If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
*WARNING* (was Insider 16215)
On 11/06/2017 19:48, David B. wrote:
Philo, whilst we are chatting about scripts, have you any notion of why this would be on a web site (without the knowledge of the site owner)? !-- [if IE] sc​ript type="text/javascript" src=hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/" / sc​ript !-- [endif]-- div IE sc​ript here /div Your 'best guess' will do! ;-) *WARNING* I followed the link above on my iMac My now-resident ClamXAV detected a Trojan there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/744lnwkkut...2017.tiff?dl=0 What was it doing on the web site of a retired programmer who should know better!!! (www.Tekrider.net) -- David B. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
*WARNING* (was Insider 16215)
On 11/06/2017 20:44, David B. wrote:
On 11/06/2017 19:48, David B. wrote: Philo, whilst we are chatting about scripts, have you any notion of why this would be on a web site (without the knowledge of the site owner)? !-- [if IE] sc​ript type="text/javascript" src=hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/" / sc​ript !-- [endif]-- div IE sc​ript here /div Your 'best guess' will do! ;-) *WARNING* I followed the link above on my iMac My now-resident ClamXAV detected a Trojan there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/744lnwkkut...2017.tiff?dl=0 What was it doing on the web site of a retired programmer who should know better!!! (www.Tekrider.net) https://virustotal.com/en/url/705002...is/1497210967/ -- "Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
*WARNING* (was Insider 16215)
David B. STALKER wrote:
... hxxp://windows-web-browsers.co.cc/alert/ *WARNING* I followed the link above on my iMac How do you follow a link to an *HXXP* site? My now-resident ClamXAV detected a Trojan there! https://www.dropbox.com/STALKING_POST What was it doing on the web site of a retired programmer who should know better!!! You have been TOLD that "script" (which is NOT a script) is a FAULT with your FAULTY TOOL. Your beloved Mike Easter explained it to you. The "script" does *NOT EXIST* on my web site. You are ignoring his advice so you can continue your despicable behaviour. KWIT STALKING! Reread my offer to you. -- -bts |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
*WARNING* (was Insider 16215)
David B. STALKER wrote:
https://virustotal.com/SNIP_STALKING_LINK/ You are so lame. They ran 64 scanners at that URL. 2 gave a false positive. **62** said it is a _Clean site_. You need to stop using tools you know nothing about, STALKER! -- -bts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
*WARNING* (was Insider 16215)
David B. STALKER wrote:
On 11/06/2017 21:02, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: KWIT STALKING! Reread my offer to you. I've unearthed this infrmation about your web site. I will investigate further tomorrow:- Save your energy. Do something worthwhile. Turn off your computer and take your wife to dinner. -- -bts |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:56:39 -0400, Paul wrote:
I suspect the model used, isn't as "pure" as the verbiage in the Ars article would have us believe. No doubt the model differs from the practice (the map is not the territory, etc.) Why moan about the insider versions? Joe Public gets the release product, insiders are extended beta testers, put in the bug reports, get over it. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
mechanic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:56:39 -0400, Paul wrote: I suspect the model used, isn't as "pure" as the verbiage in the Ars article would have us believe. No doubt the model differs from the practice (the map is not the territory, etc.) Why moan about the insider versions? Joe Public gets the release product, insiders are extended beta testers, put in the bug reports, get over it. For the extended beta testers to test, the product must install. You can't even dogfood a release, if the installer doesn't work. Paul |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
"David B."
Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:29:14 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Thanks, Philo. You still don't grasp simple concepts, obviously. The 'script' doesn't even exist on the site BTS created. It's an error! on the part of Sucuri. I've already told you, btw, that a url by itself IS NOT MALICIOUS and is NOT MALWARE. It doesn't seem to sink into that dense skull of yours, though. If you actually want the pic of you standing beside your wife removed, and/or the section of the site warning others about your actual intentions, you're going about it the wrong way https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php FYI - See above. "Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." At what point do you intend to take the advice your tagline suggests? By that I mean, specifically, when do you intend to STOP STALKING people, David? -- Insert witty tagline here https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
Paul wrote:
mechanic wrote: On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:56:39 -0400, Paul wrote: I suspect the model used, isn't as "pure" as the verbiage in the Ars article would have us believe. No doubt the model differs from the practice (the map is not the territory, etc.) Why moan about the insider versions? Joe Public gets the release product, insiders are extended beta testers, put in the bug reports, get over it. For the extended beta testers to test, the product must install. You can't even dogfood a release, if the installer doesn't work. Paul That's part of the planned obsolescence of devices. Prior to W10 intro the discussion here and elsewhere centered incorrectly on Win10 for the life of the device. Then, and now it still means Win10 for the *supported* life of the device and that includes all those free upgrades, pre-installed Win10 devices, retail installed product, OEM BYO, and Insider releases. Another misnomer is extended beta testers - only a small subset of the population is statistically necessary to determine the Win10 platform's direction and resource. Since 2012(Win10 initial development) that focus has and will continue to be on Enterprise adoption, everything else(e.g. consumer)is secondary. Fyi...the 3-400 million on the financial books(over the 3 yr period starting in '15) covering the cost of the Win10 free upgrade will cease once 2018 Budget Year arrives. In fact some of that allocation won't ever be spent since the targeted quantity of upgrades was less than the accrued estimate. -- ...winston msft mvp windows experience 2007-2016, insider mvp 2016-2017 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:15:38 -0400, . . .winston wrote:
Another misnomer is extended beta testers - only a small subset of the population is statistically necessary to determine the Win10 platform's direction and resource. But that's not what beta testing is about. It's about identifying bugs. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
mechanic wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:15:38 -0400, . . .winston wrote: Another misnomer is extended beta testers - only a small subset of the population is statistically necessary to determine the Win10 platform's direction and resource. But that's not what beta testing is about. It's about identifying bugs. Size of the beta testing population(Windows Insiders) does not, and has never indicated more bugs will be identified let alone reported. Furthermore, an identified bug doesn't indicate resource assignment for addressing said identification. Beta testing feedback while having an impact on development in its simplest form is about how to market the product and since the latter stages of Windows 7 beta testing has been managed by MSFT's Marketing team. -- ....winston msft mvp windows experience -- ...winston msft mvp windows experience 2007-2016, insider mvp 2016-2017 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:48:54 +0100, "David B."
wrote: Philo, whilst we are chatting about scripts, have you any notion of why this would be on a web site (without the knowledge of the site owner)? snip Your 'best guess' will do! ;-) TIA Nice! First, engage in a bit of (fake) friendly banter, then smoothly slip in an innocent-looking request for stalking assistance. That's a great model, but where have we seen it before? Oh, that's right, it's what you always do. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
On 15/06/2017 15:49, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:48:54 +0100, "David B." wrote: Philo, whilst we are chatting about scripts, have you any notion of why this would be on a web site (without the knowledge of the site owner)? snip Your 'best guess' will do! ;-) TIA Nice! First, engage in a bit of (fake) friendly banter, then smoothly slip in an innocent-looking request for stalking assistance. That's a great model, but where have we seen it before? Oh, that's right, it's what you always do. Nothing fake in our relationship, Char. Truly! :-) Philo has been a Facebook friend of mine for years. I've purchased his book of photographs AND the book of paintings published by his wife. If you'd like a copy of Philo's book , it's available from Amazon, he- https://www.amazon.com/Kochanskis-Co...dp/1466441682/ You might enjoy this item about Colleen and her work:- http://shepherdexpress.com/article-2...d-express.html This week the couple arrived in Amsterdam for a life-long promised holiday in the place where Colleen's mother was born! I'm sure they'll have a great time. ;-) -- "Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Insider 16215
Char Jackson
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:49:56 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:48:54 +0100, "David B." wrote: Philo, whilst we are chatting about scripts, have you any notion of why this would be on a web site (without the knowledge of the site owner)? snip Your 'best guess' will do! ;-) TIA Nice! First, engage in a bit of (fake) friendly banter, then smoothly slip in an innocent-looking request for stalking assistance. That's a great model, but where have we seen it before? Oh, that's right, it's what you always do. Very perceptive of you to notice. LOL! -- In the beginning there was nothing, and God said 'Let there be light.' And there was still nothing, but at least you could see it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|