![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Dell XPS 8500, with Windows 7 Professional, SP1,
with Spywareblaster, Malwarebytes, Avast , Windows Defender and Windows firewall. (1) TB HD Intel (R) Core (TM) i7-33-3770 CPU @ 3.40 GHz Ram 12.0 GB System type : 64-bit operating system I also have I have a Dell Optiplex 780 Tower, with Windows 7 Professional, SP1, with Spywareblaster, Malwarebytes, Avast , Windows Defender and Windows firewall. Seagate Desktop HDD ST2000DM001 2TB 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal System type : 64-bit operating system and (external hard drives) (8500) WD BLACK SERIES WD2003FZEX 2TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive (780) Seagate Desktop HDD ST2000DM001 2TB 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive The problem lies with the 8500. I inadvertently deleted or moved a folder and I can't find it. Before I do any more damage I thought I had better post it here and maybe I can recover the folder/files? Thanks, Robert -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I have a Dell XPS 8500, with Windows 7 Professional, SP1, with Spywareblaster, Malwarebytes, Avast , Windows Defender and Windows firewall. (1) TB HD Intel (R) Core (TM) i7-33-3770 CPU @ 3.40 GHz Ram 12.0 GB System type : 64-bit operating system I also have I have a Dell Optiplex 780 Tower, with Windows 7 Professional, SP1, with Spywareblaster, Malwarebytes, Avast , Windows Defender and Windows firewall. Seagate Desktop HDD ST2000DM001 2TB 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal System type : 64-bit operating system and (external hard drives) (8500) WD BLACK SERIES WD2003FZEX 2TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive (780) Seagate Desktop HDD ST2000DM001 2TB 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive The problem lies with the 8500. I inadvertently deleted or moved a folder and I can't find it. Before I do any more damage I thought I had better post it here and maybe I can recover the folder/files? Thanks, Robert You must stop using the partition immediately, to avoid damage to the missing items. Like, don't use Firefox or any other program which causes writes to the C: with the "missing files". https://www.ccleaner.com/recuva The colored dot next to the file name, indicates how damaged the file is. If it has already been overwritten (the clusters reused by the file system), the dot will be red. If the file is in perfect condition, the dot will be green. A color of yellow is bad news too. Let's draw an example to illustrate. This is the drive, when the accident happens. +-----+--------------------------------+ | MBR | C: Windows with deleted files | +-----+--------------------------------+ Plug in your emergency boot drive, boot from it. +-----+--------------------------------+ | MBR | C: Emergency Boot Drive | === download Recuva onto this one. +-----+--------------------------------+ Then, point it to E: to scan. Store the recovered files on C: of Emergency Boot Drive, not on E: +-----+--------------------------------+ | MBR | E: Windows with deleted files | === we're not running this one, we're +-----+--------------------------------+ trying to recover the files while this operates as a "data drive". Now, maybe you would be sticking one drive inside your machine, and the second drive in your USB enclosure. But, you get the idea. C: would be inside the machine, E: would be in the enclosure. Note: Piriform is the company that invented Recuva. There are many similar programs, it's not the only one. Piriform was bought by Avast, and when you download Recuva, there is a danger that other garbage software will get installed. Read all prompts carefully, and do your best to avoid getting unnecessary passengers from the Recuva installer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recuva Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't quite know what you mean by I must stop using
the partition? I just had a folder named 'Shopping' and I had files in it of things like books, DVD's etc that were on my list. I have lots of folders/files like that. You're saying it's bad? Isn't that what Favorites/folders/files are for? Hmmmm, I already downloaded CCleaner on the 8500 but I haven't opened it. I then removed them from the download history. When I click your link it doesn't give me any option to download in another location, then the dialog box pops up to save it or open. So how do I download it to a USB flash drive? Then I run a scan from there correct? Thanks, Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/24/2021 7:47 PM, Robert in CA wrote:
I don't quite know what you mean by I must stop using the partition? You stop as much disk activity as possible because when ANYTHING is written to the disk there is a chance it will get written over one of your deleted files and it will be gone forever. I just had a folder named 'Shopping' and I had files in it of things like books, DVD's etc that were on my list. I have lots of folders/files like that. You're saying it's bad? Isn't that what Favorites/folders/files are for? Hmmmm, I already downloaded CCleaner on the 8500 but I haven't opened it. I then removed them from the download history. When I click your link it doesn't give me any option to download in another location, then the dialog box pops up to save it or open. So how do I download it to a USB flash drive? Then I run a scan from there correct? Thanks, Robert Robert: I have used "restoration" in the past with good results. https://www.download3k.com/Install-Restoration.html The sooner you use it the better your chances of getting deleted files back. BTW have you checked in the "Recycle Bin"? If you think you have just MOVED it to some obscure place you can use the "Search" function of Windows explorer. Enter a remembered folder or file name, point it at the root of the disk drive (C:\) and check the "advanced" setting to "Search Subfolders". HTH & GL John -- \\\||/// ------------------o000----(o)(o)----000o---------------- ----------------------------()-------------------------- '' Madness takes its toll - Please have exact change. '' |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I don't quite know what you mean by I must stop using the partition? I just had a folder named 'Shopping' and I had files in it of things like books, DVD's etc that were on my list. I have lots of folders/files like that. You're saying it's bad? Isn't that what Favorites/folders/files are for? Hmmmm, I already downloaded CCleaner on the 8500 but I haven't opened it. I then removed them from the download history. When I click your link it doesn't give me any option to download in another location, then the dialog box pops up to save it or open. So how do I download it to a USB flash drive? Then I run a scan from there correct? Thanks, Robert The objective, is to treat the partition that had the accident, as read-only. The C: partition, while the machine is booted and Windows is running, is constantly writing to C: . Maybe the search indexer is running and doing writes. If files are lost (accidental delete), you would shut down the machine immediately. Now, we're not doing read or write. You have other drives with a copy of the OS on them. Imagine that drive is used to boot the computer. Now the C: writes are happening to a partition you don't care about. Using that drive, you download Recuva Free. Install Recuva Free on that drive. Now you are ready to scan. Now, connect the original drive, using a USB enclosure. There is no constant activity to the enclosure when it is connected. It's ready to do what you wish to it. It is treated as a data drive, because it has not been used to boot the computer. If you were to look in Disk Management, the swapped in drive has +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | ..."System" | ..."Boot" } === the drive being used to boot +-----+-----------------+------------+ Windows writes to this C: Recovered files go to this drive, until recovery from the other drive is complete. +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | | } === no special designations, +-----+-----------------+------------+ now a "data" drive and ready to be scanned with Recuva Once you are sure you've Un-Deleted as many files as the job requires, then it is "safe" to write to the bottom drive, so that when that drive becomes the main boot drive again, the recovered materials are there for you to use. You don't write to the bottom drive, until you're absolutely sure each and every file is intact, and no further forensics on the bottom drive are needed. At that point, the bottom drive is safe to write and update as you wish. Then, shut down the computer, and the bottom drive can be put back inside the machine. There is nothing special about being inside or outside the machine. I'm just taking your usual usage pattern into account. On my machines here, pretty well all drive activity is internal. If I needed to do this... +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | ..."System" | ..."Boot" } +-----+-----------------+------------+ +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | | } === needs UnDelete +-----+-----------------+------------+ it would be done with two adjacent trays that slide in. I would need to know the names and sizes of the drive, so I booted from the correct one (the un-damaged one) and not boot from the damaged one. We don't want writes on the bottom one. When a file is deleted, its resources can be reused at any time. We seek to stop writing to the drive, to protect those resources. If the resources have not been tampered with, Recuva simply flips a single byte value in the $MFT and the file is instantly available again. If you continue to write to the drive and don't act quickly enough (use the drive for the rest of the day), the freed-up clusters from the files that were deleted, they get overwritten. Even if you flipped the byte in the $MFT, the file is corrupt. It is for this reason that the filenames have the colored dots next to them. A file with a "red dot", is unfit for recovery. A file with a "green dot" or all the files having "green dots", means you stopped usage of the drive soon enough to keep them green. All it would take, is writing one giant movie file, to overwrite all the deleted files and turn all the dots "red" and nothing could be recovered. You can flip the byte on a "red" file and make the file appear again in the listing. But if you do that, practically none of the original data is inside it. It contains portions of other files that have been stored. Thus, if you open the file, your picture viewer crashes or there are other anomalies. You have to check the files. If the files had green dots next to them, testing the files should take only a short time. If the files are red, expect trouble, and the testing is likely to fail (and hopefully, in not too spectacular a fashion - *don't* run tools with built-in automated repair capability because they can make a mess of a file with random bits of other files in it). To test a file, you want dumb tools that don't take liberties with the files. Your data is there, but it is only there until the clusters get overwritten. Every write operation on the partition with the problem, risks overwriting the freed-up resources. That's why there is a rush to stop using that drive for writes. And the OS loves to write to the drive. The more modern the version of Windows, the more it likes to write. An accidental deletion then, the files will be unrecoverable in a short time, if the OS is writing stuff to C: . That's why, if you notice files are missing several days or a week later, it's not very likely they're coming back. They'll all have red dots next to their name. Or, if the $MFT entries get reused (which happens!), not even the file names will be locatable by Recuva. I've watched how the $MFT is used, and it really doesn't take that long for the filename to disappear either. The other technique is scavenging. That's when Recuva doesn't work, the filename is missing or the filename is there but has a red dot. You can use Photorec and scan the drive for "fragments of files". But the output is such a mess, don't waste the time. I tried once. I got 100,000 chunks of stuff, that when opened were all corrupted and useless. It's wishful thinking to think doing more work than the Recuva approach, is going to pay off. If the file is still mostly intact, flipping the $MFT byte brings it back. If it's damaged, there's a good chance it is never coming back. I've tested undelete, by deleting a JPEG and immediately doing a scan, and the file was located and had a green dot. So it can work. But don't be "testing it", until your recovery project is complete. Then you can be messing around if you want. You'll only get the one chance to get these back, so concentrate on that. Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 5:33:27 PM UTC-7, Paul wrote:
Robert in CA wrote: I don't quite know what you mean by I must stop using the partition? I just had a folder named 'Shopping' and I had files in it of things like books, DVD's etc that were on my list. I have lots of folders/files like that. You're saying it's bad? Isn't that what Favorites/folders/files are for? Hmmmm, I already downloaded CCleaner on the 8500 but I haven't opened it. I then removed them from the download history. When I click your link it doesn't give me any option to download in another location, then the dialog box pops up to save it or open. So how do I download it to a USB flash drive? Then I run a scan from there correct? Thanks, Robert The objective, is to treat the partition that had the accident, as read-only. The C: partition, while the machine is booted and Windows is running, is constantly writing to C: . Maybe the search indexer is running and doing writes. If files are lost (accidental delete), you would shut down the machine immediately. Now, we're not doing read or write. You have other drives with a copy of the OS on them. Imagine that drive is used to boot the computer. Now the C: writes are happening to a partition you don't care about. Using that drive, you download Recuva Free. Install Recuva Free on that drive. Now you are ready to scan. Now, connect the original drive, using a USB enclosure. There is no constant activity to the enclosure when it is connected. It's ready to do what you wish to it. It is treated as a data drive, because it has not been used to boot the computer. If you were to look in Disk Management, the swapped in drive has +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | ..."System" | ..."Boot" } === the drive being used to boot +-----+-----------------+------------+ Windows writes to this C: Recovered files go to this drive, until recovery from the other drive is complete. +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | | } === no special designations, +-----+-----------------+------------+ now a "data" drive and ready to be scanned with Recuva Once you are sure you've Un-Deleted as many files as the job requires, then it is "safe" to write to the bottom drive, so that when that drive becomes the main boot drive again, the recovered materials are there for you to use. You don't write to the bottom drive, until you're absolutely sure each and every file is intact, and no further forensics on the bottom drive are needed. At that point, the bottom drive is safe to write and update as you wish. Then, shut down the computer, and the bottom drive can be put back inside the machine. There is nothing special about being inside or outside the machine. I'm