If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
I now have my Creative EXT modem connected to the XP computer. I
connected with no problems, am connected at 38.6. I was able to read a few messages on this newsgroup. I ten opened Seamonkey and went to Filehippo.com. I intended to check the download speed of some random file. I chose Acdsee. I have waited 26 minuites so far, just for the download page to load. Have not even gotten to the actual download, and the data transfer has nearly come to a stop. I cant even open messages on my newsreader at the same time. While this EXT modem connects better than the internal one, the connection is totally useless. At 29 minutes, the download page on Filehippo timed out, and is dead. This is the same **** I have gotten trying to use my Win2K install dual booted on my Win98 machine, with same modem and phone line and ISP. I think I'd be better off going back to sending Telegraphs, using the Morse Code, than this ****!!! I'll have to disconnect and reconnect to the internet just to send this message! My newsreader shows no connection posssible, yet I am connected. I shut down, had to try 4 times to connect, shut modem off to reset it. I now have a 42.6 connection. Lets see if I can send this messasge, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote:
Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) -- Bill Dell Latitude Slate Tablet 128GB SSD ('12 era) - Thunderbird v24.3.0 Intel Atom Z670 1.5GHz - 2GB RAM - Windows 8 Pro |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
On 03/14/2014 04:23 AM, BillW50 wrote:
On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote: Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) I've been using Linux for 14 years. About five years ago I started using it as my full time OS. About the only time I have had to use Windows was when I published my book. There is no good publication software for Linux AFAIK. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 03:53:59 -0500, philo* wrote:
On 03/14/2014 04:09 AM, wrote: I now have my Creative EXT modem connected to the XP computer. I connected with no problems, am connected at 38.6. I was able to read a few messages on this newsgroup. I ten opened Seamonkey and went to Filehippo.com. I intended to check the download speed of some random file. I chose Acdsee. I have waited 26 minuites so far, just for the download page to load. Have not even gotten to the actual download, and the data transfer has nearly come to a stop. I cant even open messages on my newsreader at the same time. snip Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps Nothing against you or your choice of OSs, but just the thought of Linux makes me shudder..... I tried it back in the mid 90s, and about 5 times since then, with the latest being about 3 years ago. I have never gotten anything to work or load except my stress level. In fact just a few weeks ago, I got a copy of an older version of PcLinux on a CD and it was a self loading CD. I thought, what the heck, I'll stick it in the CD drive and see what it looks like. I unplugged my harddrive just to make sure no data got corrupted. stuck the CD in the drive and was taken to that dreaded Linux command line after several error messages. I believe it was PcLinux from 2008. I'd think that should have run on a computer from 2002. At the same time, this modem mess is getting as bad as the linux command line, with all those init strings and such. I'm about ready to just give up on the whole thing, and just live with the script errors in the limited browsers still usable in win98. In the meantime, I'm getting more and more serious abotu buying an Apple based computer. I was under the misconception that XP was pretty much plug-n-play compared to Win98. Boy was I wrong!!! I can plug almost any external modem into the W98 computer, install some drivers and get a good connection. I have not had such a terrible time connecting a modem to XP (and Win2K), since back around 1993 when I tried to connect a modem to Windows 3.x. And I even did get that working sooner than I'm experiencing now. I'm close to just accepting the fact that dialup internet just can not be used on any NT based operating systems. I'm just glad I have my Win98 system which connects fine to the internet. Thank God for Win98! I just wish someone would make a newer browser that works on Win98. That would solve everything! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 04:35:36 -0500, philo* wrote:
On 03/14/2014 04:23 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote: Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) I've been using Linux for 14 years. About five years ago I started using it as my full time OS. About the only time I have had to use Windows was when I published my book. There is no good publication software for Linux AFAIK. I've heard many times that Linux lacks in software apps. Even if I could get it to work, I'm too used to certain Windows software to have to relearn everything. I know a few programs (like Firefox) are made for both Windows and Linux, but for the most part, none of my windows software could be used. And most of the software I use is actually older stuff, like PaintShopPro from around 1999. It, like most software, got too damn bloated and complicated later on. Just like these damn "Smartphones". NO THANKS.... Just give me a cellphone that makes calls, and nothing more. I'm probably showing my old age . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
