If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
micky writes:
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:26:22 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , micky writes: [things that let old hardware run under new versions of Windows] I've never seen what I'm talking about on the web. not even one, let alone the "some" that you talk about below. [] I've seen one for scanners; unfortunately it isn't free, and costs about the same as a cheap scanner. This is sad, as it's a good product; it's just made by a small company (Australian, I think) who aren't big enough to be able to offer it at a lower price. (There is a free "evaluation" version, but that puts overprinting on the result - it's intended for you to see if your scanner works with it.) /../ Yeah, that's it. https://www.hamrick.com/reg.html 30 or 80 dollars. American dollars afaict. For the extra money you get flim and slide scanning, OCR of text, and unnamed extra features. /../ But still, they seem to have done it for scanners, which I was also interested in. . There are a lot more printers and there's a a lot more printing being done. Maybe greater volume would allow a lower price, although I can see that printing is a lot more complicated than scanning. Hi Mick, VueScan is good stuff, really! I can recommend it even though I don't use it. Those people work hard to reverse-engineer the scanning protocols and idiosyncracies of individual scanners. Under linux and MacOSX we have the SANE project for scanning, and the gutenprint project for printing. Both provide back-ends, that is, drivers, for the hardware. Look them up online, both are free software, and continuously improving and keeping up with the latest devices, while adding older one as well, best of both worlds. The SANE project to which I contributed in the past mostly for Canon devices, has most of the capabilities of VueScan, but OCR is not part of the project, and unfortunately also still lacking infra-red dust removal capability for those devices that have it physically (the new PIE backend has it, so in future other back-ends may be able to implement such capability also). The gutenprint project, to which I contribute as maintainer of the Canon backend, offers varied support for a host of printers from many different manufacturers, mostly inkjets, and dye-sublimation devices. Since printers use different print languages and data formats, even a back-end for one manufacturer has tons of variations to accommodate differences. And then occasionally one needs to create a new back-end entirely. Gutenprint does well for standard text and graphics printing, but has no calibration for photo printing for different media and resolutions, so it is up to the user to adjust individual ink densities and so on for best performance. This is an area where the project could improve, but also impossible without access to the printer by developers, or some automated way for users to do themselves. Gutenprint tries to handle all linux and MacOSX versions as far back as possible, but because of the idiosyncracies of MacOSX, support for 10.2, then 10.3 and 10.4, and finally 10.5 had to be dropped, and the latest version requires 10.6 or later. Regards, Gernot Hassenpflug -- NNTP on Emacs 24.3 from Windows 7 |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:32:31
+0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: micky writes: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:26:22 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , micky writes: [things that let old hardware run under new versions of Windows] I've never seen what I'm talking about on the web. not even one, let alone the "some" that you talk about below. [] I've seen one for scanners; unfortunately it isn't free, and costs about the same as a cheap scanner. This is sad, as it's a good product; it's just made by a small company (Australian, I think) who aren't big enough to be able to offer it at a lower price. (There is a free "evaluation" version, but that puts overprinting on the result - it's intended for you to see if your scanner works with it.) /../ Yeah, that's it. https://www.hamrick.com/reg.html 30 or 80 dollars. American dollars afaict. For the extra money you get flim and slide scanning, OCR of text, and unnamed extra features. /../ But still, they seem to have done it for scanners, which I was also interested in. . There are a lot more printers and there's a a lot more printing being done. Maybe greater volume would allow a lower price, although I can see that printing is a lot more complicated than scanning. Hi Mick, VueScan is good stuff, really! I can recommend it even though I don't use it. Those people work hard to reverse-engineer the scanning protocols and idiosyncracies of individual scanners. Under linux and MacOSX we have the SANE project for scanning, and the gutenprint project for printing. Both provide back-ends, that is, drivers, for the hardware. Look them up online, both are free software, and continuously improving and keeping up with the latest devices, while adding older one as well, best of both worlds. Coincidentally -- well not really because I think my excess hardware from win98 days is what made me think abou this in the first place -- but anyhow, yesterday I listed a flatbed scanner from win98 days on Freecycle, and within an hour I got someone who said she's interested. The "ad" said that it only works with a parallel port but I said some (PCI) are as low as $5.25 and I offered to help install it, because this scanner is new in the box and I really don't want to see it get scrapped without ever being used. Anyhow, though this one only has a parallel port, it does have drivers for up to win7. Interesting, huh? I willl tell her or whoever