just taking your usual usage pattern into account. On my machines here, pretty well all drive activity is internal. If I needed to do this... +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | ..."System" | ..."Boot" } +-----+-----------------+------------+ +-----+-----------------+------------+ | MBR | | } === needs UnDelete +-----+-----------------+------------+ it would be done with two adjacent trays that slide in. I would need to know the names and sizes of the drive, so I booted from the correct one (the un-damaged one) and not boot from the damaged one. We don't want writes on the bottom one. When a file is deleted, its resources can be reused at any time. We seek to stop writing to the drive, to protect those resources. If the resources have not been tampered with, Recuva simply flips a single byte value in the $MFT and the file is instantly available again. If you continue to write to the drive and don't act quickly enough (use the drive for the rest of the day), the freed-up clusters from the files that were deleted, they get overwritten. Even if you flipped the byte in the $MFT, the file is corrupt. It is for this reason that the filenames have the colored dots next to them. A file with a "red dot", is unfit for recovery. A file with a "green dot" or all the files having "green dots", means you stopped usage of the drive soon enough to keep them green. All it would take, is writing one giant movie file, to overwrite all the deleted files and turn all the dots "red" and nothing could be recovered. You can flip the byte on a "red" file and make the file appear again in the listing. But if you do that, practically none of the original data is inside it. It contains portions of other files that have been stored. Thus, if you open the file, your picture viewer crashes or there are other anomalies. You have to check the files. If the files had green dots next to them, testing the files should take only a short time. If the files are red, expect trouble, and the testing is likely to fail (and hopefully, in not too spectacular a fashion - *don't* run tools with built-in automated repair capability because they can make a mess of a file with random bits of other files in it). To test a file, you want dumb tools that don't take liberties with the files. Your data is there, but it is only there until the clusters get overwritten. Every write operation on the partition with the problem, risks overwriting the freed-up resources. That's why there is a rush to stop using that drive for writes. And the OS loves to write to the drive. The more modern the version of Windows, the more it likes to write. An accidental deletion then, the files will be unrecoverable in a short time, if the OS is writing stuff to C: . That's why, if you notice files are missing several days or a week later, it's not very likely they're coming back. They'll all have red dots next to their name. Or, if the $MFT entries get reused (which happens!), not even the file names will be locatable by Recuva. I've watched how the $MFT is used, and it really doesn't take that long for the filename to disappear either. The other technique is scavenging. That's when Recuva doesn't work, the filename is missing or the filename is there but has a red dot. You can use Photorec and scan the drive for "fragments of files". But the output is such a mess, don't waste the time. I tried once. I got 100,000 chunks of stuff, that when opened were all corrupted and useless. It's wishful thinking to think doing more work than the Recuva approach, is going to pay off. If the file is still mostly intact, flipping the $MFT byte brings it back. If it's damaged, there's a good chance it is never coming back. I've tested undelete, by deleting a JPEG and immediately doing a scan, and the file was located and had a green dot. So it can work. But don't be "testing it", until your recovery project is complete. Then you can be messing around if you want. You'll only get the one chance to get these back, so concentrate on that. Paul OK, I understand now,..... I did do a search after reading John's post and I did find the missing Folder/files https://postimg.cc/0M83SSP7 I opened the one highlighted to confirm they were there. If I understand you I'm suppose to remove the HD and put in another HD then download Recuva then attach my original HD via USB and scan it that way? Is that correct? Ok,.. here I go I hope I don't screw this up. Thanks, Robert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 5:33:27 PM UTC-7, Paul wrote:
I changed HD's on the 8500 and now in Windows Boot Manager it says Windows failed to start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause. To fix the problem: 1. insert your Windows installation disc and restart your computer. 2. choose your language settings, and then click 'next' 3. click 'repair your computer'. If you do not have this disc, contact your system administator or computer manufacturer for assistance. Status 0xc000000e Info: The boot selection failed because a required device is inaccessible. Great, now the problem is worst than before! I knew something this would happen. I never liked opening up the computers. I'm going to switch back the hard drives. I sure hope I haven't lost the 8500 because of this!! Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm back on the 8500, that was a little scary I was wondering if I would get the 8500 back! Whew! Here's what I was looking at: https://postimg.cc/Cd9M2Cfk I think it was a bad HD. I checked and I have (2) HD's for the 780 with Win 10 and (1) HD for the 8500 with Win 10 but I thought we made more than one HD for the 8500 with Win 7 Pro? So it means I have to buy some HD's and we have to make up at least (2) for the 8500 and (1) for the 780 although I may of just mislabeled them. I would have to put each one in to check for sure but in any case more Win 7 Pro OS is called for and I still need to buy a APC surge protector. btw how do I use CcCleaner? I seem to remember you can really screw things up with it. Are there allot of checdk boxes etc? So at this point, I would rather have an operational 8500 and I can just rebuild the lost folder/files from the bookmarks I found but there's a couple of other things that have happened. My mouse seems over sensitive when I click it and I haven't messed with any of the settings and I've noticed recently that my backspace key doesn't function. It's weird how they changed by themselves. Thanks, Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
btw, I realize I could use my Win 10 HD to do this but it seems
allot of effort just to recover bookmarks. Is there something else were looking for? I just would hate to loose my Win 7 on the 8500 because I depend on it allot and I don't particularly like opening it up to change HD's because with my past history it can create more problems. Robert Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I'm back on the 8500, that was a little scary I was wondering if I would get the 8500 back! Whew! Here's what I was looking at: https://postimg.cc/Cd9M2Cfk I think it was a bad HD. I checked and I have (2) HD's for the 780 with Win 10 and (1) HD for the 8500 with Win 10 but I thought we made more than one HD for the 8500 with Win 7 Pro? So it means I have to buy some HD's and we have to make up at least (2) for the 8500 and (1) for the 780 although I may of just mislabeled them. I would have to put each one in to check for sure but in any case more Win 7 Pro OS is called for and I still need to buy a APC surge protector. btw how do I use CcCleaner? I seem to remember you can really screw things up with it. Are there allot of checdk boxes etc? So at this point, I would rather have an operational 8500 and I can just rebuild the lost folder/files from the bookmarks I found but there's a couple of other things that have happened. My mouse seems over sensitive when I click it and I haven't messed with any of the settings and I've noticed recently that my backspace key doesn't function. It's weird how they changed by themselves. Thanks, Robert There's probably nothing wrong with the hard drive, particularly. Carefully maintain your labeling, so cloned drives are being plugged into the correct machine. Your favorite model of new hard drive, may have been supplanted by a more crappy version. The three platter one you were using, seemed to be nice. But that may have been replaced by a two platter one, and some of those are a bit slower and jerky when loaded up with Windows. We know you don't like the WDC Black, because they're a bit noisy. And they keep messing around with the models anyway, and you have to be careful to not pick something that's taken a turn for the worse. ******* Using the Macrium boot CD, you can select "boot repair" while *only* the defective 8500 drive in in the 8500 tray. And no other drives, not even connected via USB. Just the one drive. One of the menus has a "Boot Repair" item, and this will locate trivially lost items and bolt them back together. If C: on the emergency 8500 drive had been absolutely destroyed (which could happen), then Macrium Boot Repair will not help. The hard drive will remain unbootable if the C: was trashed. Using your collection of backup images, your knowledge of which ones aren't infected, you can put back a good copy of C: over top. But this generally requires two drives (one USB connected), so that you have a source ..mrimg file to use to restore the C: that needs repairing. ******* With regard to what happened to your bookmarks, either you have the correct collection of bookmarks, or you don't. You have to decide, whether your recovery was successful and "the fire is out". I can't tell from here, whether any more forensic effort is required or not. You make it sound like this is a misplacement issue (drag and drop with a sticky mouse button will do that). In which case, you'd make sure your mouse was fully functional, so it doesn't happen a second time. I had to open up my Logitech mouse and do some cleaning up near the buttons on the casing, to restore decent drag (without dropping). I've on occasion, dropped a folder in some obscure spot, and yes, Agent Ransack search finds it for me :-) As long as you haven't deleted the files or the folder, then we don't really need to be using Recuva. It's only if Agent Ransack can't find the correct version, that tools like Recuva (and the