If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:57:24 +0100, Mark Lloyd wrote:
On 10/01/2018 05:55 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: [snip] Trouble is inkjets like to make stripes. They do. Sometimes that can be fixed by wasting ink (cleaning cycles, usually more than one). Do too many of those and it claims the "waste ink pad is full" and I must either replace the printer or pay Epson more than the value of it to replace the ink pad, which apparently I can't do myself. I did do it myself once (in fact all I did was tell the printer I'd done it by using 3rd party software). |
Ads |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:49:42 +0100, Mark Lloyd wrote:
On 10/01/2018 05:56 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: [snip] I replaced my last Epson with a 2nd hand one so I could keep the same ink system. I'll consider that, maybe there'll be one on eBay. I've done that before. Look up CISS (Continuous Ink Supply System) on Ebay, and find one that matches a printer you can also get hold of. It's 0.01 GBP per ml of ink. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:46:20 +0100, Mark Lloyd wrote:
On 10/01/2018 04:18 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: [snip] No, because you can't buy cheaper toner. Toner is inherently expensive, even if you refill them yourself. I tried some "low cost" cartridges in my printer. They were NOT "low cost", considering that they leaked toner messing up every page. BTW, that printer is OK once I cleaned it thoroughly and put in good cartridges. I have only ever had them leak in the post, not the printer. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:42:59 +0100, Mark Lloyd wrote:
On 10/01/2018 04:17 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: [snip] Most people have many uses for a printer and need it done now, not the next day. Many people seem to think of cost only in money. I'm aware of how much time my inkjet spends cleaning the printheads rather than the printing I wanted. Also, now I've got a (Epson) inkjet printer that will not print black (it prints the other colors OK), even with a new cartridge. Yes I've wasted hours cursing the ****ing thing. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
In article , Mark Lloyd
wrote: Trouble is inkjets like to make stripes. They do. not normally, they don't. Sometimes that can be fixed by wasting ink (cleaning cycles, usually more than one). if it's due to a clogged jet, then a head cleaning will fix it, usually just once unless it's *really* clogged, which is very rare. if it's due to misalignment, then a cleaning won't help, but an alignment will, which doesn't use much ink (it's just printing patterns). https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/T...171/d2e7447044 77437281f0a8edbbdddaec |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
In article , Mark Lloyd
wrote: Buying almost any laser printer is the better choice. not necessarily. for photos, it's a much worse choice. My current Brother laser printer won't print photos on glossy paper, but it does a decent job on plain paper. it's not as good as what an inkjet can do, even if it's not a photo quality inkjet printer. Not as good. I often find it to be good enough, and preferable to multiple "head cleaning" cycles (sometimes requiring a new ink cartridge or two) on an inkjet. there's no need to do a head cleaning cycle unless there is a clog which is mostly a thing of the past, except perhaps, if the printer is not used very often or improperly shut down. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 19:17:21 +0100, nospam wrote:
In article , Mark Lloyd wrote: Buying almost any laser printer is the better choice. not necessarily. for photos, it's a much worse choice. My current Brother laser printer won't print photos on glossy paper, but it does a decent job on plain paper. it's not as good as what an inkjet can do, even if it's not a photo quality inkjet printer. Not as good. I often find it to be good enough, and preferable to multiple "head cleaning" cycles (sometimes requiring a new ink cartridge or two) on an inkjet. there's no need to do a head cleaning cycle unless there is a clog which is mostly a thing of the past, except perhaps, if the printer is not used very often or improperly shut down. No, I find they also clog in the middle of a large run. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
In article , Jimmy Wilkinson
Knife wrote: No, I find they also clog in the middle of a large run. bull****. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 19:17:18 +0100, nospam wrote:
In article , Mark Lloyd wrote: Trouble is inkjets like to make stripes. They do. not normally, they don't. Sometimes that can be fixed by wasting ink (cleaning cycles, usually more than one). if it's due to a clogged jet, then a head cleaning will fix it, usually just once unless it's *really* clogged, which is very rare. You must have a very rare and expensive inkjet. Most clog repeatedly and often need several cleaning cycles, whether they're used infrequently or not. if it's due to misalignment, then a cleaning won't help, but an alignment will, which doesn't use much ink (it's just printing patterns). https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/T...171/d2e7447044 77437281f0a8edbbdddaec I've never seen any inkjet or other printer go out of line. Not sure why they have that alignment procedure as it's never needed. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
In article , Jimmy Wilkinson
Knife wrote: Sometimes that can be fixed by wasting ink (cleaning cycles, usually more than one). if it's due to a clogged jet, then a head cleaning will fix it, usually just once unless it's *really* clogged, which is very rare. You must have a very rare and expensive inkjet. nope. Most clog repeatedly and often need several cleaning cycles, whether they're used infrequently or not. nope. if it's due to misalignment, then a cleaning won't help, but an alignment will, which doesn't use much ink (it's just printing patterns). https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/T...171/d2e7447044 77437281f0a8edbbdddaec I've never seen any inkjet or other printer go out of line. that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Not sure why they have that alignment procedure as it's never needed. yes it is. |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 03:06:46 +0100, Paul wrote:
