A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 28th 17, 03:11 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Jonas S Schneider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

I changed the browser so I did a basic check at panopticlick.eff.org only
to find that my system fonts are basically making me unique no matter what
browser I use on WinXP or what IP address I have.

Is there a trick to just the system fonts that everyone else has, so that I
can delete the ones that are making me unique?

I know fonts get scattered about depending on what is installed but what
I'm asking is if there is a common cleanup program (like ccleaner is for
other stuff) which cleans up non-standard Windows XP fonts.

Does such a font cleaner exist?
Ads
  #2  
Old April 28th 17, 05:56 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
R.Wieser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,302
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

Jonas,

You have not told us which browser you use, but a browser like FireFox
allows you to change its "user-agent" string, even allowing you to disguise
yourself as a fully different browser.

https://superuser.com/questions/9879...-user-agent-vi
a-aboutconfig

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


-- Origional message:
Jonas S Schneider schreef in berichtnieuws
...
I changed the browser so I did a basic check at panopticlick.eff.org only
to find that my system fonts are basically making me unique no matter what
browser I use on WinXP or what IP address I have.

Is there a trick to just the system fonts that everyone else has, so that

I
can delete the ones that are making me unique?

I know fonts get scattered about depending on what is installed but what
I'm asking is if there is a common cleanup program (like ccleaner is for
other stuff) which cleans up non-standard Windows XP fonts.

Does such a font cleaner exist?



  #3  
Old April 28th 17, 07:13 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
VanguardLH[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,881
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

"R.Wieser" wrote:

Note: Wieser puts attribution lines before his reply making it appear
the quoted poster said his reply (nothing to do with the top- versus
bottom-posting argument). Attribution order was corrected.

Jonas wrote:

I changed the browser so I did a basic check at panopticlick.eff.org
only to find that my system fonts are basically making me unique no
matter what browser I use on WinXP or what IP address I have.

Is there a trick to just the system fonts that everyone else has, so
that I can delete the ones that are making me unique?

I know fonts get scattered about depending on what is installed but
what I'm asking is if there is a common cleanup program (like
ccleaner is for other stuff) which cleans up non-standard Windows XP
fonts.

Does such a font cleaner exist?


You have not told us which browser you use, but a browser like FireFox
allows you to change its "user-agent" string, even allowing you to disguise
yourself as a fully different browser.


How would changing the web browser's UA string help? If he is using
Firefox, that stat buries him within the entire community of Firefox
users to make him NOT unique. If he uses a Google Chrome Chrome UA
string then he is hidden amongst all those users. If he uses a UA
string that differs from the rendering engine in his real web browser,
sites may not function properly. For example, if he uses a mobile web
browser UA then the site may present a less functional, reduced size, or
stripped web site along with one that doesn't present an entire page but
keeps appending content when he scrolls to the current end of page (the
page keeps growing). If he used a unique UA string then obviously he
would be highly identifiable.

That site can rely ONLY on the number of visitors that have used it as
their sampling on which to judge uniqueness. They've only had 215,282
visitors, plus that community does not represent the typical user
community (it is not a proper random sampling) hence results are highly
skewed. This is like visiting a forum and wondering why everyone is
reporting problems with a program. Users don't visit forums to deposit
glowing product reviews there. They go to the forums to get help. You
think 200K for a /non-random/ sampling size accurately reflects the
entire web surfing community of 3.4 *BILLION* users
(http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/)?

If you use an extension to randomize canvas reads, this site won't test
that. They assume whatever value your client returns to them is static.
So using a canvas blocker will not reflect that your value changes on
every canvas read to eradicate that value from their fingerprint rating.

