If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
Slimer wrote:
On 2016-02-20 4:47 PM, Stef wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2016-02-19 11:51 PM, Jasen Betts wrote: On 2016-02-18, Slimer wrote: RAID0. I know how to "tell" Linux how to do things, it simply didn't see the RAID which had been set by the damned BIOS. This is a Linux problem, not a user or computer problem. definately fake raid if it's in the bios. Yep. Anything that Linux can't do properly is fake. Don't get your panties in a bunch. FakeRAID is just a general term applied to any RAID implementation, regardless of OS, that is not 100% hardware based via a dedicated RAID card. I know of no motherboards that have a RAID controller chip built-in. So, their implemenations are all "fake," too, even though they work and appear just like the hardware version. Even Linux's software RAID which has been around for as long as I can remember is called "fake" even by those who use it to distinguish it from the hardware card type. As far as BIOS RAID, it is a hybrid which uses both software and a special hard drive controller chip (NOT a RAID controller) to implement the RAID, and is still considered "fake." As Linux doesn't use BIOS for hardware info and configuration, it's not going to "see" that BIOS setting for RAID. However, their are exceptions. And I've read that most any Linux can be configured to use BIOS RAID, but I've never done it. Here's some links for your edification (old, but useful): http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=3626577 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FakeRaidHowto https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Raid Also, you never said what you needed the RAID for. Mirroring? JBOD? Etc? It's not needed per se. The way this laptop was configured by default, it set two M.2 SSDs of 128GB each in a RAID0 configuration to provide the user with the best possible performance that would also have a decent amount of space for the operating system and software. I could just as easily use two separate disks and have actually changed the partitioning somewhat so that 100GB is given to the OS and the rest goes to games but I want to maintain a RAID because it does, indeed, optimize performance. I can see a set up like this for spinning disks, but as SSDs are so damn fast anyway is there really a significant improvement? The bottleneck is going to be the OS I/O. It can only respond so fast regardless of how potentially fast the disk set up is. Just curious. Stef |
Ads |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:41:33 -0500, Slimer
wrote: Your position is interesting because it essentially tells me that some people, if they chose to use something as obsolete as the Atari 1040ST, might still be able to do whatever they need to provided that the latest in multimedia doesn't interest them. I'd actually tell you that your old, archaic technology might allow you to focus more as today's systems and software do little more than simply distract us from what we really need to do. I dont know anything about Atari, I never used one, but I do know they are far behind Windows 9x and 2000. But if people want to use an Atari, it's their preference and right to do so. I dont consider Windows 98se or 2000 to be archaic. Both of them are usable and they do the job. The only thing archaic about them is that they were developed to be practical and useful OSs, and not bloated "toys" which is what newer Windows OSs are. You're right, the latest multimedia doesn't interest me. I can easily play videos, and animations. I dont play games at all, so none of that matters to me. My computer is a tool for productivity, not a toy, not a thing to annoy me with stupid questions, popups, silly animated dog pictures, ugly Metro touch screens, and other annoyances which began with XP, and has only gotten worse. Nor did I get a computer to constantly upgrade, relearn and spend days trying to remove all the unwanted "forced" irritating features. These old, and relatively simple OSs, get my projects done, and without a lot of hassles. Just like a 20 year old car which runs well, it gets me to my destination. What has really changed since Windows 98se? Actually not much. The productivity existed back then, and occurred with much less hardware requirements. MS is notorious for slowing down every upgrade in hardware speed, created by the computer manufacurers and continues to demand more and more power, while the actual user speed of computers has not increased because MS wastes all that power and speed allowed by faster CPU's, dual core, much more RAM, and so on. All that extra power and it all goes to waste running unneeded bloat. On top of that, when newer OSs go awry, it becomes a major task to repair them, or often re-install them. For example, the install of XP on my laptop seems to need to be reinstalled every 2 years or it just keeps getting slower and slower, despite the fact I have most of the bloat disabled, clear cache, do not store deleted files in the recycle bin, and so on. Yet, I'm still running the same installation of Win98se which I installed 15 or 16 years ago. Yea, I did have to restore my backup a few times due to malware, but I have not reinstalled it. I've even moved it to other (newer and faster) computers, by simply moving the hard drive and installing some drivers for the new hardware. You cant do that with XP (I tried), and I'm sure there are more limitations with Vista, Win7 8 or 10. No Thanks, I dont need the hassle or headaches of newer