A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #151  
Old June 21st 16, 04:19 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
None
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

Wolf K wrote on 06.21.2016 :
On 2016-06-20 21:11, Roger Blake wrote:
[...]
I know of nothing in recent history that would make me ashamed to be
labeled a "conservative." (Noting of course that "conservative" and
"Republican" are not necessarily the same thing.) In fact I consider
liberal attacks to be a badge of honor.

There was a time when "liberal" had a positive connotation, as in
"classical
liberal," but that time has long since passed.


As an outside observer, this kind of language sounds like religion.

Lighten up. It's just about politics, not Eternal Truth.


A poorly disguised attack on Roger Blake, simply because you do not
like what he said.

'If you don't agree with what is said and don't have a good reply,
insult and diminish the content by comparing it to something you think
most people hate. Then, badger the author to change his words in the
hope he will be embarrassed and will remain silent'

Very slick Wolfie, betcha no one noticed......
Ads
  #152  
Old June 21st 16, 05:23 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Roger Blake[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 536
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

On 2016-06-21, Wolf K wrote:
You guys really are religious about politics.


Since government in the U.S. has become increasingly invasive, extending
its tentacles of coercion and violence into all aspects of life, it is
natural to become passionate about politics.

I don't have any skin in your game, I merely observe from the sidelines.


An enviable position to be in for this American election cycle. No matter
which of the current presumptive candidates wins we are screwed. To
quote Tom Lehrer, "It has been a nervous year and people have begun to
feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis."

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.)

NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  #153  
Old June 21st 16, 06:42 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
. . .winston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 335
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

Stormin' Norman wrote on 06/20/2016 3:34 PM:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:01:26 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:55:18 +0000, Stormin' Norman
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:03:43 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

Thanks. How are you doing on finding that evidence of voter fraud? Remember
that?

Char, I suspect you are only interested in ideological talking points, ad hominem attacks, your racist agenda
and unsubstantiated accusations.


I believe you've attributed to me that which you see in yourself. I haven't
done any of those things, but you have. I've called you out numerous times
already in this thread. Turning it around and pretending that it wasn't you
simply won't work. I expect better of you.


However, giving you the benefit of the doubt, you can obtain a copy of this
monograph, as did I, through a subscription held by the public library. Or, you can spend the $19.95 to
purchase it directly.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...61379414000973


Its pedigree seems to be highly suspect. Can you do better?


Char, when it comes to political debates, you have proven yourself to be a one trick pony, if it isn't an ad
hominem attack or another form of lie used to advance your agenda, you would have nothing to say.

Resultantly, I am not surprised you would denigrate the "pedigree" of the journal "Electoral Studies", as that
serves your purpose. You present nothing which refutes the study, nothing that shows the journal itself is
disreputable, nothing that factually impugns the veracity of the research, the integrity of the methodology or
the objectivity of the authors. You simply use a broad brush, dipped in feces, in an Alinsky-like attempt to
squelch any information you find contrary to your agenda.


There's a boatload of information and impropriety surrounding
ScienceDigest and its parent company and Group 'pedigree'. Dipping your
net on the suport side appears to be sinking your boat, just like the
last one launched on voter fraud.

--
...winston
msft mvp windows experience
  #154  
Old June 21st 16, 07:16 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
None
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

After serious thinking Wolf K wrote :
On 2016-06-21 11:19, none wrote:
Wolf K wrote on 06.21.2016 :
On 2016-06-20 21:11, Roger Blake wrote:
[...]
I know of nothing in recent history that would make me ashamed to be
labeled a "conservative." (Noting of course that "conservative" and
"Republican" are not necessarily the same thing.) In fact I consider
liberal attacks to be a badge of honor.

There was a time when "liberal" had a positive connotation, as in
"classical
liberal," but that time has long since passed.

As an outside observer, this kind of language sounds like religion.

Lighten up. It's just about politics, not Eternal Truth.


A poorly disguised attack on Roger Blake, simply because you do not
like what he said.


Bull****. You have no idea whether I agree or disagree with what he said, in
part or in tot. And I ain't gonna tell yer.

You guys really are religious about politics. I don't have any skin in your
game, I merely observe from the sidelines.

'If you don't agree with what is said and don't have a good reply,
insult and diminish the content by comparing it to something you think
most people hate. Then, badger the author to change his words in the
hope he will be embarrassed and will remain silent'

Very slick Wolfie, betcha no one noticed......


