Rude replies

Boring!!!
--
Neil UK


"kurttrail" wrote:

Neil UK wrote:
Dear Mr K**tr**l

http://microscum.com/kurtdevil.gif

You may address me as kurtdevil!

Is there some reason that you feel driven to write insulting and
abusive material?

Nope. I just want to.

It must go back to an unhappy childhood, I suppose.

LOL! If I had you as a father, perhaps, however my old man was a man
with a big set of balls, not a pretentious little pansy like you.

But why don't you cut out the "***" and write the words out in full
English? I assume it because you know that someone would cut out your
reply. Cowardly!

LOL!

http://microscum.com/censored/

I'm no stranger to being censored. I censor my own words for the little
brats left to surf the net without parental supervision.

I am not a pansy: details of my heterosexual background can be
supplied (though not on this site).

LOL! It figures you would misunderstand me alluding to your affected
effeminate nature as meaning I'm calling you gay! Your a senile
homophobic pansy!

But if all you can do is to smear
those who object to your remarks, then you have no place in what is
called an Expert Zone for the discussions of problems involving the
resolutions of XP problems.

LOL! "Expert Zone!"

Because you promoted it in these very pages, I have seen your
polemical website. It may surprise you but I do not disagree with
many of the points you make on that site. What I do disagree with is
your immediate snarling attitude on this particular website. The
words "Up" and "Grow" leap unbidden to my lips.

This isn't a website, it just appears that way to those that use the
dumbed down web access. If you polled all of the regulars around here,
most, like around 90% in not more, would vote to ban the web interface
to this group.

"Up" yours! And "Grow" some balls, Neil. There is a very long
tradition of flaming in Newsgroups. And if you can't stand the heat,
maybe you would fare better someplace else, like an old age home.

Go and lie in a darkened room and keep taking the tablets.

I'm a heretic and gave up on the Ten Commandments long ago!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Well, it's not very simple. My company runs it's own mail server, and we
aren't beholden to AOL or some other ISP. True of many, many mail servers.

Tom
"Neil UK" wrote in message
...
| Dear Tom
|
| It is very simple. When you want to create a username to go online with,
| say, AOL, or some other ISP, you'll find that some names have already been
| reserved by others. You must have found that out when creating a new email
| address. So why can't Microsoft create a system whereby each user has a
| specific name to the exclusion of all others? It happens all the time in
| email systems. So why not in this system?
| --
| Neil UK
|
|
| "Tom" wrote:
|
|
| Just out of curiosity, how would we go about determining who uses the
name?
| I know that are probably millions of people with the name Tom. Should I
get
| in touch with them and we could draw straws?
|
| Tom
| | I appreciate what has been said about people using the same name: it
just
| | doesn't sit well with me. Change the system, I say. One name one
| contributor!
| | --
| | Neil UK
| |
| |
|
|
|

Wrong. I am not a troll, in any way you choose to define that word. You
cannot find in any previous posting of mine where I have raised points merely
to be a nuisance. I just want this website, or whatever it s supposed to be
called, to be used only to solve the problems of XP users. Is that too much
to ask?
--
Neil UK


"Jone Doe" wrote:

Frankly no one is interested in your opinion, and most of us are now
recognizing you for what you are, which is a troll, and will ignore anything
more you post.

"Neil UK" wrote in message
...
Dear Mr K**tr**l

Sorry David. Your name was raised by me in the original message simply
because you were using the most amazing language in response to someone.
Kelly came to your defence and your name was only included by me because
today is the first time I have come across two contributors using immoderate
language on the same day. All I have asked is: Is this necessary? Especially
in a technical site that calls itself "Expert Zone".

