If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" wrote in message ... "Alias" wrote in message ... And had Bush told congress the truth, the funds would have never been approved. The so called "coallition" went to war based on a pack of lies. Alias So who was it that was doing the lying? Allow me to quote: Who went to war based on these lies? Clinton? No. Bush? Yes. I haven't much use for politicians who lie, be they republican, democrat or whatever. Fact is Bush went to war and now we have 65 dollar oil for which I am sure that Bush's buddies in the oil business are thankful, just as the Halliburton's of the world are thankful for the reconstruction contracts. We now have over 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians dead and almost 2000 Americans. Iraq is no freer or safer now than it was under Hussein. Alias "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001 "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 "When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian Gulf region." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 "I think that we were right to go. I think we were right to go to the United Nations. I think we couldn't let those who could veto in the Security Council hold us hostage. And I think Saddam Hussein, being gone is good. Good for the American people, good for the security of that region of the world, and good for the Iraqi people." Sen. John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 13. 2003 |
Ads |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
Plato wrote:
kurttrail wrote: Who cares? Iraq is the stupidest move by a President, since "Read My Lips." It's even dumber than the stained blue dress since the only person really hurt that didn't deserve it was Hillary. While the President can order a small military action at will, he is limited by the Budget for the Department of Offense [misnamed the DOD or dept of defense]. Any long term involvement HAS to be financed by the us congress, ie the body that controls spending. If congress did not approve the last several 100 billion dollars to invade iraq, the invasion would not have occured. Yep. So that means that Iraq was the stupidest move done by a political party. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Peter A. Stavrakoglou wrote:
"Alias" wrote in message ... And had Bush told congress the truth, the funds would have never been approved. The so called "coallition" went to war based on a pack of lies. Alias So who was it that was doing the lying? Allow me to quote: "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 All of the above quotes, taken totally out of context, were in response to Saddam kicking weapon inspector out of Iraq. Funny thing is, Bush got weapon inspectors back into Iraq before the war, and they found nothing. "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001 "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 Again, these quotes are taken out of context, and were based on totally bad intel. "When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian Gulf region." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 And then Kerry went on to say, "I will vote yes because I believe it is the best way to hold Saddam Hussein accountable. And the administration, I believe, is now committed to a recognition that war must be the last option to address this threat, not the first, and that we must act in concert with allies around the globe to make the world's case against Saddam Hussein." Since Bush's weapons inspectors never found any real evidence of WMDs, war was not the last option to address the threat. "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 "I think that we were right to go. I think we were right to go to the United Nations. I think we couldn’t let those who could veto in the Security Council hold us hostage. And I think Saddam Hussein, being gone is good. Good for the American people, good for the security of that region of the world, and good for the Iraqi people." Sen. John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 13. 2003 A bunch of quotes taken out of context, and much of it based on the faulty intel of Iraqi exiles that had very ulterior motives. It was known long before the war that the Neocons in the Bush admin had been drooling to invade Iraq for a long time. The difference is that they convinced Bush to do it. I know I was against it. And had he been alive, Yeshua would have been against it too. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
However, blocks that constitute a copyright enforcement scheme
cannot be lawfully circumvented (unless each indvidual does it all by himself with no help from anyone else) in the United States because of the DMCA. But Vista is supposed to be sold worldwide. What may be illegal according to american law may be (and often is) considered fair use in other countries. Is M$ going to sell different flavors of Vista? A restricted version in the USA and a DRM-free version in countries with more liberal copyright laws, or will Vista be used as a method to force american copyright laws upon the rest of the planet? |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
In message 666
wrote: However, blocks that constitute a copyright enforcement scheme cannot be lawfully circumvented (unless each indvidual does it all by himself with no help from anyone else) in the United States because of the DMCA. But Vista is supposed to be sold worldwide. What may be illegal according to american law may be (and often is) considered fair use in other countries. Is M$ going to sell different flavors of Vista? A restricted version in the USA and a DRM-free version in countries with more liberal copyright laws, or will Vista be used as a method to force american copyright laws upon the rest of the planet? Shhh... Don't tell the Americans that they aren't the whole world. -- Tonight on eye on Springfield: Just miles from your doorstep, hundreds of men are given weapons and trained to kill. The government calls it /The Army/ but a more alarmist name would be "The Kill-Bot Factory" |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
We aren't?
