A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » The Basics
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 7th 06, 09:42 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pappion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall (through my IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two were not needed.

I agree with that, but what is some expert opinions on this?

I have AdAware, Spybot Search & Destroy, and run Housecall every 2 wks. My AV is run daily, and automatically updated as are Windows Updates automatically downloaded. Thus far, since owning this system (and before) I've had no serious malware, Virus, or Trojans.

But, lately had a deluge of spam, which my DSL company says may indicate "This is a form of "spoofing" and I should clean my mailbox, because it won't go away if there's something in an email. But, my Grisoft AV checks my incoming and outgoing email...I think! Note: this was prior to upgrading my DSL modem to one that had a router in it.

My system is HP dc5000 uT (Invent business desk top computer), running MS XP Pro, V2002, Service Pack 2.

Thank you.


Ads
  #2  
Old November 7th 06, 11:11 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Another Brian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

You can deactivate ZA, but it is generally good practice to have both
a hardware firewall and a software firewall. ZA has an advantage over
most in that it also blocks outgoing.


"Pappion" wrote in message
...
My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall (through
my IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two were not
needed.

I agree with that, but what is some expert opinions on this?

I have AdAware, Spybot Search & Destroy, and run Housecall every 2
wks. My AV is run daily, and automatically updated as are Windows
Updates automatically downloaded. Thus far, since owning this system
(and before) I've had no serious malware, Virus, or Trojans.

But, lately had a deluge of spam, which my DSL company says may
indicate "This is a form of "spoofing" and I should clean my mailbox,
because it won't go away if there's something in an email. But, my
Grisoft AV checks my incoming and outgoing email...I think! Note: this
was prior to upgrading my DSL modem to one that had a router in it.

My system is HP dc5000 uT (Invent business desk top computer), running
MS XP Pro, V2002, Service Pack 2.

Thank you.


  #3  
Old November 7th 06, 11:24 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pop`
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 615
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

Pappion wrote:
My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall
(through my IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two
were not needed.

I agree with that, but what is some expert opinions on this?


Well, there are too many missing details here, but ... if your DSL router
contains a NAT router, then the best situation it the NAT (a hardware
firewall) backed up by a software firewall such as Zone Alarm. In fact, at
the moment general concensus seems to be that NAT plus ZA is the best
combination to have.

So, if that's the case you should keep ZA.

If however your ISP gave you some sort of software firewall in addition to
the hardware NAT, then yes, one of the two software firewalls should be
disabled. Which one is your decision; I already stated my opinion on ZA.


I have AdAware, Spybot Search & Destroy, and run Housecall every 2
wks. My AV is run daily, and automatically updated as are Windows
Updates automatically downloaded. Thus far, since owning this system
(and before) I've had no serious malware, Virus, or Trojans.


Continue. That's a decent arsenal that should serve you well.

But, lately had a deluge of spam, which my DSL company says may
indicate "This is a form of "spoofing" and I should clean my mailbox,
because it won't go away if there's something in an email. But, my
Grisoft AV checks my incoming and outgoing email...I think! Note:
this was prior to upgrading my DSL modem to one that had a router in
it.


Whoever's telling you to clean your mailbox is an idiot. IFF you're
infected, deleting an email won't get rid of it; that advice is BS.
FWIW, there has been a large upswing in the amount of spam flying around
lately so that's likely what you're seeing. Just about everyone is seeing
it. But that has nothign to do with firewalls, spyware or viruses; spam is
its own animal.

My system is HP dc5000 uT (Invent business desk top computer),
running MS XP Pro, V2002, Service Pack 2.

Thank you.


One parting word: It's usually "bad" to be scanning outgoing emails with
antivirus. The reason is, for me, occasional problems and timeouts can
cause mail to go to the Sent folder and to look like it went out when it
actually did not. I've turned off my outgoing email scans for exactly that
reason.
Many will tell you to also kill the incoming scans of email, alluding to
the fact that it's not needed because regular AV software will still catch
it, but personally I've had no problems with scanning outgoing emails, nor
has anyone else I know of. I'd rather catch it before it even hits my hard
drive, so I leave the outgoing scans running. Ymmv of course, but that's my
experience and I feel strongly about it. I suspect there will be a scream
or two that I said I'd leave incoming scanning enabled; so be itg.

