If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
LAN Connections in XP
Host #1:
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.11.10(Preferred) Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.11.1 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.11.1 Host #2: IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1 Host #3: IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.8(Preferred) Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1 Host #2 just says "IP address", not "IPv4 address". Is host #2 your Windows XP host? Does your router actually have 2 DHCP servers to serve different subnets? I don't remember seeing consumer-grade routers with multiple DHCP servers. If it has just one DHCP server (likely), what is its IP address and [sub]netmask values? Are you chaining routers (one router chains to the main router that goes to the cable modem)? Are you using an AP (access point) for wi-fi access that chains to the main router going to the cable modem? If so, did you leave the DHCP server enabled in the downstream router or AP instead of having it pass that traffic up to the main router's DHCP server? If you don't want subnetting then use the downstream router or AP as a simple switch, not as a router and not using its DHCP server. Host #1 = 192.168.11.10 Host #2 = 192.168. 0. 2 Host #3 = 192.168. 0. 8 (spaces added only to provide alignment for readability) You've got 2 hosts on 192.168.0.x and one on 192.168.11.x. Two are have a 3rd octet of 0 (zero) while one has a 3rd octet of 11. While all of them use 255.255.255.0 for the subnet mask, that mask only covers addresses in the 192.168.1.0/24 range (or 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.1.255). 192.168.11.x is outside that range so it is in a different subnet than for your other two hosts. If you don't want to change the assigned IP address to each host, you need to change their subnet mask so they are within the same subnet, like 255.255.0.0 (or 255.255.240.0 at a minimum). http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=192.168...ask1=20&mask2= To get 11.x into the same subnet as for 0.x, you need the netmask to have zeros (which bits to ignore or put under the same subnet) under the maximum significant binary digits for an address. 11 decimal = 1101 binary. That's 4 more digits you want to include in addressing to stay in the same subnet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subnetwork Traffic is exchanged (routed) between subnetworks with special gateways (routers) when the routing prefixes of the source address and the destination address differ. A router constitutes the logical or physical boundary between the subnets. That is true *if* the router is configured to allow traffic between its subnets. Is it? If you want 11.x and 0.x to be in the same subnet, does your router use a subnet mask of 255.255.240.0, or lower? If you want one host's IP address to be in a subnet of another host, their subnet masks must span a range to include both addresses. The subnet mask defines the boundaries (addressing range) of an IP subnet. The router might have a feature to allow traffic between subnets (if enabled). It might not. Tough to know what is in your network, how devices are chained, and how they are configured. Subnetting might be the problem. Might not if the router(s) were configured to pass traffic between them. For example, the corporate network did not want our high volume of test traffic to our test hosts on their network. We employed a switch that simply isolated each subnet. Traffic on the alpha lab's subnet stayed in the alpha lab's network and did not impinge on the corporate network; however, select alpha lab hosts in the switch's config were allowed to connect to the corporate subnet. Routers have switches, too. Traffic isolation was afforded by restricting traffic across subnets. Are you sure the printer is configured as a shareable resource on your Windows XP host? On the host (Windows XP) to which the printer is attached, go to Control Panel - Printers and Other Hardware - Printers and Faxes. Right-click on the printer. Under the Sharing tab, is the printer shared? Under the Additional Drivers button, you have to enable the driver(s) that each of your other host(s) will use. Also, back under the Security tab (of the Windows XP host to which the printer is connected), check the Everyone security group is listed as having Print permission. Being able to find a printer doesn't necessarily grant permission to use it. "bought a new Brother printer and connected it to my XP machine" does not say you installed the device's driver. https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/.../bb457001.aspx https://www.microsoft.com/resources/....mspx?mfr=true When you get prompted that you need permissions for Administrator, it is NOT asking for you to use an admin-level account on the host you are using. It is asking for the admin on the OTHER host to grant your permission to connect there. You have to go to other host to which you are trying to connect (and to which the printer is connected) to grant the host you are currently using to connect that other host. For whatever account name under which you log under on one host, did you define an account on Windows XP by the same name and password? |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
LAN Connections in XP
On Mon, 15 May 2017 03:11:48 -0500, VanguardLH wrote:
Host #1 = 192.168.11.10 Host #2 = 192.168. 0. 2 Host #3 = 192.168. 0. 8 You made the same mistake I did. 192.168.11.10 was the IP of another poster trying to help Only 192.168.0.2 and 192.168.0.8 were from the OP. He can't ping 192.168.0.8 from 192.168.0.2 (his computer), but he can see the router at 192.168.0.1, so I'd say a firewall issue. He didn't post the ping from 192.168.0.8 and 192.168.0.2 to the router, so I'm at a lost as to whether the firewall block is at the router or his machine. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
LAN Connections in XP
On Mon, 15 May 2017 11:28:17 -0300, Shadow wrote:
He didn't post the ping from 192.168.0.8 and 192.168.0.2 to the router, so I'm at a lost as to whether the firewall block is at the router or his machine. []'s Here you go: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Steveping 192.168.0.1 Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms -- Steve Hayes http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm http://khanya.wordpress.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
LAN Connections in XP
On Tue, 16 May 2017 06:34:37 +0200, Steve Hayes
wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2017 11:28:17 -0300, Shadow wrote: He didn't post the ping from 192.168.0.8 and 192.168.0.2 to the router, so I'm at a lost as to whether the firewall block is at the router or his machine. []'s Here you go: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Steveping 192.168.0.1 Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms After much Googleing and trying different things I was able to get my Acer Aspire One with Windows XP to print to my laser printer which is connected to a desktop running Windows 10. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
LAN Connections in XP
On Tue, 16 May 2017 06:34:37 +0200, Steve Hayes
wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2017 11:28:17 -0300, Shadow wrote: He didn't post the ping from 192.168.0.8 and 192.168.0.2 to the router, so I'm at a lost as to whether the firewall block is at the router or his machine. []'s Here you go: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Steveping 192.168.0.1 Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms You forgot 192.168.0.8 (or whatever the other PC's current IP is) to the router. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
LAN Connections in XP
On Tue, 16 May 2017 09:29:09 -0300, Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2017 06:34:37 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2017 11:28:17 -0300, Shadow wrote: He didn't post the ping from 192.168.0.8 and 192.168.0.2 to the router, so I'm at a lost as to whether the firewall block is at the router or his machine. []'s Here you go: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Steveping 192.168.0.1 Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms You forgot 192.168.0.8 (or whatever the other PC's current IP is) to the router. []'s Thank you, everyone for your help. Suddenly, with no intervention from me, my XP machine (on which I'm typing this) is back on the network. Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Steveping 192.168.0.8 Pinging 192.168.0.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.0.8: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.0.8: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.0.8: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.0.8: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.0.8: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 60ms, Average = 18ms I don't recall doing anything to cause it to work again. I had copied some stuff from the web to a spreadsheet, and wanted my wife to manipulate it, as she is a spreadsheet fundi, and was about to copy it to a flash drive when she said she could see my computer on the network again, and so I copied it to the public directory on her Win 8.1 laptop, and it worked. I then set up my laptop and pinged it, with the result seen above. -- Steve Hayes http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm http://khanya.wordpress.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|