Challeng to Bruce Chambers

I challenge you to a registry cleaner duel.

We will set up a reg file to import and seriously inflate our working
registries. Such inflation not to cause any inability to boot or run
the machines.

We'll take say 3 popular registry cleaners and "clean" our registries xx
number of times, say ten, for each cleaner.

We'll agree on a method and take measurements of timng changes, removal
rates and any damage that requires having to Restore, restore froma
saved System State, or re-image our drives to get it workable again.

Let me know how you want to start.

If you're worried about my lying, as I am about you, then we can instead
make a pact to document and report each and every fix we do of a
registry issue on any XP machine over say the next x months; you pick
the number.

Or, you could just go ahead and provide any of the evidence you claim to
have supporting your posit that all cleaners are 'snake oil'. AFAIK you
have NEVER provide a single bit of anything to support your contention
on registry cleaners, not even a definition of what constitutes a
registry cleaner. A quick look thru my archives shows that you've been
asked to do that over time by at least 3 different people but you never
even responded to them let alone provide anything useful to back up your
claims. I also have the archive where I provide you with my own
findings, because you kept harping about it, to which you never even
responded.

If you have a better way to prove who's right, let's hear it. I'm open
to reasonable, workable and relevant proposals.

Twayne

Capital!

CCleaner
Disk Cleanup
NTREGOPT.EXE
PerfectDisk 2008

THOSE are the best tools to use.
--
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"Twayne" wrote in message
...

I challenge you to a registry cleaner duel.

We will set up a reg file to import and seriously inflate our
working registries. Such inflation not to cause any inability to
boot or run the machines.

We'll take say 3 popular registry cleaners and "clean" our
registries xx number of times, say ten, for each cleaner.

We'll agree on a method and take measurements of timng changes,
removal rates and any damage that requires having to Restore,
restore froma saved System State, or re-image our drives to get it
workable again.

Let me know how you want to start.

If you're worried about my lying, as I am about you, then we can
instead make a pact to document and report each and every fix we do
of a registry issue on any XP machine over say the next x months;
you pick the number.

Or, you could just go ahead and provide any of the evidence you
claim to have supporting your posit that all cleaners are 'snake
oil'. AFAIK you have NEVER provide a single bit of anything to
support your contention on registry cleaners, not even a definition
of what constitutes a registry cleaner. A quick look thru my
archives shows that you've been asked to do that over time by at
least 3 different people but you never even responded to them let
alone provide anything useful to back up your claims. I also have
the archive where I provide you with my own findings, because you
kept harping about it, to which you never even responded.

If you have a better way to prove who's right, let's hear it. I'm
open to reasonable, workable and relevant proposals.

Twayne

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:47:08 +0100, D. Spencer Hines wrote:

Capital!

CCleaner
Disk Cleanup
NTREGOPT.EXE
PerfectDisk 2008

THOSE are the best tools to use.

To do what? Cleanse your colon?

--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

Lots of silence; guess that's a qualified NO. Also what I expected.
All air, no substance.




I challenge you to a registry cleaner duel.

We will set up a reg file to import and seriously inflate our working
registries. Such inflation not to cause any inability to boot or run
the machines.

We'll take say 3 popular registry cleaners and "clean" our registries
xx number of times, say ten, for each cleaner.

We'll agree on a method and take measurements of timng changes,
removal rates and any damage that requires having to Restore, restore
froma saved System State, or re-image our drives to get it workable
again.
Let me know how you want to start.

If you're worried about my lying, as I am about you, then we can
instead make a pact to document and report each and every fix we do
of a registry issue on any XP machine over say the next x months; you
pick the number.

Or, you could just go ahead and provide any of the evidence you claim
to have supporting your posit that all cleaners are 'snake oil'. AFAIK
you have NEVER provide a single bit of anything to support your
contention on registry cleaners, not even a definition of what
constitutes a registry cleaner. A quick look thru my archives shows
that you've been asked to do that over time by at least 3 different
people but you never even responded to them let alone provide
anything useful to back up your claims. I also have the archive
where I provide you with my own findings, because you kept harping
about it, to which you never even responded.

If you have a better way to prove who's right, let's hear it. I'm open
to reasonable, workable and relevant proposals.

Twayne

include Registry Mechanic to go with the rest of your pig swill.
that is what the standard idiot that comes here uses.
let put money on it, TROLL.
--
HTH,
nass
----
http://www.nasstec.co.uk


"D. Spencer Hines" wrote:

Capital!

CCleaner
Disk Cleanup
NTREGOPT.EXE
PerfectDisk 2008

THOSE are the best tools to use.
--
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"Twayne" wrote in message
...

I challenge you to a registry cleaner duel.

We will set up a reg file to import and seriously inflate our
working registries. Such inflation not to cause any inability to
boot or run the machines.

We'll take say 3 popular registry cleaners and "clean" our
registries xx number of times, say ten, for each cleaner.

We'll agree on a method and take measurements of timng changes,
removal rates and any damage that requires having to Restore,
restore froma saved System State, or re-image our drives to get it
workable again.

Let me know how you want to start.

If you're worried about my lying, as I am about you, then we can
instead make a pact to document and report each and every fix we do
of a registry issue on any XP machine over say the next x months;
you pick the number.

Or, you could just go ahead and provide any of the evidence you
claim to have supporting your posit that all cleaners are 'snake
oil'. AFAIK you have NEVER provide a single bit of anything to
support your contention on registry cleaners, not even a definition
of what constitutes a registry cleaner. A quick look thru my
archives shows that you've been asked to do that over time by at
least 3 different people but you never even responded to them let
alone provide anything useful to back up your claims. I also have
the archive where I provide you with my own findings, because you
kept harping about it, to which you never even responded.

If you have a better way to prove who's right, let's hear it. I'm
open to reasonable, workable and relevant proposals.

Twayne

Since 9-29 nothing but silence from the infamous egotist. Typical
response whenever challenged to anything. Nothing, not even the usual
hot air.

I challenge you to a registry cleaner duel.

We will set up a reg file to import and seriously inflate our working
registries. Such inflation not to cause any inability to boot or run
the machines.

We'll take say 3 popular registry cleaners and "clean" our registries
xx number of times, say ten, for each cleaner.

We'll agree on a method and take measurements of timng changes,
removal rates and any damage that requires having to Restore, restore
froma saved System State, or re-image our drives to get it workable
again.
Let me know how you want to start.

If you're worried about my lying, as I am about you, then we can
instead make a pact to document and report each and every fix we do
of a registry issue on any XP machine over say the next x months; you
pick the number.

Or, you could just go ahead and provide any of the evidence you claim
to have supporting your posit that all cleaners are 'snake oil'. AFAIK
you have NEVER provide a single bit of anything to support your
contention on registry cleaners, not even a definition of what
constitutes a registry cleaner. A quick look thru my archives shows
that you've been asked to do that over time by at least 3 different
people but you never even responded to them let alone provide
anything useful to back up your claims. I also have the archive
where I provide you with my own findings, because you kept harping
about it, to which you never even responded.

If you have a better way to prove who's right, let's hear it. I'm open
to reasonable, workable and relevant proposals.

Twayne