If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
"Arlen Holder" wrote in message
... On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:35:14 +0200, R.Wieser wrote: So, where is that rampant evidence ? Hi Rudy, This isn't for you, since you're incapable of ever adding value. o To any thread topic Quote:
Rudy Wieser _still_ can't, after more than a half dozen posts, add a _single_ iota of added on-topic technical value to this thread topic. Quote:
Rudy Wieser |
Ads |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
Alan,
While it's clear the OP spent a lot of time annotating detailed screenshot o For example... https://i.postimg.cc/NFhjn4cd/icon04.jpg *How many screenshots did you post to add value to this thread, Rudy?* Hint: none So the only way to add value to a thread is to post a screenshot? No, thats not it. He's just trying to move goalposts from "purposely helpfull suggestions" to something else, as he lost the argument to the former. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/...-the-Goalposts Also, notice that he defines the "playing field" as small as possible (in his own thread, where he already knows nothing of the kind has happened - crowing an easy victory), /already denying/ the validity of any proof that might exist outside of it - A method often referred to as "stacking the cards". Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
Arlen,
This isn't for you, since you're incapable of ever adding value. o To any thread topic So than why are you challenging me by name further down ? [quote=you] *How many screenshots did you post to add value to this thread, Rudy?* [quote] But pray tell, why should I have needed to do that ? I'm not the one who is writing your tutorial. You are. While it's clear the OP spent a lot of time annotating detailed screenshot Hmmm. Talking about yourself in the third person. Not really a good sign .... Putting energy in something does not equal creating something of worth. Any parent of a kid digging holes in a sandbox can tell you that. But yes, I acknowledge that you have put some effort into creating and annotating those images. Alas, just as the "tutorials" you use them in, they do not ammount to much (if anything). Rudy Wieser _still_ can't, after more than a half dozen posts, add a _single_ iota of added on-topic technical value to this thread topic. I did. You keep choosing to ignore it. Not my really problem. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:11:47 +0200, R.Wieser wrote:
Rudy Wieser _still_ can't, after more than a half dozen posts, add a _single_ iota of added on-topic technical value to this thread topic. I did. You keep choosing to ignore it. Not my really problem. Hi Rudy, Again, this post is to prove, for the permanent record, what you are. o You infest this thread _after_ all the work is done - and complain. The evidence is rampant, Rudy Wieser, you're a worthless piece of ****. o You can't add value to _any_ topic, least of all this topic. All worthless pieces of **** like you are, Rudy, can do is complain that a) You can't even click on links everyone else can, and, b) You can't cut-&-paste the step-by-step instructions anyone else can. You prove yourself that you're a worthless piece of **** by the answer to this very simple question, since you "claim" to have added on-topic technical value, Rudy: Name the Message-ID of just one post where you added on-topic value. o And describe, in a sentence, _what_ that technical value added was. HINT: you can't -- It's a fact of life there are only two types of people who post to Usenet: o Those who add value; and those who can't. (Rudy Wieser is of the latter.) |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
Arlen,
Again, this post is to prove, for the permanent record, what you are. o You infest this thread _after_ all the work is done - and complain. As far as I'm concerned, and no doubt quite a number of other people here, you have not finished that "tutorial" of yours. Not by a long shot. You may stopped doing anything with it, but that doesn't automaticaly mean its therefore also finished. There /is/ a difference. And yes, I told you that /and/ pointed quite a few things out. You know, doing a bit better than just yelling "Arlen, you're a worthless piece of ****. You can't add value to _any_ topic". But you call what I did a complaint ? Well, if you say so. The evidence is rampant, Rudy Wieser, you're a worthless piece of ****. o You can't add value to _any_ topic, least of all this topic. Quote:
All worthless pieces of **** like you are, Rudy, can do is complain that a) You can't even click on links everyone else can, and, b) You can't cut-&-paste the step-by-step instructions anyone else can. Yada, yada, yada. Already responded to. Quote:
Name the Message-ID of just one post where you added on-topic value. o And describe, in a sentence, _what_ that technical value added was. This thread. At Fri, 19 Jun 2020 23:34:35 +0200. Multiple. I even marked one with "Whooo! I just made /another/ tutorial !". Go fetch. And no, I'm not going to put any effort into re-iterating stuff I've already explained, only for you to /again/ ignore it. As they say, I may be a nice guy, but my mama didn't raise no fools - or something like that. But there you are, /again/ moving the goalposts, now make it sound that the only thing that may be called helpfull is adding to /your/ tutorial. Ofcourse, by that definition, rejecting/refusing to accept anything that I've already offered you, or others elsewhere. Two flies in one stroke. Kiddo, you are so very transparent in your antics, its almost as if you are not quite there anymore. :-) It's a fact of life there are only two types of people who post to Usenet: o Those who add value; and those who can't. (Rudy Wieser is of the latter.) Quote:
Rudy Wieser |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
On 6/21/2020 1:56 PM, R.Wieser wrote:
Arlen, Again, this post is to prove, for the permanent record, what you are. o You infest this thread _after_ all the work is done - and complain. As far as I'm concerned, and no doubt quite a number of other people here, you have not finished that "tutorial" of yours. Not by a long shot. You may stopped doing anything with it, but that doesn't automaticaly mean its therefore also finished. There /is/ a difference. And yes, I told you that /and/ pointed quite a few things out. You know, doing a bit better than just yelling "Arlen, you're a worthless piece of ****. You can't add value to _any_ topic". But you call what I did a complaint ? Well, if you say so. The evidence is rampant, Rudy Wieser, you're a worthless piece of ****. o You can't add value to _any_ topic, least of all this topic. Quote:
All worthless pieces of **** like you are, Rudy, can do is complain that a) You can't even click on links everyone else can, and, b) You can't cut-&-paste the step-by-step instructions anyone else can. Yada, yada, yada. Already responded to. Quote:
Name the Message-ID of just one post where you added on-topic value. o And describe, in a sentence, _what_ that technical value added was. This thread. At Fri, 19 Jun 2020 23:34:35 +0200. Multiple. I even marked one with "Whooo! I just made /another/ tutorial !". Go fetch. And no, I'm not going to put any effort into re-iterating stuff I've already explained, only for you to /again/ ignore it. As they say, I may be a nice guy, but my mama didn't raise no fools - or something like that. But there you are, /again/ moving the goalposts, now make it sound that the only thing that may be called helpfull is adding to /your/ tutorial. Ofcourse, by that definition, rejecting/refusing to accept anything that I've already offered you, or others elsewhere. Two flies in one stroke. Kiddo, you are so very transparent in your antics, its almost as if you are not quite there anymore. :-) It's a fact of life there are only two types of people who post to Usenet: o Those who add value; and those who can't. (Rudy Wieser is of the latter.) Quote:
Regards, Rudy Wieser get a life |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
On 2020-06-21 12:00 p.m., TPayne wrote:
On 6/21/2020 1:56 PM, R.Wieser wrote: Arlen, Again, this post is to prove, for the permanent record, what you are. o You infest this thread _after_ all the work is done - and complain. As far as I'm concerned, and no doubt quite a number of other people here, you have not finished that "tutorial" of yours.Â* Not by a long shot. You may stopped doing anything with it, but that doesn't automaticaly mean its therefore also finished.Â*Â* There /is/ a difference. And yes, I told you that /and/ pointed quite a few things out.Â* You know, doing a bit better than just yelling "Arlen, you're a worthless piece of ****. You can't add value to _any_ topic".Â*Â* But you call what I did a complaint ?Â*Â* Well, if you say so. The evidence is rampant, Rudy Wieser, you're a worthless piece of ****. o You can't add value to _any_ topic, least of all this topic. Quote:
All worthless pieces of **** like you are, Rudy, can do is complain that a) You can't even click on links everyone else can, and, b) You can't cut-&-paste the step-by-step instructions anyone else can. Yada, yada, yada.Â*Â* Already responded to. Quote:
Name the Message-ID of just one post where you added on-topic value. o And describe, in a sentence, _what_ that technical value added was. This thread.Â* At Fri, 19 Jun 2020 23:34:35 +0200. Multiple.Â*Â* I even marked one with "Whooo! I just made /another/ tutorial !".Â* Go fetch. And no, I'm not going to put any effort into re-iterating stuff I've already explained, only for you to /again/ ignore it.Â*Â*Â* As they say, I may be a nice guy, but my mama didn't raise no fools - or something like that. But there you are, /again/ moving the goalposts, now make it sound that the only thing that may be called helpfull is adding to /your/ tutorial. Ofcourse, by that definition, rejecting/refusing to accept anything that I've already offered you, or others elsewhere.Â*Â* Two flies in one stroke. Kiddo, you are so very transparent in your antics, its almost as if you are not quite there anymore. :-) It's a fact of life there are only two types of people who post to Usenet: o Those who add value; and those who can't. (Rudy Wieser is of the latter.) Quote:
Regards, Rudy Wieser get a life Does no one who posts that not see the irony? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
Well Arlen,
What a surprise that you are not responding anymore. But, thats really you, isn't it ? Making accusations you have no way of proving them, getting told as much and than simply re-posting them. Demanding that I respond with proof to this-and-that, but you yourself not responding anything I said or answered with. Regardless of if it was an assessment - including reasoning - of the worth of your "tutorials"or to the purposely helpfull suggestions I made otherwise (than again, you seem to have a rather quaint, centered on you, notion of what "purposely helpfull suggestions" is supposed to mean). Whats the matter ? Afraid that we would trash you if you would acknowledge that you actually know very little about writing tutorials ? We already do - with me just being just a tad more persistent and direct about it. So, what do you have to lose ? Besides, there is a plus side to where you a Pretty-much the only way is up. :-) And as a parting gift: You've got well-ment advice from quite a number of people here. I suggest you use it. With or without thanking the giver for it. Goodbye - for now. We will no doubt meet again. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
How do you edit an icon in one of the Windows system DLLs?
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:21:55 +0200, R.Wieser wrote:
What a surprise that you are not responding anymore. Hi Rudy Wieser, You, yourself, are a perfect proof Rudy, of a worthless piece of ****! For the permanent Usenet record to preserve... (as always)... 1. I researched the topic before I posted the detailed questions. 2. I wrote prior tutorials on an aspect of the topic needing improvement. 3. I asked a technical question about the topic spending energy on details. *Since Usenet is a wonderful public helpful adult discussion medium*... A. People read & understood my detailed questions B. Adults spent time & energy to provide helpful suggestions C. I tested all viable suggestions, & I spent energy detailing the solution *Since Usenet is a playground for worthless pieces of **** like you*, Rudy a. You complained that you don't like the tutorial b. You even complained that you can't click on what is a simple link c. Now you complain that it's clear you're a worthless piece of ****. It's amazing how you _always_ prove to act, Rudy Wieser: o You posted about a score of times - adding _negative_ value each time And then, after posting _nothing_ of value, you complain that people don't respond to you? You've never even once in your life added technical value to any thread. o And then, you complain, that people have stopped responding to you. -- You, yourself, are a perfect proof Rudy, of a worthless piece of ****! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|