Also, please switch to Plain Text for newsgroup posts; html should not be
used in newsgroups for many reasons.

HTH
Pop`


  #4  
Old November 8th 06, 12:06 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
gls858
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 212
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

Pop` wrote:
Pappion wrote:
My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall
(through my IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two
were not needed.

I agree with that, but what is some expert opinions on this?


Well, there are too many missing details here, but ... if your DSL router
contains a NAT router, then the best situation it the NAT (a hardware
firewall) backed up by a software firewall such as Zone Alarm. In fact, at
the moment general concensus seems to be that NAT plus ZA is the best
combination to have.

So, if that's the case you should keep ZA.

If however your ISP gave you some sort of software firewall in addition to
the hardware NAT, then yes, one of the two software firewalls should be
disabled. Which one is your decision; I already stated my opinion on ZA.

I have AdAware, Spybot Search & Destroy, and run Housecall every 2
wks. My AV is run daily, and automatically updated as are Windows
Updates automatically downloaded. Thus far, since owning this system
(and before) I've had no serious malware, Virus, or Trojans.


Continue. That's a decent arsenal that should serve you well.
But, lately had a deluge of spam, which my DSL company says may
indicate "This is a form of "spoofing" and I should clean my mailbox,
because it won't go away if there's something in an email. But, my
Grisoft AV checks my incoming and outgoing email...I think! Note:
this was prior to upgrading my DSL modem to one that had a router in
it.


Whoever's telling you to clean your mailbox is an idiot. IFF you're
infected, deleting an email won't get rid of it; that advice is BS.
FWIW, there has been a large upswing in the amount of spam flying around
lately so that's likely what you're seeing. Just about everyone is seeing
it. But that has nothign to do with firewalls, spyware or viruses; spam is
its own animal.
My system is HP dc5000 uT (Invent business desk top computer),
running MS XP Pro, V2002, Service Pack 2.

Thank you.


One parting word: It's usually "bad" to be scanning outgoing emails with
antivirus. The reason is, for me, occasional problems and timeouts can
cause mail to go to the Sent folder and to look like it went out when it
actually did not. I've turned off my outgoing email scans for exactly that
reason.
Many will tell you to also kill the incoming scans of email, alluding to
the fact that it's not needed because regular AV software will still catch
it, but personally I've had no problems with scanning outgoing emails, nor
has anyone else I know of. I'd rather catch it before it even hits my hard
drive, so I leave the outgoing scans running. Ymmv of course, but that's my
experience and I feel strongly about it. I suspect there will be a scream
or two that I said I'd leave incoming scanning enabled; so be itg.

Also, please switch to Plain Text for newsgroup posts; html should not be
used in newsgroups for many reasons.

HTH
Pop`




NAT is not a firewall.

http://kalsey.com/2003/10/nat_is_not_a_firewall/

gls858
  #5  
Old November 8th 06, 12:48 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
DanS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

gls858 wrote in
:


NAT is not a firewall.

http://kalsey.com/2003/10/nat_is_not_a_firewall/

gls858


Well, then the Windows 'FireWall' is not a firewall either, according to
that definition, since it does not monitor outgoing data either.

The author also states.....'I know someone will point out that my
description of NAT is a gross simplification and isn’t entirely accurate,
so I’m going to mention up front that I know that.'

I also agree with the author that firewalling is a byproduct of NAT. So
yes, NAT is not a true firewall, but you are 1000 times safer connecting
your always-on broadband connection to a 'NAT device' than directly to a
PC.

DanS


  #6  
Old November 8th 06, 02:28 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pappion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

Thank you... and sorry about the html duh!
"Pop`" wrote in message
...
Pappion wrote:
My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall
(through my IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two
were not needed.

I agree with that, but what is some expert opinions on this?


Well, there are too many missing details here, but ... if your DSL router
contains a NAT router, then the best situation it the NAT (a hardware
firewall) backed up by a software firewall such as Zone Alarm. In fact, at
the moment general concensus seems to be that NAT plus ZA is the best
combination to have.

So, if that's the case you should keep ZA.