The panopticlick rating has little value. Extremely small sampling size
which is not random, doesn't reiterate the test to check for varying
results (e.g., canvas and webgl reads), and weights the rating of each
fingerprint component by the "one in X" value which is based on just
that non-random small sampling. Considering that few users do not
disable DOM Storage in their web browsers or clear it upon exit from the
web browser, that fingerprinting is irrelevant. A site can use DOM
Storage (instead of cookies) to track you. They don't check for the
window object's name (not what you see in the titlebar but the object
name) which can be used to track you between pages (I've used it instead
of Referer). If you save Site Preferences in Firefox, there is a known
hack that creates a unique hash across Firefox sessions. This site
won't test that because it would have to remember your values between
sessions which means you would need to have an account there, do a test,
unload the web browser, re-login, and continue the test.

The point of testing how big a fingerprint you have is to determine how
effectively you *might* be tracked but using only that scheme. I've
found panopticlick to be of little value as to how visible I am
regarding trackability. It is a poor measure. It has little value in
tracking YOU. I could have a very low fingerprint rating at
panopticlick and still be easily tracked if I didn't lock down the web
browser (as much as possible since some are more configurable than
others).

  #4  
Old April 28th 17, 09:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Jonas S Schneider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:13:05 -0500, VanguardLH wrote:

How would changing the web browser's UA string help? If he is using
Firefox, that stat buries him within the entire community of Firefox
users to make him NOT unique. If he uses a Google Chrome Chrome UA
string then he is hidden amongst all those users.


While we can pick a UA string for the most common browser for the given
platform, the UA string will have zero effect on the system fonts.

The classic technique to lower your fingerprinting level is to work down
from the worst offender, which for me is not my UA string but my total
collection of fonts on the system.

If there was a "font cleaner" like there is a "crap cleaner", that would be
ideal as all I want to do is pare down my fonts to whatever fonts are most
common on Windows XP systems today.

The way to do that is to get rid of the fonts that are not common.
But how does one accomplish that easily?

That site can rely ONLY on the number of visitors that have used it as
their sampling on which to judge uniqueness. They've only had 215,282
visitors


While that is partly true, that's besides the point. Panopticlick has been
around for years, and they reset their numbers periodically, so I've been
unique in the past (mostly due to odd scree size, incidentally) out of six
million users, the number of users only has to be at a basic level to give
you an "idea" of how bad your fingerprint is.

My fingerprint is bad. Real bad. Mostly due to fonts, surprisingly.
It wouldn't need to tell me anything more if ten million people used that
site.

All it would tell me if ten million people used it is that there are ten or
twenty other guys like I am, but that's still way too easily fingerprinted.

While you'd love to be in the millions, what you can realistically aim for
is to be fingerprinted to the low tens of thousands, but certainly not the
low tens.

plus that community does not represent the typical user
community (it is not a proper random sampling) hence results are highly
skewed.


Again, it doesn't matter.
What matters is how easily you are fingerprintable.
And, what property of your system is causing you to be most
fingerprintable.

In my system, the font list is what is causing me to be easily
fingerprinted. Unique or not, tens or not, it's still the fonts that are
most different on my system from yours and the guy next door and the lady
across the street.

All I'm asking for is whether anyone knows of a font-cleaner program (sort
of like how crap cleaner works) that will clean out the non-Windows fonts
easily.

Otherwise, I have to become a font expert to root out all the foreign
fonts. That's possible. But I'd rather not become a font expert.

I'd just like to get to a list of fonts that is the same as most others
have.

If you use an extension to randomize canvas reads, this site won't test
that. They assume whatever value your client returns to them is static.
So using a canvas blocker will not reflect that your value changes on
every canvas read to eradicate that value from their fingerprint rating.


Canvas blocking isn't my biggest problem.
Fonts are.

The panopticlick rating has little value.


I understand what you're saying because you're interpreting the value of
the results totally differently than I am.

It's like my son takes 50 and divides by 5.12345 and then gives me an
answer that is out to twenty digits when the answer is really just "10".

All I want from panopticlick is for it to tell me which is my "worst"
offender. And for me, there is absolutely no doubt that it is the fonts on
my system based on their report.