philo wrote:
On 03/14/2014 04:23 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote: Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) I've been using Linux for 14 years. About five years ago I started using it as my full time OS. About the only time I have had to use Windows was when I published my book. There is no good publication software for Linux AFAIK. I just fired up this Linux machine about 25 minutes ago (after dusting it off) and I had to wait 20 minutes for Thunderbird to respond. And Linux is claiming my battery now at 80% will take 20 hours to charge to 100%. Yes Linux is really good for something, click and wait, click and wait. Amazing! Now it says that my battery is 90% charged and just 10 hours now to finish. Gee it thinks 10 hours just past in less than a minute. At least the outside temp seems right on the money and it got the time and date right. So it is good for something. -- Bill Asus EEE PC 702G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Ubuntu 9.10 Netbook Remix Linux |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
BillW50 wrote:
philo wrote: On 03/14/2014 04:23 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote: Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) I've been using Linux for 14 years. About five years ago I started using it as my full time OS. About the only time I have had to use Windows was when I published my book. There is no good publication software for Linux AFAIK. I just fired up this Linux machine about 25 minutes ago (after dusting it off) and I had to wait 20 minutes for Thunderbird to respond. And Linux is claiming my battery now at 80% will take 20 hours to charge to 100%. Yes Linux is really good for something, click and wait, click and wait. Amazing! Now it says that my battery is 90% charged and just 10 hours now to finish. Gee it thinks 10 hours just past in less than a minute. At least the outside temp seems right on the money and it got the time and date right. So it is good for something. Linux at idle is eating 40% of the processor power (reported by the System Monitor), that is huge! Windows 7 on this same machine eats 50% at idle and XP eats 10% at idle. -- Bill Asus EEE PC 702G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Ubuntu 9.10 Netbook Remix Linux |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
BillW50 wrote:
BillW50 wrote: philo wrote: On 03/14/2014 04:23 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote: Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) I've been using Linux for 14 years. About five years ago I started using it as my full time OS. About the only time I have had to use Windows was when I published my book. There is no good publication software for Linux AFAIK. I just fired up this Linux machine about 25 minutes ago (after dusting it off) and I had to wait 20 minutes for Thunderbird to respond. And Linux is claiming my battery now at 80% will take 20 hours to charge to 100%. Yes Linux is really good for something, click and wait, click and wait. Amazing! Now it says that my battery is 90% charged and just 10 hours now to finish. Gee it thinks 10 hours just past in less than a minute. At least the outside temp seems right on the money and it got the time and date right. So it is good for something. Linux at idle is eating 40% of the processor power (reported by the System Monitor), that is huge! Windows 7 on this same machine eats 50% at idle and XP eats 10% at idle. Linux is waiting 20 minutes to play an asf audio stream. Firefox reports it is transferring data. I gave up and tried a mp3 stream. At least it can play that. Although the CPU is pushing 90% for such easy work. Frankly I don't know how you put up with all of the limitations of Linux. Every time I fire Linux up, I am more disappointed over how little I can actually do. Under Windows, I can actually download those asf streams and use the Bulk Rename Utility to quickly rename them in one sweep. Yet another simple task that Linux doesn't want to do. Every time I install Linux on a new machine, I think what a waste of good hardware. As the machine is never going to be able to do that much at all. Heck it doesn't even know there is a webcam on this machine. :-( -- Bill Asus EEE PC 702G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Ubuntu 9.10 Netbook Remix Linux |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
On 03/14/2014 05:05 AM, BillW50 wrote:
philo wrote: On 03/14/2014 04:23 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote: Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) I've been using Linux for 14 years. About five years ago I started using it as my full time OS. About the only time I have had to use Windows was when I published my book. There is no good publication software for Linux AFAIK. I just fired up this Linux machine about 25 minutes ago (after dusting it off) and I had to wait 20 minutes for Thunderbird to respond. And Linux is claiming my battery now at 80% will take 20 hours to charge to 100%. Yes Linux is really good for something, click and wait, click and wait. Your machine is either underpowered or you have no idea how to set it up. The machine I am now using is a dual boot Linux/XP . My guess is that you have installed Linux on an old hunk of junk that's probably got very little RAM...and then are using a resource hungry GUI such as KDE. Even though I am a bit of a Luddite I realize that with newer hardware you get more bang for your buck. I just bought 8 gigs of DDR3 for a machine I'm building for $60. I was going to use an older motherboard but 4gigs of DDR-2 would have cost $80 Xp runs very well on my machine but on the Linux side everything responds quite a bit faster. It takes 30 seconds for Linux boot yet XP takes about 4 minutes for the same. On shut down, Linux takes THREE seconds and XP takes about 90 seconds...sometimes a lot more. I certainly do not have to defrag, nor does Linux need the hassle of a virus checker etc. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
On 3/14/2014 7:51 AM, philo wrote:
On 03/14/2014 05:05 AM, BillW50 wrote: philo wrote: On 03/14/2014 04:23 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 3/14/2014 3:53 AM, philo wrote: Have you ever tried Linux? You may want to see if you can connect better using Linux then dual boot. Use Linux for all your Internet stuff, then boot to XP if you need to run win-apps I have two Linux machines and they make great dust collectors. ;-) I've been using Linux for 14 years. About five years ago I started using it as my full time OS. About the only time I have had to use Windows was when I published my book. There is no good publication software for Linux AFAIK. I just fired up this Linux machine about 25 minutes ago (after dusting it off) and I had to wait 20 minutes for Thunderbird to respond. And Linux is claiming my battery now at 80% will take 20 hours to charge to 100%. Yes Linux is really good for something, click and wait, click and wait. Your machine is either underpowered or you have no idea how to set it up. The machine I am now using is a dual boot Linux/XP . My guess is that you have installed Linux on an old hunk of junk that's probably got very little RAM...and then are using a resource hungry GUI such as KDE. Same machines that I run Windows on. And my earlier posts sig had one of the Linux machines listed. And the EeePC one runs Windows 2000/XP just fine with 2GB of RAM. But Ubuntu Netbook Remix is pretty dang slow. Yet it is specially configured for that machine. So far you got nothing right yet. Even though I am a bit of a Luddite I realize that with newer hardware you get more bang for your buck. I just bought 8 gigs of DDR3 for a machine I'm building for $60. I was going to use an older motherboard but 4gigs of DDR-2 would have cost $80 Xp runs very well on my machine but on the Linux side everything responds quite a bit faster. Maybe you don't know how to setup Windows? As Windows 2000/XP blows Linux away here on the same machines. The other Linux machine has dualboot Ubuntu/Puppy on a Gateway M465. Same machines that I run XP, Windows 7, and Windows 8 on. It takes 30 seconds for Linux boot yet XP takes about 4 minutes for the same. Windows 2000 boots on the EeePC in 30 seconds on those mini SSD. Linux takes 40 seconds on the same SSD. On shut down, Linux takes THREE seconds and XP takes about 90 seconds...sometimes a lot more. Yup, you have Windows setup incorrectly. As all mine shuts down in 10 seconds or less. I certainly do not have to defrag, nor does Linux need the hassle of a virus checker etc. I don't defrag Windows drives either. And of course most Linux users don't care about security. That is why a Linux trojan was infecting machines for almost 7 months before someone was smart and had an AV on their Linux machine and finally caught it. Linux: Infected by Complacency http://computingondemand.com/linux-i...y-complacency/ -- Bill Dell Latitude Slate Tablet 128GB SSD ('12 era) - Thunderbird v24.3.0 Intel Atom Z670 1.5GHz - 2GB RAM - Windows 8 Pro |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless internet connection - Creative modem on XP
On 03/14/2014 11:09 AM, BillW50 wrote:
Your machine is either underpowered or you have no idea how to set it up. The machine I am now using is a dual boot Linux/XP . My guess is that you have installed Linux on an old hunk of junk that's probably got very little RAM...and then are using a resource hungry GUI such as KDE. Same machines that I run Windows on. And my earlier posts sig had one of the Linux machines listed. And the EeePC one runs Windows 2000/XP just fine with 2GB of RAM. But Ubuntu Netbook Remix is pretty dang slow. Yet it is specially configured for that machine. So far you got nothing right yet. Then how come Linux works fine here and you are afraid to post the specs of the machine. The problem is on your end I'd say. Maybe you don't know how to setup Windows? As Windows 2000/XP blows Linux away here on the same machines. The other Linux machine has dualboot Ubuntu/Puppy on a Gateway M465. Same machines that I run XP, Windows 7, and Windows 8 on. I've been doing this a bit longer than you, I did my first computer repair back in the days before PC's existed. snip nor does Linux need the hassle of a virus checker etc. I don't defrag Windows drives either. That kind of proves my point that you are clueless when it comes to computers...even newbies know how to defrag. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|