![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In comp.mobile.android, on Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:19:34 +0000, Andy Burns
wrote: micky wrote: what I wanted was to play the cellphone app radio through the better, louder speakers of the laptop I doubt it's set-up to work that way, far more likely to play audio from the laptop to a higher quality speaker ... probably nothing in the spec preventing it, but nobody would expect you to want to do it. The reason is that at least two of the apps ar e better than anything I've found on the PC. The WYPR app will play that station live, but it also has On Demand almost anything that's been on NPR in the last few weeks. And Simple Radio automaticallly listed 17 local radio stations (though it's either music or talk in a language I can't understand) plus I could find my own choices world-wide and switch from one to another in a second. Radiomaximus on the PC is almost that good but it doesn't have WYPR for some reason, the local NPR station for Baltimore. . |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/2019 10:50, micky wrote:
Well, so far, no luck. It actually asked my phone for the code, suggesting 0000 and 1234, but neither worked. Yes, I've seen that too. What seems to fix it is on each device to remove or forget the other, then try to pair again, and then the originating devices creates and displays a key, and the target device throws up a popup displaying that key and asking whether it is correct. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/03/2019 21:12, Java Jive wrote:
I think I have the Bluetooth Stack.Â* In the past I've successfully paired with my (now dead) Samsung Galaxy S2 mobile phone, and just now with another laptop as a test case.Â* However the other PC with this same build, but downgraded to Home Premium, can't install 'drivers' for that same laptop. There's been some developments wrt this, but I'll put them in a reply to my OP, so that the information is all in one place. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/03/2019 18:07, Java Jive wrote:
I authenticate between the two successfully, but then W7 complains that it doesn't have drivers for three new devices labelled ... Â*Â*Â*Â*Bluetooth Peripheral Device ... and that it can't find them by searching the web.Â* There are no drivers on the Samsung support page for that device: Â*Â*Â*Â*https://www.samsung.com/uk/support/m...M-T719NZWEDBT/ I've now tested this on two separate laptops: 1) Dell Inspiron 15RSE 7520 running W7 Home Premium As explained to Paul, initially this didn't work at all, but I've now found some drivers/software from Dell's site that weren't installed when I copied the build from this PC and downgraded it to Home Premium, and installed them, thereby converting all the 'Bluetooth Peripheral Device's into proper devices, and so got it to pair successfully with the tablet. On this PC, Device Manager, View, Devices by connection shows: Intel(R) Centrino(R) Wireless Bluetooth(R) 4.0 + High Speed Adaptor Bluetooth Device (Personal Area Network) #2 Bluetooth Device (RFCOMM Protocol TDI) #2 Standard Serial over Bluetooth link (COM10) Standard Serial over Bluetooth link (COM14) Microsoft Bluetooth Enumerator Bluetooth Audio 2) Dell Precision M6300 running W7 Ultimate I've downloaded and installed all the drivers from Dell's site, which were Vista 64-bit ones, but this PC is still showing three 'Bluetooth Peripheral Devices'. On this PC, Device Manager, View, Devices by connection shows: Dell Wireless 360 Bluetooth Module Bluetooth Device (Personal Area Network) #13 Bluetooth Device (RFCOMM Protocol TDI) #13 Standard Serial over Bluetooth link (COM10) Standard Serial over Bluetooth link (COM16) Microsoft Bluetooth Enumerator BIP Responder Bluetooth Peripheral Device Bluetooth Peripheral Device Bluetooth Peripheral Device Bluetooth Stereo Audio Finally, he gave an email address for their technical support helpdesk, I've emailed them, and received an acknowledgement, but as yet no useful help. Still nothing from Samsung. So, although I've got the best laptop working, I've not got this one going, and would like to. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/2019 10:50, micky wrote:
I don't think the Dell Latitude E4300 came with bluetooth. Some did, most, I think, did not. The way to tell is to look at the underside - if the area containing labels, electrical clearance certificates, etc, has a label in every quadrant, then the laptop was supplied ex-factory with Bluetooth, if, as is more usual, one quadrant is blank and free of any labelling, then the laptop was supplied ex-factory without Bluetooth, but you could still buy the module and install it very easily yourself - it goes behind a cover in the battery compartment, there's a connector there for it, even in the models supplied without. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/03/2019 21:52, Roger Mills wrote:
Does it need to be bluetooth? Perhaps not. I'll explain my need and see what others suggest. There is in my wider family's safekeeping, but which rightfully belongs to me, a very beautiful antique book, which because of an unforeseen horrendous problem I've decided must be sold to fund my house renovations, but, beforehand, I'd like to photograph the hand-painted pictures that it contains. I had considered scanning it, but it's too big, so some of the images would need to be scanned piecemeal, and I'm worried that the book might not survive such rough handling as to be perched on a scanner. So I've decided to try and photograph it using my tablet. I'll construct some sort of frame to hold the tablet securely a suitable height over the book, and try and find a suitable source of illumination. The need therefore is a way of controlling the tablet's camera from a PC, either via WiFi, Bluetooth, or USB cable. After managing late last night to pair the tablet with one of my W7 laptops, I tried some software called Camera Remote PC Sync (on the PC) and Camera Remote (on the tablet). This