If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
"default" wrote
| I laughed at my old man when he told me that TV sets would one day be | worn on the wrist just like the old comic strip "Dick Tracy" showed. I | knew TVs' were huge heavy things that could never fit on a wrist, yet | we have them today. Yes, but we're still waiting for a lightweight microscope that clips on to earbud wires, so that we can see what's on TV. |
Ads |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
On 11/12/2018 14:41, nospam wrote:
In article , David B. wrote: There's no way for anyone here to KNOW the truth. shrug yes there is, and it ain't from you. Read the post by 'default' and educate yourself! I confess that I was a little surprised that someone here DOES know the truth! :-) -- Regards, David B. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
In article , David B.
wrote: Just because the phone appears to be turned off, doesn't mean it is. yes it does. Anyone can download an app that can turn it into a surveillance device. they could, but they'd have to launch it for it to take effect. Once it is on the phone the phone can be remotely monitored it doesn't require that the app be launched. yes it does. You don't understand how microprocessors work. The android operating system (any/every OS) is programmed into a chip. It is not carved in silicon, it is in a "protected" area of memory, but it can be accessed and modified. The processor chip has to (it is a requirement) to allow for something called interrupts where it is told to break the routine it is running and go off and do something else. That is done on a "machine level" (totally ones and zeros in registers - memory locations- that makes little sense to humans) It would be child's play for someone (with the knowledge) to integrate a few snippets of code that runs in the background and never alerts the operator (malicious code does it all the time - the processor doesn't know the difference) The phone doesn't have an on-off switch, it has a pushbutton that sends a request to the processor to send it into a hibernate state. (that is what "off" is to you) The battery is still connected and still feeding a trickle of power to the processor. The uP can wake itself periodically to check some variable (like sound, light, movement, etc.) It can go to sleep and wake up for a few microseconds every second or less with minimal change in battery drain. [snipped for brevity only] What a wonderful post! :-D and factually incorrect. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
In article , David B.
wrote: There's no way for anyone here to KNOW the truth. shrug yes there is, and it ain't from you. Read the post by 'default' and educate yourself! i read it and it's complete bull****. I confess that I was a little surprised that someone here DOES know the truth! :-) yep, and it's not who you think it is. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
In article , Wolf K
wrote: if it hasn't been launched, it's not running, so it's not tracking anything, and if the phone is off, nothing is running and no tracking can occur. You're right if by "off" you power off. yep. However, AFAICT, most people just press the off button, which blanks the screen and stops a few apps, but leaves the phone powered on, so that they can receive calls/texts. After all, that's why they carry the phone. yep. however, that doesn't mean an app can be remotely launched which activates the camera and microphone and secretly spies on someone. http://www.ktre.com/story/5777429/co...your-cell-phon e-to-spy-on-you/ "The FBI can access cell phones and modify them remotely without ever having to physically handle them," .... According to the recent court ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, "The device functioned whether the phone was powered on or off, intercepting conversations within its range wherever it happened to be." that is simply false. full stop. if the phone is off, it's not intercepting *anything*. I rarely power off my phone. A charge lasts about two days in simple off mode. When I've activated Bluetooth, it lats about one day. if by 'simple off mode', you mean sleep, that's not off. do not confuse the two. also, bluetooth uses a negligible amount of power with only a slight impact to battery life, especially when it's not actively being used. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
In article , default
wrote: Just because the phone appears to be turned off, doesn't mean it is. yes it does. Anyone can download an app that can turn it into a surveillance device. they could, but they'd have to launch it for it to take effect. Once it is on the phone the phone can be remotely monitored it doesn't require that the app be launched. yes it does. You don't understand how microprocessors work. oh yes i do. The android operating system (any/every OS) is programmed into a chip. It is not carved in silicon, it is in a "protected" area of memory, but it can be accessed and modified. not easily, it can't. The processor chip has to (it is a requirement) to allow for something called interrupts where it is told to break the routine it is running and go off and do something else. That is done on a "machine level" (totally ones and zeros in registers - memory locations- that makes little sense to humans) including you. It would be child's play for someone (with the knowledge) to integrate a few snippets of code that runs