My thesis amounts to this: do we respond to the queries of the afflicted
negatively or positively? My belief is that we should give a positive
response to questions if we have any knowledge to contribute. But we should
shut up if we don't.
--
Neil UK


"David Candy" wrote:

web interface

In part this is what the thread he complains about is about. Of which no person seeking assistance was even mentioned after the first level replies and certainly not abused. Also the original poster was not afflicted.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=================================================
"kurttrail" wrote in message ...
Neil UK wrote:
Dear Mr K**tr**l

http://microscum.com/kurtdevil.gif

You may address me as kurtdevil!

Is there some reason that you feel driven to write insulting and
abusive material?

Nope. I just want to.

It must go back to an unhappy childhood, I suppose.

LOL! If I had you as a father, perhaps, however my old man was a man
with a big set of balls, not a pretentious little pansy like you.

But why don't you cut out the "***" and write the words out in full
English? I assume it because you know that someone would cut out your
reply. Cowardly!

LOL!

http://microscum.com/censored/

I'm no stranger to being censored. I censor my own words for the little
brats left to surf the net without parental supervision.

I am not a pansy: details of my heterosexual background can be
supplied (though not on this site).

LOL! It figures you would misunderstand me alluding to your affected
effeminate nature as meaning I'm calling you gay! Your a senile
homophobic pansy!

But if all you can do is to smear
those who object to your remarks, then you have no place in what is
called an Expert Zone for the discussions of problems involving the
resolutions of XP problems.

LOL! "Expert Zone!"

Because you promoted it in these very pages, I have seen your
polemical website. It may surprise you but I do not disagree with
many of the points you make on that site. What I do disagree with is
your immediate snarling attitude on this particular website. The
words "Up" and "Grow" leap unbidden to my lips.

This isn't a website, it just appears that way to those that use the
dumbed down web access. If you polled all of the regulars around here,
most, like around 90% in not more, would vote to ban the web interface
to this group.

"Up" yours! And "Grow" some balls, Neil. There is a very long
tradition of flaming in Newsgroups. And if you can't stand the heat,
maybe you would fare better someplace else, like an old age home.

Go and lie in a darkened room and keep taking the tablets.

I'm a heretic and gave up on the Ten Commandments long ago!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

I have only been introduced to the word "Troll" for the first time today.
Sorry, I don't fit your bill. I'm just a guy who is tired of being jerked
around by jerks. I have been called naive in this thread, and I am clearly no
expert. I just want this group to be used for the discussion of problems in
Windows XP, with no insults and no bad language. Is that too much to ask?
--
Neil UK


"Jone Doe" wrote:

Frankly no one is interested in your opinion, and most of us are now
recognizing you for what you are, which is a troll, and will ignore anything
more you post.

"Neil UK" wrote in message
...
Dear Mr K**tr**l

Many here are utter fools. Some are old and refuse to learn new tricks =
and keep giving advice suitable for the 70s. I wrote a program 10 years =
ago that did not cope with long file names. I refused to use long file =
names so wasted a lot of time before I noticed. It requires an effort to =
change, which those I refer to refuse to make.

Others are hoping for a reward from MS and will say no evil.

MS wants to own consumers, preferable every consumer. They want to =
control your interaction with the world in the hope one day they can tax =
it or sell you to other companies. MSN was originally a competing =
network with the internet (as AOL and it's forbears were). So they foist =
web interfaces on people as web interface is controllable by them where =
NNTP isn't. A month or two ago they closed down the FTP site (and it's =
been years since anything new was put up) as they prefer web access for =
downloads. This controls the consumer and also trains the consumer to =
reley on MS as their gatekeeper.

An example was MS Money. Ease of use wasn't a metric they cared about =
but how many web hits it caused on the MS site.

Four years ago most posters were dealt with quickly. Attach a small file =
to do the work. Poster reads replies, click attachment, problem solved. =
However this didn't meet MS goals of controlling consumers.