OSs, when nothing useful has really changed. I know that MS wants to keep making money, so they keep adding more bloated crap and call it a "New and Improved Version". Yea, it's "New" but "improved" is questionable... The only thing that' really lacking in Win98 or 2000, is someone to write a web browser that works properly with modern websites. But there again, what has really improved on these new websites? NOT MUCH. They just bloat them with useless features, which requires more crap to load, faster internet service, and lots of wasted bandwidth. Of you compare the web to a daily newspaper, there are only two needed things. TEXT and PICTURES. With these two things, you can do a story and let people know what's happening. The old websites were exactly that. They were useful and relatively fast to load. But that's a thing of the past too. Now we need tons of scripts, CSS, a video for damn near everything, not to mention the excessive advertising. What was once a useful library of quick to access information, is now a sea of garbage with the possibility of finding something useful, like finding a needle in a haystack. The usefulness of the internet is gone. It's now faster to drive to the local library and go back to the old ways of reading books. Nothing has really improved, in fact we have taken a step backwards. But MS and hardware manufacturers keep making money, while our garbage dumps keep filling up with toxic waste from old computers that often were still usable, but MS made sure that people dumped them and spent their money for the latest garbageware...... |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
On 2/21/2016 3:56 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote:
Martin Edwards argues: On 2/20/2016 4:59 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: ...the Garden of Eden - which was a glorified place, not a temporal place... There is no textual evidence for that at all. God built a garden, on his own presumably. On what evidence is your premise based? Somethin' you saw on TV?!? Well, there is "textual evidence" of "that"... If the Bible, or the Torah, or the book of Genesis can be self-evincing. You see, in Chapter 3 of Genesis, when God evicted Adam and Eve, two (2) very poignant and profound things happened; 1) God said "If you eat... you will surely die..." Adam ate - as did Eve - but they didn't "die" IMMEDIATELY -- therefore the concept of 'time' (temporal) is introduced; and, 2) God busily dressed Adam and Eve in "skins" to protect them from elements of weather, etc., and addressed a lot of other ingredients they would now have to be dealing with which they previously did not have to deal with - because of their physical changes and the physical changes of the environment in which they'd now have to survive... See, that's the Devil's "big lie"... God said "...you will surely die..." and the Devil said "Nawwwww... God's just telling you a tale to keep you subservient..." So when they ate, they didn't immediately fall down and "die", thus they thought God might have been lying to them - or at least embellishing the consequences. That's how Eve convinced Adam to eat... "See, I ate and I did not die!" That's not a verbatim quote, however you can get that from God's discussion with Adam after the rebellion... "It was that woman you gave me who made me do it." This is "Original Sin". This is why we are born into "Original Sin". It's nothing we did particularly. It's just that Adam and Eve "fell short of God's will" [which is the definition of "sin"] and we are procreated in the image of a fallen Adam and Eve. Taaaaaa daaaaa! And that's WHY we need a path back to be re-unified with God, our Creator... and that's WHAT Jesus did and why he's called "The Second Adam". He obeyed God's will despite unspeakable and horrible physical pain and suffering... That's also WHY Jesus cannot be "God", per se. He's simply returned to a state of glorified existence, the same glorified existence in which Eden with Adam and Eve were created; to wit, "Heaven"! As in simple mathematics, you simply have to accept that "2" is a symbol of a very real precept to not get all confused by "2 + 2 = 4". Keep taking the pills. -- Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
On 2/21/2016 3:26 PM, Caver1 wrote:
On 02/21/2016 02:43 AM, Martin Edwards wrote: On 2/20/2016 5:17 PM, Caver1 wrote: On 02/20/2016 12:05 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! Hitler was trying to setup his own religion. That has to be treated with caution. Himmler was, but by some accounts Hitler made fun of him. Hitler admired the organization of the Catholic church even though he disliked Christianity. Hitler was trying to set up a Nazi "religion" in Germany that all would follow using many of the structures of the Catholic church. Hitler realized that if he wanted the masses to to believe in Nazism he needed that kind of structure. Yes. The cranky stuff came from Himmler and his acolytes, that's all I'm saying. Caution is needed because some writers claim that the Third Reich was a full blown Satanic empire. -- Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
John Q. Public Dumbass:
Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via : Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! How many Muslims do you know personally? What you just posted is bull**** as most Muslims want no part of war. 'Cept the ones who do! If "most Muslims" wanted no part of violence and war, they'd STOP the ones who do in their tracks - or at least turn them all in... Then there'd be no war! (SEAL) If all the Muslims, all 1.5 billion of them, wanted you dead, you would be DEAD. Do you even know how many Muslims are living in the USA? So far all the mass shootings in your **** poor excuse for a country, are done by bat **** crazy white Christians. San Bernadino! Shot them filthy Muslims so many times they processed them like a screen door in a submarine. So, come on down and start shooting, if you be a Muslim and don't be value yer life! I got yer boom! right here. -- I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; Resolve conflicts the American way: Rock - Paper - Scissors - Concealed Firearm! .... and I approve this message! |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
Martin Edwards posted this via
: On 2/21/2016 3:56 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: Martin Edwards argues: On 2/20/2016 4:59 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: ...the Garden of Eden - which was a glorified place, not a temporal place... There is no textual evidence for that at all. God built a garden, on his own presumably. On what evidence is your premise based? Somethin' you saw on TV?!? Well, there is "textual evidence" of "that"... If the Bible, or the Torah, or the book of Genesis can be self-evincing. You see, in Chapter 3 of Genesis, when God evicted Adam and Eve, two (2) very poignant and profound things happened; 1) God said "If you eat... you will surely die..." Adam ate - as did Eve - but they didn't "die" IMMEDIATELY -- therefore the concept of 'time' (temporal) is introduced; and, 2) God busily dressed Adam and Eve in "skins" to protect them from elements of weather, etc., and addressed a lot of other ingredients they would now have to be dealing with which they previously did not have to deal with - because of their physical changes and the physical changes of the environment in which they'd now have to survive... See, that's the Devil's "big lie"... God said "...you will surely die..." and the Devil said "Nawwwww... God's just telling you a tale to keep you subservient..." So when they ate, they didn't immediately fall down and "die", thus they thought God might have been lying to them - or at least embellishing the consequences. That's how Eve convinced Adam to eat... "See, I ate and I did not die!" That's not a verbatim quote, however you can get that from God's discussion with Adam after the rebellion... "It was that woman you gave me who made me do it." This is "Original Sin". This is why we are born into "Original Sin". It's nothing we did particularly. It's just that Adam and Eve "fell short of God's will" [which is the definition of "sin"] and we are procreated in the image of a fallen Adam and Eve. Taaaaaa daaaaa! And that's WHY we need a path back to be re-unified with God, our Creator... and that's WHAT Jesus did and why he's called "The Second Adam". He obeyed God's will despite unspeakable and horrible physical pain and suffering... That's also WHY Jesus cannot be "God", per se. He's simply returned to a state of glorified existence, the same glorified existence in which Eden with Adam and Eve were created; to wit, "Heaven"! As in simple mathematics, you simply have to accept that "2" is a symbol of a very real precept to not get all confused by "2 + 2 = 4". Keep taking the pills. Keep spinning on that stick you got stuck up yer ass. -- I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; Resolve conflicts the American way: Rock - Paper - Scissors - Concealed Firearm! .... and I approve this message! |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
Martin Edwards posted this via news:UWyyy.684848
: On 2/21/2016 3:26 PM, Caver1 wrote: On 02/21/2016 02:43 AM, Martin Edwards wrote: On 2/20/2016 5:17 PM, Caver1 wrote: On 02/20/2016 12:05 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! Hitler was trying to setup his own religion. That has to be treated with caution. Himmler was, but by some accounts Hitler made fun of him. Hitler admired the organization of the Catholic church even though he disliked Christianity. Hitler was trying to set up a Nazi "religion" in Germany that all would follow using many of the structures of the Catholic church. Hitler realized that if he wanted the masses to to believe in Nazism he needed that kind of structure. Yes. The cranky stuff came from Himmler and his acolytes, that's all I'm saying. Caution is needed because some writers claim that the Third Reich was a full blown Satanic empire. Evil is as Evil does. -- I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; Resolve conflicts the American way: Rock - Paper - Scissors - Concealed Firearm! .... and I approve this message! |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:57:57 -0600, philo wrote:
On 02/18/2016 05:47 PM, T wrote: On 02/18/2016 02:34 PM, philo wrote: http://toastytech.com/files/95browsing.html Great Link :-) And for those annoyed by Mozilla, there is also Ice Weasel I may fire up one of my antique machines just to give it a try. As to NT3.51 I never used it other than for demonstration purposes on one of my antique machines. For the little I saw of it, it worked fine...the older NT 3.1 which I also fooled with ...locked up often. As to NT-4...I did not want to leave it, but the USB support of Win-2000 forced me to abandon it. I used to use NT 3.51 Server version on one of my PS/2 machines. Just a 32bit version of WfWG! |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
Bucky Breeder wrote:
John Q. Public Dumbass: Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via : Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! How many Muslims do you know personally? What you just posted is bull**** as most Muslims want no part of war. 'Cept the ones who do! If "most Muslims" wanted no part of violence and war, they'd STOP the ones who do in their tracks - or at least turn them all in... Then there'd be no war! (SEAL) If all the Muslims, all 1.5 billion of them, wanted you dead, you would be DEAD. Do you even know how many Muslims are living in the USA? So far all the mass shootings in your **** poor excuse for a country, are done by bat **** crazy white Christians. San Bernadino! Shot them filthy Muslims so many times they processed them like a screen door in a submarine. So, come on down and start shooting, if you be a Muslim and don't be value yer life! I got yer boom! right here. One case. Wow. I'm unimpressed and you are too stupid to listen to reason so **** off. -- John Q. Public |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
John Q. Public, the stupid dumbass:
Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public Dumbass: Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via : Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! How many Muslims do you know personally? What you just posted is bull**** as most Muslims want no part of war. 'Cept the ones who do! If "most Muslims" wanted no part of violence and war, they'd STOP the ones who do in their tracks - or at least turn them all in... Then there'd be no war! (SEAL) If all the Muslims, all 1.5 billion of them, wanted you dead, you would be DEAD. Do you even know how many Muslims are living in the USA? So far all the mass shootings in your **** poor excuse for a country, are done by bat **** crazy white Christians. San Bernadino! Shot them filthy Muslims so many times they processed them like a screen door in a submarine. So, come on down and start shooting, if you be a Muslim and don't be value yer life! I got yer boom! right here. One case. Wow. I'm unimpressed and you are too stupid to listen to reason so **** off. Oh... NOW, because YOU pooped yer geriatric diapers, I'm "too stupid to listen to 'reason'..." Filthy freakin' Muslims... You know why Muslims wear rags on their heads? So they have a spare set of diapers to poop before they martyr a bunch of innocent people and little children and old people who aren't bothering anybody but just sitting around doing Arab stuff when the Mental Muslims want to blow up some more stuff for obscure "reasons" --- That's the Muslim way of getting people to "listen to [their] 'reason'..." Like you, you're obviously mentally retarded but you keep making noise because you can't blow up the internets. You stupid degenerate, you **** off -- and die -- and wear a sign that says you're a martyr for your cause; the "cause" being stupidity! The #1 growth industry today is 'Making Martyrs Out of Muslims' because they're a violent and stupid people who are the Biblical "Wolves in Sheeps' Clothing". "Muslims are so religious and peaceful.... BOOM!!! FYI. -- I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; Resolve conflicts the American way: Rock - Paper - Scissors - Concealed Firearm! Donald Trump will build a wall around the entire Earth - and make the Aliens pay for it! .... and I approve this message! |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
John Q. Public, resident village dumbass drooled this:
Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via : Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! How many Muslims do you know personally? What you just posted is bull**** as most Muslims want no part of war. 'Cept the ones who do! If "most Muslims" wanted no part of violence and war, they'd STOP the ones who do in their tracks - or at least turn them all in... Then there'd be no war! (SEAL) If all the Muslims, all 1.5 billion of them, wanted you dead, you would be DEAD. Do you even know how many Muslims are living in the USA? So far all the mass shootings in your **** poor excuse for a country, are done by bat **** crazy white Christians. Bull****! You can't prove there are 1.5 billion Muslims... You can't even count that high. Even if there were so many Muslims, most "Muslims" just say that they are "Muslims" because a Muslim - or Muslims - have a gun to their head, or a knife at their throats or have kidnapped their children... Given the choice to die or say you are a Muslim, you would probably say you are a Muslim too -- even though you probably cannot pass the Muslim test. The #1 economic growth industry in the world today is 'Making Martyrs Out of Muslims' because Muslims are such dumbass terrorists and maniacs. If there were so many "peaceful Muslims" then they would absolutely stop all the violence and senseless violence and turn the bad ones in so they could live in peace - if that's what they REALLY wanted... But they don't! They're all a bunch of lying chicken**** violent goatfuukers who want to go out of this world in violence and explosions because they're stupid and brain damaged by their stupid and brain damaged parents, families, villages and churches - probably because historically they spent too much time out in the sun, so their brains are extremely damaged by evolution and they pass that on to their little baby Muslims... Read the internets and you might learn some truth even if you have to take your ADHD drugs to listen to reason. FYI. -- I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; Resolve conflicts the American way: Rock - Paper - Scissors - Concealed Firearm! Donald Trump will build a wall around the entire Earth - and make the Aliens pay for it! .... and I approve this message! |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
