If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Word look alike?
In article , Paul
wrote: That doesn't mean the 32-bit version is slower. It does mean you can't open documents bigger than 4 GB; 32-bit does not mean that. usually it does, often 2-3 gb due to os limitations, but not always. Without dwelling on detail, 32-bit Photoshop could malloc around 1.8GB of memory. you mean skipping detail. 32 bit photoshop on windows can address 2gb of physical memory, 3gb with the /3gb switch and ~3.5gb on mac. photoshop also implements its own virtual memory system which can go beyond the 32 bit address space limit of 4gb, up to a theoretical limit of 4 exabytes for photoshop 7 (20 years old). If Photoshop had multiple undo buffers, it does, and has since version 5, nearly 25 years ago. then the uncompressed size of images in memory could be "relatively small" by modern standards. The 1.8GB value was related to the 2GGB:2GB address space split, with 2GB for kernel addresses and 2GB for user-space addresses. And the malloc of memory for the program is in user space, and in that example, can't be more than 2GB. And for Photoshop, this number happened to be 1.8GB. We don't really know what filesizes might correspond to the availability of that much RAM. Maybe a 2MB GIF decompresses to fill a 1.8GB space in memory for example. no. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|