The people I was flaming are those that support such behaviour.
--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"Neil UK" wrote in message =
...
Sorry David. Your name was raised by me in the original message simply =

because you were using the most amazing language in response to =
someone.=20
Kelly came to your defence and your name was only included by me =
because=20
today is the first time I have come across two contributors using =
immoderate=20
language on the same day. All I have asked is: Is this necessary? =
Especially=20
in a technical site that calls itself "Expert Zone".
=20
My thesis amounts to this: do we respond to the queries of the =
afflicted=20
negatively or positively? My belief is that we should give a positive=20
response to questions if we have any knowledge to contribute. But we =
should=20
shut up if we don't.
--=20
Neil UK
=20
=20
"David Candy" wrote:
=20
web interface=20
=20
In part this is what the thread he complains about is about. Of =
which no person seeking assistance was even mentioned after the first =
level replies and certainly not abused. Also the original poster was not =
afflicted.
--=20
=
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"kurttrail" wrote in =
message ...
Neil UK wrote:
Dear Mr K**tr**l
=20
http://microscum.com/kurtdevil.gif
=20
You may address me as kurtdevil!
=20
Is there some reason that you feel driven to write insulting and
abusive material?
=20
Nope. I just want to.
=20
It must go back to an unhappy childhood, I suppose.
=20
LOL! If I had you as a father, perhaps, however my old man was a =
man=20
with a big set of balls, not a pretentious little pansy like you.
=20
But why don't you cut out the "***" and write the words out in =
full
English? I assume it because you know that someone would cut out =
your
reply. Cowardly!
=20
LOL!
=20
http://microscum.com/censored/
=20
I'm no stranger to being censored. I censor my own words for the =
little=20
brats left to surf the net without parental supervision.
=20
I am not a pansy: details of my heterosexual background can be
supplied (though not on this site).
=20
LOL! It figures you would misunderstand me alluding to your =
affected=20
effeminate nature as meaning I'm calling you gay! Your a senile=20
homophobic pansy!
=20
But if all you can do is to smear
those who object to your remarks, then you have no place in what =
is
called an Expert Zone for the discussions of problems involving =
the
resolutions of XP problems.
=20
LOL! "Expert Zone!"
=20
Because you promoted it in these very pages, I have seen your
polemical website. It may surprise you but I do not disagree =
with
many of the points you make on that site. What I do disagree =
with is
your immediate snarling attitude on this particular website. The
words "Up" and "Grow" leap unbidden to my lips.
=20
This isn't a website, it just appears that way to those that use =
the=20
dumbed down web access. If you polled all of the regulars around =
here,=20
most, like around 90% in not more, would vote to ban the web =
interface=20
to this group.
=20
"Up" yours! And "Grow" some balls, Neil. There is a very long=20
tradition of flaming in Newsgroups. And if you can't stand the =
heat,=20
maybe you would fare better someplace else, like an old age home.
=20
Go and lie in a darkened room and keep taking the tablets.
=20
I'm a heretic and gave up on the Ten Commandments long ago!
=20
--=20
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"=20
=20
=20
=20

What's your problem with bad language? I can understand the septics =
problem with it (lots of guns), but yours.

--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"Neil UK" wrote in message =
...
I have only been introduced to the word "Troll" for the first time =
today.=20
Sorry, I don't fit your bill. I'm just a guy who is tired of being =
jerked=20
around by jerks. I have been called naive in this thread, and I am =
clearly no=20
expert. I just want this group to be used for the discussion of =
problems in=20
Windows XP, with no insults and no bad language. Is that too much to =
ask?
--=20
Neil UK
=20
=20
"Jone Doe" wrote:
=20
Frankly no one is interested in your opinion, and most of us are now =

recognizing you for what you are, which is a troll, and will ignore =
anything=20
more you post.
=20
"Neil UK" wrote in message=20
...
Dear Mr K**tr**l=20
=20
=20

Neil UK wrote:
Arrogant prick? It takes one to know one.

Yes it does! And I'm damned proud of it. Unlike you, trying to deny
yourself, behind a veil of feigned civility!