If however your ISP gave you some sort of software firewall in addition to
the hardware NAT, then yes, one of the two software firewalls should be
disabled. Which one is your decision; I already stated my opinion on ZA.


I have AdAware, Spybot Search & Destroy, and run Housecall every 2
wks. My AV is run daily, and automatically updated as are Windows
Updates automatically downloaded. Thus far, since owning this system
(and before) I've had no serious malware, Virus, or Trojans.


Continue. That's a decent arsenal that should serve you well.

But, lately had a deluge of spam, which my DSL company says may
indicate "This is a form of "spoofing" and I should clean my mailbox,
because it won't go away if there's something in an email. But, my
Grisoft AV checks my incoming and outgoing email...I think! Note:
this was prior to upgrading my DSL modem to one that had a router in
it.


Whoever's telling you to clean your mailbox is an idiot. IFF you're
infected, deleting an email won't get rid of it; that advice is BS.
FWIW, there has been a large upswing in the amount of spam flying around
lately so that's likely what you're seeing. Just about everyone is seeing
it. But that has nothign to do with firewalls, spyware or viruses; spam is
its own animal.

My system is HP dc5000 uT (Invent business desk top computer),
running MS XP Pro, V2002, Service Pack 2.

Thank you.


One parting word: It's usually "bad" to be scanning outgoing emails with
antivirus. The reason is, for me, occasional problems and timeouts can
cause mail to go to the Sent folder and to look like it went out when it
actually did not. I've turned off my outgoing email scans for exactly that
reason.
Many will tell you to also kill the incoming scans of email, alluding to
the fact that it's not needed because regular AV software will still catch
it, but personally I've had no problems with scanning outgoing emails, nor
has anyone else I know of. I'd rather catch it before it even hits my hard
drive, so I leave the outgoing scans running. Ymmv of course, but that's my
experience and I feel strongly about it. I suspect there will be a scream
or two that I said I'd leave incoming scanning enabled; so be itg.

Also, please switch to Plain Text for newsgroup posts; html should not be
used in newsgroups for many reasons.

HTH
Pop`


  #7  
Old November 8th 06, 03:09 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Sharon F
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 480
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:42:35 -0600, Pappion wrote:

My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall (through my
IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two were not needed.


What kind of firewall does your ISP provide? The answer to that will help
others to answer your question more accurately.

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User
  #8  
Old November 8th 06, 06:08 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
gls858
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 212
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

DanS wrote:
gls858 wrote in
:

NAT is not a firewall.

http://kalsey.com/2003/10/nat_is_not_a_firewall/

gls858


Well, then the Windows 'FireWall' is not a firewall either, according to
that definition, since it does not monitor outgoing data either.

The author also states.....'I know someone will point out that my
description of NAT is a gross simplification and isn’t entirely accurate,
so I’m going to mention up front that I know that.'

I also agree with the author that firewalling is a byproduct of NAT. So
yes, NAT is not a true firewall, but you are 1000 times safer connecting
your always-on broadband connection to a 'NAT device' than directly to a
PC.

DanS


I agree.

gls858
  #9  
Old November 8th 06, 08:27 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pappion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

I'll check...they told me to pen my IE and type in a few letters then "turn
it on..." Its a Siemens Speedstream 4200.

Thank you.

"Sharon F" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:42:35 -0600, Pappion wrote:

My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall (through my
IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two were not needed.


What kind of firewall does your ISP provide? The answer to that will help
others to answer your question more accurately.

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User



  #10  
Old November 8th 06, 08:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pappion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

I typed in 192.168.254.254 and a simple page opened to turn on the
"firewall." Does that help??

"Pappion" wrote in message
...
I'll check...they told me to pen my IE and type in a few letters then
"turn it on..." Its a Siemens Speedstream 4200.

Thank you.

"Sharon F" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:42:35 -0600, Pappion wrote:

My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall (through
my
IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two were not needed.


What kind of firewall does your ISP provide? The answer to that will help
others to answer your question more accurately.

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User





  #11  
Old November 8th 06, 09:01 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pappion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

PS: they also told me I did not need to turn my computer off (electrically
via the surge suppressor as I've always done), and could safely leave it on
all night--"it takes the same power to turn it on as it would leaving it on,
and it's well protected, now." Comment???