takes it about the software above, for when they upgrade beyond 7. The SANE project to which I contributed in the past mostly for Canon devices, has most of the capabilities of VueScan, but OCR is not part of the project, Can't one use separate OCR software? (I've always wanted to OCR something but in fact I never have a need for it.) and unfortunately also still lacking infra-red dust removal capability for those devices that have it physically (the new PIE backend has it, so in future other back-ends may be able to implement such capability also). The gutenprint project, to which I contribute as maintainer of the Canon backend, offers varied support for a host of printers from many different manufacturers, mostly inkjets, and dye-sublimation devices. Since printers use different print languages and data formats, even a back-end for one manufacturer has tons of variations to accommodate differences. And then occasionally one needs to create a new back-end entirely. Gutenprint does well for standard text and graphics printing, but has no calibration for photo printing for different media and resolutions, so it is up to the user to adjust individual ink densities and so on for best performance. This is an area where the project could improve, but also impossible without access to the printer by developers, or some automated way for users to do themselves. Gutenprint tries to handle all linux and MacOSX versions as far back as possible, but because of the idiosyncracies of MacOSX, support for 10.2, then 10.3 and 10.4, and finally 10.5 had to be dropped, and the latest version requires 10.6 or later. Well I hope the old versions are still available, and even my friend has upgraded to 10.6, for other reasons. Regards, Gernot Hassenpflug |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
On 18/08/2015 17:43, Good Guy wrote:
On 18/08/2015 13:06, micky wrote: Seems to me, someone should be able to write a printer driver driver, that will take the output from XP, 7, 8, or 10 and convert it to what the output from win98 or XP would look like, to be used as input for old printers. So that old printers -- and other accessories -- could be used with new versions of windows. So it woudln't have to be printer-specific, If this won't work, how come? It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Of course there are people writing drivers for old printers for new OS. The only problem is that they have over-advertised themselves and so people are wary of them. They stick their Ad in almost anything, even in articles when you focus on a particular word, something pops up. People have said enough is enough and so they just ignore them. Do a search and you will find lots of them but be careful about them. Some are good and some are pure evil. they will take you and your bank to cleaners. Interesting thought, but I'm still using a printer that I bought in the middle of Windows 98. Works fine in 8.1, and even behaved under 10, though I upgraded back to 8.1 pretty quickly (another story). It's HP Deskjet3845 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
In message , Gernot Hassenpflug
writes: [] VueScan is good stuff, really! I can recommend it even though I don't use it. Those people work hard to reverse-engineer the scanning protocols and idiosyncracies of individual scanners. Under linux and MacOSX we have the SANE project for scanning, and the gutenprint project for printing. Both provide back-ends, that is, drivers, for the hardware. Look them up online, both are free software, and continuously improving and keeping up with the latest devices, while adding older one as well, best of both worlds. [] Regards, Gernot Hassenpflug So what chance (minimal I suspect since Windows and Linux folk on the whole aren't too fond of each other) of someone writing a TWAIN-to-SANE, er, driver (translator, whatever), and a Windows driver for *the* gutenprint "printer" (not unlike the PDF "printer"s)? -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Radio 4 is the civilising influence in this country ... I think it is the most important institution in this country. - John Humphrys, Radio Times 7-13/06/2003 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
In message , micky
writes: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:32:31 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: [] The SANE project to which I contributed in the past mostly for Canon devices, has most of the capabilities of VueScan, but OCR is not part of the project, Can't one use separate OCR software? [] Yes; I get depressed (or used to) at how many people think OCR is a function of the scanner. It isn't. Most OCR software (all that I've ever seen) can take image files as input (albeit sometimes limited to only the common-with-scanner formats, such as TIFF and PDF), as well as directly "driving" a scanner. Certainly Omnipage, Abbyy (sp?), and PagePlus (I think) can. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Radio 4 is the civilising influence in this country ... I think it is the most important institution in this country. - John Humphrys, Radio Times 7-13/06/2003 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:06:15
+0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , micky writes: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:32:31 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: [] The SANE project to which I contributed in the past mostly for Canon devices, has most of the capabilities of VueScan, but OCR is not part of the project, Can't one use separate OCR software? [] Yes; I get depressed (or used to) at how many people think OCR is a I'm glad you said "used to". Untreated OCR depression can be as great a problem as OCD depression, or OCW**. function of the scanner. It isn't. Most OCR software (all that I've ever seen) can take image files as input (albeit sometimes limited to only the common-with-scanner formats, such as TIFF and PDF), as well as directly "driving" a scanner. Certainly Omnipage, Abbyy (sp?), and PagePlus (I think) can. **That's what Elmer Fudd has. Optical Character Wecognition. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