pair of apps are supposed to be able to connect either via Bluetooth or WiFi, but if the PC side tries to connect to the tablet side via WiFi, the tablet app bombs, so it has to be Bluetooth. I could do the job with this software, but it would require a great deal of time and patience, because it's clunky in the extreme - the PC window is too big for the height of my laptop's screen even though that is fairly standard dimensions for a laptop screen; some of the dialogs have black text on a black background; you can only download one picture at a time, not mark a whole lot of them and download them all at once, and each time you do a download, the software begins by defaulting to the User's folder on the C: drive, thus necessitating a wearisome navigation back to the D: drive to save it where I actually want to save it; etc; etc! So if anyone here can suggest suitable software to allow a PC to control an Android tablet's camera relatively painlessly, I'd be very grateful to know. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Java Jive
wrote: There is in my wider family's safekeeping, but which rightfully belongs to me, a very beautiful antique book, which because of an unforeseen horrendous problem I've decided must be sold to fund my house renovations, but, beforehand, I'd like to photograph the hand-painted pictures that it contains. I had considered scanning it, but it's too big, so some of the images would need to be scanned piecemeal, and I'm worried that the book might not survive such rough handling as to be perched on a scanner. So I've decided to try and photograph it using my tablet. I'll construct some sort of frame to hold the tablet securely a suitable height over the book, and try and find a suitable source of illumination. The need therefore is a way of controlling the tablet's camera from a PC, either via WiFi, Bluetooth, or USB cable. for the best results, don't use a tablet. use an slr and a copy stand or better yet, have it scanned by a professional lab who specializes in such things, who will have a scanner that's both big enough and designed for books which won't damage it. but if you're committed to doing it yourself with a tablet, just take the photos of each page using the tablet without involving the computer at all, then after everything has been copied, connect the tablet to the computer and copy all of the photos. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/2019 18:41, Java Jive wrote:
On 08/03/2019 10:50, micky wrote: I don't think the Dell Latitude E4300 came with bluetooth. Some did, most, I think, did not.Â* The way to tell is to look at the undersideÂ* -Â* if the area containing labels, electrical clearance certificates, etc, has a label in every quadrant, then the laptop was supplied ex-factory with Bluetooth, if, as is more usual, one quadrant is blank and free of any labelling, then the laptop was supplied ex-factory without Bluetooth, but you could still buy the module and install it very easily yourselfÂ* -Â* it goes behind a cover in the battery compartment, there's a connector there for it, even in the models supplied without. If it's the same module that went into the Inspiron 9400, I have one spare if anyone wants it. Free to a good home. Don't think I have the driver disc for it any more, but it should be downloadable. -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Java Jive wrote:
On 07/03/2019 21:52, Roger Mills wrote: Does it need to be bluetooth? Perhaps not. I'll explain my need and see what others suggest. There is in my wider family's safekeeping, but which rightfully belongs to me, a very beautiful antique book, which because of an unforeseen horrendous problem I've decided must be sold to fund my house renovations, but, beforehand, I'd like to photograph the hand-painted pictures that it contains. I had considered scanning it, but it's too big, so some of the images would need to be scanned piecemeal, and I'm worried that the book might not survive such rough handling as to be perched on a scanner. So I've decided to try and photograph it using my tablet. I'll construct some sort of frame to hold the tablet securely a suitable height over the book, and try and find a suitable source of illumination. The need therefore is a way of controlling the tablet's camera from a PC, either via WiFi, Bluetooth, or USB cable. After managing late last night to pair the tablet with one of my W7 laptops, I tried some software called Camera Remote PC Sync (on the PC) and Camera Remote (on the tablet). This pair of apps are supposed to be able to connect either via Bluetooth or WiFi, but if the PC side tries to connect to the tablet side via WiFi, the tablet app bombs, so it has to be Bluetooth. I could do the job with this software, but it would require a great deal of time and patience, because it's clunky in the extreme - the PC window is too big for the height of my laptop's screen even though that is fairly standard dimensions for a laptop screen; some of the dialogs have black text on a black background; you can only download one picture at a time, not mark a whole lot of them and download them all at once, and each time you do a download, the software begins by defaulting to the User's folder on the C: drive, thus necessitating a wearisome navigation back to the D: drive to save it where I actually want to save it; etc; etc! So if anyone here can suggest suitable software to allow a PC to control an Android tablet's camera relatively painlessly, I'd be very grateful to know. You can rent a book scanner. This scanner "snapscan SV600" is no longer in production. It takes 3 seconds per page. And software is there for curvature correction. https://fujitsuscannerstore.com/rentsv600-aenbd/ Advert for one. https://www.amazon.com/Fujitsu-Scann.../dp/B00FPW9946 Since the field of view is limited and text at the bottom of the page may be "blurry" according to one review, you may need to rotate the book and take images of the pages a second time. ******* It's either that, or operate the tablet