I don't come here to ask for answers, but to provide them. And I try to
have a good time along the way, and hope that others are amused, but
certain that some uptight anal pansy will become upset. Do I try to
upset people on purpose? No, for the most part. Mostly I'm trying to
be entertaining, but when someone takes my entertainment too seriously,
those I do go out of my way to offend.

You are the one with the
problems.

None at all. I'm not the one that is upset, over mere words, you are.

I was just seeking answers on this site, when suddenly I
found a foul-mouthed person, namely YOU.

That sounds like your problem, not mine. Foulness is in the mind of the
beholder. What you consider foul, another may find to be harmless
humor.

And what is this about
paying for my own group?

If you want to have a group that will change its rules for your
sensibilities, then create your own. MS is not gonna change its rules
for some ****** like you!

Do you own or pay for the present group?

I'm not the one saying that the rules about peoples nick's need to be
changed so that they are unique to the individual.

I
doubt it.

Whatever.

The group is owned by Bill Gates, not you.

Obviously you don't know how corporate ownership by shareholders works.
Bill is but one of millions of owners of Microsoft. He is NOT the sole
owner of Microsoft, nor of this group.

I see you in
your small room, in the darkness, venting filth.

LOL! I see you, in a sh*t-filled pair of Depends, with a very bad set
of false teeth. A Monty Python village idiot reject.

Like this:

http://www.microscum.com/media/qw-1.wmv

Have a nice day,
Jersey Boy.

I always do! And I'm a South-Florida boy now!



Neil UK wrote:
Dear Mr Eddy

I do appreciate the fact that you are taking the time to address the
issues I have raised. I don't at this time see the link you mention
for complaining. I have already complained in detail. If you can't
find the people concerned, that's your problem.

How effin't rude! Your the one with a problem, supposedly with me
over my Jersey Boy manner, and then you try to turn it around to
make your problem John's!

What an arrogant prick you are, Neil! Who do you think you are to
push your problems on to others?!

I appreciate what has been said about people using the same name: it
just doesn't sit well with me. Change the system, I say. One name
one contributor!

When you pay for you own group, then you can make the rules, but
until then, go bugger off!

This is the "Contact Us" link that John was talking about:

http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=2028376

Alternately, you can go to the page at the link below, and then
click on "Contact Us" at the bottom of that page:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ewsgroups.mspx

HTH

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"



--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

In ,
Neil UK typed:

I just want this group to be used
for the discussion of problems in Windows XP, with no insults
and no
bad language. Is that too much to ask?


I'm afraid it is too much to ask. As much as you or I might want
to set such rules, the reality of the way these newsgroups work
is that there are essentially no rules.

What is, is. Your choices are to live with it the way it is, or
if you can't, killfile those who offend you. Alternatively stay
away from the group entirely.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

Neil UK wrote:
Boring!!!


But it goes to show, that you lack the self-control to stop reading my
posts. You continue to torture yourself reading my rude posts, instead
of taking matters into your own hands and stop reading my words! But
then again, at your age, you have a hard enough of a time controlling
your bowels let alone being able to control what you read!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

http://www.defence.gov.au/RAAF/inter...mes/AFDG_W.zip


Here's a reward fo y'all. You too can be a RAAF guard. RAAF bases get =
buzzed by wild balloons and only the guard can defend the base.

