If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Again the question was if the board dies do I have to get another copy this
is what an OEM would have to adhere to which is also then what the customer by accepting the OEM copy would adhere to "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Keith AH wrote: This is copied direct from the OEM license Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the original Microsoft® OEM operating system software, with the exception of an upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which Microsoft® OEM operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If the motherboard is upgraded or replaced, for reasons other than a defect, then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the PC. The reason for this licensing rule primarily relates to the end-user license agreement (EULA) and the support of the software covered by that EULA. The EULA is a set of usage rights granted to the end-user by the PC manufacturer and relates only to rights for that software as installed on that particular PC. The System Builder is required to support the software on that individual PC. Understanding that end users, over time, upgrade their PC with different components, Microsoft needed to have one base component "left standing" that would still define that original PC. Since the motherboard contains the CPU and is the "heart and soul" of the PC, when the motherboard is replaced (for reasons other than defect) a new PC is essentially created. The original System Builder, therefore, can not be expected to support this new PC that they in effect, did not manufacture. Where did you get that, as it sounds like the System Builder License, NOT the END USERS LICENSE AGREEMENT! What is the difference? The End User, like the OP, NEVER agreed to be held to the terms of the SYSTEM BUILDERS LICENSE! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The wording in the post by Keith AH is not something you agreed to. Although
you are "your own OEM," you are not formally an OEM in the eyes of MS. That is why it is clear as mud. You, by definition, "slip between the cracks." "David Sewell" wrote in message ... I read it all. Hence my subject heading "Win xp oem activation hits me clear as mud!" Sorry, have you heard of the plain english society? Maybe there should (if it does not already exist) be an American version.... Sorry guys........ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Carey Frisch [MVP]" wrote in message ... You paid less for an OEM version and as a consequence you do not receive the benefits of a Retail Version. OEM versions of Windows XP are non-transferrable and if your motherboard dies, so does your OEM license. Microsoft does not sell OEM versions to end-users, only Retail Versions. Horsepucky. It's the same computer. A motherboard does not a computer make. Do you for some reason get pleasure out of misinforming people so they think, incorrectly, that they should pay for the same thing again? Are you rich? Alias -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User Microsoft Newsgroups Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security Technologies: http://www.microsoft.com/athome/secu...xp/choose.mspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "David Sewell" wrote: | I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail | edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build | my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now | dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I | am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby | keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become | accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't | moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault | cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard | heaven? | | Thanks, | David |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Does this mean that the person that sold me a copy of oem win xp should
give me another copy of win xp if there supplied motherboard should fail? We could go on like this forever, and this is where the problem lies as I see it. "Keith AH" wrote in message ... Again the question was if the board dies do I have to get another copy this is what an OEM would have to adhere to which is also then what the customer by accepting the OEM copy would adhere to "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Keith AH wrote: This is copied direct from the OEM license Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the original Microsoft® OEM operating system software, with the exception of an upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which Microsoft® OEM operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If the motherboard is upgraded or replaced, for reasons other than a defect, then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the PC. The reason for this licensing rule primarily relates to the end-user license agreement (EULA) and the support of the software covered by that EULA. The EULA is a set of usage rights granted to the end-user by the PC manufacturer and relates only to rights for that software as installed on that particular PC. The System Builder is required to support the software on that individual PC. Understanding that end users, over time, upgrade their PC with different components, Microsoft needed to have one base component "left standing" that would still define that original PC. Since the motherboard contains the CPU and is the "heart and soul" of the PC, when the motherboard is replaced (for reasons other than defect) a new PC is essentially created. The original System Builder, therefore, can not be expected to support this new PC that they in effect, did not manufacture. Where did you get that, as it sounds like the System Builder License, NOT the END USERS LICENSE AGREEMENT! What is the difference? The End User, like the OP, NEVER agreed to be held to the terms of the SYSTEM BUILDERS LICENSE! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
No
