If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tab betweenno accelerations and basic accelerations?
Hi!
Does anyone know if there are programs or guides on what disabling all hardware accelerations does in Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tab between no accelerations and basic accelerations? I want the technical details. Is it related to DirectX? Thank you in advance. -- "If ants are such busy workers, how come they find time to go to all the picnics?" --Marie Dressler /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tabbetween no accelerations and basic accelerations?
Ant wrote:
Hi! Does anyone know if there are programs or guides on what disabling all hardware accelerations does in Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tab between no accelerations and basic accelerations? I want the technical details. Is it related to DirectX? Thank you in advance. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...(v=vs.85).aspx Level 0 The slider is in the far right position. Hardware acceleration is fully enabled. Level 1 Hardware cursor and device-bitmap support are disabled. Level 2 The following display driver functions are not called. Instead, GDI performs the operations in software. DrvStretchBlt, DrvPlgBlt, DrvFillPath, DrvStrokeAndFillPath, DrvLineTo, DrvStretchBltROP, DrvTransparentBlt, DrvAlphaBlend DrvGradientFill Level 3 Microsoft DirectDraw and Direct3D support are disabled. Level 4 Only the following graphics operations are accelerated. DrvTextOut, DrvBitBlt, DrvCopyBits, DrvStrokePath Also, the following display driver functions are not called. DrvSaveScreenBits, DrvEscape, DrvDrawEscape, DrvResetPDEV, DrvSetPixelFormat, DrvDescribePixelFormat, DrvSwapBuffers Level 5 The slider is in the far left position. The panning driver (part of kernel-mode GDI) handles all rendering. GDI calls the display driver's DrvEnablePDEV and DrvEnableSurface functions to create a primary surface and also calls the display driver to set the display mode. The display driver is not called to do any rendering. Not a clue what it means, but there should be enough search terms there to dig up something. HTH, Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tabbetween no accelerations and basic accelerations?
On 6/6/2012 10:52 AM PT, Paul typed:
Does anyone know if there are programs or guides on what disabling all hardware accelerations does in Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tab between no accelerations and basic accelerations? I want the technical details. Is it related to DirectX? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...(v=vs.85).aspx Level 0 The slider is in the far right position. Hardware acceleration is fully enabled. Level 1 Hardware cursor and device-bitmap support are disabled. Level 2 The following display driver functions are not called. Instead, GDI performs the operations in software. DrvStretchBlt, DrvPlgBlt, DrvFillPath, DrvStrokeAndFillPath, DrvLineTo, DrvStretchBltROP, DrvTransparentBlt, DrvAlphaBlend DrvGradientFill Level 3 Microsoft DirectDraw and Direct3D support are disabled. Level 4 Only the following graphics operations are accelerated. DrvTextOut, DrvBitBlt, DrvCopyBits, DrvStrokePath Also, the following display driver functions are not called. DrvSaveScreenBits, DrvEscape, DrvDrawEscape, DrvResetPDEV, DrvSetPixelFormat, DrvDescribePixelFormat, DrvSwapBuffers Level 5 The slider is in the far left position. The panning driver (part of kernel-mode GDI) handles all rendering. GDI calls the display driver's DrvEnablePDEV and DrvEnableSurface functions to create a primary surface and also calls the display driver to set the display mode. The display driver is not called to do any rendering. Not a clue what it means, but there should be enough search terms there to dig up something. Interesting. It looks like my video card or driver is failing when I completely disable all of its accelerations without the rare and random hard crashes. You can read more about it: http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33988430 ... -- "Each of us needs to withdraw from the cares which will not withdraw from us. We need hours of aimless wandering or spates of time sitting on park benches, observing the mysterious world of ants and the canopy of treetops." --Maya Angelou (b. 1928) American writer and entertainer /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tabbetween no accelerations and basic accelerations?