Paul wrote: Char Jackson wrote: On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:38:41 +1000, Peter Jason wrote: By the way, are laser toners light fast? I have been downloading a few artworks & either printing them out on my laser color printer (FujiXerox CP405d) or printing the A3 version in the local computer shop. The quality of the FujiXerox is very good, though the long-lasting cartridges cost about $440. I have no idea. Hopefully, someone else will chime in. I don't see the words "archival print quality" in the article on toner. Black toner used to be made from carbon particles, and that material should hold up well. Something made from colored plastic or wax, not so much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toner Paul Actually, the Wired article will give you the names of some colored stuff. https://www.wired.com/2015/03/whats-...printer-toner/ Carbon Black Pigment Yellow 180 benzimidazolone Pigment Red 122 2,9-dimethyl-quinacridone Pigment Blue 15:3 Copper phthalocyanine Then, if you toss the "end-word" of those into a Google search, you can get more info. Those compounds are used in inkjet inks. You would need to find a similar paper on toner, to prove the compounds are actually in toner. http://www.cabotcorp.com/~/media/fil...for-inkjet.pdf The important takeaway from that PDF, is that the lightfastness varies greatly. It means of the toner colors in a print, one color might outlast some of the others. The print will fade in one color, and be "off". Rather than all the colors just "disappearing" on some sunny day. The articles seem to think that red pigment is pretty good. If that's the case, why can't we have red cars where the color stays good for the life of the car ? The "red" used in paints isn't very good. I don't know how you come to that conclusion. I've never seen a car where the paint has faded, even when old enough so that the mechanical parts are beyond repair. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 07:48:10 +0100, Martin Edwards wrote:
On 10/2/2018 12:08 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:55:55 +0100, Martin Edwards wrote: On 9/30/2018 7:00 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:29 +0100, nospam wrote: In article , Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Why is it, that in the 21st century, printers never do what you tell them to? They forget you want landscape, they forget the number of copies, they refuse to cancel a job you've sent, they try to use colour ink for a black and white image and take 5 times longer, they can't feed a piece of paper without jamming it, the nozzles clog up every five minutes, the ink cartridges are stupidly small, and they **** about for ten minutes doing god knows what, spinning the roller and moving the cartridge back and forth for no reason before they get to work! oh ! user error How is any of that user error? because it doesn't happen to just about everyone else. I don't know anyone who hasn't been annoyed 50% of the time they use their printer. settings are saved between jobs, Well they try to. Then you get stupid things like 100 copies of document x means you must want 100 copies of document y. And cancelling a job is almost impossible, you have to turn off the printer, tell the computer to cancel it, then for some reason wait 5 minutes?! ink use is whatever the user chooses, Really? So I can just insert a sensible sized tank into my inkjet can I? there is no delay in printing, and paper jams are *very* rare, usually the fault of improperly loading the tray. All printers are **** at loading paper, mind you it's pretty hard to pick up one sheet with your fingers without licking them. My loader is upright. At first it did not work because I shoved the paper in too far. I learned to just drop it in, but chck that it had made contact. I thought that was obvious. I daresay it was, but I'm not very practical. I used to know a Czech professor who could change 15 settings in Windows simply by moving the mouse. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:14:59 +0100, nospam wrote:
In article , Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Sometimes that can be fixed by wasting ink (cleaning cycles, usually more than one). if it's due to a clogged jet, then a head cleaning will fix it, usually just once unless it's *really* clogged, which is very rare. You must have a very rare and expensive inkjet. nope. Most clog repeatedly and often need several cleaning cycles, whether they're used infrequently or not. nope. if it's due to misalignment, then a cleaning won't help, but an alignment will, which doesn't use much ink (it's just printing patterns). https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/T...171/d2e7447044 77437281f0a8edbbdddaec I've never seen any inkjet or other printer go out of line. that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Not sure why they have that alignment procedure as it's never needed. yes it is. Strange that your printers never clog, but mine never go out of line. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:12:35 +0100, nospam wrote:
In article , Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: No, I find they also clog in the middle of a large run. bull****. It isn't Mr Speed, as you have never seen my printer running. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Annoying printers
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 03:09:31 +0100, Jim H wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 23:56:05 +0100, in , "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote: I replaced my last Epson with a 2nd hand one so I could keep the same ink system. I gave my inkjet printer to Goodwill years ago and replaced it with a laser printer. The cartridges are pricey, but I get 2x to 3x the pages for the same cost vs ink... and no nozzles to plug up. But do your research because some have a reputation for bad paper handling and jams are a real pain in the ass to remove unless you have easy access to the back of the printer. Shop based on reliability, reputation, ratings and definitely toner COST PER PAGE. Shop only for lowest price for the printer and you're begging for disappointment. When you set it up, decrease the auto-calibration and self cleaning intervals drastically or turn both off altogether. You can calibrate or clean manually by punching a few button or via a few mouse clicks when truly needed. What a bloody hassle, the printer should be made properly in the first place. And lastly, if you do go the laser route, don't be discouraged by the number of pages you get with the cartridges that come with the printer. Fairly standard practice is that they're only half full vs replacement cartridges. As for the all the rest that you started out with... I've never heard anything like it. You were either exaggerating or the printer you have is a lemon. Plus a good healthy dose of not knowing how printer settings work. Switching to a laser won't help even one little bit with the latter... and might even make it worse. Which of "the rest" are you referring to? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|