If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
I am looking for either an application (preferably freeware) or a Web
site that will reveal the owner of an IPv6 address. I already have an application that does a WhoIs on IPv4 addresses. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there will be an increase in the demand for abortions. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
David E. Ross wrote:
I am looking for either an application (preferably freeware) or a Web site that will reveal the owner of an IPv6 address. I already have an application that does a WhoIs on IPv4 addresses. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ipv6+whois -- I've been here since the beginning and I still don't know what the hell's goin' on. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
On 11/5/2017 6:54 PM, Auric__ wrote:
David E. Ross wrote: I am looking for either an application (preferably freeware) or a Web site that will reveal the owner of an IPv6 address. I already have an application that does a WhoIs on IPv4 addresses. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ipv6+whois After posting my original message, I did locate a few Web tools. I am still interested in locating an IPv6 WhoIs application to install on my PC. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there will be an increase in the demand for abortions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there will be an increase in the demand for abortions. I don't usually respond to sigs, but this one is just inflammatory to me. Instead of blaming Trump for a policy that was debated and passed in some states long before he was in office, maybe the responsibility should be put upon the person who gets pregnant. Condoms are cheap, and, in a lot of places, free for all at the local health and welfare offices. And, as un-fun as it would be, no one ever got pregnant practicing abstinence (except, I suppose, the Virgin Mary) :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
In message , KenW
writes: On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 07:53:49 -0500, "SC Tom" wrote: By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there will be an increase in the demand for abortions. I don't usually respond to sigs, but this one is just inflammatory to me. [] Don't you know, it is an "in" thing to bash Trump. For the uninformed at least or worse. The informed realise that the effort of doing so is not necessary (-: KenW -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf My mission in life is not merely to survive, but to thrive, and to do so with some passion, some compassion, some humour, and some style. - Maya Angelou, quoted by Annabel Nnochiri, in RT 2017/5/13-19 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
"SC Tom" wrote
| I don't usually respond to sigs, but this | one is just inflammatory to me. They're all in bad taste. But I wouldn't have noticed if you hadn't mentioned it. I skip them in general. | maybe the responsibility should be put | upon the person who gets pregnant. I think the idea is to make it as easy as possible to use birth control, because the unplanned pregnancies tend to be among teenagers who have difficulty admitting their own sexual feelings to themselves. Thus, consciously and reasonably planning their sex lives is something they just can't handle. Standardizing birth control makes that a bit easier. Do you really want nervous teenagers to pay their whole life for reckless judgement at 16 years old? | And, as un-fun | as it would be, no one ever got pregnant | practicing abstinence Misery loves company? This is perhaps the best example of hypocrisy on both left and right, which is why abortion is such a central issue of debate. At their extremes the left and right are a kind of polarity. The left is obsessed with personal freedom above all else and they want that legislated. Theirs is the godless consumer approach and quality of life is all that matters. They drive to the store in their giant SUV to buy a 6-pack of disposable soy milk cartons, but it's OK because they brought their own bag and saved a tree. Lip service to moral superiority justifies consumer freedom. Their excuse for funding birth control is concern for womens' freedom. With abortion, for them it's all about the woman's rights. Fight oppression. But really it's about freedom to pursue enjoyment in all things: I pay my taxes. I have a right to have fun with no penalty, from Man or karma. The right is obsessed with rules and traditions and social restrictions. Their excuse for being against abortion rights and funding birth control is usually that the public shouldn't have to pay for personal behavior. The small gov't approach. But the real reason is that they think people should feel guilty about sex and they fear that things will fall apart if social norms change or are even subjected to inspection: If God wanted you to think he would have had you born in Europe. Typically, you couldn't resist adding that no sex is the real safe sex. By disallowing birth control and abortion, they believe, we can artificially revert to Nature's rule that existed up until about 1960: Everyone has to get married and raise kids, or suffer the crazed insanity of no sex life. And everyone is either a rich boss or owes his soul to the company store. Order restored. Then probably global warming would go away because God would be happy. At root their real fear is being responsible for their own actions. Much less stressful to be under the yoke of a God/boss. There's no sin if there's no free will. Just like it says in the Bible.... Oh, wait... never mind. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
