If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
For GMail Account and Hotmail Account
What is the difference functionally between POP and IMAP? Beside the username and password what is the value of all the other settings for POP and IMAP? Someone post a nice succinct table ... please I always have trouble figuring out how to do this. Bad enough I have to remember the password. GMail IMAP Incoming Server, port, outgoing Server, port, etc, etc POP Incoming Server, port, outgoing Server, port, etc, Hotmail IMAP Incoming Server, port, outgoing Server, port, etc POP Incoming Server, port, outgoing Server, port, etc Thank you. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
On 25 Apr 2015, OldGuy wrote in
alt.windows7.general: What is the difference functionally between POP and IMAP? POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. It can be jiggered into leaving mail on the server, but that's not what the original intent was. IMAP protocol is designed to store email on the server and allow you to manage (view, reply, forward, mark for deletion, etc.) locally. Most IMAP clients will also let you keep copies locally for off-line reading and archiving. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
Nil wrote:
On 25 Apr 2015, OldGuy wrote in alt.windows7.general: What is the difference functionally between POP and IMAP? POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. It can be jiggered into leaving mail on the server, but that's not what the original intent was. IMAP protocol is designed to store email on the server and allow you to manage (view, reply, forward, mark for deletion, etc.) locally. Most IMAP clients will also let you keep copies locally for off-line reading and archiving. Because of the above, IMAP suits users with multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone) on the same account. Actions such as reading and deleting that you carry out on one device are visible on the other(s). Using POP with multiple devices is pretty inconvenient. -- Mike Barnes Cheshire, England |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:37:59 +0100, Mike Barnes wrote:
Because of the above, IMAP suits users with multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone) on the same account. Actions such as reading and deleting that you carry out on one device are visible on the other(s). Using POP with multiple devices is pretty inconvenient. I use both POP on my smartphone and my computer, but my smartphone is set up to leave messages on server unless I delete them. If needed, I can use Portable Thunderbird. -- s|b |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
s|b wrote on 4/25/2015 2:09 PM:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:37:59 +0100, Mike Barnes wrote: Because of the above, IMAP suits users with multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone) on the same account. Actions such as reading and deleting that you carry out on one device are visible on the other(s). Using POP with multiple devices is pretty inconvenient. I use both POP on my smartphone and my computer, but my smartphone is set up to leave messages on server unless I delete them. If needed, I can use Portable Thunderbird. +1 I have about 5 vm's and a few PC's, phones, tablet. All pop leaving the mail on server and then my main laptop does the download and delete. Laptop is the main record keeper. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
On 25 Apr 2015, Mike Barnes wrote in
alt.windows7.general: Nil wrote: POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. It can be jiggered into leaving mail on the server, but that's not what the original intent was. IMAP protocol is designed to store email on the server and allow you to manage (view, reply, forward, mark for deletion, etc.) locally. Most IMAP clients will also let you keep copies locally for off-line reading and archiving. Because of the above, IMAP suits users with multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone) on the same account. Actions such as reading and deleting that you carry out on one device are visible on the other(s). Using POP with multiple devices is pretty inconvenient. I use a combination of both. I use IMAP to check email on my main account from my several devices. Then, every day or two, I download it all to my main computer using POP3, deleting it from the server at that time. I did all IMAP for a while, but I found that you're at the mercy of the server for every little operation, every fetch and delete, and some mail servers can be quite slow. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
Nil wrote:
On 25 Apr 2015, Mike Barnes wrote in alt.windows7.general: Nil wrote: POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. It can be jiggered into leaving mail on the server, but that's not what the original intent was. IMAP protocol is designed to store email on the server and allow you to manage (view, reply, forward, mark for deletion, etc.) locally. Most IMAP clients will also let you keep copies locally for off-line reading and archiving. Because of the above, IMAP suits users with multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone) on the same account. Actions such as reading and deleting that you carry out on one device are visible on the other(s). Using POP with multiple devices is pretty inconvenient. I use a combination of both. I use IMAP to check email on my main account from my several devices. Then, every day or two, I download it all to my main computer using POP3, deleting it from the server at that time. AAMOI do you also have an IMAP connection on your main computer, for normal email reading etc? Otherwise you wouldn't be able to tell which messages you'd already read on your other devices. I did all IMAP for a while, but I found that you're at the mercy of the server for every little operation, every fetch and delete, and some mail servers can be quite slow. I do all IMAP and haven't suffered from slowness. I guess it depends on the server and on the software you use. I get the impression that Thunderbird syncs between the server and local storage in the background, so I don't have to wait, BICBW. -- Mike Barnes Cheshire, England |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
On 25 Apr 2015, Mike Barnes wrote in
