Google keeps a log of all digital receipts emailed to your GMail account.

On 5/21/19 PDT 2:28 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 21/05/2019 00.59, wrote:
As far as the Gmail keeping receipts "issue", don't u GMail. Use a separate
throwayay address for the specific use these receipts.

Or not throwaway, but permanent. Receipts are usually important.


OK

In comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 18 May 2019 08:37:02 -0000 (UTC), John
Doe wrote:

The Real Bev wrote:

Arlen G. Holder wrote:

Google keeps a log of all digital receipts emailed to your GMail
account.

It's a permanent log of digital and physical things you've bought
that Google's automated scans picked up from receipts sent to
your Gmail inbox.

It's apparently located at:
https://myaccount.google.com/purchases

I have none in either account that I use for shopping.

There are a bunch in mine.

There are none in mine.

Which purchases are being tracked?

Looks like Amazon. Could be others. I do lots of online shopping,

I buy from Amazon. Last time was in January or Feb. It's not there.

I don't use a gmail address to buy things or to deal with anyone but
people I don't want to know my name. Gmail itself might know my name
and credit card because I bought a couple apps, but no one else does.
For them I use phoney names.

but employ no Google services for that. So the poster is obviously
right, they are effectively reading my emails.

Of course their filthy justification for reading our emails is that
they are providing a service, even though it is a duplicative,
unwanted, and mostly hidden service.

This troll is over one year late to the party...

--
micky wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: micky
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.c omp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.freeware
Subject: Google keeps a log of all digital receipts emailed to your GMail account.
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:25:32 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a5e9156a8cc6e2baf1f101ac9d78d76a"; logging-data="18340"; "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/R2uNydqiAxr9bCpq1FTvZ"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fA5c44nzowZGd+3nl9WvC5ycmc8=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.mobile.android:70246 misc.phone.mobile.iphone:135795 alt.comp.os.windows-10:121194 alt.comp.freewa338196

In comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 18 May 2019 08:37:02 -0000 (UTC), John
Doe wrote:

The Real Bev wrote:

Arlen G. Holder wrote:

Google keeps a log of all digital receipts emailed to your GMail
account.

It's a permanent log of digital and physical things you've bought
that Google's automated scans picked up from receipts sent to
your Gmail inbox.

It's apparently located at:
https://myaccount.google.com/purchases

I have none in either account that I use for shopping.

There are a bunch in mine.

There are none in mine.

Which purchases are being tracked?

Looks like Amazon. Could be others. I do lots of online shopping,

I buy from Amazon. Last time was in January or Feb. It's not there.

I don't use a gmail address to buy things or to deal with anyone but
people I don't want to know my name. Gmail itself might know my name
and credit card because I bought a couple apps, but no one else does.
For them I use phoney names.

but employ no Google services for that. So the poster is obviously
right, they are effectively reading my emails.

Of course their filthy justification for reading our emails is that
they are providing a service, even though it is a duplicative,
unwanted, and mostly hidden service.

On 7/1/2020 12:25 AM, micky wrote:
In comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 18 May 2019 08:37:02 -0000 (UTC), John
Doe wrote:

The Real Bev wrote:

Arlen G. Holder wrote:

Google keeps a log of all digital receipts emailed to your GMail
account.

It's a permanent log of digital and physical things you've bought
that Google's automated scans picked up from receipts sent to
your Gmail inbox.

It's apparently located at:
https://myaccount.google.com/purchases

I have none in either account that I use for shopping.

There are a bunch in mine.

There are none in mine.

Which purchases are being tracked?

Looks like Amazon. Could be others. I do lots of online shopping,

I buy from Amazon. Last time was in January or Feb. It's not there.

I don't use a gmail address to buy things or to deal with anyone but
people I don't want to know my name. Gmail itself might know my name
and credit card because I bought a couple apps, but no one else does.
For them I use phoney names.

but employ no Google services for that. So the poster is obviously
right, they are effectively reading my emails.

Of course their filthy justification for reading our emails is that
they are providing a service, even though it is a duplicative,
unwanted, and mostly hidden service.


Sounds paranoid to me. I buy a TON of stuff online and almost invariably
use one of my Gmail addresses when doing so but to this supposed tracking
URL I find nothing listed. Then I looked at the heading "Purchases made
using Search, Maps, and the Assistant are organized to help you get things
done, like tracking a package or reordering food." I have never AFAIK used
any of these things for buying and I suspect that few people do.

