A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Security and Administration with Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old October 16th 06, 04:12 AM posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security,microsoft.public.security.homeusers,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
imhotep
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher

Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...

Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have
become trying...

Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually.

Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry.

Remember, your inability to see understanding does
in no way indicate lack thereof.


Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent...


I assure you, it is quite effortless

I am sure looking like a clown comes quite easy to you...

I wonder if you are related to PC BUTTS 1.


Legos,

Recess is over. Go inside.

At least I'm not immature enough to not spell your name properly.



Legos,

So, ah, "...PC BUTTS 1" is mature? Nothing worse than a hypocrite.

Go away the amateur hour is over.


Well, you are acting just like he did before he was banned from using
that nickname.


Legos,

So you are telling me that you felt compelled to warn me of my sins? Please.
You were better off not "contributing" to this thread....

Again, I challenge you to contribute not flame. I prefer to contribute, but
be forewarned, I can flame with the best of them....your choice.

Im
Ads
  #47  
Old October 16th 06, 04:17 AM posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security,microsoft.public.security.homeusers,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
imhotep
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher

Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Why don't one of you try to describe the problem so at least I
understand what your problem is? See, this whole "issue" started by
a couple of people accusing me of using a broken newsreader, etc,
etc. Now, fair is fair, if anyone starts a conversation with such
rudeness I am really not going to take them very seriously,
especially when it *is* their newsclient after all...

What about the people that don't have the group to force the
follow-up to from their ISP?

Which is exactly why I set the "followup-to" a very common generalized
newsgroup. In this case "microsoft.public.security". This newsgroup
just about all newsservers carry.

By doing what you are doing, the reply will never be seen from you
and they will never be able to reply properly.


Read above...This would only be true if I set the followup-to to a
specialized, and hence non-popular, newsgroup...

Except you don't know what groups are carried by what ISP, and you
state you are trying to reach the masses with your message, but you
don't seem to care that the non-technical will not be able to properly
reply to your message due to the way you break the chain for your own
personal pleasure.


Legos,

Again, read my post. I intentionally place a very common group in within
the "followup-to" field. In fact the most common newsgroup. Did you not
even read my previous post?


Road Runner in my area does not carry that group, and RR has a LARGE
base in Ohio, like the number 2 provider in Ohio. In fact, RR is three
areas I just checked does not carry "microsoft.public.security".

So, your method means that 10's of thousands of people that might see
your message are unable to properly reply to you unless they know enough
to fix your improper use of Follow-up methods.



Funny, you are posting microsoft.public.security now?

*Most* ISPs *DO* carry microsoft.public.security...

In either case, I am not going to stop. What I am doing is FULLY within the
specs of NNTP...you can keep on acting foolish if you wish but it is not
going to change anything.

I would suggest, that you read up on all the features that you are clearly
unaware of...knowledge is power. Get powerful.

Im
  #48  
Old October 16th 06, 06:10 AM posted to microsoft.public.security,microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security,microsoft.public.security.homeusers,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
Roger Abell [MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems
rather
than hijack them...

I believe I do assist

Not when you hijack.


And you, not when you fragment threads


It only is fragmented when you do not know what you are doing! So from
your
point of view, I guess it is....

That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads

English please.


It is. I do not care to diagram for you.


Oh please...


As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt
to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack!

Like your endless rants of newsclients here in a thread about a new MVP
who
supported malware?


That topic was dead out of the starting gate.


That Microsoft gave a MVP to a spyware pusher? Not at all. If nothing
else,
it signifies that the MVP does not mean much. You have one right?


However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below)
I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in
msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads.
I wonder why.

Easy to deduce. How many time have you hijack the topic, like here,
forcing
me to try and steer the conversation back on topic for the sake of the
many
users here. What don't you investage that? Ah, I guess the truth hurts
now,
doesn't it.


I like the truth. I just do not see you displaying it much, certainly
not
here/now.


The truth is you *do* hijack the topic of this and other threads. You know
as do I.

You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make
claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually
experienced by people.

Maybe that is why you hijack posts like this one? Don't feel you can
contrube but *also* want to increase you news post counts?

Listen, I do not get evaluated for the number of news posts. I believe
an
MVP does.

If I was getting evaluated for the number of news posts, I would use my
real
name, *like* *you*...


You clear do not understand how it works.


Funny, mine works flawlessly without any problems. I simply click and go.
You are having problems but, *I* don't understand?

Hahahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks, for the chuckle!

As I see you are quite difficult to wear down, I guess just ignoring you
would be the best way to minimize your presence, ey?


I don't really care what you do. I never have. You're just learning that
now? You really are slow....

Roger, let's be honest here. Your whole rant here was not about anything
more than the fact that Microsoft messed up and gave a spyware pusher a
MVP. You being a MVP felt your had to somehow defend/protect Microsoft. I
would respect you more if you were just honest from the beginning.
However,
you are not. As such, I view you, and your posts, as pretty much
worthless.

In either case, ignore me if you wish. Never did care much what you did...


You are indeed quite dense, and able to claim anything as if it made sense.
It is all too clear you have never cared what anyone (except yourself) has
had to say (unless it agreed with you).





(oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info,
yes, one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your
posts)


Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search
date
Author:
First Seen: 9/3/2005
Last Seen: 10/12/2006
Aliases: Imhotep

Newsgroups Days Active
Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched
Day / Last Day 5 / 4
20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7
Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4
62
/
75 4 / 5 21 / 32
Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19
137
/
134 9 / 11 4 / 36
Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49
137 /
295 9 / 36 44 / 98
Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64
432
/
476 45 / 62 136 / 196

Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending)
First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies
Threads
Initiated Threads Touched
microsoft.public.security
9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217
30
57
microsoft.public.security.homeusers
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152
29
59
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security
9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142
26
43
microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115
27
48
alt.security
9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29
16
39
comp.security.misc
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14
16
37
comp.security
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10
16
34
comp.os.linux.security
7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4
5
11
comp.security.firewalls
9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2
5
10
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3
0 1
microsoft.public.windows.server.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
comp.security.unix
10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
comp.security.pgp.test
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
alt.computer.security
9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2
0 1
microsoft.public.win2000.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
sci.crypt
10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1
0 2
alt.security.pgp
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
soc.culture.canada
10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1
0 1
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1
0 1




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.