directly while it is in your scan frame. I find it's just about impossible to photo stuff with a webcam, unless the webcam is firmly held via a tripod or the like. I did documentation photos for a project, with the webcam screwed to a tripod. If you take two photos and absolutely nothing moves, you can use Photoshop (A+B)/2 to average out sensor noise. That's what I did for my webcam shots. Even though the scene was well lit, the webcam still had a lot of noise. Averaging just two photos together, gives some improvement. Averaging sixteen photos, doesn't actually seem to do much more than two photos averaged together. I have a $150 Point and Shoot digital camera now, which is miles better than a $100 webcam. The only problem with that is, the autofocus gets confused by "complex" scenes with a dark left half and a bright white right half. You can't convince the camera to focus on the material in the center of field. I suppose disabling the autofocus would be one solution. But in terms of recognizing "typical" applications of the camera, it's pretty good. It's just not a replacement for a "lab microscope". ******* Based on my experience with doing stuff like this, I find you need "immediate feedback" of what is going on. Trying to operate remotely is "a step too far". If you stand over the equipment, you get to visually review that the book is properly placed, that the page hasn't moved, while you operate the device. If the tablet has a camera on the side opposite the LCD panel, that would be ideal. If you need more storage space for the photos (until download), you can always plug in an SD or a USB flash stick. Paul |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/2019 21:18, Paul wrote:
Based on my experience with doing stuff like this, I find you need "immediate feedback" of what is going on. Yes, but that's what I'm hoping to get by linking the tablet to a PC - the ideal would be to set up the book and the frame holding the tablet, and a PC nearby. When each page is ready, I press a key on the PC and the tablet takes the picture and sends it directly to the PC, where I examine it for problems before turning the page to the next. Thanks for your other remarks. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/2019 19:50, nospam wrote:
In , Java Jive wrote: There is in my wider family's safekeeping, but which rightfully belongs to me, a very beautiful antique book, which because of an unforeseen horrendous problem I've decided must be sold to fund my house renovations, but, beforehand, I'd like to photograph the hand-painted pictures that it contains. I had considered scanning it, but it's too big, so some of the images would need to be scanned piecemeal, and I'm worried that the book might not survive such rough handling as to be perched on a scanner. So I've decided to try and photograph it using my tablet. I'll construct some sort of frame to hold the tablet securely a suitable height over the book, and try and find a suitable source of illumination. The need therefore is a way of controlling the tablet's camera from a PC, either via WiFi, Bluetooth, or USB cable. for the best results, don't use a tablet. use an slr and a copy stand or better yet, have it scanned by a professional lab who specializes in such things, who will have a scanner that's both big enough and designed for books which won't damage it. but if you're committed to doing it yourself with a tablet, just take the photos of each page using the tablet without involving the computer at all, then after everything has been copied, connect the tablet to the computer and copy all of the photos. I would agree with all of that. If you *must* use a tablet, why not control it with a selfie-stick rather than trying to control it with a computer? Simply store all the images (or batches thereof) on the tablet, and then transfer them using a USB cable or FTP over WiFi. Or am I missing something? -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Roger Mills
writes: On 08/03/2019 19:50, nospam wrote: In , Java Jive wrote: [] renovations, but, beforehand, I'd like to photograph the hand-painted pictures that it contains. I had considered scanning it, but it's too big, so some of the images would need to be scanned piecemeal, and I'm worried that the book might not survive such rough handling as to be perched on a scanner. There are scanners that look like a mouse; the one I have is by LG, and is model LSM-150, but there are others (I think LSM-100 is one). You move them over the object to be scanned, and the software supplied with stitches the sweeps together as you scan - up to A3 size IIRR is claimed. For some reason they seem to have stopped making them, but you can still find them - often unopened - on ebay and the like. I see no reason why you should not be able to use them via a sheet of clear plastic if you are worried about sliding the "mouse" over the images (they work like an optical mouse, i. e. it uses the image itself to know where it is, there are no little wheels involved). Work fine with Windows 7, and I think earlier and later. So I've decided to try and photograph it using my tablet. I'll construct some sort of frame to hold the tablet securely a suitable height over the book, and try and find a suitable source of illumination. The need therefore is a way of controlling the tablet's camera from a PC, either via WiFi, Bluetooth, or USB cable. for the best results, don't use a tablet. use an slr and a copy stand or better yet, have it scanned by a professional lab who specializes in such things, who will have a scanner that's both big enough and designed for books which won't damage it. but if you're committed to doing it yourself with a tablet, just take Yes, I did wonder why you can't use a camera. If this book is worth enough to fund house developments, then even buying a camera ought not to be out of the question - you can always sell it again afterwards; if you buy second-hand (after all, you don't need modern gimmicks like face recognition - and I suspect you