Nope, you guys attack each other the way religious fanatics attack each
other. Ad hominems, deliberate misreadings, unsound and invalid inferences,
attribution of hidden agendas, contemptuous use of labels, insults, and above
all the refusal treat each other as people of goodwill trying to come to some
understanding about what might actually work. You don't want to increase
understanding, you want to crush your opposition.

As Mercutio said, A pox on both your houses!

On the voter ID issue, I've several times referred you to the Canadian
system, which works very well, and once I even described it for you. No one
has actually considered that it might, just might, work for you, too. And no
one has explained why _States_ are allowed to regulate _Federal_ voting,
although I've indicated I'm puzzled. And I am gonna tell yer what I think
about that arrangement: It's system guaranteed to produce corruption.


Typical defense, turn it around on the other guy. LOL!

Have a good day wallowing in your bull**** Wolfie.
  #155  
Old June 21st 16, 07:32 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
None
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

.. . .winston wrote :

Char, when it comes to political debates, you have proven yourself to be a
one trick pony, if it isn't an ad
hominem attack or another form of lie used to advance your agenda, you
would have nothing to say.

Resultantly, I am not surprised you would denigrate the "pedigree" of the
journal "Electoral Studies", as that
serves your purpose. You present nothing which refutes the study, nothing
that shows the journal itself is
disreputable, nothing that factually impugns the veracity of the research,
the integrity of the methodology or
the objectivity of the authors. You simply use a broad brush, dipped in
feces, in an Alinsky-like attempt to
squelch any information you find contrary to your agenda.


There's a boatload of information and impropriety surrounding ScienceDigest
and its parent company and Group 'pedigree'. Dipping your net on the suport
side appears to be sinking your boat, just like the last one launched on
voter fraud.


Funny, you still can't provide ANY evidence to discredit the journal
Electoral Studies or the specific study in question. Don't worry, I am
probably the only one who noticed your bull**** ad hom attack.

Hey, Norm posted a link to an article from the Washington Post about
this same topic, maybe you should try to discredit that source too?

http://wapo.st/28Qd4lq

ROTFLMAO!
  #156  
Old June 21st 16, 08:35 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Justin Tyme[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 282
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:32:38 -0700, none wrote:

. . .winston wrote :

Char, when it comes to political debates, you have proven yourself to be a
one trick pony, if it isn't an ad
hominem attack or another form of lie used to advance your agenda, you
would have nothing to say.

Resultantly, I am not surprised you would denigrate the "pedigree" of the
journal "Electoral Studies", as that
serves your purpose. You present nothing which refutes the study, nothing
that shows the journal itself is
disreputable, nothing that factually impugns the veracity of the research,
the integrity of the methodology or
the objectivity of the authors. You simply use a broad brush, dipped in
feces, in an Alinsky-like attempt to
squelch any information you find contrary to your agenda.


There's a boatload of information and impropriety surrounding ScienceDigest
and its parent company and Group 'pedigree'. Dipping your net on the suport
side appears to be sinking your boat, just like the last one launched on
voter fraud.


Funny, you still can't provide ANY evidence to discredit the journal
Electoral Studies or the specific study in question. Don't worry, I am
probably the only one who noticed your bull**** ad hom attack.

Hey, Norm posted a link to an article from the Washington Post about
this same topic, maybe you should try to discredit that source too?

http://wapo.st/28Qd4lq

ROTFLMAO!


I think your panties are too tight.
--
JT
  #157  
Old June 21st 16, 08:47 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
None
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

Justin Tyme used his keyboard to write :
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:32:38 -0700, none wrote:

. . .winston wrote :

Char, when it comes to political debates, you have proven yourself to be a
one trick pony, if it isn't an ad
hominem attack or another form of lie used to advance your agenda, you
would have nothing to say.

Resultantly, I am not surprised you would denigrate the "pedigree" of the
journal "Electoral Studies", as that
serves your purpose. You present nothing which refutes the study, nothing
that shows the journal itself is
disreputable, nothing that factually impugns the veracity of the research,
the integrity of the methodology or
the objectivity of the authors. You simply use a broad brush, dipped in
feces, in an Alinsky-like attempt to
squelch any information you find contrary to your agenda.


There's a boatload of information and impropriety surrounding ScienceDigest
and its parent company and Group 'pedigree'. Dipping your net on the
suport side appears to be sinking your boat, just like the last one
launched on voter fraud.


Funny, you still can't provide ANY evidence to discredit the journal
Electoral Studies or the specific study in question. Don't worry, I am
probably the only one who noticed your bull**** ad hom attack.