That result isn't likely to change even if they had ten million viewers.

I've
found panopticlick to be of little value as to how visible I am
regarding trackability. It is a poor measure. It has little value in
tracking YOU.


I think you interpret the results differently than I do.
I look for the worst offender.
You seem to care more about the individual values.
I place little to no meaning in the individual values because the weakest
link is the issue.

It's like the French putting so much trust in the Maginot line that they
didn't bother having a strategic reserve.

What Panopticick told me was that I need a strategic reserve which is I
need to reduce my fonts to a level that is more like what most people have.

I can become a font expert to do that, or, I can find a program that does
that for me. If the program was easy to find, I wouldn't even be here.

The only question I'm asking of you windows xp experts is whether you know
of an easy way to get the fonts back to what most people have.

I could have a very low fingerprint rating at
panopticlick and still be easily tracked if I didn't lock down the web
browser (as much as possible since some are more configurable than
others).


I don't know how you're using Panopticlick, but I use it simply to tell me
the worst offender. Then I fix that. Then I move on to the next worse
offender. And I fix that. At some point I run into something that I can't
fix, but by then, I should be in the range of a lot more people.

I already did this once where my screen resolution was so odd that it was
the worse offender on a system that was pretty darn clean. I fixed that
(which wasn't intuitive because I couldn't change the screen itself) but
that's what I'm doing here.

All I'm asking of windows experts is how to get the fonts back to what most
people have.

Any ideas on that question?
  #5  
Old April 28th 17, 09:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Jonas S Schneider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:56:13 +0200, "R.Wieser"
wrote:

You have not told us which browser you use, but a browser like FireFox
allows you to change its "user-agent" string, even allowing you to disguise
yourself as a fully different browser.


Thanks. I see that Vanguard explained already that this is about the system
and application fonts installed on the entire Windows PC.

What happens is that panopticlick runs a Java (or Flash?) program which
reveals to the web server *all* the fonts on your system.

From that, they can "fingerprint" you (in addition to other things).

It's hard to explain if you've never been to panopticlick, but if you go
there once, you'll see that they list a dozen items which they use to
fingerprint you, where your job is to look at the worst one and fix it.

For me, the worst one is that the fonts scattered about on my WinXP system
pretty much make me unique.

So the question is merely whether there is an *easy* way to get back to
whatever fonts that most systems have, where I surmise the easiest way to
do that is to find a "font cleaner" (similar in operation to how ccleaner
works for example).

Does anyone know of such a font cleaner for WinXP?
  #6  
Old April 28th 17, 09:38 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
R.Wieser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,302
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

VanguardLH,

Note: Wieser puts attribution lines before his reply making it
appear the quoted poster said his reply


Really ? I mean, I did address the OP before talking to him further. Are
you *that* easy to confuse ?

As for the rest of your "rebuttal":

How would changing the web browser's UA string help? If he is
using Firefox, that stat buries him within the entire community of
Firefox users to make him NOT unique.


You obviously didn't actually read the OPs post, did you ? You see, in it
he mentioned a few things that *do* make him stand out.

If he uses a UA string that differs from the rendering engine in his
real web browser, sites may not function properly.


Yep. But that was not what the OP was asking about, now was he ? And I
assumed him for smart enough to read-up on the warnings the websites most
likely include with their explanation to how-and-where to make such a UA
change.

But, don't let me stop you from telling him about all the dangers of
changing *anything* to his browser. My god man! Next thing you know he
will go and disable JS or something. What will the world come to than ? :-)

For example, if he uses a mobile web browser UA [snip]


Yeah, yeah. If he chooses to cloak himself as something *fully different*
than what he actually is than he could get into "troubles". Troubles, by
the way, which can be easily solved by removing the cloaking. So what are
you getting riled all up about ?