-- All the Best, Kelly (MS-MVP) Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com In memory of those lost during Katrina & Prayers and Hope for the remaining displaced. "DevilsPGD" wrote in message news In message 666 wrote: However, blocks that constitute a copyright enforcement scheme cannot be lawfully circumvented (unless each indvidual does it all by himself with no help from anyone else) in the United States because of the DMCA. But Vista is supposed to be sold worldwide. What may be illegal according to american law may be (and often is) considered fair use in other countries. Is M$ going to sell different flavors of Vista? A restricted version in the USA and a DRM-free version in countries with more liberal copyright laws, or will Vista be used as a method to force american copyright laws upon the rest of the planet? Shhh... Don't tell the Americans that they aren't the whole world. -- Tonight on eye on Springfield: Just miles from your doorstep, hundreds of men are given weapons and trained to kill. The government calls it /The Army/ but a more alarmist name would be "The Kill-Bot Factory" |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Kelly wrote:
We aren't? You weren't supposed to be listening, Kelly. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Sounds like you want a copy of Vista N.
666 wrote: However, blocks that constitute a copyright enforcement scheme cannot be lawfully circumvented (unless each indvidual does it all by himself with no help from anyone else) in the United States because of the DMCA. But Vista is supposed to be sold worldwide. What may be illegal according to american law may be (and often is) considered fair use in other countries. Is M$ going to sell different flavors of Vista? A restricted version in the USA and a DRM-free version in countries with more liberal copyright laws, or will Vista be used as a method to force american copyright laws upon the rest of the planet? |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote:
Because it has nothing to do with Vista. Just because you "can do" something doesn't mean it's legit. An OS that's gonna be sold all over the planet should stay far away from questions like 'is it legit?' Things like DMCA and INDUCE are just local laws. Most copies of Vista are gonna be sold outside the USA. In my country (the Netherlands, Europe) I can legally copy any CD or DVD for personal purposes. It doesn't even have to be my own disk. I can borrow my friends CDs (or just get them from the library, or the video rental store), make copies for myself, return the original disks, and keep the copies. That's all allowed by the Dutch Copyright Act from 1912 (and never ever updated). I can even legally break any encryption method if I need to do so to make protected audio files compatible with my hardware, like an mp3 player that doesn't support DRM. And my local electronic store sells DVD players without region locks without breaking any law. If Vista comes with code that locks the owner out o parts of his own computer, there should be localized versions to cater for local laws. Of course this will make OS-embedded DRM useless, because people in more restrictive countries can simply buy foreign copies of Vista. I'm looking forward to an EU ruling that requires M$ to strip its TC from the OS, just like the european courts forced M$ to strip Windows Media Player from XP. |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
My bad, but you live in the US too. )
-- All the Best, Kelly (MS-MVP) Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com In memory of those lost during Katrina & Prayers and Hope for the remaining displaced. "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Kelly wrote: We aren't? You weren't supposed to be listening, Kelly. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Kelly wrote:
My bad, but you live in the US too. ) Yeah, but I'm just a first generation American on my fathers side, so knowing that the US isn't the whole world hasn't been genetically removed entirely. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
And that's the strange part, he despises it so much...why does he stick around and suffer? "Kelly" wrote in message ... My bad, but you live in the US too. ) -- All the Best, Kelly (MS-MVP) Troubleshooting Windows XP http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com In memory of those lost during Katrina & Prayers and Hope for the remaining displaced. "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Kelly wrote: We aren't? You weren't supposed to be listening, Kelly. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Bob wrote:
And that's the strange part, he despises it so much...why does he stick around and suffer? Ah, you must be a Republican that believes that anyone that believes that in liberty and justice for ALL hates America. Anyone that believes in the freedom to choose is a commie. Anyone that believes in human rights is a evil liberal! I hate nothing. I dislike have a President that is a Mis-Leader when it comes to war, and much prefer having a President that is a Mis-Leader about cumming on a blue dress. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