don't need multi-megapixel, either: I'm guessing these are to go on something like ebay), you shouldn't lose too much. Or you could maybe hire one, but I have no knowledge of that. the photos of each page using the tablet without involving the computer at all, then after everything has been copied, connect the tablet to the computer and copy all of the photos. I would agree with all of that. If you *must* use a tablet, why not control it with a selfie-stick rather than trying to control it with a computer? Simply store all the images (or batches thereof) on the tablet, and then transfer them using a USB cable or FTP over WiFi. And if you must use the tablet, with the software you have, then rather than resetting it every time to put the images on D: where you want them, let it put them where it wants on C:, and move them all in one go afterwards. Or am I missing something? Or I (-: -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)[email protected]+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf The desire to remain private and/or anonymous used to be a core British value, but in recent times it has been treated with suspicion - an unfortunate by- product of the widespread desire for fame. - Chris Middleton, Computing 6 September 2011 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/2019 21:51, Roger Mills wrote:
On 08/03/2019 19:50, nospam wrote: for the best results, don't use a tablet. use an slr and a copy stand or better yet, have it scanned by a professional lab who specializes in such things, who will have a scanner that's both big enough and designed for books which won't damage it. I have a tablet, I do not have any of the other stuff, and cannot afford anything better, because as much money generated from this sale as possible has to go on the house. As it is the round trip to pick up the book, photograph it, and take it to the auction house will likely cost at least £200 in fuel even at LPG prices. There will be further fees for provenance, valuation, auction, etc. but if you're committed to doing it yourself with a tablet, just take the photos of each page using the tablet without involving the computer at all, then after everything has been copied, connect the tablet to the computer and copy all of the photos. No, I need to see each picture on a decent screen as soon as it is photographed or scanned, so I can be sure it's good enough before going on to the next. I would agree with all of that. Sorry, but I wouldn't. I put this question to the ng after much thought, and am not interested in solutions involving much further expenditure. If you *must* use a tablet, why not control it with a selfie-stick rather than trying to control it with a computer? Simply store all the images (or batches thereof) on the tablet, and then transfer them using a USB cable or FTP over WiFi. I had thought about a selfie-stick held by something like a chemistry lab retort stand, but I don't know where I'd borrow one of the latter. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , J. P. Gilliver (John)
wrote: renovations, but, beforehand, I'd like to photograph the hand-painted pictures that it contains. I had considered scanning it, but it's too big, so some of the images would need to be scanned piecemeal, and I'm worried that the book might not survive such rough handling as to be perched on a scanner. There are scanners that look like a mouse; the one I have is by LG, and is model LSM-150, but there are others (I think LSM-100 is one). You move them over the object to be scanned, and the software supplied with stitches the sweeps together as you scan - up to A3 size IIRR is claimed. For some reason they seem to have stopped making them, but you can still find them - often unopened - on ebay and the like. I see no reason why you should not be able to use them via a sheet of clear plastic if you are worried about sliding the "mouse" over the images (they work like an optical mouse, i. e. it uses the image itself to know where it is, there are no little wheels involved). Work fine with Windows 7, and I think earlier and later. those are not very good, and scanning a large format book with such a device is crazy. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/03/2019 22:23, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
Yes, I did wonder why you can't use a camera. If this book is worth enough to fund house developments, then even buying a camera ought not to be out of the question - you can always sell it again afterwards; if you buy second-hand (after all, you don't need modern gimmicks like face recognition - and I suspect you don't need multi-megapixel, either: I'm guessing these are to go on something like ebay), you shouldn't lose too much. Or you could maybe hire one, but I have no knowledge of that. I used to be interested in photography, and had all sorts of expensive gear included telephoto zoom lenses, etc, but when I wanted to sell it all after it had lain idle for a while, the interior of the most expensive lenses had acquired slight fungal growth, vastly devaluing their worth so that the sale still wasn't enough to buy my first PC. I already have too many expensive things like musical instruments at risk of a similar sort of fate. Just now, I have to make sure that every penny I can raise goes on the house. And if you must use the tablet, with the software you have, then rather than resetting it every time to put the images on D: where you want them, let it put them where it wants on C:, and move them all in one go afterwards. The C: drive is, of course, the system drive, and I'm trying to keep it under 64GB, so there isn't a great deal of spare disk space on it. Also, it looks as though I might have to reimage it before long, so all in all I don't want to save any data there. Also, I don't want to rely on such crap software anyway. I'd rather find something similar that is written by someone who has some idea of how to write something that works properly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|