In message , Mayayana
writes: [] The right is obsessed with rules and traditions and [] If God wanted you to think he would have had you born in Europe. [] I love that one! -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Our thorny national debate about Brexit could turn out to be irrelevant. Sooner or later the EU as we know it may no longer be there for us to leave. - Katya Adler, BBC Europe editor (RT, 2017/2/4-10) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote
| If God wanted | you to think he would have had you born in Europe. | [] | I love that one! I guess you would. It has to be recognized, though, that the US has a long tradition of willful stupidity, falsely believing it's necessary for equality that no one excel academically. We come from a culture of hayseeds. Good students are harassed. While in Europe there's a long tradition of taking pride in intellectual excellence. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
In message , Mayayana
writes: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote | If God wanted | you to think he would have had you born in Europe. | [] | I love that one! I guess you would. It has to be recognized, though, that the US has a long tradition of willful stupidity, falsely believing it's necessary for equality that no one excel academically. We come from a culture of hayseeds. Good students are harassed. While in Europe there's a long tradition of taking pride in intellectual excellence. Ah, would that it were so! Yes, at some of the universities - some of the German ones, and about two of them here when they dare. But the levelling view is more common he not so much that good students are harassed, more that everyone has to be told they're a good student. (There are periodic backlashes of course - but on the whole, the "everyone is good" view prevails. Often this is confused with "everyone deserves a chance", which is _not_ the same thing; I think most people would agree with that. But anyone who challenges "everyone is good" is in danger of being accused of attacking "everyone deserves a chance", even though mostly they're not.) -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf "We're plumbing shallows we didn't know existed here" - Jeremy Paxman (as quizmaster of "University Challenge"), 1998 (when losing team suddenly put on a spurt by showing knowledge of things like the Eurovision Song Contest ...) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
Il giorno Mon 06 Nov 2017 03:54:11a, *Auric__* ha inviato su
alt.windows7.general il messaggio 15.223. Vediamo cosa ha scritto: http://lmgtfy.com this new version is too much polite where is the good old one with that sarcastic question at the end? I remember something like "Was it so difficult?" -- /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\ -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=- http://www.bb2002.it ............ [ al lavoro ] ........... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote
| Ah, would that it were so! Yes, at some of the universities - some of | the German ones, and about two of them here when they dare. But the | levelling view is more common he not so much that good students are | harassed, more that everyone has to be told they're a good student. That's true here, too. I guess I think of them as two different things. The anti-intelligence position is somewhat of an American tradition. The "man of action" is the idealized type. He represents winning through ambition. The existence of unequal talents and unequal opportunity conflict with our mythology. But the approach of giving everyone a trophy has also developed here. It seems that we've equated gross egoism with self-respect. Pride means in-your- face. Integrity means not backing down on what you want. And Heaven forbid we should introduce self doubt with constructive criticism or imposed discipline. The kids end up seeming confident, but at some level they undoubtedly sense that the whole thing is neither honest nor wholesome. It reminds me of a high school sports cheer: We're from [your town here] And no one could be prouder If you can't hear us We'll yell a little louder. That chant would be done maybe a half dozen times, presumably intimidating the opposing team. But that was just high school sports. Now swaggering has become an advanced skill that indicates.... balanced self-actualization! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
Ammammata wrote:
Il giorno Mon 06 Nov 2017 03:54:11a, *Auric__* ha inviato su alt.windows7.general il messaggio 15.223. Vediamo cosa ha scritto: http://lmgtfy.com this new version is too much polite where is the good old one with that sarcastic question at the end? I remember something like "Was it so difficult?" Probably too many complaints from special snowflakes. "You hurt my widdle feewings, waaaaah!" -- Illnesses include The Common Cold, Bad Hair Day, Relationship Problems, Unemployment, and Paranoia. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
IPv6 Ownership
Il giorno Thu 09 Nov 2017 04:10:22a, *Auric__* ha inviato su
alt.windows7.general il messaggio 15.223. Vediamo cosa ha scritto: where is the good old one with that sarcastic question at the end? I remember something like "Was it so difficult?" Probably too many complaints from special snowflakes. "You hurt my widdle feewings, waaaaah!" I wrote to the developer to allow customized messages... -- /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\ -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=- http://www.bb2002.it ............ [ al lavoro ] ........... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|