If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
Good evening. I was trying to download the windows defender spyware
definitions but it went too slow. Did cancel, perhaps I will try another day. Do you think Windows Defender is good enough for windows 8 or is it better to install Microsoft Security Essentials? Thanks. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On 8/4/2015 7:40 PM, Michael Bob wrote:
Good evening. I was trying to download the windows defender spyware definitions but it went too slow. Did cancel, perhaps I will try another day. Do you think Windows Defender is good enough for windows 8 or is it better to install Microsoft Security Essentials? They are the same thing and they are a baseline AV. You would be better off using a 3rd party free AV program. Here is a list for you. A lot of people use Avast! I have installed Panda on some friends and family computers that don't want to have to fool with any settings. http://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-anti-virus-software.htm#Quick_Selection_Guide |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
Thanks, I use Mcafee a lot. It doesn't slow down the system very much.
"Ron" escreveu na mensagem ... On 8/4/2015 7:40 PM, Michael Bob wrote: Good evening. I was trying to download the windows defender spyware definitions but it went too slow. Did cancel, perhaps I will try another day. Do you think Windows Defender is good enough for windows 8 or is it better to install Microsoft Security Essentials? They are the same thing and they are a baseline AV. You would be better off using a 3rd party free AV program. Here is a list for you. A lot of people use Avast! I have installed Panda on some friends and family computers that don't want to have to fool with any settings. http://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-anti-virus-software.htm#Quick_Selection_Guide |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On 8/4/2015 8:21 PM, Michael Bob wrote:
Thanks, I use Mcafee a lot. It doesn't slow down the system very much. Nothing wrong with McAfee or Norton especially if you can get them for free through your ISP(s) like I can. Now wait for the hundreds of comments bashing both products. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:06:07 -0400, Ron wrote:
On 8/4/2015 8:21 PM, Michael Bob wrote: Thanks, I use Mcafee a lot. It doesn't slow down the system very much. Nothing wrong with McAfee or Norton especially if you can get them for free through your ISP(s) like I can. Now wait for the hundreds of comments bashing both products. I know it's not fair to hold a grudge after 20 years but I used Norton Security Suite something like 20 years ago and it made my system crawl, loaded up all sorts of needless and useless utilities and was a nightmare to get rid of (the system ran SO much better without it and crashed a lot less). So I still will not use any Norton Product. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
Regular off-topic nym-shifting troll...
-- "Michael Bob" marketing lovendish.com wrote in news:mprii6$q9h$1 news.datemas.de: Path: eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net !newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Michael Bob" marketing lovendish.com Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-8 Subject: Windows Defender too slow to update Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 00:40:52 +0100 Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de Lines: 9 Message-ID: mprii6$q9h$1 news.datemas.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: KlsLDEKWvy4QhjpvSZkAH1zatSMXWRODJsTBfqGtVAw7cH70kj Z2pLvqNpA2R9PRQHmfwuPCig7KXiUC52CLSLgcC1Att2nKXRP4 roh6pyPFf02AhO+jrLrge//FKTHUAkJVN9VM68wYmKjcDMbIvsUGWtNsR71sOrHjp0UZQdTzR k5FnVVkHA== X-Complaints-To: abuse datemas.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:40:54 +0000 (UTC) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 Xref: mx02.eternal-september.org alt.comp.os.windows-8:27460 Good evening. I was trying to download the windows defender spyware definitions but it went too slow. Did cancel, perhaps I will try another day. Do you think Windows Defender is good enough for windows 8 or is it better to install Microsoft Security Essentials? Thanks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On 8/4/2015 7:40 PM, Michael Bob wrote:
Good evening. I was trying to download the windows defender spyware definitions but it went too slow. Did cancel, perhaps I will try another day. Do you think Windows Defender is good enough for windows 8 or is it better to install Microsoft Security Essentials? Thanks. I recommend Avira |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:03:26 -0400, Vitalic wrote:
I recommend Avira Why? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
Correction: I wanted to say I used to use Mcafee a lot. One time I bought
