A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

H.D. monitor



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 9th 16, 03:44 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Andy[_17_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default H.D. monitor

I am interested in an H.D. monitor.

I found this.

Full HD 1920x1080 2ms HDMI DVI-D VGA Back-lit LED Monitor

What video card resolution would the graphics card or integrated card need to be able to display such a resolution ?

Does anyone have one and can you notice any difference ?

Thanks,
Andy
Ads
  #2  
Old June 9th 16, 06:08 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,275
Default H.D. monitor

Andy wrote:
I am interested in an H.D. monitor.

I found this.

Full HD 1920x1080 2ms HDMI DVI-D VGA Back-lit LED Monitor

What video card resolution would the graphics card or integrated card need to be able to display such a resolution ?

Does anyone have one and can you notice any difference ?

Thanks,
Andy


It will be a multisync monitor.

It supports more than one resolution.

However, the picture is only "sharp as a tack", at 1920x1080 @ 60Hz.

The other choices will be a bit more fuzzy.

You would check the resolution settings on your
(unstated) video card, for such a setting.

Why not give the details of the video card ?
Based on your previous question about reinstalling
WinXP (circa 2002 computer), a guess would
be there is an older video card involved.

The preferred connection would be via DVI-D.

VGA is less preferred. As the resolution choice
rises higher and higher, you see more cable
reflections and distortions in the resulting
image. I am happy with my 1440x900 monitor
over VGA.

Check the box contents for cables. Some really
cheap monitors don't come with all the cables.
Order a cable at the same time you order the
(cable-less) monitor. Just as the printer I
got several years ago, didn't include a USB cable.

More details on DVI and the various connector types, is here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvi

To understand what the screen is going to look
like, look at the orange rectangle at the bottom of
the group of four rectangles. If you currently use
a 1024x768 monitor, that is a 4:3 ratio. That would
be the top rectangle. Notice how the 16:9 monitor
at the bottom, is "squat looking". You may find that
aspect of the monitor a bit disturbing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_aspect_ratio

And they do make really wide monitors. You would need
a swivel chair to use this. I think there may even
be some items like that, which are curved instead
of flat.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824260115

(A curved one...)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...9SIAACM3UU3642

Paul
  #3  
Old June 9th 16, 12:27 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
David H. Lipman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,185
Default H.D. monitor

On 6/8/2016 10:44 PM, Andy wrote:
I am interested in an H.D. monitor.

I found this.

Full HD 1920x1080 2ms HDMI DVI-D VGA Back-lit LED Monitor

What video card resolution would the graphics card or integrated card need to be able to display such a resolution ?

Does anyone have one and can you notice any difference ?

Thanks,
Andy


Computer monitors are inherently high definition ( high resolution ) by
nature.

It is the Television ( TV ) that has been low definition ( low
resolution ) by nature.

Televisions had to catch up to computer monitors. That is why, for many
years, one could not simply connect a computer to a TV. They had no
more than 5MHz of bandwidth while computer monitors had a good 20MHz
bandwidth. Thus a computer monitor could always display TV but not the
other way around. Now that TVs use digital technology and comb filters
their ability to display at higher resolutions has greatly been increased.



--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
  #4  
Old June 9th 16, 05:10 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Andy[_17_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default H.D. monitor

On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:27:31 AM UTC-5, David H. Lipman wrote:
On 6/8/2016 10:44 PM, Andy wrote:
I am interested in an H.D. monitor.

I found this.

Full HD 1920x1080 2ms HDMI DVI-D VGA Back-lit LED Monitor

What video card resolution would the graphics card or integrated card need to be able to display such a resolution ?

Does anyone have one and can you notice any difference ?

Thanks,
Andy


Computer monitors are inherently high definition ( high resolution ) by
nature.

It is the Television ( TV ) that has been low definition ( low
resolution ) by nature.

Televisions had to catch up to computer monitors. That is why, for many
years, one could not simply connect a computer to a TV. They had no
more than 5MHz of bandwidth while computer monitors had a good 20MHz
bandwidth. Thus a computer monitor could always display TV but not the
other way around. Now that TVs use digital technology and comb filters
their ability to display at higher resolutions has greatly been increased.



--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


thanks gentlemen for the info.

Andy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.