And by the way: What *I* ment to suggest is for him to look at his browsers
UA, and remove the parts that make him stand out. Nothing more, nothing
less.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

P.s.
You "fixing" my posts ? Thats rather "not done" on usenet. And no, two
wrongs do not make a right.


-- Origional message:
VanguardLH schreef in berichtnieuws
...
"R.Wieser" wrote:

Note: Wieser puts attribution lines before his reply making it appear
the quoted poster said his reply (nothing to do with the top- versus
bottom-posting argument). Attribution order was corrected.

Jonas wrote:

I changed the browser so I did a basic check at panopticlick.eff.org
only to find that my system fonts are basically making me unique no
matter what browser I use on WinXP or what IP address I have.

Is there a trick to just the system fonts that everyone else has, so
that I can delete the ones that are making me unique?

I know fonts get scattered about depending on what is installed but
what I'm asking is if there is a common cleanup program (like
ccleaner is for other stuff) which cleans up non-standard Windows XP
fonts.

Does such a font cleaner exist?


You have not told us which browser you use, but a browser like FireFox
allows you to change its "user-agent" string, even allowing you to

disguise
yourself as a fully different browser.


How would changing the web browser's UA string help? If he is using
Firefox, that stat buries him within the entire community of Firefox
users to make him NOT unique. If he uses a Google Chrome Chrome UA
string then he is hidden amongst all those users. If he uses a UA
string that differs from the rendering engine in his real web browser,
sites may not function properly. For example, if he uses a mobile web
browser UA then the site may present a less functional, reduced size, or
stripped web site along with one that doesn't present an entire page but
keeps appending content when he scrolls to the current end of page (the
page keeps growing). If he used a unique UA string then obviously he
would be highly identifiable.

That site can rely ONLY on the number of visitors that have used it as
their sampling on which to judge uniqueness. They've only had 215,282
visitors, plus that community does not represent the typical user
community (it is not a proper random sampling) hence results are highly
skewed. This is like visiting a forum and wondering why everyone is
reporting problems with a program. Users don't visit forums to deposit
glowing product reviews there. They go to the forums to get help. You
think 200K for a /non-random/ sampling size accurately reflects the
entire web surfing community of 3.4 *BILLION* users
(
http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/)?

If you use an extension to randomize canvas reads, this site won't test
that. They assume whatever value your client returns to them is static.
So using a canvas blocker will not reflect that your value changes on
every canvas read to eradicate that value from their fingerprint rating.

The panopticlick rating has little value. Extremely small sampling size
which is not random, doesn't reiterate the test to check for varying
results (e.g., canvas and webgl reads), and weights the rating of each
fingerprint component by the "one in X" value which is based on just
that non-random small sampling. Considering that few users do not
disable DOM Storage in their web browsers or clear it upon exit from the
web browser, that fingerprinting is irrelevant. A site can use DOM
Storage (instead of cookies) to track you. They don't check for the
window object's name (not what you see in the titlebar but the object
name) which can be used to track you between pages (I've used it instead
of Referer). If you save Site Preferences in Firefox, there is a known
hack that creates a unique hash across Firefox sessions. This site
won't test that because it would have to remember your values between
sessions which means you would need to have an account there, do a test,
unload the web browser, re-login, and continue the test.

The point of testing how big a fingerprint you have is to determine how
effectively you *might* be tracked but using only that scheme. I've
found panopticlick to be of little value as to how visible I am
regarding trackability. It is a poor measure. It has little value in
tracking YOU. I could have a very low fingerprint rating at
panopticlick and still be easily tracked if I didn't lock down the web
browser (as much as possible since some are more configurable than
others).



  #7  
Old April 28th 17, 10:55 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:11:17 +0000 (UTC), Jonas S Schneider
wrote:

I changed the browser so I did a basic check at panopticlick.eff.org only
to find that my system fonts are basically making me unique no matter what
browser I use on WinXP or what IP address I have.

Is there a trick to just the system fonts that everyone else has, so that I
can delete the ones that are making me unique?