the software on store before Microsoft had Security Essentials. But then I found it was only valid for a year, then you had to pay more. So I gave up. I think it was one of the first softwares for rent I saw. In the past you could buy this AV software and update for free. "Ron" escreveu na mensagem ... On 8/4/2015 8:21 PM, Michael Bob wrote: Thanks, I use Mcafee a lot. It doesn't slow down the system very much. Nothing wrong with McAfee or Norton especially if you can get them for free through your ISP(s) like I can. Now wait for the hundreds of comments bashing both products. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On 8/6/2015 7:30 AM, mechanic wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:03:26 -0400, Vitalic wrote: I recommend Avira Why? Why not? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:03:10 -0400, Ron wrote:
On 8/6/2015 7:30 AM, mechanic wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:03:26 -0400, Vitalic wrote: I recommend Avira Why? Why not? There are alternatives. On this machine I'm using Lavasoft Ad-Aware but that's crashing one other machine I have so I moved to Avast. But I've no real idea which is best. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On 8/6/2015 1:36 PM, mechanic wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:03:10 -0400, Ron wrote: On 8/6/2015 7:30 AM, mechanic wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:03:26 -0400, Vitalic wrote: I recommend Avira Why? Why not? There are alternatives. On this machine I'm using Lavasoft Ad-Aware but that's crashing one other machine I have so I moved to Avast. But I've no real idea which is best. Sure there are alternatives, but Avira is one of the top free AVs that you can use. Has been for years. Lavasoft Ad-Aware? I haven't used that in about 10 years. And that is not an AV program. It is to be used in addition to your AV program. Malwarebytes and Superantispware are better programs though. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:47:06 -0400, Ron wrote:
Lavasoft Ad-Aware? I haven't used that in about 10 years. And that is not an AV program. Check your facts. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
On 06-Aug-2015 13:47, Ron wrote:
On 8/6/2015 1:36 PM, mechanic wrote: On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:03:10 -0400, Ron wrote: On 8/6/2015 7:30 AM, mechanic wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:03:26 -0400, Vitalic wrote: I recommend Avira Why? Why not? There are alternatives. On this machine I'm using Lavasoft Ad-Aware but that's crashing one other machine I have so I moved to Avast. But I've no real idea which is best. Sure there are alternatives, but Avira is one of the top free AVs that you can use. Has been for years. Lavasoft Ad-Aware? I haven't used that in about 10 years. And that is not an AV program. It is to be used in addition to your AV program. Malwarebytes and Superantispware are better programs though. Yep. Check your facts. http://www.lavasoft.com/ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Defender too slow to update
Jonas Q wrote:
On 06-Aug-2015 13:47, Ron wrote: On 8/6/2015 1:36 PM, mechanic wrote: On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:03:10 -0400, Ron wrote: On 8/6/2015 7:30 AM, mechanic wrote: On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:03:26 -0400, Vitalic wrote: I recommend Avira Why? Why not? There are alternatives. On this machine I'm using Lavasoft Ad-Aware but that's crashing one other machine I have so I moved to Avast. But I've no real idea which is best. Sure there are alternatives, but Avira is one of the top free AVs that you can use. Has been for years. Lavasoft Ad-Aware? I haven't used that in about 10 years. And that is not an AV program. It is to be used in addition to your AV program. Malwarebytes and Superantispware are better programs though. Yep. Check your facts. http://www.lavasoft.com/ I like Wikipedia, for some background info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad-Aware "In the 2008 Edition, Lavasoft bundled Ad-Aware Pro and Plus for the first time with an antivirus scanner, which used the Avira engine --- and this arrangement continued for a few years. Starting with Ad-Aware version 10, the Bitdefender antivirus engine was used instead." --- Note that this is a popular option in the industry. Several of the companies, sell their engine to third parties. And that's how an Adware program can acquire basic AV capabilities. Such an AV capability might be signature based. You wouldn't expect industry-leading heuristic detection. But, signature analysis is better than no protection at all. So before using a product like that, you would check the recent AV-Comparatives for Bitdefender, and see what percentage of stuff Bitdefender detects. And make your decision that way. Paul |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|