in the background and never alerts the operator (malicious code does it all the time - the processor doesn't know the difference) nope. it's definitely not child's play and requires *much* more than a few snippets of code to run in the background. The phone doesn't have an on-off switch, it has a pushbutton that sends a request to the processor to send it into a hibernate state. (that is what "off" is to you) The battery is still connected and still feeding a trickle of power to the processor. The uP can wake itself periodically to check some variable (like sound, light, movement, etc.) It can go to sleep and wake up for a few microseconds every second or less with minimal change in battery drain. nope. the on/off switch is managed by a separate power management chip, completely separate from the main cpu. the main cpu is *off*. it's far too power hungry to be on all the time waiting for a button press. As long as the battery is connected and charged, the phone is not off, it is just hibernating and waiting for a button push. only the power management chip is on. the rest of the device is off, including the radios, which means *it* cannot be remotely accessed. The company you bought your phone from, programs them wirelessly using wireless capability already built into wireless phones. no they definitely don't. not even close to correct. They don't open them up and tinker with the guts - they are sales people and wouldn't know how, but they do know how to access your phone and activate it even if they don't know what activation entails. also wrong. I program controllers that use all the same things a cell phone does. cell phones don't use the same controllers you use. I needed a device to behave differently (refuse to come on when it was dark out). I just had it wake itself every 15 minutes and check the light and when it sensed enough light it would allow the operator to turn it on and become active. The operator didn't know what the processor was doing only that it didn't do anything when it was dark. That could just as easily been a sound and I could program it to check for noise every second and it would still get plenty of sleep time and not drain the battery... not relevant to a cellphone. A cell phone can do the same things and you would never have to know about it. It could, for instance, record every conversation nearby and store it digitally in a compressed format, time stamp it, stamp the GPS coordinates, etc.. I could have it wait until it was by a wifi, or cell phone tower, and dump the recorded conversations in one fast burst transmission. Even if the phone was in a faraday shield it could still be recording and only phone home when it was let out. Minimal battery drain too.... only if an app was running and definitely not minimal battery drain. I know you'd like to think that apps need permission and all, and IF the people vetting the apps are doing their jobs that is true. But you can't check the app yourself to see if it is doing what it claims. false. it's very easy to determine which apps are running and how much data they're using. also, the phone would be warmer than normal if it was transmitting back to some outside entity and the battery would be dead in hours. That's where the spy apps you can buy operate. Most of them need physical access to a cell phone to put the app on them, but once it is on there, it can hide it's operation from the OS and the operator. exactly what i said, that physical access is required to modify the phone. And when was the last time you read the boiler plate legal statements laughingly referred to as "privacy statements?" You can often find the legalese written in such a way as to allow, just what they seem to be telling you they would never do. A team of Philadelphia lawyers might understand privacy statements but they are often written to obfuscate, not enlighten. the legal statements do not give free access to monitor and record user actions. The feds can do pretty much the same things, without even having the phone anywhere nearby; as long as it is communicating with cell towers or wifi. They are using the same technology that the cell phone company uses to program your phone. no they can't, and the cell phone company doesn't program anything. you have no clue about this stuff. Most folks get their phone and look at the pretty screen and think, "how nice it has the weather." That weather app knows your GPS location and it can just as easily tell someone where that phone is, if it is part of it's program. Nearly all apps have the ability to "update." Every time you turn the phone on, or periodically, it may be checking for dozens of app updates and sending your location back to someone else. checking the weather is not the same as secretly recording audio or video. Data mining companies are big business, there's money in it. quite a bit, however, that has nothing to do with hacking people's phones. You, my friend, are a guppy swimming in shark infested waters and are blissfully unaware of it. ad hominem. unlike you i'm *very* aware of what can and cannot be done. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
nospam wrote:
and there's still the question how a phone that's off can be remotely turned on by some magical signal that is received by a radio that's off. RFID-like schemes transmit enough power to run circuitry. You could do it that way. To do that city wide, would just take a powerful transmitter, operating on some frequency other than the cellphone frequency. The addressed responding device, only has to operate its transmitter and regular receiver, long enough to ping back. That wouldn't run the battery down too much, since the regular circuitry goes back to sleep until the passive RFID chunk receives another burst of energy during the next ping. Paul |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
default wrote:
It would be child's play for someone (with the knowledge) to integrate a few snippets of code that runs in the background and never alerts the operator (malicious code does it all the time - the processor doesn't know the difference) That's already in your desktop. It's called SMM. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Management_Mode It can run 30 times a second, and the OS doesn't know it is happening. It totally preempts the OS when running. You can observe its presence indirectly using DPCLAT (on older OSes). The SMM code is in the BIOS (that's where it's supposed to come from), and we don't know if there is any way for OS level exploitation or not, by a bad actor. The SMM code is installed by the motherboard company. A typical usage is for switching off unused "phases" on the VCore regulator. Asus has also used it to run the 5.25" iPanel tray display they used to sell. The iPanel would send an SMI to the computer, to receive SMM "service". http://ixbtlabs.com/articles/asusipanelbasic/index.html If you check Google, you'll find references to "SMM rootkits". Whether those are a practical concern, who knows. A well-written SMM subroutine, only takes 10us to 100us or so. It doesn't run for a long time, and as a consequence, it's hard to tell it is upsetting machine operation. People who build audio recording workstations, are the ones who care about SMM and how long it runs per invocation. http://forum.notebookreview.com/medi...l?d=1260040283 That tool doesn't work properly on Windows 10 (apparently). Which means some detail about DPC has changed. Paul |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
On 11/12/2018 09:17, default wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:23 -0500, nospam wrote: In article , Mayayana wrote: "David B." "David wrote | Even if you/we THINK that a device is 'off' it COULD still be in | communication with an outside entity. | I know my Tracphone is off when I turn it off because the charge will last for months and it can't get calls. It could certainly have some kind of beacon in it, but that seems very unlikely. It only cost $10. exactly. if your phone was transmitting to some outside entity, the battery would be dead within hours. That's only true if the phone is fully functioning. It could still record audio with just a tiny smidgen of the power it takes to receive and transmit. Compress the audio and transmit in a burst and you'd never know it by the battery capacity. you would definitely notice a dead battery when you turned it on, or tried to. if it received a call or text while 'off', you'd definitely know something unusual was going on. You wouldn't know if a background program was running. The uP is always on. In a well designed secure system it is only supposed to be checking the power button every few milliseconds. But off and hibernate are not the same thing. The little controllers I like to use have: sleep, nap, rest, and hibernate. They all save the battery life, but there is no such thing as off. The different sleep states are just there because some functions can be programmed to run while the thing is sleeping... It only shuts down when the battery drops below a certain level, that's an automatic function designed to prolong battery life, but I can tell it to ignore that feature and let it run until it hasn't got enough energy to function. Not a good practice with rechargeable batteries but acceptable for disposable batteries or super capacitors - the chip only does what it was programmed to do. and there's still the question how a phone that's off can be remotely turned on by some magical signal that is received by a radio that's off. I don't know about Android and iPhone, but I'm guessing that people think off means the screen is black because few people actually turn them off. you guess wrong. people are well aware of the difference between sleep versus fully off. people don't turn off their phones because if they did, they would not be able to receive calls, texts and push notifications. it would also take a minute or two to boot if they wanted to use an app or call/text someone. It can be on and still act as if it is off. You have no way of telling without some pretty sophisticated test equipment, and even then, if I thought it may be monitored I'd find a way for it to hide all activity until the threat passed. they also might be listening to music, podcasts or internet radio with the phone in their pocket, screen off. The condition of the screen doesn't indicate what the phone is doing, it is just there so the operator can tell what it wants you to know or allow you to do. Is your computer/device CLOCK wrong? Are you willing to disclose your credentials - do you have a LinkedIn persona, for example, to give more credibility to your words? (in case of doubt, I believe YOU - I do NOT believe 'nospam', who I know to be untrustworthy). -- Regards, David B. https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:44:08 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote: On 11/12/2018 09:17, default wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:23 -0500, nospam wrote: In article , Mayayana wrote: "David B." "David wrote | Even if you/we THINK that a device is 'off' it COULD still be in | communication with an outside entity. | I know my Tracphone is off when I turn it off because the charge will last for months and it can't get calls. It could certainly have some kind of beacon in it, but that seems very unlikely. It only cost $10. exactly. if your phone was transmitting to some outside entity, the battery would be dead within hours. That's only true if the phone is fully functioning. It could still record audio with just a tiny smidgen of the power it takes to receive and transmit. Compress the audio and transmit in a burst and you'd never know it by the battery capacity. you would definitely notice a dead battery when you turned it on, or tried to. if it received a call or text while 'off', you'd definitely know something unusual was going on. You wouldn't know if a background program was running. The uP is always on. In a well designed secure system it is only supposed to be checking the power button every few milliseconds. But off and hibernate are not the same thing. The little controllers I like to use have: sleep, nap, rest, and hibernate. They all save the battery life, but there is no such thing as off. The different sleep states are just there because some functions can be programmed to run while the thing is sleeping... It only shuts down when the battery drops below a certain level, that's an automatic function designed to prolong battery life, but I can tell it to ignore that feature and let it run until it hasn't got enough energy to function. Not a good practice with rechargeable batteries but acceptable for disposable batteries or super capacitors - the chip only does what it was programmed to do. and there's still the question how a phone that's off can be remotely turned on by some magical signal that is received by a radio that's off. I don't know about Android and iPhone, but I'm guessing that people think off means the screen is black because few people actually turn them off. you guess wrong. people are well aware of the difference between sleep versus fully off. people don't turn off their phones because if they did, they would not be able to receive calls, texts and push notifications. it would also take a minute or two to boot if they wanted to use an app or call/text someone. It can be on and still act as if it is off. You have no way of telling without some pretty sophisticated test equipment, and even then, if I thought it may be monitored I'd find a way for it to hide all activity until the threat passed. they also might be listening to music, podcasts or internet radio with the phone in their pocket, screen off. The condition of the screen doesn't indicate what the phone is doing, it is just there so the operator can tell what it wants you to know or allow you to do. Is your computer/device CLOCK wrong? Yes, thanks for noticing. It is about noon and showing 4xx am... and according to my desktop it is synchronized with nist.gov, I switched to time.windows.com and it is more believable now. Are you willing to disclose your credentials - do you have a LinkedIn persona, for example, to give more credibility to your words? (in case of doubt, I believe YOU - I do NOT believe 'nospam', who I know to be untrustworthy). Nope, I'm not on facebook either... LinkedIn is a joke, my sister was using it and they were sending me spam so they managed to hack into her Yahoo email account and then sent encouragements to everyone it found there. I was tinkering with electronics since I was seven, and it has been my life's work (or at least the well-paying jobs, I was a motorcycle bum and was a cook, railroad section crew member, handyman at a lodge in NC, did some power line construction etc. to pay for the freedom being a bum is all about.) I'm married retired "settled" but still design electronic devices because it's satisfying. My wife is a scientist- it is in her job title. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
In article , default
wrote: I know my Tracphone is off when I turn it off because the charge will last for months and it can't get calls. It could certainly have some kind of beacon in it, but that seems very unlikely. It only cost $10. exactly. if your phone was transmitting to some outside entity, the battery would be dead within hours. That's only true if the phone is fully functioning. which it would have to be to spy on someone. It could still record audio with just a tiny smidgen of the power it takes to receive and transmit. Compress the audio and transmit in a burst and you'd never know it by the battery capacity. nope. recording audio would require an app to be running, and that means the phone is powered on and fully operational. you would definitely notice a dead battery when you turned it on, or tried to. if it received a call or text while 'off', you'd definitely know something unusual was going on. You wouldn't know if a background program was running. nonsense. of course someone would. The uP is always on. In a well designed secure system it is only supposed to be checking the power button every few milliseconds. the cpu isn't what's checking the power button. But off and hibernate are not the same thing. that's the point. The little controllers I like