Bucky Breeder wrote:
John Q. Public, resident village dumbass drooled this: Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via : Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! How many Muslims do you know personally? What you just posted is bull**** as most Muslims want no part of war. 'Cept the ones who do! If "most Muslims" wanted no part of violence and war, they'd STOP the ones who do in their tracks - or at least turn them all in... Then there'd be no war! (SEAL) If all the Muslims, all 1.5 billion of them, wanted you dead, you would be DEAD. Do you even know how many Muslims are living in the USA? So far all the mass shootings in your **** poor excuse for a country, are done by bat **** crazy white Christians. Bull****! You can't prove there are 1.5 billion Muslims... Idiot |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
On 2/22/2016 5:56 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote:
Martin Edwards posted this via news:UWyyy.684848 : On 2/21/2016 3:26 PM, Caver1 wrote: On 02/21/2016 02:43 AM, Martin Edwards wrote: On 2/20/2016 5:17 PM, Caver1 wrote: On 02/20/2016 12:05 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! Hitler was trying to setup his own religion. That has to be treated with caution. Himmler was, but by some accounts Hitler made fun of him. Hitler admired the organization of the Catholic church even though he disliked Christianity. Hitler was trying to set up a Nazi "religion" in Germany that all would follow using many of the structures of the Catholic church. Hitler realized that if he wanted the masses to to believe in Nazism he needed that kind of structure. Yes. The cranky stuff came from Himmler and his acolytes, that's all I'm saying. Caution is needed because some writers claim that the Third Reich was a full blown Satanic empire. Evil is as Evil does. This discussion is above your level of intelligence. -- Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?=
posted this via : Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public, resident village dumbass drooled this: Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via : Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! How many Muslims do you know personally? What you just posted is bull**** as most Muslims want no part of war. 'Cept the ones who do! If "most Muslims" wanted no part of violence and war, they'd STOP the ones who do in their tracks - or at least turn them all in... Then there'd be no war! (SEAL) If all the Muslims, all 1.5 billion of them [blah-blah-blah] libberal whiney drivel SNIPPED!... Bull****! You can't prove there are 1.5 billion Muslims... Idiot You are a fuukeen idiot and a colossal asshole... Prove it, mutherfuuker, go ahead and prove it, you nym-shyfting snip-and-snipe POS... Go ahead and get your "1.5 billion Muslims" that DON'T have a knife to their throats or a gun to their head or their families being held hostage... Muslims are animals - couching themselves as a "religion"... You think you're a 'politically correct' pundit, but you are the very definition of "IDIOT"! At least cats are cute, if they wanna be a "religion". -- I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; "Éí 'Aaníígóó 'Áhoot'é" Donald Trump will build a wall around the entire Earth - and make the Aliens pay for it! .... and I approve this message! |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
ReactOS
Martin Edwards posted this via
: On 2/22/2016 5:56 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: Martin Edwards posted this via news:UWyyy.684848 : On 2/21/2016 3:26 PM, Caver1 wrote: On 02/21/2016 02:43 AM, Martin Edwards wrote: On 2/20/2016 5:17 PM, Caver1 wrote: On 02/20/2016 12:05 PM, Bucky Breeder wrote: John Q. Public posted this via news:naa42p$psk$2@dont- email.me: Slimer wrote: Firstly because Islam is not a race and people who hate it are therefore not racist Correct. They're bigots. "Isalm" aka "Muslims" is a geo-political movement which expouses the overthrow of current world governments by violence and force and masks itself as a "religion" in order to gain the benefits of civilized nations which grant considerations to legitimate religious organizations. All Hitler would have needed to do is declare "Nazi" as a religion, then he could have just immigrated his armies instead of invading countries.... You can not fool all the Red-Blooded Americans all the time! Hitler was trying to setup his own religion. That has to be treated with caution. Himmler was, but by some accounts Hitler made fun of him. Hitler admired the organization of the Catholic church even though he disliked Christianity. Hitler was trying to set up a Nazi "religion" in Germany that all would follow using many of the structures of the Catholic church. Hitler realized that if he wanted the masses to to believe in Nazism he needed that kind of structure. Yes. The cranky stuff came from Himmler and his acolytes, that's all I'm saying. Caution is needed because some writers claim that the Third Reich was a full blown Satanic empire. Evil is as Evil does. [idiot-slobber SNIPPED...] This discussion is OBVIOUSLY above your level of intelligence. -- I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; "Éí 'Aaníígóó 'Áhoot'é" Donald Trump will build a wall around the entire Earth - and make the Aliens pay for it! .... and I approve this message! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|