Ant wrote:
Interesting. It looks like my video card or driver is failing when I completely disable all of its accelerations without the rare and random hard crashes. You can read more about it: http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33988430 ... I see they've already suggested a clean install, so you can eliminate a few software variables. If you don't have enough disks to do a clean install, what you could do instead, is find enough room on other disks, to image over your WinXP setup, then delete it. Then, do your fresh install and test. When finished, restore the image from some other storage device. I did that just the other day. I found an old 80GB maxtor in one of my older computers. I wanted to try Windows 8 on the drive. The drive had two partitions and they take up half the disk. Using the port of "dd", I transferred everything from sector 0 out to the 40GB mark, to another disk that had about 70GB free on it. When I'm finished with Windows 8, I just transfer the 40GB of sectors back again, and it's "good as new". Since the second half of that disk isn't used (not allocated), I don't need to back up that part. I was also careful to not allow Windows 8 to use the second half of that disk, so if there was something there, it wouldn't be damaged. I scanned with Testdisk, to see if there were any old partitions there, but nothing showed up. (I've been known to "trick myself"...) To do a backup of an OS partition, you need to be using some other OS. "dd" is available in any Linux, or there is a Windows port, so I have many options for a sector by sector backup. Once the partitions are safe, I can define a partition for Windows 8 during the Release Preview install. And then, boot the OS installer disc and give it a try. In your situation, you'd need an OS other than the WinXP one, so the WinXP partition wouldn't be "busy" during the copying operation. My main machine is dual boot, one disk with WinXP, one disk with Win2K, and the Win2K sole purpose is doing manipulations of this type (backups, partition changes or whatever). So that's how I'd make space. Move the stuff off an existing disk, as long as another disk has the space to hold it. And then you have a disk to use for your experiments. I generally disconnect the SATA cables of the two (dual boot) drives, when doing an OS install, just in case. I've had the wrong MBR overwritten by one of my experiments, and now I'm a little more careful when installing OSes. The purpose of my Windows 8 experiment, was to check whether two disks, each with a copy of Windows 8 on them, have a tendency to "damage" one another. I tried alternating between booting Disk0 and booting the Disk1 copy of Windows 8, and to my surprise, there were no CHKDSK runs and it "just worked". I really expected fireworks. Someone had reported, that on their machine, one disk with Windows 7 and the other with Windows 8 release preview, didn't play nice together. The closest I could come to that test case, is two disks with Windows 8 on them. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tabbetween no accelerations and basic accelerations?
On 6/7/2012 3:47 AM PT, Paul typed:
Interesting. It looks like my video card or driver is failing when I completely disable all of its accelerations without the rare and random hard crashes. You can read more about it: http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33988430 ... I see they've already suggested a clean install, so you can eliminate a few software variables. If you don't have enough disks to do a clean install, what you could do instead, is find enough room on other disks, to image over your WinXP setup, then delete it. Then, do your fresh install and test. When finished, restore the image from some other storage device. I did that just the other day. Yeah, the problem is tht it is not easy and quick to reproduce the issue for clean install testings. I wished there was a live disc or something to try it without touching my/adding another HDD. Also, I have disabilities (can't even use a screwdriver) so it is not like I can work inside my computers. -- /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tabbetween no accelerations and basic accelerations?