I know fonts get scattered about depending on what is installed but what
I'm asking is if there is a common cleanup program (like ccleaner is for
other stuff) which cleans up non-standard Windows XP fonts.

Does such a font cleaner exist?


Yes, and I use it. It's called "Font Frenzy". The homepage
went down years ago, so you will have to search for it.
It's portable, and keeps backups, in case you have to restore
fonts for an app.
[]'s

Found it:

http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/deta...nt_frenzy.html
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
  #8  
Old April 29th 17, 01:04 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Jonas S Schneider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:55:57 -0300, Shadow wrote:

Yes, and I use it. It's called "Font Frenzy". The homepage
went down years ago, so you will have to search for it.
It's portable, and keeps backups, in case you have to restore
fonts for an app.
[]'s

Found it:

http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/deta...nt_frenzy.html


Thank you for helping on the question of where to find a "font cleaner"
application.

I put it in my c:\progs\cleaners\{recuva,ffrenzy,ccleaner,dupclea ner,etc.}
directory, which seemed like the appropriate category for the start menu.

That site sure does *hide* the actual link even though there are more than
a half-dozen "download now" buttons (for other things). :-)

I think this is the actual download link:
http://www.majorgeeks.com/mg/getmirr..._frenzy,1.html
http://www.majorgeeks.com/mg/getmirr..._frenzy,2.html
http://www.majorgeeks.com/mg/getmirr..._frenzy,3.html
etc.

Here's the description of the program:
Font Frenzy 1.5.152

Quote:
It's a fact that Windows fonts slow down your computer. Every font that
gets installed on your PC slows down the boot-up time and slows down your
normal operational speed.

Many programs that you install automatically add their own set of fonts,
and very soon you can end up with a frenzy of unnecessary fonts clogging up
your computer. Unless you use all of these fonts regularly, they are simply
wasting your system resources.

Font Frenzy is a font manager designed to help you to view, install, and
uninstall your fonts - it can help you "defrenzy" your whole font folder
and put an end to font frustration and slow boot-up times.

Font Frenzy allows you to strip away all your excess fonts and restores
your system to only the fonts that are essential to Windows, giving you the
maximum performance speed possible. Read more at: https://tr.im/1ZVw2
More after I use it...
  #9  
Old April 29th 17, 01:04 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Jonas S Schneider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:38:14 +0200, "R.Wieser"
wrote:

And by the way: What *I* ment to suggest is for him to look at his browsers
UA, and remove the parts that make him stand out. Nothing more, nothing
less.


I realize you were responding to someone else, but just to explain further,
all I'm "trying" to do is attack the biggest fingerprint problem first.

It's a normal way to approach such things since you never know which
fingerprinting technique sites will use. If I knew that the UA string was
the "most important", I'd attack it (but it's so easy to spoof that I
wouldn't bother with asking since there are extensions and methods abound
to change the UA string).

The problem on the fonts is that I am just looking for a program to make my
life easier. Sure, I can manually do anything but then I have to learn more
about fonts than I need to 'if' ... if a program already exists.

It's like building my own "ccleaner" or "irfanview" or "vlc". Sure, I
probably can become an expert in each, but the hope is that someone else
already specialized in that.

To that end, this thread is really here to only ask the one question of
whether anyone knows of an existing "font cleaner" which will identify all
the non-standard fonts on any WinXP computer, and allow you to easily
delete them.
  #10  
Old April 29th 17, 01:34 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Jonas S Schneider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:04:27 +0000 (UTC), Jonas S Schneider
wrote:

Font Frenzy allows you to strip away all your excess fonts and restores
your system to only the fonts that are essential to Windows, giving you the
maximum performance speed possible. Read more at: https://tr.im/1ZVw2
[/quote]

More after I use it...