"DevilsPGD" wrote in message ... In message Leythos wrote: In article , says... I apologize for the rant. http://snipurl.com/hbl7 I have made my decision Vista I will not be buying. No one is not going to tell me. I can't have access to a part of the computer or the hard drive. Imagine if a virus, spyware or adaware got into that protected area and a virus program could not clean it. I'm Sticking with xp & windows 98se forever. If I have to get a new computer it will be either mac or linux system. So, what you're saying, is that you want the option to be able to steal media if you choose and it's not the right of the OS vendor to limit you in any way? I have never bought an illegal piece of software in my life. I paid for a legal copy of Windows 95. Windows 98SE, and just bought a new system with XP SP2 pre-installed. I purposely did not buy a Linux machine, even though Linux has been my 'OS of choice' for many years now. I wanted to at least take a look at XP before just going on about my business with Linux again. I will never buy another MS product. I have had my system less than 3 months. I have had to 'start from scratch' no fewer than 3 times already. God only knows why. At least I had my backups on CD to start from or I would have just chucked XP completely. Every time I have had to go through the same 'product activation' as if I had just installed XP for the first time. There is no CD with XP on it. They have seen fit instead to take up an entire 5GB 'hidden' partition with the OEM version of XP. Is Microsoft so damned poor that they can not afford a CD for an OS that costs around $300 - if you pay full retail?? Come on Billy G. Get on the clue train bro... And I really do not care about piracy that may or may not be going on in China or God-only-knows-where. The salt in the wound is that Microsoft does not even try to have a 'secure' environment. Things that they have known about for years are still there, big gaping security holes you could drive a Mack truck through and never hit the side. What I do not understand is why the CIO's of places that get hit with the latest email worm or whatever, that takes their systems down all over the world, just shrug their shoulders, install a patch that usually makes things worse instead of better, and continue to pay MS outrageous license fees without batting an eye. Has the whole world gone mad?? Simple consumers are treated like criminals by Microsoft. And they wonder why people are leaving in droves to run Linux... Soon as my download of SuSE 10 finishes I will be joining them. Back to my 'OS of Choice' where I don't have to feel like I am some sort of a criminal... laterzzz |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Bill,
The fact there is no "CD provided" is due to the PC manufactures decision to not provide one. It has NADA to do with Microsoft, Bill G, retail copies or the price of tea in china. Please lose the rant and place the "blame" on the two people it belongs with. The uninformed purchaser and the cheap customer. Bill Turner wrote: "DevilsPGD" wrote in message ... In message Leythos wrote: In article , says... I apologize for the rant. http://snipurl.com/hbl7 I have made my decision Vista I will not be buying. No one is not going to tell me. I can't have access to a part of the computer or the hard drive. Imagine if a virus, spyware or adaware got into that protected area and a virus program could not clean it. I'm Sticking with xp & windows 98se forever. If I have to get a new computer it will be either mac or linux system. So, what you're saying, is that you want the option to be able to steal media if you choose and it's not the right of the OS vendor to limit you in any way? I have never bought an illegal piece of software in my life. I paid for a legal copy of Windows 95. Windows 98SE, and just bought a new system with XP SP2 pre-installed. I purposely did not buy a Linux machine, even though Linux has been my 'OS of choice' for many years now. I wanted to at least take a look at XP before just going on about my business with Linux again. I will never buy another MS product. I have had my system less than 3 months. I have had to 'start from scratch' no fewer than 3 times already. God only knows why. At least I had my backups on CD to start from or I would have just chucked XP completely. Every time I have had to go through the same 'product activation' as if I had just installed XP for the first time. There is no CD with XP on it. They have seen fit instead to take up an entire 5GB 'hidden' partition with the OEM version of XP. Is Microsoft so damned poor that they can not afford a CD for an OS that costs around $300 - if you pay full retail?? Come on Billy G. Get on the clue train bro... And I really do not care about piracy that may or may not be going on in China or God-only-knows-where. The salt in the wound is that Microsoft does not even try to have a 'secure' environment. Things that they have known about for years are still there, big gaping security holes you could drive a Mack truck through and never hit the side. What I do not understand is why the CIO's of places that get hit with the latest email worm or whatever, that takes their systems down all over the world, just shrug their shoulders, install a patch that usually makes things worse instead of better, and continue to pay MS outrageous license fees without batting an eye. Has the whole world gone mad?? Simple consumers are treated like criminals by Microsoft. And they wonder why people are leaving in droves to run Linux... Soon as my download of SuSE 10 finishes I will be joining them. Back to my 'OS of Choice' where I don't have to feel like I am some sort of a criminal... laterzzz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VISTA Operating System | Peace | General XP issues or comments | 47 | January 14th 06 01:30 AM |
what programs will Windows Vista run? | [email protected] | General XP issues or comments | 2 | August 5th 05 06:10 PM |
Microsoft Windows Vista Bulletin Board | Frank Steinmetzger | General XP issues or comments | 4 | August 4th 05 09:55 PM |
Windows Vista Screenshots | [email protected] | General XP issues or comments | 1 | July 25th 05 04:31 AM |
buying ram | mathawk | Windows XP Help and Support | 4 | January 23rd 05 03:38 AM |