micky writes:
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:32:31 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: micky writes: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:26:22 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , micky writes: [things that let old hardware run under new versions of Windows] /../ The SANE project to which I contributed in the past mostly for Canon devices, has most of the capabilities of VueScan, but OCR is not part of the project, Can't one use separate OCR software? (I've always wanted to OCR something but in fact I never have a need for it.) Of course, it is entirely a non-issue, I merely added that statement to highlight a difference to (apparently) VueScan. /../ Gutenprint tries to handle all linux and MacOSX versions as far back as possible, but because of the idiosyncracies of MacOSX, support for 10.2, then 10.3 and 10.4, and finally 10.5 had to be dropped, and the latest version requires 10.6 or later. Well I hope the old versions are still available, and even my friend has upgraded to 10.6, for other reasons. Sure, older versions (obviously with less printer support) of gutenprint are available (and always will be, as long as the software continues to have a place on the web). The trouble comes when people want to use a new printer with their old MacOSX, this is simply not possible (a backport for specific printers is possible in some cases, but ovbiously not feasible to maintain). -- NNTP on Emacs 24.3 from Windows 7 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:08:06
+0100, Peter wrote: On 18/08/2015 17:43, Good Guy wrote: On 18/08/2015 13:06, micky wrote: Seems to me, someone should be able to write a printer driver driver, that will take the output from XP, 7, 8, or 10 and convert it to what the output from win98 or XP would look like, to be used as input for old printers. So that old printers -- and other accessories -- could be used with new versions of windows. So it woudln't have to be printer-specific, If this won't work, how come? It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Of course there are people writing drivers for old printers for new OS. The only problem is that they have over-advertised themselves and so people are wary of them. They stick their Ad in almost anything, even in articles when you focus on a particular word, something pops up. People have said enough is enough and so they just ignore them. Do a search and you will find lots of them but be careful about them. Some are good and some are pure evil. they will take you and your bank to cleaners. Interesting thought, but I'm still using a printer that I bought in the middle of Windows 98. Works fine in 8.1, and even behaved under 10, though I upgraded back to 8.1 pretty quickly (another story). It's HP Deskjet3845 You still have a parallel port, or was there USB already then? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
On 08/18/2015 02:06 PM, micky wrote:
Seems to me, someone should be able to write a printer driver driver, that will take the output from XP, 7, 8, or 10 and convert it to what the output from win98 or XP would look like, to be used as input for old printers. So that old printers -- and other accessories -- could be used with new versions of windows. So it woudln't have to be printer-specific, If this won't work, how come? It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. From what I recall There was an `Adobe Post Script printer driver' that you could install on any windows box for printing. It would output Postscript that you could print from some application, or forward to CUPS or somesuch other ipp printer/server. Don't those things work for recent windowses? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:27:03 -0500, Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net
dot nz wrote: micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:00:55 +0100, Stuart wrote: In article , micky wrote: It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Beats me why Microsoft have to change things so that older printer drivers don't work any way. After all, a program sends the print request to the OS which then sends the information to the driver, why change stuff? Well, actually Microsoft are in cahoots with hardware manufacturers to make sure you have to keep buying new printers etc. Yeah, I'm sure that's the reason. I wonder what MS gets out of it. That is not what happens at all. Tony When I wrote my line above 5 months ago, I was sure it sounded sarcastic, but reading it now, it didn't even sound sarcastic to me. But that's how I meant it. Sorry I was misleading. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
Micky wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:27:03 -0500, Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz wrote: micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:00:55 +0100, Stuart wrote: In article , micky wrote: It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Beats me why Microsoft have to change things so that older printer drivers don't work any way. After all, a program sends the print request to the OS which then sends the information to the driver, why change stuff? Well, actually Microsoft are in cahoots with hardware manufacturers to make sure you have to keep buying new printers etc. Yeah, I'm sure that's the reason. I wonder what MS gets out of it. That is not what happens at all. Tony When I wrote my line above 5 months ago, I was sure it sounded sarcastic, but reading it now, it didn't even sound sarcastic to me. But that's how I meant it. Sorry I was misleading. Fair enough. Microsoft do not write the drivers for printers. The printer manufacturer has to do that. So there is customer and shareholder pressure to develop new operating systems and the printer manufacturers have to decide whether they develop new printer drivers for it. Tony |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz writes:
Micky wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:27:03 -0500, Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz wrote: micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:00:55 +0100, Stuart wrote: In article , micky wrote: It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Beats me why Microsoft have to change things so that older printer drivers don't work any way. After all, a program sends the print request to the OS which then sends the information to the driver, why change stuff? Well, actually Microsoft are in cahoots with hardware manufacturers to make sure you have to keep buying new printers etc. Yeah, I'm sure that's the reason. I wonder what MS gets out of it. That is not what happens at all. Tony When I wrote my line above 5 months ago, I was sure it sounded sarcastic, but reading it now, it didn't even sound sarcastic to me. But that's how I meant it. Sorry I was misleading. Fair enough. Microsoft do not write the drivers for printers. The printer manufacturer has to do that. So there is customer and shareholder pressure to develop new operating systems and the printer manufacturers have to decide whether they develop new printer drivers for it. Actually, as far as I can see in Japan, the printer manufacturers outsource the driver writing to a 3rd-party, they do not do it themselves. Hence there is yet another level of contracting and negotiations, cost-benefit analysis and so on involved. -- NNTP on Emacs 24.3 from Windows 7 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz writes: Micky wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:27:03 -0500, Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz wrote: micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:00:55 +0100, Stuart wrote: In article , micky wrote: It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Beats me why Microsoft have to change things so that older printer drivers don't work any way. After all, a program sends the print request to the OS which then sends the information to the driver, why change stuff? Well, actually Microsoft are in cahoots with hardware manufacturers to make sure you have to keep buying new printers etc. Yeah, I'm sure that's the reason. I wonder what MS gets out of it. That is not what happens at all. Tony When I wrote my line above 5 months ago, I was sure it sounded sarcastic, but reading it now, it didn't even sound sarcastic to me. But that's how I meant it. Sorry I was misleading. Fair enough. Microsoft do not write the drivers for printers. The printer manufacturer has to do that. So there is customer and shareholder pressure to develop new operating systems and the printer manufacturers have to decide whether they develop new printer drivers for it. Actually, as far as I can see in Japan, the printer manufacturers outsource the driver writing to a 3rd-party, they do not do it themselves. Hence there is yet another level of contracting and negotiations, cost-benefit analysis and so on involved. -- NNTP on Emacs 24.3 from Windows 7 Ah, I am sure you are right. And it probably makes it more difficult to justify new drivers. I was making the point that it is the responsibility of the printer manufacturer and not the responsibility of the OS developer. I have lost count of the number of times I have heard people blame Microsoft for poorly written or non-existent hardware drivers. But your point is well made. Tony |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
Tony wrote:
Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz writes: Micky wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:27:03 -0500, Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz wrote: micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:00:55 +0100, Stuart wrote: In article , micky wrote: It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Beats me why Microsoft have to change things so that older printer drivers don't work any way. After all, a program sends the print request to the OS which then sends the information to the driver, why change stuff? Well, actually Microsoft are in cahoots with hardware manufacturers to make sure you have to keep buying new printers etc. Yeah, I'm sure that's the reason. I wonder what MS gets out of it. That is not what happens at all. Tony When I wrote my line above 5 months ago, I was sure it sounded sarcastic, but reading it now, it didn't even sound sarcastic to me. But that's how I meant it. Sorry I was misleading. Fair enough. Microsoft do not write the drivers for printers. The printer manufacturer has to do that. So there is customer and shareholder pressure to develop new operating systems and the printer manufacturers have to decide whether they develop new printer drivers for it. Actually, as far as I can see in Japan, the printer manufacturers outsource the driver writing to a 3rd-party, they do not do it themselves. Hence there is yet another level of contracting and negotiations, cost-benefit analysis and so on involved. -- NNTP on Emacs 24.3 from Windows 7 Ah, I am sure you are right. And it probably makes it more difficult to justify new drivers. I was making the point that it is the responsibility of the printer manufacturer