated with respect, and filthy lying
*assholes* like "GreyCloud" getting treated as they deserve.


Quit trolling. You are a well known anti-windows troll and the worst
potty mouth on usenet.


  #13  
Old July 3rd 12, 07:11 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Gene E. Bloch[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,485
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:15:22 -0500, chrisv wrote:

Gene E. Bloch wrote:

chrisv wrote:

Perhaps you should be more careful about whom you claim to
"recognize", when you can't recall from where.


It doesn't matter that much - I've seen posts from you somewhere. When I
see another I recall the earlier experiences and consequently can figure
out where the deja vu feeling came from.


Uh huh. I sure don't recall seeing your name before.

Be aware, too, that I've been quite-often forged by - you might guess
it - anti-Linux trolls.

Anyway, if your recollection of (the real) me is true, it's of someone
who treats people very much as they deserve to be treated.
Respectable people being treated with respect, and filthy lying
*assholes* like "GreyCloud" getting treated as they deserve.


I'm willing to rethink my position, but your last sentence kind of
interferes with that idea. And it also triggers that deja vu that I
spoke of...

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
  #14  
Old July 3rd 12, 10:48 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
GreyCloud[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 419
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On 7/3/2012 12:11 PM, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:15:22 -0500, chrisv wrote:

Gene E. Bloch wrote:

chrisv wrote:

Perhaps you should be more careful about whom you claim to
"recognize", when you can't recall from where.

It doesn't matter that much - I've seen posts from you somewhere. When I
see another I recall the earlier experiences and consequently can figure
out where the deja vu feeling came from.


Uh huh. I sure don't recall seeing your name before.

Be aware, too, that I've been quite-often forged by - you might guess
it - anti-Linux trolls.

Anyway, if your recollection of (the real) me is true, it's of someone
who treats people very much as they deserve to be treated.
Respectable people being treated with respect, and filthy lying
*assholes* like "GreyCloud" getting treated as they deserve.


I'm willing to rethink my position, but your last sentence kind of
interferes with that idea. And it also triggers that deja vu that I
spoke of...

You should see him in other newsgroups. If you put a profanity filter
in, you wouldn't see much of a post. I'll put him in the filters.


  #15  
Old July 4th 12, 03:52 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Yousuf Khan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,447
Default Bit of a historical question: MS-DOS

On 03/07/2012 9:22 AM, chrisv wrote:
chrisv wrote:

Anyway, if your recollection of (the real) me is true, it's of someone
who treats people very much as they deserve to be treated.
Respectable people being treated with respect, and filthy lying
*assholes* like "GreyCloud" getting treated as they deserve.


I noticed that there are a couple old .chips guys, (krw and Yousuf
Khan) participating in this thread. They might vouch that I'm not a
bad sort, and that the above is true. Or they might (wisely) choose
to stay out of this silliness. 8)


I'm not getting involved in any ****ing match.

I started this thread originally, and my original question has long
since been answered. Not sure why this thread is still going.

Yousuf Khan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.