Thankfully Australia's enemies don't seem to have planes.
--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"kurttrail" wrote in message =
...
Neil UK wrote:
Arrogant prick? It takes one to know one.
=20
Yes it does! And I'm damned proud of it. Unlike you, trying to deny=20
yourself, behind a veil of feigned civility!
=20
I don't come here to ask for answers, but to provide them. And I try =
to=20
have a good time along the way, and hope that others are amused, but=20
certain that some uptight anal pansy will become upset. Do I try to=20
upset people on purpose? No, for the most part. Mostly I'm trying to =

be entertaining, but when someone takes my entertainment too =
seriously,=20
those I do go out of my way to offend.
=20
You are the one with the
problems.
=20
None at all. I'm not the one that is upset, over mere words, you are.
=20
I was just seeking answers on this site, when suddenly I
found a foul-mouthed person, namely YOU.
=20
That sounds like your problem, not mine. Foulness is in the mind of =
the=20
beholder. What you consider foul, another may find to be harmless=20
humor.
=20
And what is this about
paying for my own group?
=20
If you want to have a group that will change its rules for your=20
sensibilities, then create your own. MS is not gonna change its rules =

for some ****** like you!
=20
Do you own or pay for the present group?
=20
I'm not the one saying that the rules about peoples nick's need to be=20
changed so that they are unique to the individual.
=20
I
doubt it.
=20
Whatever.
=20
The group is owned by Bill Gates, not you.
=20
Obviously you don't know how corporate ownership by shareholders =
works.=20
Bill is but one of millions of owners of Microsoft. He is NOT the =
sole=20
owner of Microsoft, nor of this group.
=20
I see you in
your small room, in the darkness, venting filth.
=20
LOL! I see you, in a sh*t-filled pair of Depends, with a very bad set =

of false teeth. A Monty Python village idiot reject.
=20
Like this:
=20
http://www.microscum.com/media/qw-1.wmv
=20
Have a nice day,
Jersey Boy.
=20
I always do! And I'm a South-Florida boy now!
=20
=20

Neil UK wrote:
Dear Mr Eddy

I do appreciate the fact that you are taking the time to address =
the
issues I have raised. I don't at this time see the link you =
mention
for complaining. I have already complained in detail. If you can't
find the people concerned, that's your problem.

How effin't rude! Your the one with a problem, supposedly with me
over my Jersey Boy manner, and then you try to turn it around to
make your problem John's!

What an arrogant prick you are, Neil! Who do you think you are to
push your problems on to others?!

I appreciate what has been said about people using the same name: =
it
just doesn't sit well with me. Change the system, I say. One name
one contributor!

When you pay for you own group, then you can make the rules, but
until then, go bugger off!

This is the "Contact Us" link that John was talking about:

http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=3D2028376

Alternately, you can go to the page at the link below, and then
click on "Contact Us" at the bottom of that page:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ewsgroups.mspx

HTH

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
=20
=20
=20
--=20
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"=20
=20
=20

David Candy wrote:
What's your problem with bad language? I can understand the septics
problem with it (lots of guns), but yours.

There hardly is anything more relativistic than the concept of "bad
language."

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

David Candy wrote:
http://www.defence.gov.au/RAAF/inter...mes/AFDG_W.zip


Here's a reward fo y'all. You too can be a RAAF guard. RAAF bases get
buzzed by wild balloons and only the guard can defend the base.

Thankfully Australia's enemies don't seem to have planes.

They'll just "borrow" America's planes when they feel the need!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Ken Blake wrote:
In ,
Neil UK typed:

I just want this group to be used
for the discussion of problems in Windows XP, with no insults
and no
bad language. Is that too much to ask?


I'm afraid it is too much to ask. As much as you or I might want
to set such rules, the reality of the way these newsgroups work
is that there are essentially no rules.

What is, is. Your choices are to live with it the way it is, or
if you can't, killfile those who offend you. Alternatively stay
away from the group entirely.

He'd have to use a newsreader in order to kill-file me like you have
Ken! ROFL!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

"kurttrail" wrote

David Candy wrote:
Most of the others here who do mince words are also americians.
Americians are known for excessive politeness.

Not where I'm from we ain't.

--
Peace!
Kurt

Maybe David's confusing us with the English. American are famous for
hoofinmouth afflictions. Look at who's in the White House for crying
outloud. Bush would probably think that "polite" means "pour me a lite".

Heh.

Just had to interject my "rude reply".

Alias