and not the responsibility of the OS developer. I have lost count of the number of times I have heard people blame Microsoft for poorly written or non-existent hardware drivers. But your point is well made. Tony But there are attempts at "Universal Printer Drivers". Microsoft makes unidrv, HP has something (which could actually be from Microsoft for all I know). This supports PCL5/PCL6/PostScript. http://www8.hp.com/us/en/solutions/b...tions/UPD.html I'm interested in drivers like that, as a means to "Print to file" in PostScript format. Then, pass the PostScript to an old copy of Acrobat Distiller. Giving me a Print To PDF capability. One benefit of my workflow that way, is I can make huge pages if I want. Like make a single page 108" inches in length. This sometimes helps with bugs in Firefox, where "only page 1 prints" and the other pages are invisible. If you make the page size 108", you can then manage to capture the entire web page in one image. It's absolutely useless for printing when made that way, but provides nice archival storage for viewing on screen later. This works, until you hit the coordinate space limits of PostScript/PDF, whatever they are. This all started, when I had a 36" wide roll-fed inkjet at work. The driver for that, made nice big pages in PostScript, as the device had a PostScript interpreter in it. You could send PCL or PostScript to it. And later, I continued to use that print driver for home usage, making my "PDF printer" based on the driver concept. When drivers for that printer were no longer available, I switched over to a Universal Printer Driver that has PostScript support (the HP one). I think I may have used that in a Windows 7 install. I don't know if there is a solution for a later OS or not. Paul |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
printer driver driver
Paul wrote:
Tony wrote: Gernot Hassenpflug wrote: Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz writes: Micky wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:27:03 -0500, Tony lizandtony at orcon dot net dot nz wrote: micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:00:55 +0100, Stuart wrote: In article , micky wrote: It annoys me that not only do they want us to buy a new version of Windows, which often means a new computer, but then we have to buy new printers, etc. Beats me why Microsoft have to change things so that older printer drivers don't work any way. After all, a program sends the print request to the OS which then sends the information to the driver, why change stuff? Well, actually Microsoft are in cahoots with hardware manufacturers to make sure you have to keep buying new printers etc. Yeah, I'm sure that's the reason. I wonder what MS gets out of it. That is not what happens at all. Tony When I wrote my line above 5 months ago, I was sure it sounded sarcastic, but reading it now, it didn't even sound sarcastic to me. But that's how I meant it. Sorry I was misleading. Fair enough. Microsoft do not write the drivers for printers. The printer manufacturer has to do that. So there is customer and shareholder pressure to develop new operating systems and the printer manufacturers have to decide whether they develop new printer drivers for it. Actually, as far as I can see in Japan, the printer manufacturers outsource the driver writing to a 3rd-party, they do not do it themselves. Hence there is yet another level of contracting and negotiations, cost-benefit analysis and so on involved. -- NNTP on Emacs 24.3 from Windows 7 Ah, I am sure you are right. And it probably makes it more difficult to justify new drivers. I was making the point that it is the responsibility of the printer manufacturer and not the responsibility of the OS developer. I have lost count of the number of times I have heard people blame Microsoft for poorly written or non-existent hardware drivers. But your point is well made. Tony But there are attempts at "Universal Printer Drivers". Microsoft makes unidrv, HP has something (which could actually be from Microsoft for all I know). This supports PCL5/PCL6/PostScript. http://www8.hp.com/us/en/solutions/b...tions/UPD.html I'm interested in drivers like that, as a means to "Print to file" in PostScript format. Then, pass the PostScript to an old copy of Acrobat Distiller. Giving me a Print To PDF capability. One benefit of my workflow that way, is I can make huge pages if I want. Like make a single page 108" inches in length. This sometimes helps with bugs in Firefox, where "only page 1 prints" and the other pages are invisible. If you make the page size 108", you can then manage to capture the entire web page in one image. It's absolutely useless for printing when made that way, but provides nice archival storage for viewing on screen later. This works, until you hit the coordinate space limits of PostScript/PDF, whatever they are. This all started, when I had a 36" wide roll-fed inkjet at work. The driver for that, made nice big pages in PostScript, as the device had a PostScript interpreter in it. You could send PCL or PostScript to it. And later, I continued to use that print driver for home usage, making my "PDF printer" based on the driver concept. When drivers for that printer were no longer available, I switched over to a Universal Printer Driver that has PostScript support (the HP one). I think I may have used that in a Windows 7 install. I don't know if there is a solution for a later OS or not. Paul It is a while since I worked with universal drivers but my recollection is that the Microsoft one is a single common package that has to have mini drivers interfaced to it specific to each printer,. The HP driver did indeed handle a wide range of HP printers. Tony |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|