The program installed quickly and went where I wanted it to go.
c:\progs\cleaners\ffrenzy\

It didn't create a desktop shortcut for my custom start menu, so I just cut
and paste from the "programs" menu the font frenzy shortcut into my own
start menu (Start Menu Cleaners FFrenzy.lnk)

It came up with a list of "Installed Fonts" and five buttons
Defrenzy -- removes all fonts except those shipped with Windows XP!
FrenzySnap -- font snapshots to use to restore original fonts
Refrenzy -- reinstalling fonts after taking font snapshots
FrenzyMan -- font management like delete, view, add, etc.
FrenzyInfo -- it's the help menu

I hit the "FrenzySnap" button to make a snapshot of existing fonts.
Then I hit the "DeFrenzy" button to remove all but WindowsXP fonts.
http://i.cubeupload.com/5ZS5GI.gif

Surprisingly there were 357 fonts removed, with only two errors:
Error 1503: Unknown Font Type (C:\WINDOWS\Fonts\SNAP____.TTF)
Error 1503: Unknown Font Type (C:\WINDOWS\Fonts\CAMBRIA.TTC)
Both of which I simply removed manually (one of which was huge).
http://i.cubeupload.com/nB4f4x.gif

Running "Start Menu Cleaner FFrenzy" again, the log showed no font
needed to be deleted.

Going back to panopticlick.eff.org, I was still "unique" but that isn't
what I concentrate on. What changed was that the "System Fonts" section was
no longer the worst fingerprinting offender.

Surprisingly, and ironically (considering the earlier discussion about the
browser UA), the UA became the most revealing of my system characteristics!
http://i.cubeupload.com/i20npm.gif

I think it's humorous that the fingerprinting brought us back to the UA
string, but that's so easy to spoof that I'm not in need of help I don't
think (even though this is a new browser to me so I don't know how it does
UA spoofing).

The end result is that the FontFrenzy program is *easy* to use, and it
seems to do *exactly* what you want, which is in one button press, it
restores your fonts to the ones that Windows came with, and no others!

Thanks Shadow for being a Windows expert!
You saved all of us a *lot* of work because otherwise we'd have to become
font experts ourselves - whereas I'd rather push the button!

Thanks!
  #11  
Old April 29th 17, 01:44 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
VanguardLH[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,881
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

Jonas S Schneider wrote:

If there was a "font cleaner" like there is a "crap cleaner", that would be
ideal as all I want to do is pare down my fonts to whatever fonts are most
common on Windows XP systems today.


You can delete the fonts yourself. However, to know which ones to keep
that came included in Windows XP, find a list of them, like:

http://www.styopkin.com/articles/fon...led_winxp.html

However, since you installed software that also installed fonts, they
may puke when you delete their font. For example, they may use a font
in their toolbars or alongside icon and not having those fonts means the
next best matching font gets used which could be too big to fit or too
small it view easily. What you might want to try first is to hide all
the non-standard fonts. Right-click on a font and select Hide. Then
check if panopticlick can see those hidden fonts.

http://www.styopkin.com/articles/uninstall_fonts.html

Hiding is available in Windows 7 that I use. If hiding is not available
in Windows XP, see if you can drag the font to a temp folder. Then zip
up the folder and stow away the .zip file so you can recover a font that
you find later is still needed.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1768888,00.asp
  #12  
Old April 29th 17, 01:54 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
VanguardLH[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,881
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

Jonas S Schneider wrote:

What happens is that panopticlick runs a Java (or Flash?) program which
reveals to the web server *all* the fonts on your system.


Javascript can be used but is clumsy. The script iterates through a
long list of known fonts and tests to see if each one is available.
Usually Flash scripting is used to get the list of fonts on the client
end.

At panopticlick, if you disable Javascript, you'll never get past the
initial page of "Testing your browser". It can't proceed. Lots of
users use NoScript or other Javascript blockers. Until they trust a
site (or succumb to that site's requirement so the page is usable), they
don't allow Javascript. Nowadays it's pretty hard to avoid Javascript.
  #13  
Old April 29th 17, 07:16 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
R.Wieser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,302
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

Jonas,

I realize you were responding to someone else, but just to explain

further,
all I'm "trying" to do is attack the biggest fingerprint problem first.