"Pappion" wrote in message
...
I typed in 192.168.254.254 and a simple page opened to turn on the
"firewall." Does that help??

"Pappion" wrote in message
...
I'll check...they told me to pen my IE and type in a few letters then
"turn it on..." Its a Siemens Speedstream 4200.

Thank you.

"Sharon F" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:42:35 -0600, Pappion wrote:

My DSL company told me that since we activated their firewall (through
my
IE browser) I should deactivate Zone Alarm, because two were not
needed.

What kind of firewall does your ISP provide? The answer to that will
help
others to answer your question more accurately.

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User







  #12  
Old November 9th 06, 12:24 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
DanS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

"Pappion" wrote in
:

PS: they also told me I did not need to turn my computer off
(electrically via the surge suppressor as I've always done), and could
safely leave it on all night--"it takes the same power to turn it on
as it would leaving it on, and it's well protected, now." Comment???


Great, another always on or shutdown at night controversy. 6 of 1/half-
dozen of the other.

But it takes the same amount of power to turn it on as it uses to leave it
on all night ? That's just stupid. The 'more' power it takes to turn it on
is for 1 or 2 seconds, making the HD's spin up, that's it. Which
consequentially (sp.), may be happening many times during the on time
anyway, if you have power-saving enabled.

If your reason for turning it off is to save electricity, by all means, do
so.

  #13  
Old November 9th 06, 12:54 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,402
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

Pappion wrote:

PS: they also told me I did not need to turn my computer off
(electrically via the surge suppressor as I've always done), and
could safely leave it on all night--



This question is asked periodically and usually garners all sorts of fervent
responses, on both sides of the question. Some people never turn off their
computers, claiming turning them off can cause the hardware to fail sooner.
Others turn them on and off multiple times each day, to save electricity.

My view is that it doesn't matter very much either way, and you should do
what works best for you. Personally I power on once a day, when I get up in
the morning, and power off once a day, when I go to bed at night.


"it takes the same power to turn
it on as it would leaving it on,



But that is simply nonsense. Not at all true.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup


  #14  
Old November 9th 06, 01:22 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pappion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

re "may be happening many times during the on time anyway, if you have
power-saving enabled."

How can I check that, and should I have it enabled? I have XP Pro, SP2.

"DanS" wrote in message
. 97.142...
"Pappion" wrote in
:

PS: they also told me I did not need to turn my computer off
(electrically via the surge suppressor as I've always done), and could
safely leave it on all night--"it takes the same power to turn it on
as it would leaving it on, and it's well protected, now." Comment???


Great, another always on or shutdown at night controversy. 6 of 1/half-
dozen of the other.

But it takes the same amount of power to turn it on as it uses to leave it
on all night ? That's just stupid. The 'more' power it takes to turn it on
is for 1 or 2 seconds, making the HD's spin up, that's it. Which
consequentially (sp.), may be happening many times during the on time
anyway, if you have power-saving enabled.

If your reason for turning it off is to save electricity, by all means, do
so.



  #15  
Old November 9th 06, 01:25 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
Pappion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Is Zone Alarm necessary with a DSL firewall?

re I power on once a day, when I get up in
the morning, and power off once a day, when I go to bed at night.
That is exactly what I do, and often unplug my portable phones for a day or
longer, or they muck up now and then. LOL

I checked my outside power meter, and found the answer--thanks to all of
you. My DSL so-called "tech" is full of crapola. Sheesh. I upgraded to a
"faster modem" and now I'm not even sure that is what I have. They may have
just set my speed up, IMHO. Grrrrrr




"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
Pappion wrote:

PS: they also told me I did not need to turn my computer off
(electrically via the surge suppressor as I've always done), and
could safely leave it on all night--



This question is asked periodically and usually garners all sorts of
fervent responses, on both sides of the question. Some people never turn
off their computers, claiming turning them off can cause the hardware to
fail sooner. Others turn them on and off multiple times each day, to save
electricity.

My view is that it doesn't matter very much either way, and you should do
what works best for you. Personally I power on once a day, when I get up
in the morning, and power off once a day, when I go to bed at night.


"it takes the same power to turn
it on as it would leaving it on,



But that is simply nonsense. Not at all true.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.