A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Hardware and Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sapphire 128 9600 install hell



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 17th 04, 03:24 PM
James R. Lunsford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

Got this card yesterday, got a new case w/ 400w PS for it. I'm running XP
w/

Biostar m7viw
AMD XP 2000+ CPU
512 megs RAM
DX 9

Put the MoBo in the new case, formatted the HD, reinstalled XP from scratch
and it's been hell ever since. I installed some sort of ATI update from
Microsoft while I was updating XP w/ all the critical fixes, then installed
the 4.3 Catalyst drivers from the ATI website and the system went bonkers.
It would give me VPU errors, corrupt the screen and tell me that the video
card stopped responding, I was finally able to disable the VPU warnings,
then the system refused to boot. Or rather it would boot, show the logon
screen, then present a black screen fronm which I had no choice but to
reboot. I tried reinstalling the drivers in safe mode, I reinstalled XP
from scratch 2x times, and now I've got the card sort of 1/2 way limping
along, indentified as a 9600 series in System Properties, but no ATI drivers
are recognized. and truth be told, I'm almost afraid to try re-installing
the drivers for fear that the system will go bonkers again.

Any help/advice would be GREATLY appreciated.

Thanks.


Ads
  #2  
Old March 17th 04, 03:24 PM
Yves Leclerc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

Install the motherboard chipset drivers.

"James R. Lunsford" wrote in message
...
Got this card yesterday, got a new case w/ 400w PS for it. I'm running XP
w/

Biostar m7viw
AMD XP 2000+ CPU
512 megs RAM
DX 9

Put the MoBo in the new case, formatted the HD, reinstalled XP from

scratch
and it's been hell ever since. I installed some sort of ATI update from
Microsoft while I was updating XP w/ all the critical fixes, then

installed
the 4.3 Catalyst drivers from the ATI website and the system went bonkers.
It would give me VPU errors, corrupt the screen and tell me that the video
card stopped responding, I was finally able to disable the VPU warnings,
then the system refused to boot. Or rather it would boot, show the logon
screen, then present a black screen fronm which I had no choice but to
reboot. I tried reinstalling the drivers in safe mode, I reinstalled XP
from scratch 2x times, and now I've got the card sort of 1/2 way limping
along, indentified as a 9600 series in System Properties, but no ATI

drivers
are recognized. and truth be told, I'm almost afraid to try re-installing
the drivers for fear that the system will go bonkers again.

Any help/advice would be GREATLY appreciated.

Thanks.




  #3  
Old March 17th 04, 05:04 PM
dino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

and leave the MS update for it alone....disable fast writes in BIOS also


  #4  
Old March 17th 04, 05:04 PM
Dirk Dreidoppel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

and leave the MS update for it alone....disable fast writes in BIOS also

Half wrong....
ENABLE fast writes with that card. Radeon 9600 cards are the exception from
the rule. They only run reliably with fast writes ON. All others Radeons
need them off.


  #5  
Old March 17th 04, 06:01 PM
Skid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell


"Dirk Dreidoppel" wrote in message
...
and leave the MS update for it alone....disable fast writes in BIOS also


Half wrong....
ENABLE fast writes with that card. Radeon 9600 cards are the exception

from
the rule. They only run reliably with fast writes ON. All others Radeons
need them off.


All wrong ...

It's a function of the motherboard chipset and SMARTGART, not the card. Fast
writes are disabled by default on older VIA chipsets, even though many of us
were able to force them to work bypassing SMARTGART. On my current
Intel-chipset Abit IC7, fast writes are on by default and work without a
hitch with my 9500@9700 Pro. I could and did run with fast writes enabled
using a Radeon 8500 on a VIA KT133A a couple of years back.

Fast writes do almost nothing for performance, and can be a source of
instability, especially when overclocking the vid card or AGP bus. That's
why it's standard troubleshooting advice to disable them when there's a
problem.


  #6  
Old March 17th 04, 09:23 PM
Dirk Dreidoppel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

Fast writes do almost nothing for performance, and can be a source of
instability, especially when overclocking the vid card or AGP bus. That's
why it's standard troubleshooting advice to disable them when there's a
problem.


Quite right. However, my 9600 XT crashes (in NWN for example) after 10
seconds at best without fast writes enabled. With the enabled, the game runs
without a hitch for hours. And I have an old VIA Apollo Pro 133A chipset
(the P3 equivalent to the KT133A). There's a reason why Omegadrive has
forced fast writes on on all 9600 cards and off on all others in his last
set. He didn't even leave an option to change that.


  #7  
Old March 17th 04, 10:22 PM
patrickp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

"Dirk Dreidoppel" wrote in message
...