Thats a good idea ...

It's a normal way to approach such things since you never know which
fingerprinting technique sites will use.


... but when you do not know where that "biggest problem" resides that will
be a bit hard. :-)

If I knew that the UA string was the "most important",


For this you have my apologies. I'm so accustomed to having scripting
turned off, I often do not think about it until way to late (in a
non-scripting environment th UA is pretty-much the only thing giving your
secrets away - which you probably already know).

To that end, this thread is really here to only ask the one question
of whether anyone knows of an existing "font cleaner" which will
identify all the non-standard fonts on any WinXP computer, and
allow you to easily delete them.


If that really is what you want to do than you could do that manually. Just
go to the control panel, select fonts, and remove to your hearts desire.

But please do realize that by going that way you will ultimatily be left
with a machine which you can't do anything personalized with anymore, as you
need to keep it level with the rest of the mowing field. :-|

My suggestion would be to see if you can figure out which identifying
methods are the most used, and try to curtail them*. Presuming that JS
playes a big role in it, you could see if you could override certain
commands to only return some predetermined values, which you can probably do
with GreaseMonkey.

*just now the "privacy mode" of FF comes to mind.

Ofcourse, the first thing I would suggest is to see if you can simply refuse
requests from (most always third-party) websites who think they should be
fingerprinting in the first place. My plugin of choice for that is
RequestPolicy, but NoScript would most likely also work.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


-- Origional message:
Jonas S Schneider schreef in berichtnieuws
...
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:38:14 +0200, "R.Wieser"
wrote:

And by the way: What *I* ment to suggest is for him to look at his

browsers
UA, and remove the parts that make him stand out. Nothing more, nothing
less.


I realize you were responding to someone else, but just to explain

further,
all I'm "trying" to do is attack the biggest fingerprint problem first.

It's a normal way to approach such things since you never know which
fingerprinting technique sites will use. If I knew that the UA string was
the "most important", I'd attack it (but it's so easy to spoof that I
wouldn't bother with asking since there are extensions and methods abound
to change the UA string).

The problem on the fonts is that I am just looking for a program to make

my
life easier. Sure, I can manually do anything but then I have to learn

more
about fonts than I need to 'if' ... if a program already exists.

It's like building my own "ccleaner" or "irfanview" or "vlc". Sure, I
probably can become an expert in each, but the hope is that someone else
already specialized in that.

To that end, this thread is really here to only ask the one question of
whether anyone knows of an existing "font cleaner" which will identify all
the non-standard fonts on any WinXP computer, and allow you to easily
delete them.



  #14  
Old April 29th 17, 08:36 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Paul[_32_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,873
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

Jonas S Schneider wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:56:13 +0200, "R.Wieser"
wrote:

You have not told us which browser you use, but a browser like FireFox
allows you to change its "user-agent" string, even allowing you to
disguise
yourself as a fully different browser.


Thanks. I see that Vanguard explained already that this is about the system
and application fonts installed on the entire Windows PC.
What happens is that panopticlick runs a Java (or Flash?) program which
reveals to the web server *all* the fonts on your system.

From that, they can "fingerprint" you (in addition to other things).

It's hard to explain if you've never been to panopticlick, but if you go
there once, you'll see that they list a dozen items which they use to
fingerprint you, where your job is to look at the worst one and fix it.

For me, the worst one is that the fonts scattered about on my WinXP system
pretty much make me unique.
So the question is merely whether there is an *easy* way to get back to
whatever fonts that most systems have, where I surmise the easiest way to
do that is to find a "font cleaner" (similar in operation to how ccleaner
works for example).