alt.windows7.general: AAMOI do you also have an IMAP connection on your main computer, for normal email reading etc? Otherwise you wouldn't be able to tell which messages you'd already read on your other devices. I just remember which ones I've read. Not a problem. I do all IMAP and haven't suffered from slowness. I guess it depends on the server and on the software you use. I get the impression that Thunderbird syncs between the server and local storage in the background, so I don't have to wait, BICBW. One of the secondary mail accounts I use is Yahoo. Their IMAP connection get VERY slow during peak hours. They're much quicker in the middle of the night. Gmail has also seems lately to have been going through slow periods not necessarily tied to time of day. Then, after a few hours or days it speeds up again. My main email account at my ISP is fairly peppy, maybe because they don't advertise that service and I don't think it's widely used. I would think that everyone would find IMAP to be at least a little slower than POP3. As I understand it, you make an IMAP connection, and it stays open for a short while, after which you have to be validated again, which would necessarily take some time. So if you're reading and deleting a lot of mail you would probably exceed that timeout period often and have to be validated again pretty often. POP3 works in batches and retrieving even many emails should happen during one session. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
Last time I looked, Verizon does not support IMAP and neither did Time
Warner. Those are my two choices for Internet service ('tho Vz is only DSL - bah). Is anybody's experience with them different? If so, it might be time to make a change. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
Jason wrote:
Last time I looked, Verizon does not support IMAP and neither did Time Warner. Those are my two choices for Internet service ('tho Vz is only DSL - bah). Is anybody's experience with them different? If so, it might be time to make a change. Verizon, some time ago, said this: qp We have strategically chosen POP3 Email architecture to minimize storage costs. Please know that each master email account has 2GB of storage and if the user does not POP their email, the email is accessible from anywhere with internet access via myverizon.com. /qp i.e. use POP3 or use the web UI TimeWarner on the other hand, unless the email is serviced through another TW contractor, appears to support both POP3 and IMAP. http://www.timewarnercable.com/en/su...addresses.html At one time, I had TimeWarner which used Roadrunner - both POP3 and IMAP were available. I switched cable providers and the new cable company service uses Roadrunner and Earthlink. Both provide POP3. Neither provide IMAP but exceptions exist - if the prior cable was TW using RoadRunner, the TW available IMAP settings are grandfathered (though rare) as long as the TW email address was ported to the new service (i.e. a cable co change but retention of the TW email account). -- ...winston msft mvp consumer apps |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 22:40:49 -0400, Jason wrote:
Last time I looked, Verizon does not support IMAP and neither did Time Warner. Those are my two choices for Internet service ('tho Vz is only DSL - bah). Is anybody's experience with them different? If so, it might be time to make a change. I never use the email service provided by an ISP because it ties me to that ISP. I can't change ISP's without also changing my email address. So personally, I would never base an ISP decision on the availability of their email service. -- Char Jackson |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
On 4/25/2015 1:37 PM, Mike Barnes wrote:
Nil wrote: On 25 Apr 2015, OldGuy wrote in alt.windows7.general: What is the difference functionally between POP and IMAP? POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. It can be jiggered into leaving mail on the server, but that's not what the original intent was. IMAP protocol is designed to store email on the server and allow you to manage (view, reply, forward, mark for deletion, etc.) locally. Most IMAP clients will also let you keep copies locally for off-line reading and archiving. Because of the above, IMAP suits users with multiple devices (e.g. PC and phone) on the same account. Actions such as reading and deleting that you carry out on one device are visible on the other(s). Using POP with multiple devices is pretty inconvenient. And, something no one specifically mentioned, you can have folders of various saved emails stored on gmail's server. I have about 20 such folders like Medical, Computer Stuff, etc. in which I squirrel away many emails I want to keep. I typically use Thunderbird and the folders are always at the left side of the window. And with IMAP, those folders are available from any of my machines. Even if I am at a friend's house and need some info, I can get to the folders via web based gmail. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
Nil wrote:
On 25 Apr 2015, OldGuy wrote in alt.windows7.general: What is the difference functionally between POP and IMAP? POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. Not true...it does not move all mail, it only moves mail from the account's Inbox on the server to the locally setup account Inbox. -- ...winston msft mvp consumer apps |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
In message , . . .winston
writes: Nil wrote: On 25 Apr 2015, OldGuy wrote in alt.windows7.general: What is the difference functionally between POP and IMAP? POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. Not true...it does not move all mail, it only moves mail from the account's Inbox on the server to the locally setup account Inbox. I'm obviously not grasping something here. Your use of the word "only" implies that there's some mail other than that in "the account's Inbox on the server", that would still match ...winston's description of "your email". -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Dictionary: Opinion presented as truth in alphabetical order. -John Ralston Saul, essayist, novelist, and critic (1947- ) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
POP vs IMAP
J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , . . .winston writes: Nil wrote: On 25 Apr 2015, OldGuy wrote in alt.windows7.general: What is the difference functionally between POP and IMAP? POP3 protocol is designed to move all your email to your local computer. Not true...it does not move all mail, it only moves mail from the account's Inbox on the server to the locally setup account Inbox. I'm obviously not grasping something here. Your use of the word "only" implies that there's some mail other than that in "the account's Inbox on the server", that would still match ...winston's description of "your email". Yes there is. Drafts, Sent, Deleted, etc, not to mention any archive folders that you've created. -- Mike Barnes Cheshire, England |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|