![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello\,
Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. Why not create one yourself instead of asking here. Nobody in their right mind
will do this for you -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "dubya" wrote in message ... Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't ask anyone to do anything, let alone create something.
You know, pal, most people in their right minds can read and actually do read posts before replying. "Peter Foldes" wrote in message ... No. Why not create one yourself instead of asking here. Nobody in their right mind will do this for you -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "dubya" wrote in message ... Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"dubya" wrote in message
... Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? There's no such thing, but there are things that come close. You probably need to find another way of accomplishing what you want, but 'what you want' isn't exactly clear in your post Are you intending to study the worm, or are you trying to test a network? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dubya,
The EICAR group came up with a harmless file detected by antivirus products so you can safely verify the product's working. If you haven't seen Windows Defender detect something, visit http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm , download the 68 byte file eicar.com.txt, and copy it to your startup folder. Your AV solution (that you should be running in addition to Windows Defender) will also pick it up." -=- "dubya" wrote: Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
??ç?l typed: dubya, The EICAR group came up with a harmless file detected by antivirus products so you can safely verify the product's working. If you haven't seen Windows Defender detect something, visit http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm , download the 68 byte file eicar.com.txt, and copy it to your startup folder. Your AV solution (that you should be running in addition to Windows Defender) will also pick it up." -=- "dubya" wrote: Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike . Good response: Eicar is completely safe and won't cause any harm. It's old but it at least shows that the signature it uses gets caught by security-ware. HTH, Twayne` |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Twayne" wrote in message
... In , ??ç?l typed: dubya, The EICAR group came up with a harmless file detected by antivirus products so you can safely verify the product's working. If you haven't seen Windows Defender detect something, visit http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm , download the 68 byte file eicar.com.txt, and copy it to your startup folder. Your AV solution (that you should be running in addition to Windows Defender) will also pick it up." -=- "dubya" wrote: Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike . Good response: Eicar is completely safe and won't cause any harm. It's old but it at least shows that the signature it uses gets caught by security-ware. It is not a worm, so how is that relevent to his query. I am suspecting that the OP wants a *worm* (without a payload) to run rampant on his network so that he can study worm behavior. This is entirely unsafe - better would be to put restrictions on the worm (such as requiring some registry value only found in the test network's computers or requiring users' permission before replicating) which violates the *other* request that the worm *only* propagte - and do nothing else. An impossibility. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....or just copy this
X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H* and paste it into notepad and save it as a batfile or comfile if your AV doesn't alert on it when saved as a textfile. ....or see attached if it comes through. "??ç?l" wrote in message ... dubya, The EICAR group came up with a harmless file detected by antivirus products so you can safely verify the product's working. If you haven't seen Windows Defender detect something, visit http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm , download the 68 byte file eicar.com.txt, and copy it to your startup folder. Your AV solution (that you should be running in addition to Windows Defender) will also pick it up." -=- "dubya" wrote: Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... "dubya" wrote in message ... Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? There's no such thing, but there are things that come close. You probably need to find another way of accomplishing what you want, but 'what you want' isn't exactly clear in your post Are you intending to study the worm, or are you trying to test a network? Sorry for the lack of clarity. Test the network. A mix of virtual machines and hosts with various firewalls or lack thereof. I just want to see what it gets through and what it doesn't. Nothing will be connected to any public networks, so no risk to public bandwidth. Thanks, Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
?ç?l,
Thanks. Indeed, that is a neat little item. I've used it. But it doesn't attempt to travel from one machine to another on a network, which is what I want to check. Mike "??ç?l" wrote in message ... dubya, The EICAR group came up with a harmless file detected by antivirus products so you can safely verify the product's working. If you haven't seen Windows Defender detect something, visit http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm , download the 68 byte file eicar.com.txt, and copy it to your startup folder. Your AV solution (that you should be running in addition to Windows Defender) will also pick it up." -=- "dubya" wrote: Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? Thanks! Mike . |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
P.S.
You may be right that there is no such thing. I thought I might find one on a security website, but quite a bit of searching before I posted here turned up zilch. I guess people fear such a thing would be turned to a destructive purposes - as some people here seemed to assume. And perhaps too that someone using it to test their own setup would not know enough to pull the cord to the internet. Mike "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... "dubya" wrote in message ... Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? There's no such thing, but there are things that come close. You probably need to find another way of accomplishing what you want, but 'what you want' isn't exactly clear in your post Are you intending to study the worm, or are you trying to test a network? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"dubya" wrote in message
... "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... "dubya" wrote in message ... Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? There's no such thing, but there are things that come close. You probably need to find another way of accomplishing what you want, but 'what you want' isn't exactly clear in your post Are you intending to study the worm, or are you trying to test a network? Sorry for the lack of clarity. Test the network. A mix of virtual machines and hosts with various firewalls or lack thereof. I just want to see what it gets through and what it doesn't. Nothing will be connected to any public networks, so no risk to public bandwidth. True worms are generally dependent upon software vulnerabilities. The only test worms I know about are historical in nature, and were written for historical exploits of historical vulnerabilities. Google Fred Cohen and read some of his papers on viruses (many of what were called viruses then were actually worms in retrospect now that worms are better defined). Part of the reproductive function of his test virus asked the user for permission to infect IIRC - something any self-respecting true worm wouldn't dream of doing. You could concieveably install the necessary vulnerabilities (retrograde your patches for instance) to provide an environment that supports a particular kind of worm (like CodeRed or Sapphire) - but what would be the point then, as you wouldn't actually be testing the network. ....as for playing with worms, that might work, but it could be dangerous. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are basline security analyzers and vulnerability scanners out
there. It is those things that actually support true network worms, the networking aspect is what networks are *supposed* to do. It is usually a vulnerability that allows the parent to ensure its progeny is executed, and this is what separates true worms from viruses. By "no such thing", I was referring to your request: "...a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate..." To be *safe* it must do *more* than just propagate - it must set serious restrictions on itself. ![]() "dubya" wrote in message ... P.S. You may be right that there is no such thing. I thought I might find one on a security website, but quite a bit of searching before I posted here turned up zilch. I guess people fear such a thing would be turned to a destructive purposes - as some people here seemed to assume. And perhaps too that someone using it to test their own setup would not know enough to pull the cord to the internet. Mike "FromTheRafters" erratic @nomail.afraid.org wrote in message ... "dubya" wrote in message ... Hello\, Does anyone know of a non-destructive, safe worm - one that doesn't do anything but propagate and is easy to remove - that I can use for testing in small networks? There's no such thing, but there are things that come close. You probably need to find another way of accomplishing what you want, but 'what you want' isn't exactly clear in your post Are you intending to study the worm, or are you trying to test a network? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|