Does anyone know of such a font cleaner for WinXP?


http://www.networkworld.com/article/...-to-erase.html

"Circumventing the Fingerprint

A better approach is to make your browser fingerprint as common
and generic as possible. You can do that by running the browser
inside a clean and un-customized virtual machine. It’s only in
this kind of environment that it’s feasible to revert to the clean
state at the end of every use, preventing the accumulation of
identifying changes. This approach gives the browser a truly
generic identifier, while eliminating all other kinds of tracking
techniques."

The idea is, you install the OS, install the browser, shut down the
VM and make a backup copy. Now, unpack a fresh copy of the OS image,
before using the browser in it. This prevents cookies from being
collected (even in DOM). And by using an out-of-the-box setup with
minimal customization, your panopticlick should be "better but not perfect".

Paul
  #15  
Old April 29th 17, 03:04 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default Changed browser and noticed system fonts are making me unique

On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:34:18 +0000 (UTC), Jonas S Schneider
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:04:27 +0000 (UTC), Jonas S Schneider
wrote:

Font Frenzy allows you to strip away all your excess fonts and restores
your system to only the fonts that are essential to Windows, giving you the
maximum performance speed possible. Read more at: https://tr.im/1ZVw2
[/quote]

More after I use it...


The program installed quickly and went where I wanted it to go.
c:\progs\cleaners\ffrenzy\

It didn't create a desktop shortcut for my custom start menu, so I just cut
and paste from the "programs" menu the font frenzy shortcut into my own
start menu (Start Menu Cleaners FFrenzy.lnk)

It came up with a list of "Installed Fonts" and five buttons
Defrenzy -- removes all fonts except those shipped with Windows XP!
FrenzySnap -- font snapshots to use to restore original fonts
Refrenzy -- reinstalling fonts after taking font snapshots
FrenzyMan -- font management like delete, view, add, etc.
FrenzyInfo -- it's the help menu

I hit the "FrenzySnap" button to make a snapshot of existing fonts.
Then I hit the "DeFrenzy" button to remove all but WindowsXP fonts.
http://i.cubeupload.com/5ZS5GI.gif

Surprisingly there were 357 fonts removed, with only two errors:
Error 1503: Unknown Font Type (C:\WINDOWS\Fonts\SNAP____.TTF)
Error 1503: Unknown Font Type (C:\WINDOWS\Fonts\CAMBRIA.TTC)
Both of which I simply removed manually (one of which was huge).
http://i.cubeupload.com/nB4f4x.gif

Running "Start Menu Cleaner FFrenzy" again, the log showed no font
needed to be deleted.

Going back to panopticlick.eff.org, I was still "unique" but that isn't
what I concentrate on. What changed was that the "System Fonts" section was
no longer the worst fingerprinting offender.

Surprisingly, and ironically (considering the earlier discussion about the
browser UA), the UA became the most revealing of my system characteristics!
http://i.cubeupload.com/i20npm.gif

I think it's humorous that the fingerprinting brought us back to the UA
string, but that's so easy to spoof that I'm not in need of help I don't
think (even though this is a new browser to me so I don't know how it does
UA spoofing).

The end result is that the FontFrenzy program is *easy* to use, and it
seems to do *exactly* what you want, which is in one button press, it
restores your fonts to the ones that Windows came with, and no others!

Thanks Shadow for being a Windows expert!
You saved all of us a *lot* of work because otherwise we'd have to become
font experts ourselves - whereas I'd rather push the button!

Thanks!


YW. The only problem is that some installed programs require
special fonts. I have a Brazilian dictionary that needs it's own set
of hand brewed fonts. So I went to font frenzy's backup folder,
(FontFrenzy\Fonts) and copied the necessary fonts over to
windows\fonts.
I then defrenzied and gave the backup the name of the
dictionary. So whenever I have to use the dictionary, I just restore
that backup (over 20 fonts) with a click, use the dictionary, then
"defrenzy" again. It's annoying, but works.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.