Ant wrote:
On 6/7/2012 3:47 AM PT, Paul typed: Interesting. It looks like my video card or driver is failing when I completely disable all of its accelerations without the rare and random hard crashes. You can read more about it: http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33988430 ... I see they've already suggested a clean install, so you can eliminate a few software variables. If you don't have enough disks to do a clean install, what you could do instead, is find enough room on other disks, to image over your WinXP setup, then delete it. Then, do your fresh install and test. When finished, restore the image from some other storage device. I did that just the other day. Yeah, the problem is tht it is not easy and quick to reproduce the issue for clean install testings. I wished there was a live disc or something to try it without touching my/adding another HDD. Also, I have disabilities (can't even use a screwdriver) so it is not like I can work inside my computers. To back up the existing WinXP image, all you'd need is a Linux CD, plus enough room to store the image on another drive. You may have enough hardware in the computer, to do the whole thing. The only difficulty, is disconnecting drives for safety while doing an OS install. I'm paranoid about these things, but you don't have to be. So all you need is: 1) WinXP disk (hopefully a small partition, easy to backup) 2) Another disk, a place to make a backup of (1) 3) An OS capable of backing up (1). In a pinch, you can do it right from WinXP, using Macrium Reflect, and preparing a Macrium Reflect boot CD for restoration purposes. You'd double check the Macrium Reflect CD worked, before deleting WinXP :-) I prefer to use Linux, because I already have a proven collection of liveCDs. And the "dd" program will back up anything, since it doesn't even consider the file system type. And since I know I've captured the MBR (sector 0) plus any partitions I need, I know I've backed up everything. The only time I've "blown it", was making a math error once when setting up the block size and block count, to the "dd" command. A little dyslexia, and your partition is a bit shorter than it's supposed to be :-( Did I mention being *very* careful ? 4) Your WinXP installer CD, to do the install. HTH, Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tabbetween no accelerations and basic accelerations?
On 6/7/2012 12:23 PM PT, Paul typed:
Interesting. It looks like my video card or driver is failing when I completely disable all of its accelerations without the rare and random hard crashes. You can read more about it: http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33988430 ... I see they've already suggested a clean install, so you can eliminate a few software variables. If you don't have enough disks to do a clean install, what you could do instead, is find enough room on other disks, to image over your WinXP setup, then delete it. Then, do your fresh install and test. When finished, restore the image from some other storage device. I did that just the other day. Yeah, the problem is tht it is not easy and quick to reproduce the issue for clean install testings. I wished there was a live disc or something to try it without touching my/adding another HDD. Also, I have disabilities (can't even use a screwdriver) so it is not like I can work inside my computers. To back up the existing WinXP image, all you'd need is a Linux CD, plus enough room to store the image on another drive. You may have enough hardware in the computer, to do the whole thing. The only difficulty, is disconnecting drives for safety while doing an OS install. I'm paranoid about these things, but you don't have to be. So all you need is: 1) WinXP disk (hopefully a small partition, easy to backup) 2) Another disk, a place to make a backup of (1) 3) An OS capable of backing up (1). In a pinch, you can do it right from WinXP, using Macrium Reflect, and preparing a Macrium Reflect boot CD for restoration purposes. You'd double check the Macrium Reflect CD worked, before deleting WinXP :-) I prefer to use Linux, because I already have a proven collection of liveCDs. And the "dd" program will back up anything, since it doesn't even consider the file system type. And since I know I've captured the MBR (sector 0) plus any partitions I need, I know I've backed up everything. The only time I've "blown it", was making a math error once when setting up the block size and block count, to the "dd" command. A little dyslexia, and your partition is a bit shorter than it's supposed to be :-( Did I mention being *very* careful ? 4) Your WinXP installer CD, to do the install. Right, but I don't want to have to back and forth to make a new image (keep it updated) and restore each time I want to test it. Remember, the problem is rare and random. -- "He who cannot pick up an ant, and wants to pick up an elephant will some day see his folly." --African /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Details on Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tab between no accelerations and basic accelerations?
It's related to display driver. Not DirectX specific.
Many things are hardware accelerated. e.g.: - Bitmap (GDI) operations: copy, stretch, shape drawing, etc. - Video overlay - 3D graphics Disabling hardware acceleration at specific level will disable a specific group of accelecations and forces the operations be done by the CPU. On 3D graphics acceleration, it depend on the display driver whether it implements CPU-only version of a function or not. If not, that function will not be available. Ant wrote in m: Hi! Does anyone know if there are programs or guides on what disabling all hardware accelerations does in Windows XP's display properties' Troubleshooting tab between no accelerations and basic accelerations? I want the technical details. Is it related to DirectX? Thank you in advance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|