A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows 7 » Windows 7 Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Improve SATA performance?



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 11, 07:08 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Kenny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 552
Default Improve SATA performance?

Trying the tweak he
http://tweaks.com/articles/44119/imp...m-ide-to-ahci/
No problem editing the registry but I can't find AHCI in the BIOS!
MB is Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA770-UD3 and BIOS: Award Software
International, Inc. FG 12/29/2009.
Would it be there under a different name?

Kenny Cargill

Ads
  #2  
Old January 17th 11, 07:24 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Ed Cryer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,621
Default Improve SATA performance?

On 17/01/2011 19:08, Kenny wrote:
Trying the tweak he
http://tweaks.com/articles/44119/imp...m-ide-to-ahci/

No problem editing the registry but I can't find AHCI in the BIOS!
MB is Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA770-UD3 and BIOS: Award
Software International, Inc. FG 12/29/2009.
Would it be there under a different name?

Kenny Cargill


You'll find it in BIOS under Peripheral things.
There'll be something like "Onboard SATA controller" enabled/disabled,
and then "Onboard SATA mode" IDE/AHCI.

Ed

  #3  
Old January 17th 11, 09:43 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Kenny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 552
Default Improve SATA performance?

Thanks again Ed, there are 3 settings to change in BIOS, OnChip SATA
Controller, OnChip SATA Type & OnChip SATA Port 4/5 Mode.
Enabled 1st and the other 2 to AHCI. Doesn't appear to have changed much,
Windows Experience Index shows HDD as 5.9 which is the same as before.
HDD is pulling down overall index figure which is why I was hoping changing
BIOS would speed it up a bit.

--

Kenny Cargill

"Ed Cryer" wrote in message
...
On 17/01/2011 19:08, Kenny wrote:
Trying the tweak he
http://tweaks.com/articles/44119/imp...m-ide-to-ahci/

No problem editing the registry but I can't find AHCI in the BIOS!
MB is Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA770-UD3 and BIOS: Award
Software International, Inc. FG 12/29/2009.
Would it be there under a different name?

Kenny Cargill


You'll find it in BIOS under Peripheral things.
There'll be something like "Onboard SATA controller" enabled/disabled, and
then "Onboard SATA mode" IDE/AHCI.

Ed

  #4  
Old January 17th 11, 10:24 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,275
Default Improve SATA performance?

Kenny wrote:
Thanks again Ed, there are 3 settings to change in BIOS, OnChip SATA
Controller, OnChip SATA Type & OnChip SATA Port 4/5 Mode.
Enabled 1st and the other 2 to AHCI. Doesn't appear to have changed
much, Windows Experience Index shows HDD as 5.9 which is the same as
before.
HDD is pulling down overall index figure which is why I was hoping
changing BIOS would speed it up a bit.


Actually, be careful what you wish for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahci

AHCI includes Native Command Queueing (NCQ), which is the ability to
complete commands out of sequence. It allows the shortest path to
be planned for head movement - but that only happens, when the "queue
builds up".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Command_Queuing

In a server situation, with ten people doing ten different things, such
a feature can be a big win. The disk can't possibly keep up with what
the ten people are doing, so the queue builds. And when it does, the
controller board on the hard drive, looks at the "to do list", and
picks the items that have the least head movement required. That
prevents unnecessary excursions of the head and reduces the overall
time to complete the "to do list".

However, you, as a single user, your typical usage pattern has a queue
depth of one. With no queue to "sort" into the most desirable form,
the commands complete in the same time as they did before.

AHCI has a small amount of overhead associated with it. It means,
on average, processing commands on AHCI is slower. If the queue builds
up, it "pays for its keep". If there is no queue, then you lose a
tiny bit in speed.

Now, some users type real fast, are whizzing around doing ten different
things at once. Perhaps their queue depth is greater than one. But
a lot of users, they're "one thing at a time" kind of people, and
for them, NCQ isn't a big deal.

Many SSD owners select AHCI, because the Microsoft version of AHCI
driver (called MSAHCI), supports the TRIM command. And that is the
main reason they'd be looking for that mode of operation, as much as
anything else.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM_command

HTH,
Paul
  #5  
Old January 18th 11, 07:25 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Oldster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 88
Default Improve SATA performance?