Hey, Norm posted a link to an article from the Washington Post about
this same topic, maybe you should try to discredit that source too?

http://wapo.st/28Qd4lq

ROTFLMAO!


I think your panties are too tight.


They feel better that way. ;-)
  #158  
Old June 21st 16, 09:45 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Buffalo[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 686
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................


This time it is only 50 dead and 53 critically injured!! There you have your peace loving religion.

Is there any religion that can match this?







WTF does this have to do with Win 10, jerkoff? There are other ngs that are for that bs purpose.
--
Buffalo
  #159  
Old June 21st 16, 10:23 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
. . .winston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 335
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

none wrote on 06/21/2016 2:32 PM:
. . .winston wrote :

Char, when it comes to political debates, you have proven yourself to
be a one trick pony, if it isn't an ad
hominem attack or another form of lie used to advance your agenda,
you would have nothing to say.

Resultantly, I am not surprised you would denigrate the "pedigree" of
the journal "Electoral Studies", as that
serves your purpose. You present nothing which refutes the study,
nothing that shows the journal itself is
disreputable, nothing that factually impugns the veracity of the
research, the integrity of the methodology or
the objectivity of the authors. You simply use a broad brush, dipped
in feces, in an Alinsky-like attempt to
squelch any information you find contrary to your agenda.


There's a boatload of information and impropriety surrounding
ScienceDigest and its parent company and Group 'pedigree'. Dipping
your net on the suport side appears to be sinking your boat, just like
the last one launched on voter fraud.


Funny, you still can't provide ANY evidence to discredit the journal
Electoral Studies or the specific study in question. Don't worry, I am
probably the only one who noticed your bull**** ad hom attack.

Hey, Norm posted a link to an article from the Washington Post about
this same topic, maybe you should try to discredit that source too?

http://wapo.st/28Qd4lq

ROTFLMAO!


No need to, Norm's has yet to prove anything with substance. Pretty much
equivalent to your attempt at thinking you actually contributed
something useful.



--
...winston
msft mvp windows experience
  #160  
Old June 22nd 16, 02:46 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Ken Springer[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,817
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

On 6/21/16 10:23 AM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2016-06-21, Wolf K wrote:
You guys really are religious about politics.


Since government in the U.S. has become increasingly invasive, extending
its tentacles of coercion and violence into all aspects of life, it is
natural to become passionate about politics.

I don't have any skin in your game, I merely observe from the sidelines.


An enviable position to be in for this American election cycle. No matter
which of the current presumptive candidates wins we are screwed. To
quote Tom Lehrer, "It has been a nervous year and people have begun to
feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis."


If the polls are right, the majority of people don't like/want either one.

What irritates me is, those same people will still vote for one of them,
rather than some 3rd party candidate, then sit around and bitch because
nothing changes.

If enough people voted for a 3rd party candidate, such as Norman and
myself plan to do, someone would notice, especially if the undesired
winner didn't even get 50% of the vote.


--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 44.0
Thunderbird 38.0.1
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"
  #161  
Old June 22nd 16, 02:52 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Ken Springer[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,817
Default Peace Loving Religion has done it again .........................

On 6/21/16 8:31 AM, PAS wrote:
On 6/18/2016 5:26 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/17/16 12:32 PM, PAS wrote:
On 6/17/2016 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/17/16 7:38 AM, PAS wrote:
On 6/17/2016 12:29 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/16/16 1:34 PM, PAS wrote:
On 6/16/2016 12:53 PM, Alek wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote on 6/16/2016 9:52 AM:
On 6/16/2016 8:57 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:


snip

OH, and speaking of TN, on your way to Clingmans Dome in the Great
Smokey Mountains National Park, there used to be a sign touting you
were one mile above sea level! Denver is at one mile above sea level,
so we had a laugh at that fact. Also, Colorado Springs official
altitude is @6,000'. G


We'll be living in Kingsport which is in the Johnson City area in the
northeast corner of the state - and we will be going to that park. Sad
to say, I've never been to one of our national parks unless you count
the time we cruised through Glacier Bay National Park in Alaska. At 56
years old I wish I could say I have, I'm long overdue.


That's not too far from Oak Ridge. I had a Navy buddy that was born and
raised there.

Even thought I retired from the National Park Service (maintenance),
I've no desire to visit them. Too many people. The fewer the better is
my style.


snip


--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 44.0
Thunderbird 38.0.1
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.