If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines?
-- "Any spoke will lead the ant to the hub." --unknown /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
Ant wrote:
Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I have had a demo on one. It's got appeal. I have an iPad and a Kindle Touch, so I'm used to the experience. But I like my desktop, good seat where I like it, mouse and keyboard. And I wouldn't think of getting a touch-screen with it. Ed |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:27:58 -0700, Ant wrote:
Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I am and my wife is. It's fine. Please realize that Windows 8 has two interfaces--Metro and one much like Windows 7's. You can use either or both. When you're not using the Metro interface, a touch screen would do little or nothing for you. And if you are using Metro (which I sometimes do), a touch screen would be nice, but it's far from necessary; even Metro works fine without a touch screen. -- Ken Blake |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
Ed Cryer wrote:
Ant wrote: Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I have had a demo on one. It's got appeal. I have an iPad and a Kindle Touch, so I'm used to the experience. But I like my desktop, good seat where I like it, mouse and keyboard. And I wouldn't think of getting a touch-screen with it. Ed Touch-screens are everywhere. Market check-outs. Doctor's surgery for appointment. Govt. offices for info etc. Tablet computers, phones, e-readers etc. It's something that I didn't grow up with; but it's something that many young people are growing up with, and to them a mouse & keyboard must seem antiquated. I have a growing suspicion that MS are going to corner a vast market with their new Win8. And, quite frankly, I wish them luck. Ed |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
On 28 Oct 2012, Ed Cryer wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-8: Touch-screens are everywhere. Market check-outs. Doctor's surgery for appointment. Govt. offices for info etc. Tablet computers, phones, e-readers etc. It's something that I didn't grow up with; but it's something that many young people are growing up with, and to them a mouse & keyboard must seem antiquated. If I don't have to type in much input, a touch screen might be adequate. However a nice, large monitor works best at just below eye level, and be a few feet back, which is not a good position for touching. Also, to have to reach out to touch the screen and then go back to the keyboard is inconveniently far. Keyboard to mouse is closer and more convenient. To have to use all three is just silly. Touch screens are fine for consuming content, for selecting stuff to buy from a list, maybe for text messaging and tweeting, but I'd hate to write a novel, program computer code, edit sound, or do anything constructive on a touch computer. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
Agree!
"Ken Blake" wrote in message ... On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:27:58 -0700, Ant wrote: Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I am and my wife is. It's fine. Please realize that Windows 8 has two interfaces--Metro and one much like Windows 7's. You can use either or both. When you're not using the Metro interface, a touch screen would do little or nothing for you. And if you are using Metro (which I sometimes do), a touch screen would be nice, but it's far from necessary; even Metro works fine without a touch screen. -- Ken Blake |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
On 28 Oct 2012 19:16:01 GMT, Nil
wrote: On 28 Oct 2012, Ed Cryer wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-8: Touch-screens are everywhere. Market check-outs. Doctor's surgery for appointment. Govt. offices for info etc. Tablet computers, phones, e-readers etc. It's something that I didn't grow up with; but it's something that many young people are growing up with, and to them a mouse & keyboard must seem antiquated. If I don't have to type in much input, a touch screen might be adequate. However a nice, large monitor works best at just below eye level, and be a few feet back, which is not a good position for touching. Also, to have to reach out to touch the screen and then go back to the keyboard is inconveniently far. Keyboard to mouse is closer and more convenient. To have to use all three is just silly. Touch screens are fine for consuming content, for selecting stuff to buy from a list, maybe for text messaging and tweeting, but I'd hate to write a novel, program computer code, edit sound, or do anything constructive on a touch computer. I wouldn't particularly want a touch screen on my desktop here, because as you say, its location wouldn't be convenient. If I had one I'd probably play with it for a while, then soon stop using it. But I'd like one on a tablet that I could take with me when I traveled, instead of having a larger heavier laptop to carry. -- Ken Blake |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
"Ant" wrote in message om... Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? Read. http://www.extremetech.com/computing...treme tech%29 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
"Ken Blake" wrote in message ... On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:27:58 -0700, Ant wrote: Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I am and my wife is. It's fine. Please realize that Windows 8 has two interfaces--Metro and one much like Windows 7's. You can use either or both. When you're not using the Metro interface, a touch screen would do little or nothing for you. And if you are using Metro (which I sometimes do), a touch screen would be nice, but it's far from necessary; even Metro works fine without a touch screen. How does one access the interface that is "much like Windows7's"? Do you mean the Desktop tile? -- SC Tom |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:25:36 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:
"Ken Blake" wrote in message ... On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:27:58 -0700, Ant wrote: Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I am and my wife is. It's fine. Please realize that Windows 8 has two interfaces--Metro and one much like Windows 7's. You can use either or both. When you're not using the Metro interface, a touch screen would do little or nothing for you. And if you are using Metro (which I sometimes do), a touch screen would be nice, but it's far from necessary; even Metro works fine without a touch screen. How does one access the interface that is "much like Windows7's"? Do you mean the Desktop tile? Yes, clicking on the Desktop tile is one way. And if the tile is the upper left hand one, just press enter. Or just press the Windows key. -- Ken Blake |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:35:08 -0400, "FDK" wrote:
"Ant" wrote in message om... Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? Read. http://www.extremetech.com/computing...treme tech%29 And especially note the last sentence of page one the " For those of you who want the Start menu back, there?s an app called Classic Shell that returns it, and gives you access to a huge range of configurable options." I use Classic Shell and like it a lot. With that running, most people would have a hard time realizing that what I was running was not Windows 7. -- Ken Blake |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
Ant wrote in
m: Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I installed it last Friday night on an i5 laptop running Win7 Home Premium. So far, I'm not disliking it. :-) It's certainly weird not having the start menu but I'm thinking that I'll get used to it. My wife has a Gateway AIO touch- screen (i3 cpu with 6gb of RAM); from what she's seen of Win8, she's going to like it when I upgrade her AIO to it. For now, I'm sticking with Win7 on my desktop while I get used to Win8 on my laptop. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:22:57 -0700, Ken Blake wrote:
On 28 Oct 2012 19:16:01 GMT, Nil wrote: On 28 Oct 2012, Ed Cryer wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-8: Touch-screens are everywhere. Market check-outs. Doctor's surgery for appointment. Govt. offices for info etc. Tablet computers, phones, e-readers etc. It's something that I didn't grow up with; but it's something that many young people are growing up with, and to them a mouse & keyboard must seem antiquated. If I don't have to type in much input, a touch screen might be adequate. However a nice, large monitor works best at just below eye level, and be a few feet back, which is not a good position for touching. Also, to have to reach out to touch the screen and then go back to the keyboard is inconveniently far. Keyboard to mouse is closer and more convenient. To have to use all three is just silly. Touch screens are fine for consuming content, for selecting stuff to buy from a list, maybe for text messaging and tweeting, but I'd hate to write a novel, program computer code, edit sound, or do anything constructive on a touch computer. I wouldn't particularly want a touch screen on my desktop here, because as you say, its location wouldn't be convenient. If I had one I'd probably play with it for a while, then soon stop using it. But I'd like one on a tablet that I could take with me when I traveled, instead of having a larger heavier laptop to carry. Personal choice - having tried both a netbook and a 7" tablet with touchscreen, I find the netbook much more to my liking. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
"Ken Blake" wrote in message ... On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:25:36 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote: "Ken Blake" wrote in message ... On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:27:58 -0700, Ant wrote: Is anyone using it on non-tablet/touch screen machines? I am and my wife is. It's fine. Please realize that Windows 8 has two interfaces--Metro and one much like Windows 7's. You can use either or both. When you're not using the Metro interface, a touch screen would do little or nothing for you. And if you are using Metro (which I sometimes do), a touch screen would be nice, but it's far from necessary; even Metro works fine without a touch screen. How does one access the interface that is "much like Windows7's"? Do you mean the Desktop tile? Yes, clicking on the Desktop tile is one way. And if the tile is the upper left hand one, just press enter. Or just press the Windows key. Yeah, that's kinda what I thought you meant. I like the "use Win7 explorer" method much better. That's even MORE like Win7 :-) http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/1573...for-windows-8/ (See my reply to Dave-UK in the "classic shell vs Retro UI" thread.) -- SC Tom |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
So, how is W8 on a non-touch screen computer?
On 10/28/2012 5:38 PM PT, ray typed:
Personal choice - having tried both a netbook and a 7" tablet with touchscreen, I find the netbook much more to my liking. Ditto. I want a physical keyboard even if it is tiny. -- "If they are offered winged ants, people will eat them." --African /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|