"Paul" wrote in message ...

Kenny wrote:
Thanks again Ed, there are 3 settings to change in BIOS, OnChip SATA
Controller, OnChip SATA Type & OnChip SATA Port 4/5 Mode.
Enabled 1st and the other 2 to AHCI. Doesn't appear to have changed much,
Windows Experience Index shows HDD as 5.9 which is the same as before.
HDD is pulling down overall index figure which is why I was hoping
changing BIOS would speed it up a bit.


Actually, be careful what you wish for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahci

AHCI includes Native Command Queueing (NCQ), which is the ability to
complete commands out of sequence. It allows the shortest path to
be planned for head movement - but that only happens, when the "queue
builds up".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Command_Queuing

In a server situation, with ten people doing ten different things, such
a feature can be a big win. The disk can't possibly keep up with what
the ten people are doing, so the queue builds. And when it does, the
controller board on the hard drive, looks at the "to do list", and
picks the items that have the least head movement required. That
prevents unnecessary excursions of the head and reduces the overall
time to complete the "to do list".

However, you, as a single user, your typical usage pattern has a queue
depth of one. With no queue to "sort" into the most desirable form,
the commands complete in the same time as they did before.

AHCI has a small amount of overhead associated with it. It means,
on average, processing commands on AHCI is slower. If the queue builds
up, it "pays for its keep". If there is no queue, then you lose a
tiny bit in speed.

Now, some users type real fast, are whizzing around doing ten different
things at once. Perhaps their queue depth is greater than one. But
a lot of users, they're "one thing at a time" kind of people, and
for them, NCQ isn't a big deal.

Many SSD owners select AHCI, because the Microsoft version of AHCI
driver (called MSAHCI), supports the TRIM command. And that is the
main reason they'd be looking for that mode of operation, as much as
anything else.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM_command

HTH,
Paul


Anyone know a similar tweak for XP? I have Windows 7 and XP systems
that I switch between in the same box.

Thanks.


  #6  
Old January 19th 11, 12:53 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Char Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,449
Default Improve SATA performance?

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:25:05 -0000, "Oldster"
wrote:

Anyone know a similar tweak for XP? I have Windows 7 and XP systems
that I switch between in the same box.

Thanks.


I encourage you to try your question again. As it stands, you put your
text inline with Paul's very verbose post (rather than quoting
properly, not to mention trimming!) and it's way more trouble than I
think it's worth to try to go back through Paul's post to see what you
might be asking about.

--

Char Jackson
  #7  
Old January 19th 11, 02:57 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Bill Blanton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default Improve SATA performance?

On 1/17/2011 16:43, Kenny wrote:
Thanks again Ed, there are 3 settings to change in BIOS, OnChip SATA
Controller, OnChip SATA Type & OnChip SATA Port 4/5 Mode.
Enabled 1st and the other 2 to AHCI. Doesn't appear to have changed
much, Windows Experience Index shows HDD as 5.9 which is the same as
before.


Mechanical drive throughput doesn't even approach SATA controller
transfer speed specifications, and barely passes P-ATA specs for even
the fastest drives. And that's assuming sequential data write/reads.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_...to_other_buses

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...gb,2600-5.html

  #8  
Old January 19th 11, 07:15 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,275
Default Improve SATA performance?

Char Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:25:05 -0000, "Oldster"
wrote:

Anyone know a similar tweak for XP? I have Windows 7 and XP systems
that I switch between in the same box.

Thanks.


I encourage you to try your question again. As it stands, you put your
text inline with Paul's very verbose post (rather than quoting
properly, not to mention trimming!) and it's way more trouble than I
think it's worth to try to go back through Paul's post to see what you
might be asking about.


Some SSDs come with their own maintenance utility, to achieve the
TRIM function. But there are also SSDs that don't need TRIM,
as they have their own equivalent (garbage collection) function
built in.

And as this is bleeding edge technology, you can always find pitfalls
or poorly implemented work. You can spend your whole day, scouting
for issues. If you own an SSD, you'll never be bored :-(

http://www.behardware.com/news/10962...listen-up.html

Paul
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.