to use have: sleep, nap, rest, and hibernate. They all save the battery life, but there is no such thing as off. The different sleep states are just there because some functions can be programmed to run while the thing is sleeping... those little controllers you supposedly like to use have nothing to do with how cellphones work. It only shuts down when the battery drops below a certain level, that's an automatic function designed to prolong battery life, but I can tell it to ignore that feature and let it run until it hasn't got enough energy to function. Not a good practice with rechargeable batteries but acceptable for disposable batteries or super capacitors - the chip only does what it was programmed to do. actually, you can't, since the battery has its own microcontroller, which will shut down when the charge is too low. and there's still the question how a phone that's off can be remotely turned on by some magical signal that is received by a radio that's off. I don't know about Android and iPhone, but I'm guessing that people think off means the screen is black because few people actually turn them off. you guess wrong. people are well aware of the difference between sleep versus fully off. people don't turn off their phones because if they did, they would not be able to receive calls, texts and push notifications. it would also take a minute or two to boot if they wanted to use an app or call/text someone. It can be on and still act as if it is off. You have no way of telling without some pretty sophisticated test equipment, and even then, if I thought it may be monitored I'd find a way for it to hide all activity until the threat passed. nonsense. it's very easy to tell if a phone is truly off or only pretending to be off. they also might be listening to music, podcasts or internet radio with the phone in their pocket, screen off. The condition of the screen doesn't indicate what the phone is doing, it is just there so the operator can tell what it wants you to know or allow you to do. you're still not getting it. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
In article , Paul
wrote: and there's still the question how a phone that's off can be remotely turned on by some magical signal that is received by a radio that's off. RFID-like schemes transmit enough power to run circuitry. You could do it that way. no you couldn't. the range of rfid is *very* short and it requires the device to be powered on To do that city wide, would just take a powerful transmitter, operating on some frequency other than the cellphone frequency. The addressed responding device, only has to operate its transmitter and regular receiver, long enough to ping back. That wouldn't run the battery down too much, since the regular circuitry goes back to sleep until the passive RFID chunk receives another burst of energy during the next ping. no. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
In article , default
wrote: Not even off is off. The processor just sits there and periodically wakes up and checks the condition of the push button to see if someone is trying to turn it on. nope. it's the power management chip checks that. the processor is far too power hungry to be checking for a button press and only powers on if the pmu tells it to. From a design point of view, if the processor uses just a few micro amps of current in the off state I'll let it decide when the button is pressed. The battery capacity is on the order of thousands of milliamp hours for the sake of argument say your cell phone is one amp/hour, and you need 1 micro amp to monitor the condition of the on-off switch it will take a million hours to discharge the battery. Check my math, but that's about 114 years! The battery would self discharge sooner, the cell phone would be obsolete sooner, and the original owner would be pushing up daisies. you're ignoring self-discharge and other factors. Up that to 25 micro amps while in a surveillance mode (not unreasonable) and the battery life is cut to ~5 years. still wrong. Now, if you want Video, pictures, gps, and second by second real time surveillance it should be noticeable to most people. that's the point. But a lot has to do with the way you do it and how current and complete the data you are collecting has to be. A clever software designer will find ways to maximize the battery life with various tricks in hardware and software. If the person uses the phone or keeps it on for incoming calls, you'd never notice the difference surveillance adds. false. If your phone is a 3G tablet computer, your battery is probably going to be in the 3,000 milliamp/hour range. The hand held phones are in the 500-1000 range last time I checked. check again. smartphone batteries are typically in the 3000 mah range, with tablets in the 5000-10k mah range. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:53:15 -0500, "Mayayana"
wrote: "default" wrote | I laughed at my old man when he told me that TV sets would one day be | worn on the wrist just like the old comic strip "Dick Tracy" showed. I | knew TVs' were huge heavy things that could never fit on a wrist, yet | we have them today. Yes, but we're still waiting for a lightweight microscope that clips on to earbud wires, so that we can see what's on TV. That's So-o-o 21st century! I'm figuring and optical nerve interface is next. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox SECRETLY storing your login credentials?