Such bad manners! Skid posted this:
"Skid" wrote in message
news:9s%5c.30912$_w.528977@attbi_s53...

Fast writes do almost nothing for performance, and can be a source of
instability, especially when overclocking the vid card or AGP bus.

That's
why it's standard troubleshooting advice to disable them when there's a
problem.


Quite right. However, my 9600 XT crashes (in NWN for example) after 10
seconds at best without fast writes enabled. With the enabled, the game

runs
without a hitch for hours. And I have an old VIA Apollo Pro 133A chipset
(the P3 equivalent to the KT133A). There's a reason why Omegadrive has
forced fast writes on on all 9600 cards and off on all others in his last
set. He didn't even leave an option to change that.


I was also surprised to find, after using cards that usually wouldn't even
let me enable fast writes, and reading all the stuff about switching fast
writes off anyway, that my Sapphire 9600 Pro VIVO definitely does run better
with them on. It does seem to be a characteristic of 9600 cards.

patrickp


  #8  
Old March 18th 04, 01:03 AM
Tom Salvin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

Sorry to break the thread, but a note to Patrickp: I just got that same vivo
card and the board layout seems different (less large capcitors, etc.)--is
this an old or new design, if you happpen to know?

"patrickp" - take five to email me wrote in
message ...
"Dirk Dreidoppel" wrote in message
...

Such bad manners! Skid posted this:
"Skid" wrote in message
news:9s%5c.30912$_w.528977@attbi_s53...

Fast writes do almost nothing for performance, and can be a source of
instability, especially when overclocking the vid card or AGP bus.

That's
why it's standard troubleshooting advice to disable them when there's

a
problem.


Quite right. However, my 9600 XT crashes (in NWN for example) after 10
seconds at best without fast writes enabled. With the enabled, the game

runs
without a hitch for hours. And I have an old VIA Apollo Pro 133A chipset
(the P3 equivalent to the KT133A). There's a reason why Omegadrive has
forced fast writes on on all 9600 cards and off on all others in his

last
set. He didn't even leave an option to change that.


I was also surprised to find, after using cards that usually wouldn't even
let me enable fast writes, and reading all the stuff about switching fast
writes off anyway, that my Sapphire 9600 Pro VIVO definitely does run

better
with them on. It does seem to be a characteristic of 9600 cards.

patrickp




  #9  
Old March 18th 04, 05:45 AM
Mr. Obvious
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

ATI drivers can be a pain in the butt to install if you don't read and heed the install instructions.
  #10  
Old March 18th 04, 09:41 AM
patrickp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

"Tom Salvin" wrote in message
...
Sorry to break the thread, but a note to Patrickp: I just got that same

vivo
card and the board layout seems different (less large capcitors, etc.)--is
this an old or new design, if you happpen to know?



Don't know about the age of the design, but the card must have been old
stock, because it's no longer imported into the UK and I had a devil of a
time finding one. Was cheap, though - £92 inc VAT & p&p from RL Supplies.

The board layout is different to what - a regular 9600 Pro? I haven't
looked at one of those, I'm afraid, so I can't make the comparison.

patrickp



"patrickp" - take five to email me wrote in
message ...
"Dirk Dreidoppel" wrote in message
...

Such bad manners! Skid posted this:
"Skid" wrote in message
news:9s%5c.30912$_w.528977@attbi_s53...

Fast writes do almost nothing for performance, and can be a source

of
instability, especially when overclocking the vid card or AGP bus.

That's
why it's standard troubleshooting advice to disable them when

there's
a
problem.

Quite right. However, my 9600 XT crashes (in NWN for example) after 10
seconds at best without fast writes enabled. With the enabled, the

game
runs
without a hitch for hours. And I have an old VIA Apollo Pro 133A

chipset
(the P3 equivalent to the KT133A). There's a reason why Omegadrive has
forced fast writes on on all 9600 cards and off on all others in his

last
set. He didn't even leave an option to change that.


I was also surprised to find, after using cards that usually wouldn't

even
let me enable fast writes, and reading all the stuff about switching

fast
writes off anyway, that my Sapphire 9600 Pro VIVO definitely does run

better
with them on. It does seem to be a characteristic of 9600 cards.

patrickp






  #11  
Old March 18th 04, 02:41 PM
@ndrew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sapphire 128 9600 install hell

Skid wrote:


"Dirk Dreidoppel" wrote in message
...
and leave the MS update for it alone....disable fast writes in
BIOS also


Half wrong....
ENABLE fast writes with that card. Radeon 9600 cards are the
exception

from
the rule. They only run reliably with fast writes ON. All others
Radeons need them off.


All wrong ...



Dirk is right with the 9600 .. fast writes should be on.

regards

@ndrew

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.