--
Bodger's Dictum: Artifical intelligence
can never overcome natural stupidity.

On 01/07/2020 06.25, micky wrote:
In comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 18 May 2019 08:37:02 -0000 (UTC), John
Doe wrote:

Why are you resurrecting a thread of one year ago?

--
Cheers, Carlos.

On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:02:41 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

Why are you resurrecting a thread of one year ago?

Hi Carlos,

You know I don't respect you because you're almost always dead wrong.
o As with Apple apologists, your belief systems are usually imaginary.

But, maybe, for once in your life, you have a cite for why you say that?
o Do you have even one reputable cite that backs up your claims above?

Maybe you do (but usually your belief systems are wholly imaginary)
o So where in the Usenet etiquette is this "rule" you imply exists?

IMHO, if someone wants to post to an old thread, there's nothing wrong with
that, as far as I know about Usenet etiquette/netiquette (see references).

I don't know of any Usenet rule specifying a time limit a priori:
o Do you know more than I do, Carlos?

Where did you find this "rule" you seem to imply exists, Carlos?
o HINT: It's just "your" personal childish rule, Carlos, isn't it?

REFERENCES:
o Usenet Organization and Etiquette
http://www.smfr.org/mtnw/docs/Usenet.html

o USENET Etiquette
https://www.lsu.edu/internet/usenet/usenet-etiquette.html

o Proper Usenet Etiquette
https://www.fastusenet.org/blog/usenet-spam-flamers-trolls-etiquette.html

o Standard for Interchange of USENET Messages
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1036/rfc1036.html

o The seven don'ts of Usenet,
http://jkorpela.fi/usenet/dont.html

o USENET and Mailing List posting netiquette
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php
--
The problem with fact-free people like Carlos is they almost always prove
to own imaginary belief systems sans any citable facts underlying them.

On 7/1/2020 9:02 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 01/07/2020 06.25, micky wrote:
In comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 18 May 2019 08:37:02 -0000 (UTC), John
Doe wrote:

Why are you resurrecting a thread of one year ago?


AFAIK I wasn't resurrecting anything. It showed up as a new message (Wed,
01 Jul 2020 00:25:32 -0400) and I didn't bother to sleuth the headers,
finding it easier to simply answer succinctly.

--
Bodger's Dictum: Artifical intelligence
can never overcome natural stupidity.

On 01/07/2020 21.08, John McGaw wrote:
On 7/1/2020 9:02 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 01/07/2020 06.25, micky wrote:
In comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 18 May 2019 08:37:02 -0000 (UTC), John
Doe wrote:

Why are you resurrecting a thread of one year ago?


AFAIK I wasn't resurrecting anything. It showed up as a new message
(Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:25:32 -0400) and I didn't bother to sleuth the
headers, finding it easier to simply answer succinctly.

Not you. "micky ".


--
Cheers, Carlos.

On 01/07/2020 16.06, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:02:41 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

Why are you resurrecting a thread of one year ago?

Hi Carlos,

You know I don't respect you because you're almost always dead wrong.
o As with Apple apologists, your belief systems are usually imaginary.

But, maybe, for once in your life, you have a cite for why you say that?
o Do you have even one reputable cite that backs up your claims above?


LOL. Your BOT has got out of control X-D


Maybe you do (but usually your belief systems are wholly imaginary)
o So where in the Usenet etiquette is this "rule" you imply exists?

IMHO, if someone wants to post to an old thread, there's nothing wrong with
that, as far as I know about Usenet etiquette/netiquette (see references).

I don't know of any Usenet rule specifying a time limit a priori:
o Do you know more than I do, Carlos?

Where did you find this "rule" you seem to imply exists, Carlos?
o HINT: It's just "your" personal childish rule, Carlos, isn't it?

REFERENCES:
o Usenet Organization and Etiquette
http://www.smfr.org/mtnw/docs/Usenet.html

o USENET Etiquette
https://www.lsu.edu/internet/usenet/usenet-etiquette.html

o Proper Usenet Etiquette
https://www.fastusenet.org/blog/usenet-spam-flamers-trolls-etiquette.html

o Standard for Interchange of USENET Messages
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1036/rfc1036.html

o The seven don'ts of Usenet,
http://jkorpela.fi/usenet/dont.html

o USENET and Mailing List posting netiquette
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php



--
Cheers, Carlos.