On 11/12/2018 17:08, default wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:44:08 +0000, "David B." "David wrote: On 11/12/2018 09:17, default wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:23 -0500, nospam wrote: In article , Mayayana wrote: "David B." "David wrote | Even if you/we THINK that a device is 'off' it COULD still be in | communication with an outside entity. | I know my Tracphone is off when I turn it off because the charge will last for months and it can't get calls. It could certainly have some kind of beacon in it, but that seems very unlikely. It only cost $10. exactly. if your phone was transmitting to some outside entity, the battery would be dead within hours. That's only true if the phone is fully functioning. It could still record audio with just a tiny smidgen of the power it takes to receive and transmit. Compress the audio and transmit in a burst and you'd never know it by the battery capacity. you would definitely notice a dead battery when you turned it on, or tried to. if it received a call or text while 'off', you'd definitely know something unusual was going on. You wouldn't know if a background program was running. The uP is always on. In a well designed secure system it is only supposed to be checking the power button every few milliseconds. But off and hibernate are not the same thing. The little controllers I like to use have: sleep, nap, rest, and hibernate. They all save the battery life, but there is no such thing as off. The different sleep states are just there because some functions can be programmed to run while the thing is sleeping... It only shuts down when the battery drops below a certain level, that's an automatic function designed to prolong battery life, but I can tell it to ignore that feature and let it run until it hasn't got enough energy to function. Not a good practice with rechargeable batteries but acceptable for disposable batteries or super capacitors - the chip only does what it was programmed to do. and there's still the question how a phone that's off can be remotely turned on by some magical signal that is received by a radio that's off. I don't know about Android and iPhone, but I'm guessing that people think off means the screen is black because few people actually turn them off. you guess wrong. people are well aware of the difference between sleep versus fully off. people don't turn off their phones because if they did, they would not be able to receive calls, texts and push notifications. it would also take a minute or two to boot if they wanted to use an app or call/text someone. It can be on and still act as if it is off. You have no way of telling without some pretty sophisticated test equipment, and even then, if I thought it may be monitored I'd find a way for it to hide all activity until the threat passed. they also might be listening to music, podcasts or internet radio with the phone in their pocket, screen off. The condition of the screen doesn't indicate what the phone is doing, it is just there so the operator can tell what it wants you to know or allow you to do. Is your computer/device CLOCK wrong? Yes, thanks for noticing. It is about noon and showing 4xx am... and according to my desktop it is synchronized with nist.gov, I switched to time.windows.com and it is more believable now. YW :-) Are you willing to disclose your credentials - do you have a LinkedIn persona, for example, to give more credibility to your words? (in case of doubt, I believe YOU - I do NOT believe 'nospam', who I know to be untrustworthy). Nope, I'm not on facebook either... LinkedIn is a joke, my sister was using it and they were sending me spam so they managed to hack into her Yahoo email account and then sent encouragements to everyone it found there. I LIKE Facebook! :-) I do recall that at one time LinkedIn appeared to gain access to all of the contacts I'd accumulated with Microsoft - and it bothered be. I didn't/don't condone what was done and don't understand HOW it was done. However, although I'm aware that some people can, and do, abuse the system, ALL of my LinkedIn contacts are REAL people who I know in the real world. I was tinkering with electronics since I was seven, and it has been my life's work (or at least the well-paying jobs, I was a motorcycle bum and was a cook, railroad section crew member, handyman at a lodge in NC, did some power line construction etc. to pay for the freedom being a bum is all about.) I'm married retired "settled" but still design electronic devices because it's satisfying. My wife is a scientist- it is in her job title. Thanks. You sound like an interesting chap! ;-) -- Regards, David B. https://vxer.home.blog/2018/12/08/vxer-a-profile/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|