If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 8 SP1
On 11/10/2012 4:29 PM, Chris S. wrote: "Bob Henson" wrote in message ... On 11/10/2012 3:39 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:30:33 +0100, "Bob Henson" wrote in article ... On 11/10/2012 2:57 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:09:05 +0100, "Bob Henson" wrote in article ... Broken before it starts! Not yet on the market and the first major fix is ready. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10..._8_rtm_update/ This is not a Service Pack. It is just a handful of updates - and as I recall, there were a hand full of updates for Windows 7 shortly after release, as with Windows Vista and XP as well, so this just means they are getting a bit better at delivering updates. As to "broken before it starts", name a single modern OS that doesn't release patches and fixes on a regular schedule, often shortly after the OS is released. But not often *before* it is released. And I repeat: this just means they are getting a bit better at delivering updates. Or do you think they should wait longer before releasing the updates for some reason? It is foolish to think that all of the bugs that the updates released shortly after Win 7 etc. were released to fix were discovered and fixed after the OS was released. So, as with previous OS releases, folks on the consumer preview and early adopters of the RTM reported bugs and MS fixed and tested some of them and released them - in this case, more quickly than before. What in the world is wrong with that? Nothing - but all the beta testing and changes should be done before the release is announced and initiated. Otherwise they are taking money for a product known to be faulty. Naturally other things will need patching from time to time as the hackers get smarter and get to grips with the newly released software, but on release day the product should be complete as far as Microsoft know. -- Bob Tetbury, Gloucestershire, UK ALL software products are "known to be faulty" when they are released. Is this your first computer? Perfection is hard to achieve, but many programs come close, and you certainly don't have to apply a service pack on Day 1. I wrote a pharmacy dispensing program (using DOS, and then QuickBasic) in the early days of computing (before you were born, maybe - 1985?) of which I sold a few copies, and no bugs were ever reported back to me. I, and others, tested it for months - it wasn't by accident that it worked straight out of the box. Just for one other example - there are hundreds - I'll pick a Microsoft one. My copy of Outlook 2007 has never fallen over since I installed it (it has had the odd background patch, of course). Neither did the last one - 2003. Standards have fallen, yes, but not as far as you think - there is still some good stuff out there. Windows 8 isn't one of them. Don't worry, Windows 9 won't be far behind. Windows 7 support will be extended long enough for me not to care either way. But you'll have to forgive me for laughing at Windows 8 - because that's what it is - a joke. -- Bob Tetbury, Gloucestershire, UK A preposition must never be used to end a sentence with. And never start a sentence with a conjunction. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|