That is why if the board fails you may replace it "David Sewell" wrote in message ... Does this mean that the person that sold me a copy of oem win xp should give me another copy of win xp if there supplied motherboard should fail? We could go on like this forever, and this is where the problem lies as I see it. "Keith AH" wrote in message ... Again the question was if the board dies do I have to get another copy this is what an OEM would have to adhere to which is also then what the customer by accepting the OEM copy would adhere to "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Keith AH wrote: This is copied direct from the OEM license Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the original Microsoft® OEM operating system software, with the exception of an upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which Microsoft® OEM operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If the motherboard is upgraded or replaced, for reasons other than a defect, then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the PC. The reason for this licensing rule primarily relates to the end-user license agreement (EULA) and the support of the software covered by that EULA. The EULA is a set of usage rights granted to the end-user by the PC manufacturer and relates only to rights for that software as installed on that particular PC. The System Builder is required to support the software on that individual PC. Understanding that end users, over time, upgrade their PC with different components, Microsoft needed to have one base component "left standing" that would still define that original PC. Since the motherboard contains the CPU and is the "heart and soul" of the PC, when the motherboard is replaced (for reasons other than defect) a new PC is essentially created. The original System Builder, therefore, can not be expected to support this new PC that they in effect, did not manufacture. Where did you get that, as it sounds like the System Builder License, NOT the END USERS LICENSE AGREEMENT! What is the difference? The End User, like the OP, NEVER agreed to be held to the terms of the SYSTEM BUILDERS LICENSE! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"David Sewell" wrote Does this mean that the person that sold me a copy of oem win xp should give me another copy of win xp if there supplied motherboard should fail? We could go on like this forever, and this is where the problem lies as I see it. Replace your motherboard. Install XP. Activate it online if it's been more than 120 days since the last activation. If you have to call, read this first: http://www.microscum.com/mmpafaq/ Alias "Keith AH" wrote in message ... Again the question was if the board dies do I have to get another copy this is what an OEM would have to adhere to which is also then what the customer by accepting the OEM copy would adhere to "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Keith AH wrote: This is copied direct from the OEM license Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the original Microsoft® OEM operating system software, with the exception of an upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the motherboard is considered to result in a "new personal computer" to which Microsoft® OEM operating system software cannot be transferred from another computer. If the motherboard is upgraded or replaced, for reasons other than a defect, then a new computer has been created and the license of new operating system software is required. If the motherboard is replaced because it is defective, you do NOT need to acquire a new operating system license for the PC. The reason for this licensing rule primarily relates to the end-user license agreement (EULA) and the support of the software covered by that EULA. The EULA is a set of usage rights granted to the end-user by the PC manufacturer and relates only to rights for that software as installed on that particular PC. The System Builder is required to support the software on that individual PC. Understanding that end users, over time, upgrade their PC with different components, Microsoft needed to have one base component "left standing" that would still define that original PC. Since the motherboard contains the CPU and is the "heart and soul" of the PC, when the motherboard is replaced (for reasons other than defect) a new PC is essentially created. The original System Builder, therefore, can not be expected to support this new PC that they in effect, did not manufacture. Where did you get that, as it sounds like the System Builder License, NOT the END USERS LICENSE AGREEMENT! What is the difference? The End User, like the OP, NEVER agreed to be held to the terms of the SYSTEM BUILDERS LICENSE! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
If you are referring to the MVP's (who are not MS staff), yes, the ones with
brains realize that this is a very ambiguous, confusing topic. If you are referring to MS Support staff, they are trained not to think about it at all! "David Sewell" wrote in message ... I have a theory that the microsoft help staff are as punch drunk as the rest of us. " |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
No, but correct and honest with my answer!
-- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User Microsoft Newsgroups Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security Technologies: http://www.microsoft.com/athome/secu...xp/choose.mspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Alias" wrote: | | Horsepucky. It's the same computer. A motherboard does not a computer make. | Do you for some reason get pleasure out of misinforming people so they | think, incorrectly, that they should pay for the same thing again? Are you | rich? | | Alias --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0519-2, 05/12/2005 Tested on: 5/14/2005 7:13:06 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Keith AH wrote:
This is copied direct from the OEM license Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer's computer and the end user may maintain the license for the original Microsoft® OEM operating system software, with the exception of an upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. snip But that is not what the End User has access to, nor do I if I go to Wal-Mart or Staples and buy a copy of of WinXP Pro OEM release. This is from the EULA for OEM XP Pro: Microsoft Windows XP Professional, Microsoft(r) Windows(r) XP Tablet PC Edition and Microsoft(r) Windows(r) XP Media Center Edition END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This End-User License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual or a single legal entity) and the manufacturer ("Manufacturer") of the computer system or computer system component ("HARDWARE") with which you acquired the Microsoft software product(s) identified on the Certificate of Authenticity ("COA") affixed to the HARDWARE or on the associated product documentation ("SOFTWARE"). And he "The term "COMPUTER" as used herein shall mean the HARDWARE, if the HARDWARE is a single computer system, or shall mean the computer system with which the HARDWARE operates, if the HARDWARE is a computer system component. 1. GRANT OF LICENSE. Manufacturer grants you the following rights, provided you comply with all of the terms and conditions of this EULA: * Installation and Use. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this EULA, you may install, use, access, display and run only one (1) copy of the SOFTWARE on the COMPUTER." Nowhere in that EULA is the word "motherboard". "the computer system with which the HARDWARE operates" could mean every and anything. End users are not prohibited by the EULA from changing any and everything in the computer system. Most new PCs I see have the COA affixed to the case. Theoretically I could gut the whole damn thing and rebuild it inside with anything/everything else different. As long as that COA and case stay together there is no EULA violation that I can see. Why heck, it would sure look like the same computer, too. Steve |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
No. Just replace the motherboard with an identical motherboard!
-- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User Microsoft Newsgroups Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security Technologies: http://www.microsoft.com/athome/secu...xp/choose.mspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "David Sewell" wrote: | Does this mean that the person that sold me a copy of oem win xp should | give me another copy of win xp if there supplied motherboard should fail? | We could go on like this forever, and this is where the problem lies as I | see it. --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0519-2, 05/12/2005 Tested on: 5/14/2005 7:14:07 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
No one forced you to buy O.E.M..
You are just mad because YOU didn't do your homework! BTW, I supply a retail version of Windows XP with every computer I build for my customers. I would never place them in a predicament! -- Regards, Richard Urban aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "David Sewell" wrote in message ... I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? Thanks, David |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
No, but correct and honest with my answer! http://microscum.com/carey/ -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Urban" wrote No one forced you to buy O.E.M.. So what? I have three computers, each with an OEM on them. Plan to upgrade the motherboard, CPU, RAM and video card on one of them and expect no problems or predicaments at all! You are just mad because YOU didn't do your homework! He has nothing to be mad about. He can reinstall it on a new motherboard. BTW, I supply a retail version of Windows XP with every computer I build for my customers. I would never place them in a predicament! -- Regards, Richard Urban What predicament? Alias aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "David Sewell" wrote in message ... I purchased a win xp home oem disk, at only just pennies short of retail edition price, from the supplier that supplied me with items I used to build my own system. I already have win 95 and win 98 upgrade purchases from now dead previous pc's. So, if my motherboard fails, am I right in assuming I am supposed to buy a new motherboard and another copy of win xp, thereby keeping up Bill (love him to bits) Gates to the life style he has become accustomed, just so that I can carry on using a single system that ain't moved anywhere and is only used by the single self same person, whose fault cannot be blamed if the motherboard decides it wants to go to motherboard heaven? Thanks, David |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
David Sewell wrote:
Does this mean that the person that sold me a copy of oem win xp should give me another copy of win xp if there supplied motherboard should fail? We could go on like this forever, and this is where the problem lies as I see it. My last answer in this thread. Don't worry, be happy! Even if MS thinks you need to buy another copy of XP if you replace your motherboard (and even MS employees don't agree with that interpretation,) they will never know you changed your motherboard, unless YOU tell them. With activation, MS cannot tell what hardware has actually changed. Short answer, DON'T TELL THEM. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
David Sewell wrote:
I read it all. Hence my subject heading "Win xp oem activation hits me clear as mud!" Sorry, have you heard of the plain english society? Maybe there should (if it does not already exist) be an American version.... Sorry guys........ Plain english society? Is there such a thing? Sounds cool. I'm gonna look it up... Is this what you mean? http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/introduction.html Steve |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shutoff or clear "as you type" feature | tobyroaner | The Basics | 1 | February 3rd 05 02:25 AM |
How to clear IE Address bar's window? | Labunski | Windows XP Help and Support | 1 | January 17th 05 12:51 AM |
XP Home Activation | Mad@MS | General XP issues or comments | 10 | November 29th 04 01:15 PM |
XP will not let me remove these devices in Network Adapters Section | Butch Hoornstra | Networking and the Internet with Windows XP | 5 | September 28th 04 02:04 AM |
Activation Connection | Amanda | Windows XP Help and Support | 0 | August 2nd 04 02:33 PM |