correct discipline while using the tool) are required. Try to keep track of your most important materials. If C: became infected, you can restore it from backup. But if you overwrote C: with a really old image, then your bookmarks would take significant damage. You should keep some sort of Exported copy of Bookmarks.html for days like that. It should be stored separately somewhere, and while your regular backups will capture a copy of the bookmarks, to not lose daily bookmark changes, you'd need a daily copy of them. If you absolutely rely on browser-stored password management, then the browser profile folder could be captured as a backup item as well. An Agent Ransack search on C: for "Profiles", will find all sorts of important profiles. Here, I've located the one for the browser I use, Seamonkey. C:\... \Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\1234abcd.default -------- The Profiles folder for the various software products, has things like key3.db or key4.db and some other file similar to that, and that's where persistent password storage is located. Capturing the named folder, the "1234abcd.default" style folder, will capture individual files like key4.db . The easily infectable prefs.js is in there too (the one the adwares like to attack). To make sure you have the correct Profiles item, you'd want to make sure there was a key4.db type file in it, as that indicates it's the correct folder for the job. That 1234abcd.default folder also has "bookmarkbackups", which is the browser version of bookmarks. Doing an Export of Bookmarks, reads the current file from that collection, and delivers it as an HTML file. The HTML file is "the one humans use". It's a wee bit more portable. Paul |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to really concentrate when I read your stuff *L*
First,.. I have started to rebuild my Shopping folder/files and part of the reason was the point you hit on. My link to buying HD's. This is the one we've been using. https://www.newegg.com/seagate-deskt...2E16822148834# I have one Star Tech case left: https://www.newegg.com/startech-sat3...82E16817707227 It says they are out of stock can you suggest another case? What happens with the mouse is that for example, if I'm in my Dell imaging where I usually have 2 screens displayed. Lets say I open a third to do some work but when I close it the mouse closes one of the 2 screens that were open. It didn't use to do that. So I have to set the screens up all over like I had them. That's what happened with the bookmarks it just kept going and did whatever it did. In a way I'm glad this happened because I realized I have zero HD backups for Windows 7 Pro for either computer. I think what happened was that we did have the Win7 Pro OS but we took advantage of the Windows 10 option. Thats why all the HD's were Win 10. So here's the plan; around the end of April I get paid again and will buy (4) HD's so we can create Win 7 Pro OS for both the 8500 and 780 and we can pick up again then. I checked and I do have rescue disks etc that we made before so I'm sure I have something there. You made sure I did everything correct. Oh btw what do you think of me using brushes or compressed air to clean the inside of the computer out? Thoughts/suggestions? Robert |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
btw I have a logitech m310 mouse and cleaned the lens with
some Windex on a q-tip. It seems to have made a difference. Thanks, Robert |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
btw I have a logitech m310 mouse and cleaned the lens with some Windex on a q-tip. It seems to have made a difference. Thanks, Robert Yes, test with a working mouse and see if the symptoms of mis-behavior go away. That would tend to support either a cleaning issue with the defective mouse, or an electrical issue. And if the mouse cable has an open in it, you'd probably have a wider variety of symptoms. The optical part of modern mice is pretty good, when it comes to dust preventing the lens from working. The sensor is more of an array than a single sensor. Don't let the grotty appearance of the plastics they use for those, deceive. I know some people, assume the appearance is a defect, and scrub them, but they don't really need to be scrubbed particularly. Whoever makes the sensor assemblies for those, just doesn't care what the mold plastic looks like :-) Only if some sort of foreign matter (like the mouse fell into a bowl of chili), would it need the real cleaning treatment. But dust does pack in other places, especially around where the mouse button cover plastic on top, meets the microswitch. You can get enough dust impacted, to prevent the microswitch from depressing. When you disassemble a mouse for cleaning, be careful around the scroll wheel. Some scroll wheels have a tiny bit of a clear gel grease on them. And you would not want to remove stuff like that. There are all sorts of fiddly springs on those scroll wheels. When you tilt up the hinged cover, do the tilting in the upright position, so the scroll wheel doesn't fall out of its mount, onto the desk. And all those blasted small parts with it. I learned my lesson when I took my Logitech apart - what I can't believe, is they design them with that many parts inside. It must take a ton of human assemblers to be putting those together. Paul |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I have to really concentrate when I read your stuff *L* First,.. I have started to rebuild my Shopping folder/files and part of the reason was the point you hit on. My link to buying HD's. This is the one we've been using. https://www.newegg.com/seagate-deskt...2E16822148834# I have one Star Tech case left: https://www.newegg.com/startech-sat3...82E16817707227 It says they are out of stock can you suggest another case? What happens with the mouse is that for example, if I'm in my Dell imaging where I usually have 2 screens displayed. Lets say I open a third to do some work but when I close it the mouse closes one of the 2 screens that were open. It didn't use to do that. So I have to set the screens up all over like I had them. That's what happened with the bookmarks it just kept going and did whatever it did. In a way I'm glad this happened because I realized I have zero HD backups for Windows 7 Pro for either computer. I think what happened was that we did have the Win7 Pro OS but we took advantage of the Windows 10 option. Thats why all the HD's were Win 10. So here's the plan; around the end of April I get paid again and will buy (4) HD's so we can create Win 7 Pro OS for both the 8500 and 780 and we can pick up again then. I checked and I do have rescue disks etc that we made before so I'm sure I have something there. You made sure I did everything correct. Oh btw what do you think of me using brushes or compressed air to clean the inside of the computer out? Thoughts/suggestions? Robert The Startech seems to have moved to putting fans, only on their multi-bay enclosures. And those are too expensive for a little occasional usage with a single drive. There is the Rosewill one. This has a fan on it. https://www.newegg.com/rosewill-rx30...82E16817182316 But it's so hard to tell how the drive installs in there, and you know how important that is when they get it wrong. https://www.rosewill.com/product/ros...display-panel/ There is a 55MB user manual with pictures. Their download page is a bit slow, so this will take a bit of time. https://www.rosewill.com/download/us...dl=37249&ind=0 ( from https://www.rosewill.com/download/us...u3-35b-ol-pdf/ ) There aren't going to be as many options with fans. They like to make enclosures without fans, to try to cook the drives. ******* A lot of cleaning methods, to remove dust from computers, generate static electricity. And that isn't always the best for the equipment. If you use the duster-in-a-can, that's a refrigerant, and can drop the temperature of the chips you point it at, quite drastically. They don't have windowed DIP EPROMS in computers any more, but when they did, the low temperature materials in spray cans could kill those. That's the only component I know of, that could be killed by sudden temperature shock. A less-concentrated airflow, like maybe a reversed vacuum cleaner, used outdoors on a table, might be a way to dislodge the dust. Some vacuum cleaners, had fittings so you could reverse the flow for blower applications. Using a vacuum in vacuum mode, isn't recommended. Static discharge can come off the barrel of the metal tube. It's the movement of dust particulate, over the black plastic surfaces of the ICs, that can generate static, and that is static right next to the electrical pins on them. But some static can also be generated on vacuum hoses or tubing, and if the vacuum metal tube touches something, there could be a discharge. It's really hard to give iron-clad guarantees about this topic. If the anti-static police at work were here, they'd be constantly rapping me on the knuckles, for "bad technique". We had some guys, entrusted with that role. Anti-static police. Paul |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read all your info,. and bookmarked the cases and the 55mb file
thanks *s* btw I liked your comment,... if the mouse fell into a bowl of chili *L* I was a bit premature with the mouse and my backspace key still doesn't function. I didn't spill anything etc to cause this it just stopped functioning like the mouse is too sensitive when I open/close things it keeps on going and closes or opens more than I want. Like the Dell Imaging example I gave you. So how do I restore my backspace key and mouse so they are back to 'normal'? hmm I have to check and see if I have a spare mouse or maybe I should just buy a new one? What do you think about restoring the 8500 with the last Mrimg? wouldn't that restore all the bookmarks and maybe fix the mouse and backspace problem or maybe do a system restore? Although I'm a bit iffy of doing so until I have a backup Win 7 Pro created. Ok, this just happened,..... How weird, the 8500 just started up like it was a fan going and then died down again! and now alls quiet! I have never heard it do that! Whats going on ? That was very weird!!! p.s. while were talking about mice, I haven't seen any since you gave me the great advice 8 months ago? Thoughts/suggestions? Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|